One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Progressive One
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1329 next>>
May 4, 2017 02:23:28   #
Post the conflicting timeline I supposedly posted with the date and time so it can be verified I did.
Go to
May 4, 2017 02:21:38   #
America Only wrote:
Caught you again in a lie...your recall is so piss poor...right here you in this particular post..claim you worked on this in the years...what? 1984-1987...right? OH but now wait!!!!!! Hold THAT BUS for Kevin H. H.!!!!!!!!!! Just a post above in another post...your words not mine I copied and pasted like how YOU do....

I worked on the program from 1988-1991......DING DING DING!!!!!!!!!! July 31 , 1987 Contract award to Rockwell International
1987 August 1 Start of Final Assembly contract given to Rockwell International......
1987 September 28 Start structural assembly of aft fuselage
1990 July 6 Completed Final Assembly ready to go to pre-flight and pre-launch testing....

So now...you have one time span you claim in 1984 but then you had to check with wiki pedia and other online sources to bolster your claims and posted a whole new set of years you worked on all this....you just don't stop with your fantasy wishes.....geez you are a danger to yourself and others...mentally unbalanced....you need some SERIOUS mental health help.....maybe you should look up mental health clinics in the local areas and see if they will take you in....I firmly believe you need to get into a live in program......as you are no doubt...mentally ill. NO doubt at all! Not sure but you are close enough to Santa Ana or Costa Mesa medical clinics which I would imagine have some mental health help for people like you.
Caught you again in a lie...your recall is so piss... (show quote)

YOU ARE ALL WRONG DUMBASS CRACKA
you are one stupid ass motherf-cker....the damn thing was rolled out in 91...dont't try to get out answering my questions regarding the controller and the shuttle.....i'm not answering your bullshit but look below to see that you don't know what the fk you are talking about. I was there from october 88 until april 91 when I started with the company I am with now....April 1 1991 is when I started after leaving the shuttle project...look when it was rolled out you dumb ass idiot...I left because the contract was over....stupid ass

1991 May 7 Delivery to Kennedy Space Center

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Endeavour

you don't know shit.....you're a dumb ass uneducated cracka just like trump who creates conflict to keep the debate off his dumb ass.....obama wiretapped me, the british helped him do it....continuous dumb shit...probably why he bombed syria without damaging anything...you try to do the same thing to distract from the fact you don't know shit and go find stupid shit for a response that does not even apply....you did that with the controller, now with the shuttle, you ran from getting your people" to validate the rockwell award, you ran from discussing YOUR alleged MBA,you started talking about net jet and who you fly with and what it cost which doesn't have a motherfking thing to do with radar tracking or software programming....you're one dumb ass retarded cracka..who really think someone would put together many lies to prove something to your dumb ass......because you lie so fking much....been to my house, banged on my door, has my license, verified I don't teach with the Board of Education.........
you are one dumbass bastard to think someone has to lie to your stupid ass.....but you're like trump.....you're a fking liar sonofabitch.....i know when and where I worked .....you claim shit I said but never post my posts to prove it....prove this so-called timeline I POSTED....

* you are a retarded motherfker who posts monkey pictures, talking about raping a mop, eating seagull sandwiches......I know you've been treated for mental illness....you probably take sedatives when you are offline....you're all fked up mentally..
Go to
May 4, 2017 00:10:50   #
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Not so, Progressive One, I hope for the best health and wealth of all Americans and their freedom to choose what works best for themselves.

I do not see government healthcare as advantageous to the vast majority of Americans, whereas we only need to look to the nightmare in the European Union and its medical triage, euthanasia, and inefficiency, not to mention China's forced abortions, organ harvesting of "dissident" religious groups, or medical experimentation under the US military or the USSR military.

Furthermore, your assumption that the majority of Americans want socialized medicine is flat out wrong. We voted in Donald Trump and a Senate and House majority to dismantle Obamacare and put an end to all plans for socialized medicine or the Public Option. The vast majority of state governments are now dominated by Republican governors and legislatures. The public has made its preference for free markets loud and clear.

Today, the House compromised with Michigan Representative, Fred Upton and added an additional $8 billion dollars to fund that 1% of chronically ill, and expanded the safety net for severely handicapped citizens. So the House and Senate can now pass this generous budget on Friday.

