The last conservative that I can think of is. Newt. I know, I know everyone wants to give Clinton the praise, but in reality, it was Newt who not only balanced the budget, but also created the surplus. Now switch on over :)
Anigav6969 put a bet out to all and I accepted saying Trump will win. Well looking at what I just seen, I'm in utter amazement that this country is just this stupid. From what I seen, if the elections were held today, the liar, cheat, allowed killer of Americans WOULD win in a landslide I'm afraid. It looks that bad, that it could be called as early as 9 pm is my guess. Of course I have been wrong once before in life and this could make number 2 but will pray that people wake up for the sake of this country and vote to keep her out. You don't have to like Trump, but come on people it's not a vote for Trump, but a vote AGAINST Clinton. Come November if I'm wrong, I will be back to give the forum idiots the thrashing they deserve, I'm bowing out now because I just can not take dealing with the left lunatics at this point ANY longer. They are making me into someone that is truly not me. They wonder why people go nuts and kill people, it's because of flipping brainless idiots like them. Give them hell conservatives. I pray I will return. Truth is OUT.
Glaucon wrote:
Someone got up with a very bad attitude this morning. I think you need a great big hug and a nap.
Someone is just tired of dealing with idiots, liars, cheaters, and just basically stupid fuks such as yourself I think someone needs their fuking throat squeezed thill your face turns blue, your eyes bug out and your a sec away from expiring. Then to be tossed like the piece of shit that you are.
Singularity wrote:
S.E.P.E.R.A.T.I.O.N. is not even found in the English language!
The intent was for as solid a separation as possible be erected as noted by the Jefferson quotes. Adams and others obviously agreed. Of course there were blockheaded conservative type Christians back then as well who, just like today, cannot see outside the religious box to understand this principle.
You're a stupid fuk who needs to do some learning yourself
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Reagan is the one who said "Church and state are and must remain separate! Fool!
And JFK said this:" Nothing takes precedence over ones oath of office to uphold the constitution and all its parts, including the 1st amendment and the strict separation of church and state." Kennedy!
Research???? 50 Presidential Quotes in Defense of the Separation Church and State!
http://addictinginfo.org/2013/06/24/separation-of-church-and-state-the-presidents-versus-the-christian-right/
Reagan is the one who said "Church and state ... (
show quote)
Fool, I agree with that poster. Presidential statements mean absolutely shit, as does your idiotic opinion. Where the fuk in the supreme law of the land doesit say that? Hint: it DONT. But you keep spouting it do please show us in your infinite wisdom. Do you have any clue where it came from, who said it and why it was said? As that poster said, do some research and stop being an asshole. I will give you a bit of knowledge to help you along in your search. The baptists. Now get to work learning and STFU until you do.
Alicia wrote:
******************
Trump donated $100k and in another instance only$70k. I do wish you'd get your stories straight. But then, Trump can't get any story straight because he speaks from his gut instead of is brain(?)!
Did you step up to the plate? Did you donate money, food, toys, blankets, toothpaste, ANYTHING??? We know the answer so no need to answer it. So you have no room to open your racist trap. SOOOO, shut it
Simply flipping amazing. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3754629/Bombshell-email-shows-Hillary-aide-Huma-Abedin-left-classified-material-CAR-asked-colleague-trunk-safekeeping.html
SalMarDib wrote:
I think it is way too early to predict. With the time until the election anything could happen. Anyone who thinks this will be a landslide is fooling themselves, unless something catastrophic happens. Remember the media made our current president. He was a complete unknown 8 years ago when he defeated the most recognizable name in politics in the democrat primary. So if a complete unknown can beat HRC among her own party, she is by no means invincible.
I agree. These polls, no matter who says is winning is utter bs. I also believe you are correct of being no land slide for either. I believe it will be a close and protested finish, but believe in the end Trump will be sworn in.
rumitoid wrote:
It is too funny: you guys never add anything constructive to the conversation. Ad hominem is the epitome of your thought. Insult--and you are a champion of the Right, no explanation or any more needed. Puerile. And so demonstrative of your character.
You don't accept facts or constructive criticism when it goes against your twisted left leaning belief. So honestly, why would anyone bother?
Alicia wrote:
******************
Thanks, MO. Most of the time you come up with intelligent and unbiased facts. Again, thank you.
Unbiased? Occupy democrats. The freakin name says it all. Hahahahaha. Not that's funny stuff right there. Not only funny, but a bunch of BULLSHIT
Kevyn wrote:
Against the express wishes of the Governor of LA Donald trumps visit required local security resources that were taken away for rescue efforts. More shameful self promotion disregarding humanity.
Looks like you jumped the gun there Kevyn. Everything I read points to the Govenor being very appreciative of Trumps visit and donation.
PeterS wrote:
A poll of 1,000 conducted in 50 states, making it 50,000, has the same statistical accuracy as a poll of 1,000, or about plus or minus 3.1%. This begs the question of why they bothered with polling 50,000. Also, a state such as Montana with a population of 1 million is given the same statistical weight as California, a state with 38 million.
Either those conducting the poll didn't know what they were doing or they were intentionally trying to create a bogus poll. I'll let you take your pick...
A poll of 1,000 conducted in 50 states, making it ... (
show quote)
Well Peter, I would put a lot more value on this poll due to sample size. 50k is much more representative of the country than the normal 1,500 sample size we been seeing
tdsrnest wrote:
Will you stop with the Foundation it's a global foundation and yes the donation come from around the world. Anybody can sit back and pick these donation apart and where they came from. Tell you what give me one piece of evidence that Clinton has done for theses donors. Tell me one incident. GD it's a global foundation that has helped millions of poor and starving kids around the world. Now your agenda to starve the poor in this country and someone works to help the poor you find something wrong.
Will you stop with the Foundation it's a global fo... (
show quote)
Holy fuzzy cat nuts, you really are one stupid fuk aren't ya.
Anigav6969 wrote:
If Trump wins, I'll leave this site for good.......if Hillary wins, you leave this site for good.......I'm sure I'll get not one taker...because you all know down deep that Drumpf is a loser.....well ??......put up or shut up
I'm not the biggest Trump fan Anigav6969, but I will step up and take your bet. I mean I'm just broken hearted because KHH1 and a couple others won't talk to me anymore. Sooo since I lost him/them, what do I have to lose? I'm bout sick of Kevyn, Ryland and the rest of the lunatics, so why not. Trump loses, I will leave and won't return with a new name. Clinton loses, you leave and won't return with a new name.
Morgan wrote:
That's old news and the "truth be told" facts, where ya been?
So full of SCHIZIT, your eyes are turning brown. Clueless as they come aren't ya.