One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
How Team Obama Tried To Hack The 2016 Election . . .
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
May 28, 2017 07:51:33   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the election

Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling:

Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens —

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

And failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication.

Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties:

Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C.
Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.

The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts —

In violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant —

“Had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign.

Some of whose identities were leaked to the media.

The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.

We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump.

To a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.

Ex-CIA chief warned of Russian contact with Trump campaign officials

Under congressional questioning Tuesday:

Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Why not?

Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president.

He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.

In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence.

In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.

Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history.

Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was

“known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.

I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”

Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections.

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary.

His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat.

He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War —

Voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process.

Does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?

What Brennan and the rest of the Obama gang did.

Has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done.

Reply
May 28, 2017 08:21:50   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
Doc110 wrote:
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the election

Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling:

Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens —

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

And failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication.

Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties:

Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C.
Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.

The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts —

In violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant —

“Had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign.

Some of whose identities were leaked to the media.

The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.

We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump.

To a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.

Ex-CIA chief warned of Russian contact with Trump campaign officials

Under congressional questioning Tuesday:

Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Why not?

Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president.

He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.

In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence.

In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.

Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history.

Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was

“known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.

I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”

Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections.

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary.

His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat.

He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War —

Voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process.

Does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?

What Brennan and the rest of the Obama gang did.

Has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done.
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the electi... (show quote)






Because secular/radical liberal activist progressives, Doc110, are SUPPOSED to be "liberal," and are self-entitled to do ANYTHING to maintain control {baby control, health control, gun control, life control, business control, (D)eath control}, including rioting, looting, vandalizations, arsons violent, obnoxious (D)emonstrations to propel their "cause," and murder and "PIG" killing is just the "schroom" effect of their "self-entitled" path to power. But "conservatives," are, well, conservative, and mostly "God fearing" individuals who are supposed to do, and stay good. So when a conservative {Republican} gets caught-up in the political "earthly" web of power to "MAKE AMERICA SAFE, PROSPEROUS AND GREAT AGAIN," "lefty," CAN'T STAND IT!!! And radical/secular liberal progressive "lefty," will do ANYTHING in their power to (D)eligitimize the effort. ANYTHING!!! Hummmmmmmmmm. What IS that "crushing" noise I keep hearing??? GOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. {BORN AGAIN} TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER!!!

Reply
May 28, 2017 08:50:13   #
PRM2014
 
Doc110 wrote:
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the election

Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling:

Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens —

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

And failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication.

Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties:

Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C.
Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.

The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts —

In violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant —

“Had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign.

Some of whose identities were leaked to the media.

The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.

We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump.

To a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.

Ex-CIA chief warned of Russian contact with Trump campaign officials

Under congressional questioning Tuesday:

Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Why not?

Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president.

He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.

In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence.

In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.

Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history.

Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was

“known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.

I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”

Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections.

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary.

His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat.

He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War —

Voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process.

Does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?

What Brennan and the rest of the Obama gang did.

Has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done.
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the electi... (show quote)


I agree, that is a great post. And everyone should know by now Barack Hussein Obama the Blowhard, is a snake in the grass.

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2017 08:58:48   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Doc110 wrote:
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the election

Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling:

Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens —

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

And failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication.

Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties:

Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C.
Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.

The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts —

In violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant —

“Had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign.

Some of whose identities were leaked to the media.

The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.

We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump.

To a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.

Ex-CIA chief warned of Russian contact with Trump campaign officials

Under congressional questioning Tuesday:

Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Why not?

Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president.

He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.

In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence.

In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.

Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history.

Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was

“known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.

I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”

Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections.

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary.

His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat.

He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War —

Voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process.

Does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?

What Brennan and the rest of the Obama gang did.

Has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done.
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the electi... (show quote)


Doc, QuestGirl posted this earlier.. only telling you in case it doesn't get many responses..

Bo should be in jail, period.. Just another he totally threw the courts ruling out in 2011 and went about his way violating the very laws he was to enforce!!!

Comes in and admits right before leaving office two bit disgrace is what he is!!! And every single one of them that broke the laws should be charged too!!!!

