Posts for: JMHO
Oct 25, 2016 10:56:29 #
Oct 25, 2016 10:53:30 #
Oct 25, 2016 10:32:46 #
(Main)
Texas voters are reporting their ballots were changed on the ballot.
The Republicans claim their votes were switched from Republican to Clinton-Kaine.
It’s what most voters fear when they go in to fill out their ballots.
Early voting for the 2016 election started today (Monday, October 24th). The people of Potter and Randall County are taking this opportunity to skip the long lines that always file out of the voting locations on Election Day.
It’s common to see pictures of the “I Voted!” stickers on social media. It’s not as common to see the stories I’ve been seeing today.
Two voters from Canyon posted the experience they had while voting. Apparently, when these voters chose the straight Republican option, the ballot selected Clinton/Kaine instead of Trump/Pence.
Continue reading: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/346268/
The Republicans claim their votes were switched from Republican to Clinton-Kaine.
It’s what most voters fear when they go in to fill out their ballots.
Early voting for the 2016 election started today (Monday, October 24th). The people of Potter and Randall County are taking this opportunity to skip the long lines that always file out of the voting locations on Election Day.
It’s common to see pictures of the “I Voted!” stickers on social media. It’s not as common to see the stories I’ve been seeing today.
Two voters from Canyon posted the experience they had while voting. Apparently, when these voters chose the straight Republican option, the ballot selected Clinton/Kaine instead of Trump/Pence.
Continue reading: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/346268/
Oct 25, 2016 10:29:00 #
(Main)
Pennylynn wrote:
I am confident that Mr. Trump will win popular vote by a landslide... but, I do not feel confident that the electoral college will allow him to become president.
Yeah, that is my concern too.
Oct 25, 2016 10:27:26 #
(Main)
No, this doesn’t have anything to do with Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. If it were, the headline would be something like “On Election Day, Be VERY Glad If You’re Living On a Deserted Island With No Chance of Rescue.”
I just received my vote-by-mail ballot and I was reminded of the political and electoral cesspool that is California: the two choices that I have for Senator are a Democrat and a Democrat. In California, Republican statewide candidates need not apply.
This will be the first time this has happened since state voters began directly electing Senators, one hundred and two years ago.
This particular bit of genius goes back to 2010, when California voters decided by a 54-46 margin to approve Proposition 14. At the time, it was officially titled the “Top Two Primaries Act.” Now, of course, it can be titled “Top Way to Make Sure Leftists Run Everything Act.”
Beginning with the election in 2012, all U.S. Congressional races and all state Assembly/Senate races are subject to an open primary race, with the top two vote getters appearing on the general election ballot. There is no independent or political-party nomination process and write-in candidates are only allowed in the general if they happened to be one of the top two in the primary.
The public argument was that such a process would encourage voters to select more moderate candidates. My instinct, although I’ve no way to independently verify this, of course, is that the private argument between the statists who wanted this was something along the lines of “This is how we can stack in our favor as many decks as possible.”
The official summary of the proposition, “Encourages increased participation in elections for congressional, legislative, and statewide offices by reforming the procedure by which candidates are selected in primary elections. Gives voters increased options in the primary by allowing all voters to choose any candidate regardless of the candidate’s or voter’s political party preference. Provides that candidates may choose not to have a political party preference indicated on the primary ballot,” has enough blatant nonsense that even a Cal Berkeley Poli Sci major could read its tealeaves.
Fast forward to 2016 and the dishonorable Barbara Boxer is retiring. The tiny (4’ 11”) Boxer, after holding office for 23 years, is leaving the Senate having contributed nothing of note during her entire tenure, other than drawing solid reviews from ProChoice America and a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood. Her position summaries from OnTheIssues.org read like a grab bag wish list from the wettest of radical leftist dreams. On the other hand, she received a VERY solid F from the NRA and a Liberty Score of F-4% from Conservative Review (beaten only by my other Senator, Dianne Feinstein who received an F-0%).