Why do you have such a persecution complex? Nobody wishes any malaise upon you or others. This is not Hollywood, non of us are going to win any beauty contests, ya know! We are all here together working to solve problems. Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they hate you! Why not take the time to read some of the bills I listed above to see if they have any good news. AT my age, I have read enough history to see the failings of socialism and socialized medicine, and fear it with my life - any yours, too.
Not so, Progressive One, I hope for the best healt... (show quote)


before ObamaCare...20+ million were without....that is a benefit right there to cover those people.....
Go to
May 3, 2017 22:00:50   #
bggamers wrote:
really hate it for you but I was on obama care retired 1 yr early due to health and went on obama care till medicare came in big mistake it took obama care 5 months to double my pymts from 275 a month to 475 a month half of my s/s check had to go back to work just for insurance I felt sorry for people with family who started out at 350 and in less than a year were being charged almost a thousand it was cheaper to pay the penalty they would have to drop and hope nobody got sick so before you complain look around its not all fussy and nice out there in the real world what blew me away some people were working full time and only paying 50 bucks
really hate it for you but I was on obama care ret... (show quote)


Okay....well hopefully the GOP will destroy it,24 million will be off and insurance companies can control it all...that is what you people want but I really think many you all want 24 million to go without.....because the GOP will have everyone except the rich paying more and probably pre-existing will not count or get used up on a damn voucher..
Go to
May 3, 2017 21:10:29   #
Ricko wrote:
PO1-it is unfortunate that some have pre-existing conditions and find it difficult to get coverage. However, as was
pointed out, they represent a small minority. We should form High Risk pools for those folks, separate and apart
from mainstream coverage. Those people's misfortunes are not the responsibility of the average citizen and they
should expect to pay more for their coverage. Those who can afford it should pay for their own while those with lesser incomes could be subsidized by the taxpayers with strict controls to ensure that nobody rides the gravy
train. The poor will qualify for Medicaid and will be taken care of albeit in a no-frills fashion. Why are the taxpayers subsidizing the health care coverage of people in congress who earn a minimum of 175K yearly? Obamacare is unsustainable as some States are left with one insurer who will probably be out of business this year. The fairest way is to open the markets across State lines to generate competition. Some companies will survive while others will not. Also, allow people to choose the coverage they can afford as opposed to big brother demanding that certain procedures/items be covered in every policy issued thus increasing both the premiums and deductibles. Obamacare, for those who pay full premium, is primarily catastrophic coverage because it is useless
unless a catastrophic event occurs. With deductibles ranging anywhere from 4K to 12K+ how can it even be called
insurance ? How many insured, with deductibles of even 4 to 8K will ever benefit from their insurance in a given
year ? On average, how many insured will visit their doctors often enough in a given year to use up an out-of-pocket 8K deductible? I would surmise that they will be few and far between. Two things have to be addressed
if we are to ever solve this problem: 1. The actual cost of Health Care/Procedures/Tests, etc. 2. a reasonable ,but not excessive, rate of return for the insurer. I am sure many who are more knowledgeable than I am about the
subject can think of better ways of insuring our people than the ACA. America First !!!
PO1-it is unfortunate that some have pre-existing ... (show quote)


Obama said feel free to fixm it and improve it but don't kill it. He brought this rich ass country out if the stone age. No one should be uninsured, hungry or homeless in America......too rich of a country.
Go to
May 3, 2017 21:04:39   #
And I see you are getting away from answering the questions I asked because your dumb ass could not dig them up...Ask Al about the converted Apollo equipment and the DEC PDP-11 computers...and don't try to fake a email response because we all know you are a Net Jet Ferrari, knocked on my door, have my license fking liar.............get the questions answered and the award validated.......that will prove you talked to someone out thee because what I stated, you have to be on the inside to know........don't lie your way out the way you bitched out after posting an MBA you didn'tkn0w shit about.....that should have been easy conversation........if you studied and graduated.............
Go to
May 3, 2017 20:56:39   #
America Only wrote:
I will put you to your grave on all of this...with a simple response from the person in charge of the Shuttle Program.....and will actually take a PICTURE of his email reply in a day or so...when ever he responds....and post it in a topic all on it's own. You can think all you want to find information on the internet and cherry pick technical aspects all day long...but as a parting gift to the readers...YOU cannot name the MANUFACTURER of the Computer Systems that did control the flight aspects of the Shuttle...NOR can YOU name the MANUFACTURER of any test modules or controllers used on testing of the shuttle....but..I can....and I NEVER claimed to work on the shuttle...but you have claimed it. Unlike YOU..anyone can post words put it takes EVIDENCE to back up those words....and to date...all you have on any one topic...is mere words....not one shred of evidence...never...none....and you will never have any evidence...because only someone that WORKS in the field of being an EE or having worked on the shuttle would HAVE such evidence and documentation.....

