One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PZG1225
Page: <<prev 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 126 next>>
Oct 25, 2018 09:23:29   #
debeda wrote:
After two years of constant liberal harassment and violence suddenly, right before the midterms, Soros, Obama, Clinton and CNN receive "credible" threats in the mail. Bombs??? Sorry, I'm not buying it. Screams attention getter and slander against conservatives to me.


I totally agree!
Go to
Oct 25, 2018 09:20:23   #
proud republican wrote:
But its not helping our cause,Sir.......It makes it worse...


That's their game. Can't you see that this is what they are calling a false flag? It's really a no brainer. No
Republican did this. It's as simple as that.
Go to
Oct 17, 2018 09:48:30   #
Genius artist!
Go to
Oct 6, 2018 10:14:15   #
Pennylynn wrote:
Just a few days ago some of the folks on OPP said that Judge K's name would be withdrawn.
When that did not happen they then said the FBI investigation would make him ineligible.
Then the claim was, even if the FBI comes back with nothing... he would not receive the vote because of temperament..... You folks can not accept that you entered into a battle, yet again, and you lost...yet again. Get used to it..... YOUR TEAM IS ON A LOOSING STREAK AND IT WILL NOT END ANYTIME SOON!!


As always, you're spot on!!!
Go to
Oct 3, 2018 08:17:40   #
lindajoy wrote:
The message of the song~~~

A great message, Emily...


Of course Linda! No caffeine, no brain.
Go to
Oct 3, 2018 07:46:51   #
EmilyD wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp5JCrSXkJY

Somethin' happening here.


Buffalo Springfield ....1967
What am I missing.
Go to
Oct 2, 2018 09:27:35   #
1ProudAmerican wrote:
http://www.abcnews.live/2018/10/01/protesters-vandalize-kavanaughs-house-11000-damage/

The family home of Judge Brett Kavanaugh was a scene right out of a frat party gone wrong yesterday, as over 200 left-wing protesters, many wearing masks, shouted profane slogans, waved signs, and threw calendars, bricks, and bottles at the property. Kavanaugh himself was not in the residence, as he is currently in Washington for a symposium on anger management. His wife and children vacated the premisis and are currently housed in an unknown location for their own safety.


Read the rest of the story at the above addy.
http://www.abcnews.live/2018/10/01/protesters-vand... (show quote)




I just read the article and I'm still in shock. This is becoming surreal.
Go to
Oct 2, 2018 09:16:26   #
Nuclearian wrote:
Democrats in the Senate Judiciary Committee are making a lot of noise about an FBI investigation into Judge Brett Kavanaugh, claiming that if he isn't guilty of gang rape and attempted rape in his teenage years, he should join their call.

Republicans, being weaklings, caved in, thinking they can buy off Democrats with a week-long FBI probe which we all know Democrats will immediately dismiss as insufficient. We also know that they will use the delay to dredge up a bevy of other scurrilous allegations which of course, will also warrant investigations that Judge Kavanaugh himself must agree to.

Since the Democrats’ line of reasoning is that all allegations of dubious activity by anyone holding or seeking a government job should be fully investigated by the FBI, and subjects who don't agree must be assumed guilty., here are some questions for them:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, why aren’t you calling for a more complete FBI investigation into the alleged Chinese spy in your San Francisco office who served as your driver as well as a liaison to the Asian-American community in California? You say the FBI never informed you of any compromise of national security information, and that the staffer “never had access” to classified or sensitive information. But how could they know that without interviewing you and all the members of your staff? YOu have yet to call for an investigation into your own behavior, so obviously, you're guilty.

Why not just have the FBI investigate every allegation against everyone in public life? And if you object, you’re guilty. That’s how this works, right?

Or, how about you, Sen. Dick Durbin? In 2014, an investigation by the Chicago Tribune found that your wife lobbied on behalf of clients who then received federal funding you promoted. Your office announced the grants, but you claimed you did “nothing in terms of securing the money.” So, how about a full investigation to get to the bottom of the matter?

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand: In 2015, you received a gift worth nearly $500,000 from your husband’s British parents. That was more than the gross income of you and your husband that year. Your spokesperson declined to say why your in-laws gave the money or what you did with it. So, how about it? Full FBI investigation or you’re guilty of something nefarious, right?

What about you, Sen. Richard Blumenthal? You asked Judge Kavanaugh whether he knew the legal term “falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus” – false on one thing, false on all. Well, senator, you’ve stated that you served in Vietnam despite the fact that you sought multiple deferments and then signed up for the Marine Reserve to avoid going to war. That seems rather dishonest. How about the FBI checks into your comments? You know, for the sake of honesty.

And you, Sen. Cory Booker? What about an FBI investigation into an admission you made in 1992, writing for the Stanford student newspaper? You said that you groped one of your friends. “After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my mark,” you wrote. “Our groping ended soon and while no ‘relationship’ ensued, a friendship did. You see, the next week in school she told me that she was drunk that night and didn’t really know what she was doing.” Sounds just like something Spartacus would do. How about an FBI investigation into your admitted sexual assault against a drunk girl in high school?