The two top vote-getters in the primary were Kamala Harris (Radical Leftist D) and Loretta Sanchez (Radical Leftist D). The Republican candidate was an extremely distant third. Considering the “lesser of two evils” discussions that are occurring amongst conservatives over Donald Trump’s candidacy, they are nothing like trying to decide between Harris and Sanchez. They’re both awful disasters.
Harris has been California’s Attorney General for 5 ½ years and received more than twice as many votes as did the runner up, Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez. Having received emphatic endorsements from Feinstein and Boxer (as well as the pro-choice Emily's List), she is the strong favorite.
Sanchez is trying a very unique approach to win voters as the underdog: She is positioning herself as a centrist reach-across-the-aisle moderate. I’ve heard ads on radio that have two Republicans discussing their seeming Scylla and Charybdis options, when a helpful friend points out how much more “sensible” she is than the hard-left ideologically driven Harris. To my thinking, that’s like preferring death by a 9mm caliber bullet to a .45 caliber one because the former is much cuter.
On the other hand, one could say that the ad actually makes a decent point: Conservative Review gives her an F-23% (compared to Nancy Pelosi’s F-11%). Mathematicians will point out that an F-23% is better than Feinstein’s F-0% or Boxer’s F-4%. As much as that might be true, for guys like me, anything below a B-minus is unacceptable and anything below a C-minus is positively nausea inducing.
I remember Sanchez’s victory, when back in 1996 she barely gained 1,000 votes more than long-time Rush Limbaugh’s substitute host Bob Dornan. It occurred right in my backyard, here in Orange County’s city of Santa Ana. At the time there were LOTS of discussions about voting hanky-panky.
A decade or so later, when my contracting company was doing work in an upscale neighborhood in the city, one homeowner told me that the house next door was owned by none other than Loretta Sanchez. I asked her what kind of neighbor she was. Her response: “She’s great. The house is always kept in perfect order, although I don’t believe anyone has ever spent a night there in the last ten years.” Ever since then, I have not been a fan, regardless of her “coalition building” rebranding efforts.
Of course, that the two top vote getters for California’s open seat are Democrats is a function of the reality that Republicans are rare within the state and that actual conservatives are almost permanently extinct. The new voting system doesn’t have anything to do with that. Even so, I’d prefer to have the opportunity to cast a losing vote in a general election than not be able to vote at all.
http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelhausam/2016/10/25/on-election-day-be-very-glad-youre-not-living-in-california-n2236458?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
I just received my vote-by-mail ballot and I was reminded of the political and electoral cesspool that is California: the two choices that I have for Senator are a Democrat and a Democrat. In California, Republican statewide candidates need not apply.
This will be the first time this has happened since state voters began directly electing Senators, one hundred and two years ago.
This particular bit of genius goes back to 2010, when California voters decided by a 54-46 margin to approve Proposition 14. At the time, it was officially titled the “Top Two Primaries Act.” Now, of course, it can be titled “Top Way to Make Sure Leftists Run Everything Act.”
Beginning with the election in 2012, all U.S. Congressional races and all state Assembly/Senate races are subject to an open primary race, with the top two vote getters appearing on the general election ballot. There is no independent or political-party nomination process and write-in candidates are only allowed in the general if they happened to be one of the top two in the primary.
The public argument was that such a process would encourage voters to select more moderate candidates. My instinct, although I’ve no way to independently verify this, of course, is that the private argument between the statists who wanted this was something along the lines of “This is how we can stack in our favor as many decks as possible.”
The official summary of the proposition, “Encourages increased participation in elections for congressional, legislative, and statewide offices by reforming the procedure by which candidates are selected in primary elections. Gives voters increased options in the primary by allowing all voters to choose any candidate regardless of the candidate’s or voter’s political party preference. Provides that candidates may choose not to have a political party preference indicated on the primary ballot,” has enough blatant nonsense that even a Cal Berkeley Poli Sci major could read its tealeaves.
