Okay..start with the specifics of my post and tell us how YOU can do ALL what I described at China Lake using your off-the-shelf controller instead of one designed from scratch like mine had to be.. Don't call names, produce what I asked you since it is that simple and easy to duplicate

well...you obviously don't understand the concept of response......and if you can see through me...take a crack at what I posted about designing with and programming microprocessors to control radar systems..or MBA Technology Management curriculum material........be careful of what you call people. Don't dismiss other people's efforts in life .that is what got all of this started in the first place............I could care less personally but I respond as a matter of principle.........how can a tenth grader critique college professors? I was an honor student but not THAT full of myself........

what they said to garner that response wasn't necessary either but I see you have no problem with that. Kind of dishonest to view "effect" only and not "cause" also.........

Plus since they like to tell me I'm dumb...I like to demonstrate how dumb I really am....haha

yeah....but that is better then being a dumb...you know.......and being liked because you are a dumb.....you know........

thank You

Can I means do I have the ability? yes. Will I means will I choose not to do so? Maybe

a lot of people pay taxes for things that benefit us that we could not pay for alone. I'm willing to do the same for others....worry about what your son can get as opposed to worrying about what others should not have....priorities......

I don't even use it...all my postings are on existing threads started by others but I noticed the ones that are particularly racist where the crackas talk about black people like pieces of shit has me blocked...and I'm kool with that....fk em...........

Ask your people how this was done back then with VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration)-level discrete Texas Instruments LS (Low Power Schottky) chips were used and initial circuits consisted of wire-wrapped boards before they were tested. Also, if they know anything about the Shuttle, ask them what portions of Shuttle Endeavour and associated test equipment had to be converted from Apollo-era DTL (Diode to Transistor) logic to TTL (Transistor to Transistor) logic and why. Also ask them what successful testing criteria consisted of. How is that for a fake person? Your answers shouldn't take long to find. Good luck!!

you really don't even understand how far this is over your little pointy undeveloped head....I am talking about hand-designed microprocessor-based controller principles before these devices were even marketed. Now you need to describe how to interface a radar controller (all necessary interfaces) and then program it with interrupt-based routines in assembler language to address each specific phase of a radar tracking cycle. Now take that toy and figure out how to do that...better yet, call the vendor and see if that controller is even capable.....ask them what interface hardware is needed (for peripherals and a dedicated math board before on-board co-processor chips even came into being) and what software they can provide you to operate a system controller, A/D sampling circuitry that feeds an array processor board to perform at least a 128-point Fast Fourier Transform that will take radar returns from the receiver, change them from time to Doppler frequency domains and then use those returns and interface them to a digital shaft encoder that will provide real-time pedestal positioning data that aligns itself with missile trajectory...from the time of locking in on track until the missile flight is over and the pedestal returns to the stowed position. See if THAT is just some off-the shelf bullshit you can solve with a couple of sentences...the way it was done then....if you know your shit....you can do so without calling names...and yeah....ask your friends do they know about Michelson and Thompson Labs at the China Lake (Then named Naval Weapons Center) Naval Air Warfare Center. Ask them then what do they know about the Electronic Warfare Division, Countermeasures Branch. Ask them what was developed at Michelson Lab around the mid-80's. They should be able to tell you a lot and some names because it all began there before contractors were given final products for mass production.....

Until any of your type you can discuss the academic and technical issues in a likewise, relevant manner-I know you all are just running scared. You posted an MBA degree and you are scared to discuss specifics......I teach MBA students with an emphasis in Technology Management. You should see how authentic of a fake I can be by engaging in a relevant discussion with me....but you're like trump...all hype (name-calling, silly ass pictures) and no substance. It just kills you that a non-toadie black who was brought up better than you, more educated and intelligent than you, can still tell you fk you and split your motherfking skull if the need arises. In or outside of academia I can defeat you. That is why you run after me from post to post trying to hurt some little bitch ass feelings you must think I possess. You're just making a fking clown out of yourself as a grown ass man posting silly ass pictures and calling names like a bitch ass junior high school girl.

Again,

I understand that I am from a different area of endeavor and until you people can dialogue without insult which is not allowed in intellectual/academic environments, I realize you all are just compensating. It is like when I summarized my microprocessor interface design and assembler programming which could be considered the BIOS for the system, if any of you could have replied in a relevant, on-topic, non-insulting manner, you would have at lease demonstrated a degree of academic prowess. I was going to continue from there are describe my experience within the servomechanism and control systems realm. I was going to educate you all on Phase Locked Loops(PLL) and show you all how a integrating circuit along the lines of dv/dt can be designed using basic principles of Calculus. I have many things I can discuss with a greater degree of complexity and my Phased Array radar background afforded me the opportunity to learn things very few know. So with a EE background, being a Professor and an Advisory Consultant and showing how the curriculum from a MBA in Technology Management serves to link the technical and strategic business arenas....I don't even have to worry about peer scrutiny outside of formal evaluations. I don't have to insult and name-call to post items of substance....at all.......you can call names because that requires no skill at all but let me see you address any of the issues just mentioned in this post.

