One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PRM2014
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 101 next>>
May 30, 2017 12:16:09   #
Glaucon wrote:
Evidence is anything you can twist enough so that it appears to support what you want to believe. These are called factoids.

Did you believe Trump when. for several years, he repeatedly stated that Obama didn't have a birth certificate, was born in Kenya, is a Muslim? When Bush swore Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, did you believe him? Did you believe Trump when he said Trump University was a university? Do you now know you were conned by master con artists? Now they want you to believe Obama was guilty of collusion with Russia because Trump is being investigated by the FBI for collusion with Russia? It is so easy (for all of us) to be conned into whatever we wanted to believe anyway.
Evidence is anything you can twist enough so that ... (show quote)


Well you believe what you want, Oblowhard is a pathological "LIAR" Obama went to school in Indonesia MUSLIM School, also said the greatest thing was the call of the Muslim call to prayer, and he is part of it. Also obama-muslim-call-to-prayer-one-of-the-prettiest-sounds-on-earth/. He also said when first got into the white house, I heard him say if it comes to a conflict between United States and the Muslims. "I will stand with the Muslims" That is just like a traitor and he said it not me. And he said “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
This statement is a And white he'd said himself that that was a problem.
This could go for a long time, but the fact of the matter is he was no kind of a leader. What did he accomplish in eight years, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. It was Obama That Promised Healthcare Premiums Would Fall $2500 Per "Family". Just more LIES.
Go to
May 30, 2017 11:35:13   #
[quote=Big Bass][quote=Glaucon]How can you bigots hate Obama so much if he is only half black. I would suppose you would hate him half as much.

It is amazing that you would call Obama a blowhard. does the name, Trump ring a bell?

You have very strong, hateful emotions and Obama is merely the present focus of your rage and hate. Think about it-------actually , it would be good if you were able to think at all.[/quote
You always judge others by your own feelings.[/quote]

Has nothing to do with Rage or Hate, just the facts Oblowhard is a pathological LIAR, always has and always will be a big liar.
And I can't stand a liar, that is the long and short of it all.
Go to
May 30, 2017 11:22:46   #
Glaucon wrote:
How can you bigots hate Obama so much if he is only half black. I would suppose you would hate him half as much.

It is amazing that you would call Obama a blowhard. does the name, Trump ring a bell?

You have very strong, hateful emotions and Obama is merely the present focus of your rage and hate. Think about it-------actually , it would be good if you were able to think at all.
I can think well, and I know Oblowhard is a liar, can't tell the truth never could and never will tell the truth.

All I will say is Oblowhard is a sorry worthless snake in the grass. And he proves it when he opens his mouth, all that comes out are LIES.
A pathological liar, His patient protection and affordable care act, witch isn't affordable never was and never will be.
Obama Promised Healthcare Premiums Would Fall $2500 Per Family, "LIE" Remember if you like your insurance, can keep your ins.
If you like your doctor, you can KEEP your Doctor,"LIE" In his last State of the Union Speech, he only lied "10" TEN times, the longer he talks the more LIES come out of his mouth.
Go to
May 30, 2017 10:32:45   #
zillaorange wrote:
You were wrong about Nixon & Reagan asv well !


Nixon resigned, NOT IMPEACHED, can't have it both ways.
Don' know what your talking about Reagan? While President Ronald Reagan was a supporter of the Contra cause,[6] the evidence is disputed as to whether he authorized the diversion of the money raised by the Iranian arms sales to the Contras. Iran Contra Afair; Wikipedia.
Go to
May 30, 2017 10:12:56   #
Glaucon wrote:
Yes, Obama was and is black.


Barack Hussein Obama the Blowhard is only half BLACK, his mother was WHITE.
Obama isn't African American, Muslim Father white mother he is just another mix breed.
Go to
May 28, 2017 16:18:09   #
Nickolai wrote:
Hillary did not give any body any uranium Check your facts before you make your self look stupid


I stand Corrected; I took it on those at the news media, I checked and found you were right, don't let that happen again.Thanks for setting me
straight
Go to
May 28, 2017 16:02:04   #
PRM2014 wrote:
I have to say you are right about Fast and Furious, I left the part about Eric Holder out. But it was a great mess for a while.

The Uranium is something else, I heard that Hillary Clinton when S O S GAVE Russia 20% of Americas uranium, NOT GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!


That was all over the news media, I heard it with my own ears I am no idiot, I can hear and see thank you very much.
You might want to check your facts.
Go to
May 28, 2017 15:58:38   #
Loki wrote:
Fast and Furious started and ENDED under Bush, and it was resurrected by Eric Holder, who proceeded to lose 2500 firearms which have been responsible for scores of deaths. Obama then slapped an Executive Privilege umbrella over Holder and the senior BATFE officials responsible for the fiasco.
Saying the Iran deal makes anyone safer is like saying that Chamberlain's appeasement of Hitler kept Europe safer. Iran is the number one state sponsor of terrorism. How does giving them hundreds of billions of dollars, and allowing them to refuse to allow US inspectors on their nuclear sites make anyone safer? Other than them?
Fast and Furious started and ENDED under Bush, and... (show quote)



I have to say you are right about Fast and Furious, I left the part about Eric Holder out. But it was a great mess for a while.

The Uranium is something else, I heard that Hillary Clinton when S O S GAVE Russia 20% of Americas uranium, NOT GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!
Go to
May 28, 2017 15:15:43   #
moldyoldy wrote:
Fast and furious started under Bush.
Russia has not mined any Uranium in the US.
They wanted rights to Uranium in Kazakstan.
Reagan made a deal with Iran to release the hostages after he was elected.
Then we got Iran Contra, arms for hostages.
Even Israel knows the Iran deal makes them safer,
but Netanyahu likes to use them as a boogeyman.