So when everyone that can READ a response from Al Hoffman about you...and your NON History with the shuttle program...coming from the NUMBER ONE authority and designer of the entire electronica involved within the engineering....you can buy yourself a entire case of Kleenex...you'll need them to catch your crocodile tears......
I will put you to your grave on all of this...with... (show quote)


Ask Al about the awards and who they gave them to...like you really know him.....hilarious...anyway......show him and that and the supporting document that states what the award is for also.....and let him tell you what capacity various people worked in out there at Plant 42 on Avenue M in Lancaster/Palmdale, CA.. I almost want to post a picture of the group I worked with there but you talk to AL and discover no one has to lie to a poor ass uneducated cracka that can't do shit for me....do you ,really think I would go and find that much shit to tell your unimportant ass? The only reason I have told you people so much because it is conversational from memory and easy to recall. I wouldn't look this much shit up for Beyonce' if she promised me some pussy........
Go to
May 3, 2017 20:37:25   #
America Only wrote:
http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/68010/ It is all right here...that processor is not news...being used by KIDS.....come up with something better than that....you are seriously grasping for straws.....and NO evidence to support not one single sentence you have EVER made mention about any aspect of electronic engineering....not a one!


you stupid f-cking dumbass....this was in 1984-87 when Intel was barely out.....33 years ago dumbass. Motorola had cornered the defense market and Intel was barely out yet. CPU chips ran about 8MHZ each dumbass. GaAs (gallium Arsenide) was being developed out there at China Lake for use in Integrated Circuit chips and were successful for achieving CPU speeds in the GHZ speed range you dumbass. The problem? Data bus backplanes could not handle that rate of data transfer without ringing which in turn corrupted the data. The technology to ground the backplane came to fruition later. Only a dumbass racist cracka would think I would have to have a 200 semester unit EE degree and years in a Research and Development (R&D) laboratory designing this shit and all you got to do is cut and paste to have the same knowledge. Kids wasn't using no 68010's back then dumbass. They were for defense work...kids probably had a piece of shit 8080 CPU back then.

The Intel 8080 ("eighty-eighty") was the second 8-bit microprocessor designed and manufactured by Intel and was released in April 1974.[1] It was an extended and enhanced variant of the earlier 8008 design, although without binary compatibility. The initial specified clock frequency limit was 2 MHz, and with common instructions using 4, 5, 7, 10, or 11 cycles this meant that it operated at a typical speed of a few hundred thousand instructions per second. A slightly faster variant 8080A-1 became available later with clock frequency limit up to 3.125 MHz.

Notice how I said the 68010 was 8MHZ? that was 4times as fast as the 2MHZ 8080, which was 8 bit. What gave Motorola an advantage is that it was programmable with long-words. The 68000 was an 8-bit processor that could transfer 16-bit long words and if I remember correctly, the latter versions were 16-bit and could transfer 32-bit long words. I hope you and others think I'm making this shit up.
Go to
May 3, 2017 20:09:42   #
America Only wrote:
You have never worked on the Shuttle...EVER! I do not need to search for mumbo jumbo...from you...it would be like me merely stating...what wire was used to connect the first circuit in the left bank of the radar array systems.....withOUT having EVIDENCE that my answer would be correct...you have NO evidence...you never do...just you running your trap....all the time....so now lets see YOUR Tech released to prove even one sentence of a claim from you............well???.........................


I worked on the program from 1988-1991 after I left the USNS Observation Island. Why do you think I can ask these questions you cannot answer specifically unless you talk to someone who was there. Even if you could dig it up I still have more questions and just like that award you tried to invalidate. I told you to ask your so-called people to verify.

Answer the specific questions. If you knew people and had so much without lying then digging for it, you could have been answered those questions...........you flunked on the radar controller and this because I'm speaking specifically from experience...not no general copied bullshit. Again:

for the shuttle:

. Ask them what portions of Shuttle Endeavour and associated test equipment had to be converted from Apollo-era DTL (Diode to Transistor) logic to TTL (Transistor to Transistor) logic and why. Also ask them what successful testing criteria consisted of. what in particular had to be brought back to life for testing on Endeavour. Funny I know these things and you cannot find them on the web. Ask them what did they use a old ass DEC PDP-11 mainframe for.