Fatal police shootings of unarmed African American men — and boys, like Jordan Edwards — have fueled righteous anger across the nation and have led many to claim that police departments are stocked with racial bigots bent on state-sanctioned murder. It is far more likely that officers who needlessly kill are very much like a majority of us — affected by unconscious and unwanted biases built into our history and culture, and lacking in the extraordinary skill, training and presence of mind that should be (but often are not) mandatory for professionals who wear badges, carry guns and are called upon to protect public safety by making split-second decisions under stressful circumstances.
In the end, though, the underlying reasons for unwarranted police killings are almost beside the point when the deadly results are the same. Too many police departments in small cities like Balch Springs, Texas, or Ferguson, Mo., and even large ones like Baltimore, Chicago, New York and Los Angeles, fail in hiring, training, supervising and psychologically evaluating their officers. Too many departments are stuck in outdated tactics, despite a wealth of data and information about best practices. Too many police stop, search and arrest — and kill — blacks and Latinos in far greater numbers than whites in response to similar behavior. What’s more, department rules are relatively lenient toward officers who use their weapons, and criminal prosecution of unnecessary shootings is uncommon, leading to a culture in which police officers may feel confident they won’t be held accountable for their missteps.

Familiar tragedy, and response
The police killing of a Texas teen was senseless. The lack of national leadership on the issue is shameful.
H is name was Jordan Edwards. He was just 15, a good student and popular athlete at Mesquite High School in the Dallas suburb of Balch Springs. His death Saturday night was senseless, sudden and cruel. It came as he was leaving a party and was struck in the head by a bullet fired from a rifle into the side window of a car in which he rode beside his older brother.
The assailant was a police officer, whose reason for pulling the trigger — whose reason for raising a rifle in the first place, or even for carrying such a powerful weapon at all while responding to nothing more serious than complaints about drunken partygoers — is (pending further investigation) anyone’s guess. The Balch Springs Police Department’s first story was that Jordan’s brother was backing the car toward the officer in “an aggressive manner” when the officer fired the rifle, but video of the incident showed that particular tale to be false. More information may come from other officers at the scene, but questioning was postponed while they were given time, according to a police spokesman, to “decompress.”
Fatal police shootings of unarmed African American men — and boys, like Jordan Edwards — have fueled righteous anger across the nation and have led many to claim that police departments are stocked with racial bigots bent on state-sanctioned murder. It is far more likely that officers who needlessly kill are very much like a majority of us — affected by unconscious and unwanted biases built into our history and culture, and lacking in the extraordinary skill, training and presence of mind that should be (but often are not) mandatory for professionals who wear badges, carry guns and are called upon to protect public safety by making split-second decisions under stressful circumstances.
In the end, though, the underlying reasons for unwarranted police killings are almost beside the point when the deadly results are the same. Too many police departments in small cities like Balch Springs, Texas, or Ferguson, Mo., and even large ones like Baltimore, Chicago, New York and Los Angeles, fail in hiring, training, supervising and psychologically evaluating their officers. Too many departments are stuck in outdated tactics, despite a wealth of data and information about best practices. Too many police stop, search and arrest — and kill — blacks and Latinos in far greater numbers than whites in response to similar behavior. What’s more, department rules are relatively lenient toward officers who use their weapons, and criminal prosecution of unnecessary shootings is uncommon, leading to a culture in which police officers may feel confident they won’t be held accountable for their missteps.
In his second term, President Obama took some meek and tentative steps to bring policing practices up to date. The Department of Justice entered into consent decrees with agencies whose practices routinely violated the civil rights of those they policed. Many officers and their unions bristled at what they saw as outside interference. Many department and city leaders welcomed the assistance.
But federal help and pressure have now evaporated under the administration of President Trump and Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions, whose statements and directives reveal a stunningly shallow view of policing as a war between cops and criminals, and who see desperate attempts to curb police failures like the one that ended the life of Jordan Edwards as aid and comfort to the enemy.
We are left to rely on the too-often unreliable rectitude of police departments like the one in Balch Springs, which over the weekend said in effect that the victim had it coming to him. And on tools such as video, which on Monday compelled the department to retract its story and led the chief to acknowledge that shooting an unarmed teenager in the head with a rifle as his car was moving away from officers failed to meet the department’s “core values.” We are left to wonder why officers who witnessed the killing are accorded time to decompress before questioning, and to imagine how differently police might treat civilian triggermen and eyewitnesses.
Police have cautioned against over-reliance on video, even as many agencies have moved rapidly to equip officers with body cameras. They have resisted clear guidelines for when such images should be released to the public. (The Balch Springs video has not yet been released.) They have relied for the most part on their own counsel when deciding what weapons to carry and when to use them.
Without national leadership, and with courts that accord officers wide latitude, pressure to reform policing comes in the form of public anger. It is a dangerous, unfocused, unmanageable, unpredictable force — as those of us who were in Los Angeles 25 years ago well remember. Surely we can do better, but we struggle to figure out just how.