And what about you, Sen. Kamala Harris? When you took over the California atttorney general's office you announced a statewide task force to tackle mortgage fraud. Then your mortgage fraud office did pretty much nothing. For years. So, how about an FBI investigation into what looks like a slam-dunk case of ... something.

And you, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse: According to Politico, as lawmakers closed in on a deal over a bill called the 21st Century Cures Act, you bought shares in pharmaceutical companies. You were sitting on a Senate committee overseeing health care at the time. The day president Obama signed the bill, you started selling your pharmaceutical stock. How about we have the FBI check out your phone logs?

These are just a few of the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee. We could go on, because they all seem to have something deeply disturbing to hide. But why bother? Why not just have the FBI investigate every allegation against everyone in public life? And if you object, you’re guilty. That’s how this works, right?
Democrats in the Senate Judiciary Committee are ma... (show quote)



Wow!!!
Go to
Oct 2, 2018 08:58:22   #
Pennylynn wrote:
Good luck with whatever you are planning. The only flaw in your thinking.... the President told the FBI to interview anyone they want. If the FBI finds nothing on Judge K.... then he will most probably be seated. Once he is seated, his childhood and college years mistakes can not be held against him. I bet that the democrats who are paying for the current scandal and are already searching for another prostitute.... like your girl Stormy, to come up with a story.....

BYW..... did you notice how Ford was not headlines today? By the end of the week, she will not even be a page 40 article. My bet, FBI has already found some skeletons in her closet and a few bats in her attic.
Good luck with whatever you are planning. The onl... (show quote)


Great post Penny!
Go to
Oct 1, 2018 10:05:38   #
moldyoldy wrote:
trump used charity funds to buy a picture of himself.


There's an old saying that I will try to clean up as best I can. You'll get the point.

"Your A** must really be jealous of your mouth, for all the s*** that comes out of it."
Go to
Oct 1, 2018 06:13:36   #
moldyoldy wrote:
Trump never does anything that does not benefit him. Usually, he gets others to pay.


Let me quote one of your liberal loons from Hawaii, Maizie Hirono..."Just Shut Up!"
Go to
Sep 30, 2018 16:08:24   #
Big dog wrote:
I'm still trying to get the one about the OZ characters.


Do you remember the song "if I only had a brain?". Now help me understand the chicken wings. 3 right and 3 left?
Go to
Sep 30, 2018 11:08:59   #
tbutkovich wrote:
Getting in first was an “ Act of God,” Moldus Ignoramus!


Go to
Sep 30, 2018 09:50:39   #
whitnebrat wrote:
Yeah, I know that I've said repeatedly that I hate posting in this forum, but I always find something that riles me up to overcome the "fear and loathing" that I feel for much of the invective that passes for commentary on this site. That being said ...
Here are some of the known facts re: the Kavanaugh hearing.
Fact: When the seat on the Supreme Court came open upon the death of Justice Scalia, then-President Obama proposed Merrick Garland of the 2nd Circuit for the position. The Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell of Tennessee, refused to grant Garland a hearing or even a meeting for over a year, on the premise that it was too close to a presidential election and that the American people should have a say in the selection of the next Justice.
Fact: The Federalist Society prepared a list of "highly qualified" individuals for a position on the the Supreme Court to the Trump campaign very soon after he announced his candidacy. Gorsuch was at the top of that list … Kavanaugh was not on the list at all.
Fact: When Trump assumed the presidency, the 'advise and consent' of the Senate was pushed through in record time for now-Justice Gorsuch.
Fact: When Justice Kennedy announced his retirement in July of this year, Trump proposed Justice Kavanaugh for the position. Kavanaugh had been added to the list recently.
Fact: The confirmation process was abbreviated to the point of almost no process, so as to get it done prior to the midterm election, on the premise that we cannot let a vacancy on the Supreme Court go unfilled for any significant amount of time (McConnell's words.)
Fact: FBI background checks only go back for ten years or so, which would have meant that the charges brought by the accusers would not have shown up in the report, nor any aberrant behavior in high school or college.
Fact: Republicans resisted the appearance of his accuser until public opinion forced the issue, and Christine Blasey Ford was allowed to speak to the committee.
Fact: The Republican members of the committee chose to have their questions asked by a professional prosecutor rather than have the appearance of eleven white men questioning a sexual abuse claimant.
Fact: The contrast between Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh could not have been more evident. A timid, fearful woman versus an angry, blustering lawyer/judge.
Fact: The committee was set to report the nomination out to the full Senate when Senator Flake, along with some others, stated that they could not support the appointment by the full Senate unless an additional FBI background check was done on the current accusations.
Fact: In that light, the committee chairman was forced to ask the president to task the FBI with that investigation, which was to be limited in scope and duration (one week).
Fact: The American Bar Association has rescinded their endorsement of Kavanaugh and had significant reservations back in 2006 at his first appointment.
Unverified fact: It is now reported that the FBI investigation is limited even more (in spite of the President's comments as to its breadth) to just two of the accusers, and cannot go into more general aspects of Kavanaugh's life and drinking habits during his high school and college periods.