For the radar controller

Describe how to interface a radar controller (all necessary interfaces) and then program it with interrupt-based routines in assembler language to address each specific phase of a radar tracking cycle. Now take that toy and figure out how to do that...better yet, call the vendor and see if that controller is even capable.....ask them what interface hardware is needed (for peripherals and a dedicated math board before on-board co-processor chips even came into being) and what software they can provide you to operate a system controller, A/D sampling circuitry that feeds an array processor board to perform at least a 128-point Fast Fourier Transform that will take radar returns from the receiver, change them from time to Doppler frequency domains and then use those returns and interface them to a digital shaft encoder that will provide real-time pedestal positioning data that aligns itself with missile trajectory...from the time of locking in on track until the missile flight is over and the pedestal returns to the stowed position.
Go to
May 3, 2017 19:55:04   #
Answer the specific questions. If you knew people and had so much without lying then digging for it, you could have been answered those questions...........you flunked on the radar controller and this because I'm speaking specifically from experience...not no general copied bullshit. Again:

for the shuttle:

. Ask them what portions of Shuttle Endeavour and associated test equipment had to be converted from Apollo-era DTL (Diode to Transistor) logic to TTL (Transistor to Transistor) logic and why. Also ask them what successful testing criteria consisted of. what in particular had to be brought back to life for testing on Endeavour. Funny I know these things and you cannot find them on the web. Ask them what did they use a old ass DEC PDP-11 mainframe for.

For the radar controller

Describe how to interface a radar controller (all necessary interfaces) and then program it with interrupt-based routines in assembler language to address each specific phase of a radar tracking cycle. Now take that toy and figure out how to do that...better yet, call the vendor and see if that controller is even capable.....ask them what interface hardware is needed (for peripherals and a dedicated math board before on-board co-processor chips even came into being) and what software they can provide you to operate a system controller, A/D sampling circuitry that feeds an array processor board to perform at least a 128-point Fast Fourier Transform that will take radar returns from the receiver, change them from time to Doppler frequency domains and then use those returns and interface them to a digital shaft encoder that will provide real-time pedestal positioning data that aligns itself with missile trajectory...from the time of locking in on track until the missile flight is over and the pedestal returns to the stowed position.
Go to
May 3, 2017 19:46:16   #
Try to search for the answers to the specific questions. You may have to search the web another hour but if you knew so many Rockwell people you could get the answer immediately. You could also have them validate the kinds of awards they gave out and to which companies. Try again.....
Go to
May 3, 2017 19:43:25   #
America Only wrote:
To remind everyone...while Mr. Wanna B Perfeser here was debating about the shuttle program his statement was they were all the same.....nothing new....I just posted a release to all engineering personnel what was improved since the older electronics on the newer shuttle Endeavour...which also at the time when YOU posted all this nonsense of yours using the name. KHH1 and then your other name....democrat 2016. NOW you state there WAS some difference but only in the TEST equipment....hahahah OHOHH EVERYTHING was different Nappy BOY in the newer shuttle regarding electronics and computer systems...NOT just the TEST equipment....hehehehehe HOHOH...


Lets see what I have now.......
To remind everyone...while Mr. Wanna B Perfeser he... (show quote)


I didn't say ONLY the test equipment. You cannot find a post where I said ONLY anything. Find the post where I did. I asked a specific question about the Apollo era equipment that was upgraded. Everything I ask you never answer....you go dig up unrelated shit and then come back. If nothing else I remember the cargo bay was bigger on Endeavour.....I wasn't an assembly worker. I was a engineer working in a total different capacity.

Again ,

See if you can find it..you supposedly know so many people why can't you answer a direct question? Remember the Rockwell awards and accompany documents to say what they were for? Try again to answer the specific question and quit trying to sham your way through this. Get the people you always claim you have like you claim you have a copy of my license...haha.....

again:

Okay, use your real engineering release from those real employees who can answer the questions I posted relating to what had to be done on Endeavour with the equipment used to test it. Also ask them what equipment had to be converted from DTL to TTL like I asked you. Also ask them what was the Apollo-era equipment used to test Shuttles and what in particular had to be brought back to life for testing on Endeavour. Funny I know these things and you cannot find them on the web.