Fast forward to 2016 and the dishonorable Barbara Boxer is retiring. The tiny (4’ 11”) Boxer, after holding office for 23 years, is leaving the Senate having contributed nothing of note during her entire tenure, other than drawing solid reviews from ProChoice America and a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood. Her position summaries from OnTheIssues.org read like a grab bag wish list from the wettest of radical leftist dreams. On the other hand, she received a VERY solid F from the NRA and a Liberty Score of F-4% from Conservative Review (beaten only by my other Senator, Dianne Feinstein who received an F-0%).
The two top vote-getters in the primary were Kamala Harris (Radical Leftist D) and Loretta Sanchez (Radical Leftist D). The Republican candidate was an extremely distant third. Considering the “lesser of two evils” discussions that are occurring amongst conservatives over Donald Trump’s candidacy, they are nothing like trying to decide between Harris and Sanchez. They’re both awful disasters.
Harris has been California’s Attorney General for 5 ½ years and received more than twice as many votes as did the runner up, Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez. Having received emphatic endorsements from Feinstein and Boxer (as well as the pro-choice Emily's List), she is the strong favorite.
Sanchez is trying a very unique approach to win voters as the underdog: She is positioning herself as a centrist reach-across-the-aisle moderate. I’ve heard ads on radio that have two Republicans discussing their seeming Scylla and Charybdis options, when a helpful friend points out how much more “sensible” she is than the hard-left ideologically driven Harris. To my thinking, that’s like preferring death by a 9mm caliber bullet to a .45 caliber one because the former is much cuter.
On the other hand, one could say that the ad actually makes a decent point: Conservative Review gives her an F-23% (compared to Nancy Pelosi’s F-11%). Mathematicians will point out that an F-23% is better than Feinstein’s F-0% or Boxer’s F-4%. As much as that might be true, for guys like me, anything below a B-minus is unacceptable and anything below a C-minus is positively nausea inducing.
I remember Sanchez’s victory, when back in 1996 she barely gained 1,000 votes more than long-time Rush Limbaugh’s substitute host Bob Dornan. It occurred right in my backyard, here in Orange County’s city of Santa Ana. At the time there were LOTS of discussions about voting hanky-panky.
A decade or so later, when my contracting company was doing work in an upscale neighborhood in the city, one homeowner told me that the house next door was owned by none other than Loretta Sanchez. I asked her what kind of neighbor she was. Her response: “She’s great. The house is always kept in perfect order, although I don’t believe anyone has ever spent a night there in the last ten years.” Ever since then, I have not been a fan, regardless of her “coalition building” rebranding efforts.
Of course, that the two top vote getters for California’s open seat are Democrats is a function of the reality that Republicans are rare within the state and that actual conservatives are almost permanently extinct. The new voting system doesn’t have anything to do with that. Even so, I’d prefer to have the opportunity to cast a losing vote in a general election than not be able to vote at all.
http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelhausam/2016/10/25/on-election-day-be-very-glad-youre-not-living-in-california-n2236458?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
Oct 25, 2016 10:21:46 #
(Main)
Pennylynn wrote:
Translation of the DOJ... Democrats can break these laws as they have in the past, but this election if a Conservative hangs around a voting area they will be arrested and prosecuted.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Oct 25, 2016 10:18:18 #
(Main)
Tgards79 wrote:
We'll check back on Nov 8.
You got that right, pal. Now, go have another bowl of stupid.
Oct 25, 2016 10:15:17 #
(Main)
The United States cannot afford a president subject to fits of irrational rage. Yet that is a serious possibility, given what we can reasonably infer about the health of Hillary Clinton. Dr. Ted Noel's diagnostic talks (here, here, and here) about Hillary Clinton's many signs of Parkinson's Disease (PD) make a convincing case, to me at least, that she has moderately advanced PD, though most MDs would want to examine her personally, get access to her X rays and CAT SCANS, medication list, blood tests and all the rest. We will never get that information from the Hillary camp, which is bound and determined to catapult Hillary over the last few weeks into the Presidency and let the country be damned.