Reply
May 28, 2017 10:40:22   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Happy Memorial Weekend LJ. No fishing for me until Tuesday. To many idgits in the water. Seems the left and their god king Obama have no problem with un-Constitutional acts as long as said act promotes their ideology which of course, is Anti-American.
lindajoy wrote:
Doc, QuestGirl posted this earlier.. only telling you in case it doesn't get many responses..

Bo should be in jail, period.. Just another he totally threw the courts ruling out in 2011 and went about his way violating the very laws he was to enforce!!!

Comes in and admits right before leaving office two bit disgrace is what he is!!! And every single one of them that broke the laws should be charged too!!!!

Reply
May 28, 2017 13:07:45   #
PRM2014
 
JFlorio wrote:
Happy Memorial Weekend LJ. No fishing for me until Tuesday. To many idgits in the water. Seems the left and their god king Obama have no problem with un-Constitutional acts as long as said act promotes their ideology which of course, is Anti-American.


I agree he Obama should have been in jail eight years ago.

Reply
May 29, 2017 10:32:40   #
Glaucon
 
Doc110 wrote:
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the election

Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling:

Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens —

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

And failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication.

Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties:

Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C.
Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.

The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts —

In violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant —

“Had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign.

Some of whose identities were leaked to the media.

The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.

We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump.

To a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.

Ex-CIA chief warned of Russian contact with Trump campaign officials

Under congressional questioning Tuesday:

Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Why not?

Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president.

He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.

In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence.

In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.

Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history.

Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was

“known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.

I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”

Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections.

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary.

His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat.

He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War —

Voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process.

Does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?

What Brennan and the rest of the Obama gang did.

Has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done.
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the electi... (show quote)


Silly. You can't really believe this unsubstantiated nonsense.

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2017 12:37:49   #
Radiance3
 
Doc110 wrote:
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the election

Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling:

Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens —

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

And failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication.

Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties:

Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C.
Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.

The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts —

In violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant —

“Had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign.

Some of whose identities were leaked to the media.

The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.

We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump.

To a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.

Ex-CIA chief warned of Russian contact with Trump campaign officials

Under congressional questioning Tuesday:

Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Why not?

Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president.

He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.

In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence.

In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.

Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history.

Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was

“known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.

I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”

Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections.

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary.

His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat.

He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War —

Voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process.

Does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?

What Brennan and the rest of the Obama gang did.

Has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done.
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the electi... (show quote)

==================
Under the Obama administration , the Intel Agency, CIA, NSA, have been abused. Instead of using them against the enemies of our country, they used them against their political opponents. In this case the GOP's Republicans, and all Conservative candidates during the election. These abuses reached its highest during the 2016 election, against the candidate Donald Trump and his people, and even after he won, they've continued using it.

Obama hired all officers in his administration, ensured that they all work for him destroying all Obama's political enemies. The purpose is for continuing his evil ambitions of turning this country to be under the Muslim control, to continue his greed of power, and to prevent GOP from discovering all the abuses, and treacheries he'd done for the last 8 years against the American people.

That is why he supported Hillary, both of them corrupt and treasonous, due to greed of power and wealth.
Hillary will continue to protect Obama's legacy of destruction and both of them will ensure continued rule over the United States.

Obama's Shadow government right now have gone to all public schools, where his SEIU teachers, all democrat strongholds have brain washed public school children to hate all republicans. That include the WH, president Trump, Republicans Congress and its leaders, and all GOP elected officials. These kids will even march down the streets with violence to show their support for Obama and his continuing shadow government. That includes all millennials.

Reply
May 29, 2017 12:39:53   #
Glaucon
 
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
Under the Obama administration , the Intel Agency, CIA, NSA, have been abused. Instead of using them against the enemies of our country, they used them against their political opponents. In this case the GOP's Republicans, and all Conservative candidates during the election. These abuses reached its highest during the 2016 election, against the candidate Donald Trump and his people, and even after he won, they've continued using it.

Obama hired all officers in his administration, ensured that they all work for him destroying all Obama's political enemies. The purpose is for continuing his evil ambitions of turning this country to be under the Muslim control, to continue his greed of power, and to prevent GOP from discovering all the abuses, and treacheries he'd done for the last 8 years against the American people.

That is why he supported Hillary, both of them corrupt and treasonous, due to greed of power and wealth.
Hillary will continue to protect Obama's legacy of destruction and both of them will ensure continued rule over the United States.