So Fast and furious started under Bush, Barack Hussein Obama and Eric Holder the A G. didn't put out any effort to STOP F&F.
Go to
May 28, 2017 13:07:45   #
JFlorio wrote:
Happy Memorial Weekend LJ. No fishing for me until Tuesday. To many idgits in the water. Seems the left and their god king Obama have no problem with un-Constitutional acts as long as said act promotes their ideology which of course, is Anti-American.


I agree he Obama should have been in jail eight years ago.
Go to
May 28, 2017 09:59:42   #
popscott wrote:
How soon we forget..
Obama is and was the traitor....
Russia...
Why is Russia hacking now a problem of Trumps... when it all happened under Obama?
When Obama gives a secret message to Putin that he would have more "flexibility" after the next elections... just how did he know he could make or even keep that promise BEFORE the election happened?
Remember....'The 1980s Are Calling; They Want Their Foreign Policy Back'
Obama declined to call the Russian incursion in Ukraine an “invasion”
How soon we forget.. br Obama is and was the trait... (show quote)


The election was already rigged for Barack Hussein Obama the Blowhard's second term. Talk about collusion, Obama had it all set up.
That worthless arrogant LYING Snake in the grass. They keep saying looking for President Trump and Russia in collusion "NOT"
Haven't found any such a thing, it is all on Oblowhard.
Go to
May 28, 2017 08:59:11   #
Sassy Lass wrote:
There, there, little ignorant snowflakes. Get it all out. Vent. Vent. Vent. All of us with a brain in our head will sit back and laugh our asses off at your utter stupidity. There...there.


Sassy Lass; I like that post, keep up the good work. Should melt those ignorant "Snowflakes" And I am with you on that post.
Go to
May 28, 2017 08:50:13   #
Doc110 wrote:
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the election

Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling:

Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens —

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

And failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication.

Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties:

Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C.
Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.

The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts —

In violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant —

“Had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign.

Some of whose identities were leaked to the media.

The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.

We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump.

To a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.

Ex-CIA chief warned of Russian contact with Trump campaign officials

Under congressional questioning Tuesday:

Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Why not?

Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president.

He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.

In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence.

In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.

Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history.

Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was

“known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.

I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”

Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections.

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary.

His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat.

He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War —

Voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process.

Does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?

What Brennan and the rest of the Obama gang did.

Has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done.
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the electi... (show quote)


I agree, that is a great post. And everyone should know by now Barack Hussein Obama the Blowhard, is a snake in the grass.
Go to
May 28, 2017 08:36:20   #
thebigp wrote:
-21GH.,B38
On Saturday, brand new New York Times conservative columnist Bret Stephens penned a moderate column about climate change. In that column, he says that global warming due to man-made activity is a certainty: Anyone who has read the 2014 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change knows that, while the modest (0.85 degrees Celsius, or about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit) warming of the Northern Hemisphere since 1880 is indisputable, as is the human influence on that warming, much else that passes as accepted fact is really a matter of probabilities. That’s especially true of the sophisticated but fallible models and simulations by which scientists attempt to peer into the climate future. To say this isn’t to deny science. It’s to acknowledge it honestly.
Stephens cautions against false certainty — failing to report uncertainty in data. “We live in a world in which data convey authority,” Stephens says. “But authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.” Stephens’ language about certainty is actually designed to help climate change enthusiasts — if they keep making claims that keep being proved wrong, without any doubts baked into the cake, people will simply discount what they’re saying.
This moderate take has led a mass revolt by leftists who insist they will now cancel The New York Times. They call Stephens’ column denialism, even though Stephens acknowledges global warming has taken place. They say that it’s just wrong on a factual level. Susan Matthews of Slate called the piece “classic climate change denialism,” explaining that reasonable people could not be “skeptical about the dangers of climate change.” Erik Wemple of The Washington Post actually wrote an email to the paper complaining about the op-ed and asking for answers on Stephens’ piece — something he hasn’t done on any other New York Times op-ed he’s ever reported.
SOURCE-nyt, ben shapiro, nyt, bret stephens, susam mattews, slte, erik wemple, wash post
-21GH.,B38 br On Saturday, brand new New York Time... (show quote)


I still say it is nothing but a HOAX. Big AL GORE said in 2006 in ten years the earth will destruct, hasn't yet "WHY IT'S A BIG HOAX"
The Only one that knows is the all knowing GOD the creator of it all. It is just plane crazy to tell all this false stuff, just to make big money.
They talk about the earth being millions of years old, why hasn't it already been destroyed? Because God will destroy it in his own time, it will not be because these quacks, so called Scientists says or someone like AL GORE an arrogant know it all "NOT".

The fact of the matter this earth is around 4,000 years old, can find papers dated back to that FACT. All their fancy gadgets, certainly can be wrong.
It is all about BIG MONEY, that is the long and short of the whole HOAX.
Go to
May 24, 2017 13:48:51   #
I think we have some President Trump haters here, must be all those crying libtards/lefties.
President Trump has done more in less than 6 months, than Barack Hussein Obama the Blowhard did in all his eight years.

One thing Oblowhard is good at "LYING" to we the people, is an arrogant idiot and to top that off he is a pathological liar.
He can't tell the truth if his life depended on it. Is one sorry snake in the grass, should be facing a firing squad for treason.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 101 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.