From a more honorable and patriotic generation of politicians, running while suffering from a degenerative brain disease would have been inconceivable. FDR suffered from polio but was mentally alert and capable. JFK suffered from back pain and needed opiates, but again, he seemed healthy and alert.
Further exploration of the medical science of PD shows that it is often accompanied by impulsive rage attacks. We know that Hillary has shown intense and aggressive rage a number of times, often with considerable justification when her husband's sexual compulsions seemed to endanger their political careers time and time again. She has not had an easy life, and I don't have to consider her qualified to feel compassion for her. Compassion is not the same thing as voting for a dangerously flawed, intellectually unacceptable, ultra-corrupt, and in some cases grossly immoral politician.
The Libya invasion of a country we had no quarrel with, leading to an ongoing bloody civil war, is proof to me of her decision-making immorality. Hillary's grotesque victory speech, "We came, we saw, he died" sounds utterly sociopathic. American presidents don't celebrate the deaths of neutral heads of state, period. George W. Bush accepted Saddam Hussein's arrest for trial by Iraqis. He did not rejoice in it. For me Hillary's behavior is utterly disqualifying.
Hillary's behavior is consistent, however, with bouts of rage, which have been reported by inside sources for many years. Reasonably normal politicians show anger and rage when they miss the Big Prize, but it is not irrational rage. Normal anger and rage have plausible reasons. Irrational rage does not.
Hillary's now infamous rage at Donna Brazile and Matt Lauer after the last townhall was reported by Breitbart on its Facebook page:
We’ve all heard stories of Hillary’s rampages. I would certainly never want to be the object of one of her psychotic episodes. I almost feel sorry for her staff.
Christina Reynolds, Deputy Communications Director for the Clinton campaign, and Donna Brazile, chair of the campaign, received scathing rebukes from Hillary after Matt Lauer went “Rogue” on her.
According to inside sources, after the town hall with Matt, Hillary went ballistic, throwing a huge tantrum, with personal calls to Comcast executives, the parent company of NBC Universal. I guess they got the message with all of the ridiculous headlines to follow over the next couple of days.
A PubMed search on (Parkinson's Disease) AND (impulsive behavior) brings up many citations.
Here is one:
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Sep 15;368:150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
The high prevalence of impulse control behaviors in patients with early-onset Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional multicenter study.
The public knows that Hillary has had health problems, though she has looked comparatively radiant and in full control in her debate performances. Managing to employ all the arts of medicine and makeup for a 90-minute ordeal is one thing, but responding to the 3 AM phone call is quite another.
I wonder if Time Kaine has been fully briefed on Hillary Clinton’s medical records? My guess is that Huma Abedin knows a lot more than he does -- a situation that could well continue should there be future seizures, rages, and worse.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/hillarys_rages.html#ixzz4O6eOk4Ml
From a more honorable and patriotic generation of politicians, running while suffering from a degenerative brain disease would have been inconceivable. FDR suffered from polio but was mentally alert and capable. JFK suffered from back pain and needed opiates, but again, he seemed healthy and alert.
Further exploration of the medical science of PD shows that it is often accompanied by impulsive rage attacks. We know that Hillary has shown intense and aggressive rage a number of times, often with considerable justification when her husband's sexual compulsions seemed to endanger their political careers time and time again. She has not had an easy life, and I don't have to consider her qualified to feel compassion for her. Compassion is not the same thing as voting for a dangerously flawed, intellectually unacceptable, ultra-corrupt, and in some cases grossly immoral politician.
