You should study the history of education in America.

Historically, the Bible was taught extensively in schools, as well as used as reading material, and used to teach literature, and ethics and morality.

It wasn't unconstitutional for schools to do that then, and it is not unconstitutional to do that today.

What is unconstitutional is for the government to force students to reject religion and to perceive religion as a criminal act. That is prohibiting the free exercise of religion. That is unconstitutional.

Schools should not be paid for and controlled by the federal government. Whoever pays for and controls has power to impose its version of religion, morality, and politics.

The federal government cannot give itself that power under our constitution. That power is reserved to the people.

Schools should be established by citizens who have a vested interest in teaching a particular curriculum, and people should choose what school they want to go to based on the curriculum they prefer. Our college system is very similar to this, and it works fine. Interference by the federal government through funding and demanding control over the curriculum is the thing that is tearing down education standards in America.

Schools should be paid for by individual fees and contributions, not by tax money collected and provided through government.

You disagree that children should be exposed to God? Yet you agree that they be exposed to Atheism? How does that make sense. Evolution is the devils way of taking our mind off of God. You seem to think it is all right? How about the moon is made of cheese. Is that all right? I do believe that teaching about different religions is worthy of our school system. It is not trying to convert or distress anyone to know the systems for which many societies have grown and believed. How much do you know about Babylon? How much do you know about the Egyptian system. How much do you know about Islam, and Buddhism, and any other system, If you do not get some knowledge of it. how can you teach it or even fight it.

We are not to be free of Religion, just to be free from having it forced upon us, it is a personal choice. When you know what you are choosing, you feel secure in it.

And besides, the nature of this country was conceived by certain religious beliefs. those beliefs should be honored as part of our history. You cannot know this nation unless you know it's foundation.

In other words:

"If you do not agree with my rightwingnut perspective, then you are truly a closed minded far left liberal who can do nothing but espouse hatred as all liberals do and bow down to the God Obama."

Right?

That's the problem with you guys: unless everyone agrees 100% with all of your viewpoints, they must be "far left liberals" and "espouse hatred" and "bow down to the God Obama."

And you blame Obama for dividing America.

_______________________________________________

Wow , I will agree on one point you make.
It take some bravery to take stimulus funds and implement operation Fast and Furious. And simultaneously sending Hillary to mexico to blame America for Mexico's gun problems!!!

You are Child like to still not see the Fraud that define this Prez
and All that is the progressive movement and its "fundamental transformation" of America. Your Racist Reasoning makes you the most Transparent Bigot Today.

If you do hold to your promise make sure to vote several times like you did last election! Hah.

What you need to do is find out what makes sense to God. Unless you are God, you don't have any control over who goes to heaven and who doesn't. God makes those calls, and the only thing that matters is what makes sense to Him. And He explains all about it in the Bible if you care to find out.

Jesus said, "you will know them by their fruits." So if the guard's fruit was that he tortured and murdered Jews, that can be understood as bad fruit and therefore he is a bad tree. What did Jesus say happens to bad trees?

Matthew 7
18 A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 So then, you will know them by their fruits.

None of your listings are accurate. Not a single one. I spent years reseaching the places you named. I am for my race. You are for destruction of it.
You are either a liar or a lazy worthless
anamaly. Neither speaks well of you.
You are like a baby bird waiting for the. " gumnent" to feed you and pipe your beliefs into you. I challenge you to read the Nuremberg trial transcripts.If you ...even you. do not see the obvious fraud, I will be happy to point out to you the OBVIOUS lies in there.As for your reference to " Death Camps" there is not a single scholar who will stand beside you.applauding. got my gist?

You are assuming, that those that are not following God knowingly chose not to. People have been deluded to follow many different make believe gods created out of their own imagination because they did not see the true God. These people believed that they were worshipping the true God. They were led astray by Lucifer. thinking inanimate and self created objects were their god.

In their ignorance and their blocked exposure to the true god, they invented god. Just as most do today. Their problem is that they chose the wrong god. One of their imagination. God knows that, and although they know OF God, they did not know God. Only those given special knowledge started to know God. Those that have been mislead, will have the same chance that those who were on the earth when Jesus came to explain the truth. You are purposely defending an untenable position. Putting in God's words things He has not said, but using your interpretation of them to suit your fancy.

You are not reading the bible with the eyes of love, but with the eyes of hate. Turn your thinking around , repent, and look at it from a sensible viewpoint. As an example, when a child runs out into the street in front of a car, He knows full well that a car is dangerous because his parents have told him so, but he is ignorant of the result of his careless actions. His parents have to impress on him the imminent danger in those actions, without letting him get injured. It is difficult to do. Unless he becomes more knowledgeable of the results, he will find it hard to believe that just running in the street could be fatal. It takes more exposure to events sometimes to believe something he has not experienced. So too are those that know of God, but have never found Him. They are not ignorant of God, just not experienced.

This is not an excuse, it is just lack of information that is necessary. Many atheists refuse to acknowledge God because they have never experienced God in their life. They do not want to, they want to ignore God. But as soon as they feel the loving power of God, they change their tune. Criminals often change their direction when they experience God in their circumstances. You cannot deny that God will search for those that are afflicted with lack of knowledge. Knowing something exists is not knowing about it.

Minimum standards for schools is a valid function of government. Being in control of schools is not a function of government.

Your assertion that the state would become an oligarchy in which the rich would have absolute control of the state assumes an inherent evilness of people. That may have been true in Russia, but what makes America different is that the people are inherently moral, decent, caring, sharing, and fair. Given that, they would not want to create separate and superior schools for the rich, they would want to create the same quality education for all. If you want that, why do you assume the rest of us are evil and would deny you that?

You make a good case for why education should not be a Government action. Government should divest itself from control of schools. Schools should be independent to teach however they want. By having schools controlled by the government, the government is violating freedom of religion . Children are easily influenced and cannot be considered free to choose, therefore, whatever controls the schools is imposing its doctrine, philosophy, or "religion," and that is prohibited by the constitution from being done by the federal government. The government may not restrict the right of schools to freely exercise any religion of their choice. Therefore, the government cannot constitutionally be in control of schools.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/01/14/Israeli-Defense-Minister-Kerry-is-Obsessive-Messianic

Israel's Defense Minister, Moshe "Boogy" Ya'alon, is facing criticism from the opposition after slamming U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. The Israeli daily Yediot Ahronot reported earlier on Tuesday that the outspoken Ya'alon had said that Kerry, who recently completed his tenth trip to the region in less than a year on the job, "turned up here determined and acting out of misplaced obsession and messianic fervor" for a peace deal.

Ya'alon added: "In reality, there have been no negotiations between us and the Palestinians for all these months --but rather between us and the Americans. The only thing that can 'save us' is for John Kerry to win a Nobel Prize and leave us in peace." Breitbart News offered a similar analysis last week, noting: "The real negotiations are not those between Israel and the Palestinians, but between Israel and the Obama administration."

In addition, Ya'alon was candid in his views of Kerry's plan for Israel's security in a peace agreement, saying that it was "not worth the paper it's written on....It contains no peace and no security." Israel's chief negotiator, Tzipi Livni, accused Ya'alon of harming relations with the U.S., but other politicians came to his defense. "The State of Israel can't sacrifice its security and it can't outsource the state's security to censors," one said.