The one with a complete load of crap in your brain and believe any $h*+ that is served by the media are you.
I copy what this scientist said:
"Climate change is a hoax": Former Greenpeace president lashes out at environmental campaigns
INSTAGRAM Posted: Mar 10, 2019 21:48 GMT | Last Updated: 11 Mar 2019 01:23 GMT
The activist assures that the supposed climate catastrophe is created to instill fear and control the minds of people. The organization responds that his speech is "paid for" by the nuclear industry.
Patrick Moore, former president of Greenpeace, has claimed that "climate change is a complete hoax and scam" driven by corrupt scientists who are hooked on public subsidies that benefit them. The statements were made in an interview offered on Wednesday on Breitbart radio.
Moore, a doctor of ecology, believes that environmental campaigns are related to "green businesses" that take advantage of massive subsidies, huge tax write-offs and government mandates to increase his fortune. "In the meantime, they enjoy propaganda protection from the media," he added. "Science is being involved with superstition, and there is a kind of toxic combination between religion and political ideology," said the activist, noting that the climate catastrophe is created to instill fear and control people's minds. During the interview, Moore commented that Greenpeace previously cared about people and had a humanitarian and environmental orientation. However, he believes that a new ecological agreement "against humans" is currently being promoted, strongly criticizing the organization. In addition, the former director declared that carbon dioxide is "food for life, not pollution", claiming that the use of fossil fuels actually "saved life from an early disappearance", because CO2 was decreasing since the last ice age. , and there was barely enough left for a plant on Earth to sustain itself.
Who you have to believe is Al Gore, who is a "good scientist".
Upon leaving the White House, Mr. Gore's private fortune was $ 2 million. Today, his investments in "green technology" have increased his personal capital by hundreds of millions of dollars. The result of having invested much of it in a handful of companies, 14 of which received more than $ 2.5 billion in loans, grants, tax breaks, and much more from the Obama administration. ---

Those who try to impose "green" technology at all costs for the benefit of their fortune, deceive humanity into believing that a victory is achieved with their devices, to face an imaginary catastrophe created by them; but it is nothing more than a Pyrrhic victory, which comes at a high price, denying any true sense of achievement or undermining long-term progress.

These individuals: Kevy, rumintoid, saltwind, Milosia, Permafrost, Bad Bob and others that I don't want to remember, always try to de-legitimize what they can't answer, trying to silence any compromised discussion; and for this they use diversionary tactics, ranging from mentioning another matter to putting up a stupid picture of someone laughing like an abnormal.
I think there is a possibility in what you say, AOC and Kevyn are people who belong to the same group. They both agree that cows contribute to climate change with their flatulence. Maybe we will have to stop drinking milk and eliminate the cows, to cooperate with the Green New Deal.

Communists (read Marxists) tend to be fellow travelers who only reveal themselves as such when they establish their dictatorship. They work covertly, with a facade very different from what they are, to promote from their position all the damage they can against democracy, using the same democracy that allows them to do so.

In East Germany during the Cold War, a satellite state was created by the Soviets, giving it the name of the German Democratic Republic which was Socialist. There the political police reached a higher level, as the Gestapo and the NKVD pooled their experience and the STASI was created.
Perhaps the Democrats are on that track and will turn the FBI into STASI to build on the experience gained.

We must reduce CO2 emissions into the atmosphere to zero according to the UN's 2030 Agenda, but Patrick Moore says that: "carbon dioxide (CO2) is food for life, not pollution”, claiming that the use of fossil fuels actually saved life from an early disappearance, because CO2 was decreasing since the last ice age.

I think you are right, when an idiot is falsely elected or imposed the situation becomes dangerous.
This is demonstrated by what has been done by reducing oil production, which leads us to import oil again and to the rise in the prices of gasoline and of all products because they depend on the price of that fuel, which creates inflation; that together with the plandemic, can produce a stagflation that leads the country to another Great Depression. All to please those who want to impose the Green New Deal that would lead to Socialism, which is the final goal.
Another very dangerous issue was the hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan, leaving many people under the control of the Taliban and handing over many weapons, which will undoubtedly bring problems.
It's the same thing that was done when they withdrew from Iraq and left their weapons behind for ISIS to get hold of them; or when weapons were sold to drug cartels in Mexico.
The thing in Afghanistan has been the same as what was done in Vietnam, but on steroids.
The problem of the invasion of illegal immigrants should not be forgotten, which can bring labor and social problems, since these people forced by necessity will work for less wages than legal workers.

We must reduce CO2 emissions into the atmosphere to zero by 2030.
Do the flatulence of cows produces CO2? May be Alejandrina Ocasio Cortez has the answer.

Thank you for your support and appreciation of what I have written.