The Libya invasion of a country we had no quarrel with, leading to an ongoing bloody civil war, is proof to me of her decision-making immorality. Hillary's grotesque victory speech, "We came, we saw, he died" sounds utterly sociopathic. American presidents don't celebrate the deaths of neutral heads of state, period. George W. Bush accepted Saddam Hussein's arrest for trial by Iraqis. He did not rejoice in it. For me Hillary's behavior is utterly disqualifying.
Hillary's behavior is consistent, however, with bouts of rage, which have been reported by inside sources for many years. Reasonably normal politicians show anger and rage when they miss the Big Prize, but it is not irrational rage. Normal anger and rage have plausible reasons. Irrational rage does not.
Hillary's now infamous rage at Donna Brazile and Matt Lauer after the last townhall was reported by Breitbart on its Facebook page:
We’ve all heard stories of Hillary’s rampages. I would certainly never want to be the object of one of her psychotic episodes. I almost feel sorry for her staff.
Christina Reynolds, Deputy Communications Director for the Clinton campaign, and Donna Brazile, chair of the campaign, received scathing rebukes from Hillary after Matt Lauer went “Rogue” on her.
According to inside sources, after the town hall with Matt, Hillary went ballistic, throwing a huge tantrum, with personal calls to Comcast executives, the parent company of NBC Universal. I guess they got the message with all of the ridiculous headlines to follow over the next couple of days.
A PubMed search on (Parkinson's Disease) AND (impulsive behavior) brings up many citations.
Here is one:
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Sep 15;368:150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
The high prevalence of impulse control behaviors in patients with early-onset Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional multicenter study.
The public knows that Hillary has had health problems, though she has looked comparatively radiant and in full control in her debate performances. Managing to employ all the arts of medicine and makeup for a 90-minute ordeal is one thing, but responding to the 3 AM phone call is quite another.
I wonder if Time Kaine has been fully briefed on Hillary Clinton’s medical records? My guess is that Huma Abedin knows a lot more than he does -- a situation that could well continue should there be future seizures, rages, and worse.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/hillarys_rages.html#ixzz4O6eOk4Ml
Oct 25, 2016 10:09:42 #
(Main)
Tgards79 wrote:
I feel so badly for you. You are going to be incredibly disappointed if you think Trump is going to win. The odds are infinitesimal.
Feel bad for yourself asshole, you're going to lose....moron.
Oct 25, 2016 10:08:59 #
(Main)
WTF???????
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/10/24/doj-warns-efforts-stop-2016-voter-fraud-violate-federal-law/
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/10/24/doj-warns-efforts-stop-2016-voter-fraud-violate-federal-law/
Oct 25, 2016 10:07:08 #
(Main)
TAMPA, Florida – If Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is really down in the state of Florida as the statewide polls seem to suggest, then records could be set for his opponent Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton on Election Day.
Before a crowd of at least 20,000, according to some estimates, at the MidFlorida Amphitheatre in Tampa on Monday, supporters waited in long lines of traffic coming off Interstate 4 and paid a $10 parking fee to see the GOP nominee make his third appearance in a five-stop swing through the state of Florida.
Continue reading: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/24/tampa-turns-out-big-for-trump-in-pivotal-swing-florida-county/
Before a crowd of at least 20,000, according to some estimates, at the MidFlorida Amphitheatre in Tampa on Monday, supporters waited in long lines of traffic coming off Interstate 4 and paid a $10 parking fee to see the GOP nominee make his third appearance in a five-stop swing through the state of Florida.
Continue reading: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/24/tampa-turns-out-big-for-trump-in-pivotal-swing-florida-county/
Oct 25, 2016 10:03:54 #
(Main)
Told Ya that Fox News was moving to the left. That's the end of 'fair and balanced.'