Obama's Shadow government right now have gone to all public schools, where his SEIU teachers, all democrat strongholds have brain washed public school children to hate all republicans. That include the WH, president Trump, Republicans Congress and its leaders, and all GOP elected officials. These kids will even march down the streets with violence to show their support for Obama and his continuing shadow government. That includes all millennials.
================== br Under the Obama administrati... (show quote)


Your mindless hysteria is based on nothing. Get some facts and try again.

Reply
May 29, 2017 12:41:40   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Be careful when you reply to fat ass glaucon. If you hurt it's itty bitty fellings it'll put you on ignore.
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
Under the Obama administration , the Intel Agency, CIA, NSA, have been abused. Instead of using them against the enemies of our country, they used them against their political opponents. In this case the GOP's Republicans, and all Conservative candidates during the election. These abuses reached its highest during the 2016 election, against the candidate Donald Trump and his people, and even after he won, they've continued using it.

Obama hired all officers in his administration, ensured that they all work for him destroying all Obama's political enemies. The purpose is for continuing his evil ambitions of turning this country to be under the Muslim control, to continue his greed of power, and to prevent GOP from discovering all the abuses, and treacheries he'd done for the last 8 years against the American people.

That is why he supported Hillary, both of them corrupt and treasonous, due to greed of power and wealth.
Hillary will continue to protect Obama's legacy of destruction and both of them will ensure continued rule over the United States.

Obama's Shadow government right now have gone to all public schools, where his SEIU teachers, all democrat strongholds have brain washed public school children to hate all republicans. That include the WH, president Trump, Republicans Congress and its leaders, and all GOP elected officials. These kids will even march down the streets with violence to show their support for Obama and his continuing shadow government. That includes all millennials.
================== br Under the Obama administrati... (show quote)

Reply
May 29, 2017 12:42:25   #
Glaucon
 
Doc110 wrote:
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the election

Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling:

Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens —

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

And failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication.

Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties:

Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C.
Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.

The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts —

In violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant —

“Had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign.

Some of whose identities were leaked to the media.

The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.

We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump.

To a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.

Ex-CIA chief warned of Russian contact with Trump campaign officials

Under congressional questioning Tuesday:

Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Why not?

Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president.

He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.

In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence.

In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.

Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history.

Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was

“known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.

I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”

Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections.

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary.

His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat.

He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War —

Voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process.

Does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?

What Brennan and the rest of the Obama gang did.

Has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done.
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the electi... (show quote)


Yes, Obama was and is black.

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2017 12:47:34   #
Carol Kelly
 
lindajoy wrote:
Doc, QuestGirl posted this earlier.. only telling you in case it doesn't get many responses..

Bo should be in jail, period.. Just another he totally threw the courts ruling out in 2011 and went about his way violating the very laws he was to enforce!!!

Comes in and admits right before leaving office two bit disgrace is what he is!!! And every single one of them that broke the laws should be charged too!!!!


:

Reply
May 29, 2017 12:55:59   #
Glaucon
 
PRM2014 wrote:
I agree he Obama should have been in jail eight years ago.


Unfortunately for you and fortunately for Obama, we are a nation of laws and not merely of gossip. We don't put people in jail on gossip and skin color. Because you agree, doesn't make it OK to put people in jail without charges, trial, and conviction.

Reply
May 29, 2017 12:57:38   #
Glaucon
 
JFlorio wrote:
Be careful when you reply to fat ass glaucon. If you hurt it's itty bitty fellings it'll put you on ignore.


No chance. I get my feelings hurt only by those for whom I have some respect.

Reply
May 29, 2017 12:59:56   #
Glaucon
 
Doc110 wrote:
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the election

Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling:

Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens —

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

And failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication.

Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties:

Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C.
Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.

The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts —

In violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant —

“Had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign.

Some of whose identities were leaked to the media.

The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.

We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump.

To a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.

Ex-CIA chief warned of Russian contact with Trump campaign officials

Under congressional questioning Tuesday:

Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Why not?

Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president.

He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.

In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence.

In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.

Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history.

Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was

“known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election.

I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”

Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections.

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary.

His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat.

He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War —

Voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process.

Does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?

What Brennan and the rest of the Obama gang did.

Has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done.
05/26/2017 How Team Obama tried to hack the electi... (show quote)


That is very crazy shit and it is based on nothing.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.