OK, that brings us up to date on factual matters. The following is my opinion, based on the facts stated above.

First, there is misconduct on both sides going back several administrations. The sixty-vote majority requirement for federal court appointees should never have been scrapped by Harry Reid when the Republicans refused to pass any federal judgeships under Clinton and early Obama terms.
Then the misconduct of McConnell in holding open the Scalia seat without hearing or meetings for over a year flies in the face of Senate tradition and ranks as one of the boldest political moves in Senate history. It was done in the faint hope that a Republican could win the presidency, as subsequently happened. The ultimate hypocrisy of first holding the seat open and then bulldozing the next two appointments through with virtually no procedure is so blatant as to be unbelievable, had it not happened for real.

How the addition of Kavanaugh to the short list of nominees was done when he was never on the original list is still a murky proposition. It is probable that the president wanted an appointee that had expansive visions of executive power, and Kavanaugh filled that bill, having stated previously that he believed that a sitting president could neither be indicted nor investigated for any misconduct while in office. This appointee could very well rule on such investigations and indictments in the near future. Whether Kavanaugh would recuse himself on such a ruling is open to question.

The short list provided by the Federalist Society had in common the proclivity of all those on it to the reversal of Roe vs. Wade, their opposition to same sex marriage, opposition to gay rights and the expansion of discrimination carveouts for 'deeply held religious views'.

The Supreme Court appointments (and the packing of the lower courts) are the signature legacy of Senator McConnell to the conservative base. The evangelical leaders of the religious right held their noses and looked the other way, overlooking the multiple divorces and bevy of sexual misconduct claims against Trump, on the premise that he would lurch the courts significantly to the conservative side, particularly on the social issues that the religious right had been promoting for at least two generations. He, and Senator McConnell have delivered on that promise.

The massive breaches of tradition and protocol on both sides in the Kavanaugh hearing have done nothing to promote the reputation of the Senate for the better. Feinstein should never have held onto the first letter of accusation for as long as she did. That was misconduct as well. Eleven white guys on one side, and a diverse group opposing them with vehement invective flying between them.

Kavanaugh showed virtually no 'judicial temperament' during his latest testimony, while blustering, bloviating, and bombastic rhetoric seemed to be the order of the day ala Trump. It did nothing to counter his image as an entitled white aristocrat who felt that he was entitled to the appointment that he had been groomed for for much of his life.

Through some of my family ties, I have been exposed to that genre of American society, and the insulation of wealth and power cannot be understood unless you observe it first hand. It is a wall that is seldom penetrated on either side, and neither side respects nor understands the other. On the oligarch side, it is about preserving wealth and the power that their holdings bring with it. It is a 'whatever it takes' ideology to preserve that power that is foremost in their minds at all times. It is evidenced in few ways better than to look at the almost all-male, all-white, all rich Augusta Golf Club that holds the Master's Tournament every year. These are the movers and shakers of American Society much as Mar-a-lago reflects the rich and famous strata of our culture that is insulated by armed guards and floors full of lawyers plus politicians in their pocket.

I am not knocking the status of people that achieve what wealth they can accumulate through hard work and application. But what the Kavanaugh nomination has exposed is the vast gulf between the inherited/entitled status of some individuals and the situations of the vast majority of the citizens of the United States. Most of the entitled strata never had to work a real job in their lives; never got fired; never had to stand in line for a driver's license; and never had to apply for unemployment insurance. There is just no understanding of the common citizen's existence.

If Kavanaugh is appointed, I predict the following:
===> Roe vs. Wade will be either eliminated entirely or will be so undercut as to be virtually dead. Back-alley abortions will again be the norm in many parts of the country, with the ensuing death of many hundreds of women due to complications.
===> Same sex marriage will be reverted back to the states, whereupon a major battle over whether one state has to recognize the same-sex marriage of another state will ensue.
===> Major carveouts for 'deeply held religious views' will be allowed, thus deepening the discrimination against sexual and racial minorities.
===> The expansion of executive power in the Presidency, with consequent virtual autocracy residing in the White House.
===> Trump will be allowed to terminate the Mueller probe and bury it, thus absolving himself from any potential guilt of any kind.

In short, we (the un-entitled masses) all stand to lose.
That's my opinion … your mileage will vary, I'm sure.
Yeah, I know that I've said repeatedly that I hate... (show quote)




Your "FACTS" brat are so skewed w/liberal bias it was laughable.
And with all due respect, your opinion held no concern to me.
Go to
Sep 30, 2018 08:52:41   #
glibona wrote:
Yeah... I was a little surprised too that Judge Jeanine seem to echo the same sentiment you refer to... much too gratuitous in assuming the something that happened was of a sexual nature... more likely what has happened to Ford during the last 36 yrs. is the diligent and distructive practice of Leftism, plain and obvious IMO.


I couldn't agree more.
It will be wonderful when the country can get past this debacle. Confirm the man and let's move on! Linda was right in her post that there are many things we could be focusing on, but SCOTUS outcome will impact our country for decades to come, along with the outcome in November. World affairs will matter little if we lose our country. Agree?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 126 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.