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/10/25/top-media-reporter-hints-murdochs-could-tap-cnns-zucker-to-run-fox-news/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/10/25/top-media-reporter-hints-murdochs-could-tap-cnns-zucker-to-run-fox-news/
Oct 25, 2016 10:01:56 #
(Main)
Tgards79 wrote:
Clinton maintains her commanding lead and now only has to hold onto her "Solids" to win.
http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2016/10/btrtn-50-state-electoral-college_25.html
http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2016/10/btrtn-50-state-electoral-college_25.html
Trump will prove this idiot wrong....just watch and see.
Oct 25, 2016 09:35:00 #
(Main)
"Last night a friend claimed that Donald Trump wouldn’t make a good president; he is brash, he is racist, he is a loudmouth; you know the normal things people learn to recite after being programmed by television news. The one I loved was that, “Trump is arrogant.” My friend questioned if one man could make “that much difference in the world today.” To my friend's credit, she was respectful enough to let me respond when she asked, “Really, what has Trump done?”
I said, “In June of last year, Trump entered the race for president. In just a little over a year, Trump has single handedly defeated the Republican party. He did so thoroughly. In fact, he did so in such a resounding way that the Republican Party now suffers from an identity crisis. He literally dismantled the party. Trump even dismantled and dismissed the brand and value of the Bush family.
Trump has Obama petrified that Trump will dismiss programs that weren’t properly installed using proper law. Trump has single handedly debunked and disemboweled any value of news media as we knew it—news now suffering from an all-time level of distrust and disrespect.
Trump has leaders from all over the world talking about him, whether good or bad. Trust me, powerful men who have been president before weren’t liked by the global community. I doubt Mikhail Gorbachev liked Reagan when Reagan said, "Tear down that wall."
Trump has expressly disclosed the fraud perpetrated on the American public by Hillary Clinton. He has, quite literally, brought Hillary to her knees—if you believe that nervous tension and disorders offer physical side effects and damage.
Trump has unified the silent majority in a way that should be patently frightening to “liberals.” As the press accuses Trump of being a house of cards, Trump has proven the press is the real house of cards. He has whipped up the entire establishment into pure panic. Trump has exposed them for who they are and worse, what they are. George Clooney was right when he said Trump draws live news coverage of his podium that he’s not yet approached. Thanks, George, you were perfectly correct.
What we see as headline news today are actually the last bubbles from the ship that is now sunk—meaning the standard news media, as a propaganda machine, has been exposed. They have no more value.
In the same way Trump asked the African-American community this question, I asked my friend, ”At this point, what do you have to lose?” We have mass cop shootings, riots in our streets, ambushed cops, double digit inflation, bombs blowing up in our cities, targeted police, #BLM, a skyrocketing jobless rate, no economic growth, privately owned land being seized by the federal government, the worst racial tension in my lifetime, no God in schools, more abortions than ever, illegal aliens pouring into our country, sick veterans receiving no care, and a debt that doubled in seven years to $19 trillion. Are you really happy with the condition of the current system?
One man has done all of this in one year—one guy, and on his own dime. And with everything I’ve written above, you believe Trump hasn't done anything? You claim that you are afraid of Donald Trump? No wonder we’re in trouble. You can say that Trump is a lousy presidential candidate. That’s your right. Just don’t ever say he’s not effective.
That Megan Kelly, FOX News, CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Huffington Post, the New York Times, Raleigh’s News and Observer, the AP, Don Lemon, Jake Tapper, and many more, failed to implement their collectively orchestrated lie on the American people against Trump, is actually a massive testament to Trump. The press colluded pure propaganda to accomplish his demise … and they have collectively failed and miserably.
Here's just one example of how badly America is injured right now. There are high school football players on their knees during the national anthem simply because the press used as propaganda to program those kids to do that very thing. But, these kids are mimicking NFL stars the same way the same kids choose which brand of football shoe to purchase—they're overtly brain-washed to do that very thing.
Now, we have a generation of children who hate America. America’s problem isn’t that little children are on their knee in collective disrespect of America. Our problem is that America is on her knee from collective disrespect by Americans.