Ask them what did they use a old ass DEC PDP-11 mainframe for. You are running and getting certifications but you're not answering any questions. What is wrong?
Go to
May 3, 2017 18:14:42   #
bggamers wrote:
My son has footed the bill for his care since dx pays a whopping 750 a month for really good insurance so to cover ,My grandson was 14 when dr. decided he needed the surgery because his spine was curling under his lt shoulder blade and putting pressure on his heart.They opened up his back from neck to lower back repositioned his spine put holes in part of spine and put in rods to support his spine . Of course now he can not bend over and drs have told him he needs to use electric wheel chair. I bought his first a used one that looked brand new but in two years he out grew it. His surgery cost 500,00 dollars my son paid 5000 of this cost. His new chair cost 16,000 of which my son paid 2000. The goverment would not help not till he is 18 and can then apply for assist which is this year since my daughter in law died 2 years ago from the same thing and the loss of her money put a great strain on him having his son turn 18 is a blessing to him will releave the pressure. He makes to much to apply for medicaid and obama care these are the people who need this kind of goverment coverage .I personally think they should expand medicaid for the low income and the 1% with life time need the rest of us can get insurance from work or private insurance all this upset about goverment covering everyone is unrealistic and doomed to fail in my opinion. When obama care came out a lot of employers dropped their insurance and told their employee's to get obama care well guess what most did not qualify and the ones that did paid a high price for these employers greed they need to put restrictions in place to protect the employee's and to put realistic increases in place so the insurance co. can not kill people with increases. Mine went from 275 a month and jumped to 475 amonth in 6mo. I had to go back to work just for insurance
My son has footed the bill for his care since dx p... (show quote)


Do you people really believe profit-based insurance companies and employers are going to do more for you? I would hate to see people suffer but if they get rid of ObamaCare and insurers are allowed to do whatever people will be screaming for it again. I hate to see people learn the hard way but I hope you and everyone else get what you desire.
Go to
May 3, 2017 18:03:03   #
America Only wrote:
It is easy...all I have to know is what model and serial number of radar or tracking device needs to be programmed....pick up the phone and ORDER a Modicon to do the specific job required! You just do not GET IT!!!!!! I have watched a complete Radar Unit be Built from nothing but a stack of metal stocks, and empty panel boxes...that each and every single component was made...by a real company that made real radar and sat communication dishes and systems.....and they have been doing that since 1971....and still make them. When I fly to New York for a night out on the town with my Wife and friends the owner of that company and his Wife almost always gets invited and they go right along with us...on NET JET! If you had any money...you can get a membership for so many hours of flight time a year.....it is amazing what $45,000.00 can do for travel without the bullshit of airport security and having to deal with loons...like you dip sticks that commercial flights put ya through!

Sorry to expose you once again.....anyone on this website can simply call the website that offers Modicon programmable modules...they will be told the same as I am posting here...it is all PLUG and PLAY.,...all of it.
It is easy...all I have to know is what model and ... (show quote)


Describe how it was done at China Lake....give me the specifics needed...hardware interfaces and controller interrupt routines written in the Motorola 68010 CPU's assembler language.. Try to even see if you can configure a modern day version. you're not given any specifics....you're trying to do like trump and weasel your way through....I didn't ask you about nothing but the radar system specifics......not all that other bullshit.....don't turn ADD on me....if you're stupid enough to think you could do off of the shelf that a project team in a laboratory was needed for..,where even the transmitters were designed from scratch........and track missiles and calibrate the thing with satellites that orbit the earth, which you will also need to test the validity of the system. I'm talking about a radar system that can track things in outer space as the re-enter the atmosphere...not what it costs to fly. Keep trying.
Go to
May 3, 2017 17:51:52   #
Okay, use your real engineering release from those real employees who can answer the questions I posted relating to what had to be done on Endeavour and to the equipment used to test it. Also asked them what equipment had to be converted from DTL to TTL like I asked you. Also ask them what was Apollo-era equipment used to test Shuttles and what in particular had to be brought back to life for testing on Endeavour. Funny I know these things and you cannot find them on the web. Ask them what did they use a old ass DEC PDP-11 mainframe for. You are running and getting certifications but you're not answering any questions. What is wrong?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1329 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.