dtucker300 wrote:
They do indeed, but what pisses me off are the commentators, who to this very day, say they were glad OJ was found not guilty because they didn't want another Rodney King riot, and they claim this was justice for the way Blacks had previously been treated by the po-po. And then there is Kevyn, the poster child for stupidiocracy.
I don't know, but I feel there is a possibility (limited as it may be) that OJ was covering for his son as the real murderer. Anyway...
No way did his son do it. His blood wouldn't have matched that found at the crime scene and in the car. OJ acted guilty right from the get-go until he didn't.