You can disrespect America all you want. But, it’s high-time you respect the silent majority. Because they’re not simply the “silent majority” as you’ve been trained to believe when Hillary calls them “deplorables.” The fact is, they are simply the majority. And now they're no longer silent either. Donald Trump changed all of that, single-handedly and within one year."
I said, “In June of last year, Trump entered the race for president. In just a little over a year, Trump has single handedly defeated the Republican party. He did so thoroughly. In fact, he did so in such a resounding way that the Republican Party now suffers from an identity crisis. He literally dismantled the party. Trump even dismantled and dismissed the brand and value of the Bush family.
Trump has Obama petrified that Trump will dismiss programs that weren’t properly installed using proper law. Trump has single handedly debunked and disemboweled any value of news media as we knew it—news now suffering from an all-time level of distrust and disrespect.
Trump has leaders from all over the world talking about him, whether good or bad. Trust me, powerful men who have been president before weren’t liked by the global community. I doubt Mikhail Gorbachev liked Reagan when Reagan said, "Tear down that wall."
Trump has expressly disclosed the fraud perpetrated on the American public by Hillary Clinton. He has, quite literally, brought Hillary to her knees—if you believe that nervous tension and disorders offer physical side effects and damage.
Trump has unified the silent majority in a way that should be patently frightening to “liberals.” As the press accuses Trump of being a house of cards, Trump has proven the press is the real house of cards. He has whipped up the entire establishment into pure panic. Trump has exposed them for who they are and worse, what they are. George Clooney was right when he said Trump draws live news coverage of his podium that he’s not yet approached. Thanks, George, you were perfectly correct.
What we see as headline news today are actually the last bubbles from the ship that is now sunk—meaning the standard news media, as a propaganda machine, has been exposed. They have no more value.
In the same way Trump asked the African-American community this question, I asked my friend, ”At this point, what do you have to lose?” We have mass cop shootings, riots in our streets, ambushed cops, double digit inflation, bombs blowing up in our cities, targeted police, #BLM, a skyrocketing jobless rate, no economic growth, privately owned land being seized by the federal government, the worst racial tension in my lifetime, no God in schools, more abortions than ever, illegal aliens pouring into our country, sick veterans receiving no care, and a debt that doubled in seven years to $19 trillion. Are you really happy with the condition of the current system?
One man has done all of this in one year—one guy, and on his own dime. And with everything I’ve written above, you believe Trump hasn't done anything? You claim that you are afraid of Donald Trump? No wonder we’re in trouble. You can say that Trump is a lousy presidential candidate. That’s your right. Just don’t ever say he’s not effective.
That Megan Kelly, FOX News, CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Huffington Post, the New York Times, Raleigh’s News and Observer, the AP, Don Lemon, Jake Tapper, and many more, failed to implement their collectively orchestrated lie on the American people against Trump, is actually a massive testament to Trump. The press colluded pure propaganda to accomplish his demise … and they have collectively failed and miserably.
Here's just one example of how badly America is injured right now. There are high school football players on their knees during the national anthem simply because the press used as propaganda to program those kids to do that very thing. But, these kids are mimicking NFL stars the same way the same kids choose which brand of football shoe to purchase—they're overtly brain-washed to do that very thing.
Now, we have a generation of children who hate America. America’s problem isn’t that little children are on their knee in collective disrespect of America. Our problem is that America is on her knee from collective disrespect by Americans.
You can disrespect America all you want. But, it’s high-time you respect the silent majority. Because they’re not simply the “silent majority” as you’ve been trained to believe when Hillary calls them “deplorables.” The fact is, they are simply the majority. And now they're no longer silent either. Donald Trump changed all of that, single-handedly and within one year."
Oct 25, 2016 09:32:12 #
(Main)
Super Dave wrote:
Perhaps they're not ignorant. Perhaps they just don't care about anything except their EBT card.