Thanks for the advice and for appreciating what I have written. It is true that the garbage these individuals write is not worth answering; but in a certain aspect what he said is true, because I was having fun, when I saw that he is nothing more than a poor fool, who does not want me to write more in OPP, because it seems that he is the dictator of this forum.

I have said everything I had to say, in the best possible way so that I am understood, it seems that you consider me qualified and knowledgeable, because the mouth speaks out of the abundance of the heart. As for what I write has no substance, because of your fierce attack I understand that it has a lot of it, because the one who feels itching in the mouth, it is because something spicy that he has eaten produces an intense burning. You want me to leave OPP and with it you show that what I write does have substance, because you don't want someone to tell what you don't want to be said. As for what you consider to be a way of insulting me with the little words of protoplasm and gene pool, I am sorry that you are so unimaginative.
I'm going to take son of witless advice, as he's right. It is not worth having any interaction with people who only write garbage, without proving much or nothing of what they write. With which I end this matter.

I see that you use another technique, now it is provocation, trying to change the subject, in the absence of an argument to combat what you oppose. Use truly real arguments and not cheap propaganda; I thought you were a liberal democrat; but I see that I was wrong.
I can tell you that I am against the politically correct, because it is a form of dictatorship, imposed so that only those who exercise the dictatorship say what is convenient to them. I am against racism and indigenism, because I believe that all human beings are equal, at least before the law. I am against gender ideology because it is an aberration. I defend that men and women, as human beings, have the same rights, so I do not defend machismo or feminism. I am against the imposition of homosexuality as something normal, without denying the right that everyone has to behave as they wish in their private life; but not showing off something that goes against nature. I am against environmental pollution; but also against ecoterrorism. I fight Marxist leftism sponsored by the Sao Paulo Forum, the UN and a sector of the Democratic Party. I am for the free market against the Dictatorship of the Proletariat and all its variants: communism, socialism or fascism.

Permafrost, you denigrate what you cannot refute, playing the fool.
I have told you over and over again, that you read what I have written; but, honoring the username that identifies you here at OPP, you demonstrate having a thick, frozen layer in your brain, that prevents you from understanding what is being explained to you.
I don't want to have an argument with you, because as I said, you are playing the fool and I know that Mark Twain's quotes are full of wisdom, about people who act like you: No amount of evidence will persuade you, because you believe in your own fallacy. If I argue with you, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference between us; and also, you will try to lower me to your level and beat me with the experience you have at that level.

Dr. Christy shows in a graph (which I have not been able to copy to show it), what is the average temperature in the troposphere according to the observations of the balloons and satellite probes, in degrees Celsius; comparing them with the IPCC models between 1975 and 2025, where it is observed that until 1995, more or less there was a certain coincidence between the real data and the model, although always a little higher in the IPCC model; but from that year on, the model far exceeds the real data up to 2020 and continues to increase, although it has been seen that between 1995 and 2020 the real data maintain a very similar situation to that which existed between 1975 and 1995.
The above shows how since 1995, coinciding with the global warming campaign, these data have been manipulated and what is published is according to the model and not to the real data.

It seems that you confuse "environmental pollution" with "climate change", and do not seem to understand the difference between "anthropogenic warming" and global warming in general; furthermore, the definition of CO2 is not what someone wants to define, but what science defines it to be. The theory of anthropogenic (caused by humans) "global warming" has had many dissidents and lost credibility, so it has now been replaced by "climate change" to make it more encompassing and acceptable, as these changes are cyclic on the planet.. Climate change has always existed, what is denied is that anthropogenic CO2 is the cause. The elimination of CO2 far from solving the problem would aggravate it. The Green New Deal points in that direction to be able to introduce measures that have nothing to do with climate change. Eliminating fossil fuels is inadmissible at this time; it will be produced gradually as science advances. 200 years ago a goose pen was used to write; at present we write on a computer and even the use of paper is avoided, not because there is no geese or paper does not exist, but because the human being has risen to a new stage of civilization. Dr. John Christy, is a Professor of Atmospheric Science and Director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH). He has also been Alabama's State Climatologist since November 2000. He is mostly known for his work with the satellite-based temperature monitoring for which he and Dr. Roy Spencer received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal. Christy helped draft and signed the 2003 American Geophysical Union statement on climate change [Source: Wikipedia]. He says: "I hear that there is a consensus of thousands of scientists on the issue of global warming and that humans are causing catastrophic changes to the climate system. Well, I am a scientist, and there are many who we just say that is not true. " Dr. Christy makes his own measurements without relying on what others say and he believes that the climate system is quite insensitive to humanity’s greenhouse gas emissions and doubts that human activity is to blame for most of the observed recent warming.