One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: teaman
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 75 next>>
Sep 5, 2017 14:07:52   #
WOW! Fine outstanding citizens. You do understand that you must be born here or enter legally to become a citizen. I don't care one little bit if they are good people while here....THEY ARE STILL ILLEGAL. I want you to think about just how it would be if you enter their respective Nation ILLEGALLY......look it up!!

It is extremely hard enough for "real" citizens of our Nation to exist and make a living, yet we continue to allow trash to enter our Nation and give them all kinds of freebees at hard working taxpayers expense.

There is absolutely Know excuse for this crap and it must stop.
Go to
Sep 5, 2017 13:36:00   #
I am so sick of this bleeding heart liberal crap about DACA. As a life long "TRUE" Christian, it is not the United States responsibility to save the world. That's the job of my savior Jesus. All this passion pouring out for these ""ILLEGALS"" and don't misunderstand, for I know many were to young to know what their parents were doing(maybe). Never-the-Les, they are still ""ILLEGAL"" and their parents, along with their children, should be sent back to their respective countries.

WHERE IS THE PASSION FOR THOSE WHO CAME TO OUR NATION THE LEGAL AND PROPER WAY, AFTER YEARS OF APPLYING AND THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS SPENT. Now, the perverted communist driven left desire is to allow anyone to come in to our Nation and it doesn't matter how. WHAT A SLAP TO THE FACE OF ALL LEGAL ENTRIES!!

With the announcement that President Trump is winding down Obama’s amnesty program, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), the media is once again leading the “resistance” to this policy change with their biased coverage against it.

The MSM is already rallying to the cause and featuring the sob stories of some of the people who could be affected in the most sympathetic light while portraying anyone against DACA as evil and inhumane. It is all meant to tug on the heartstrings and get Americans all riled up to pressure Congress to extend DACA.

Don’t be fooled! The DACA picture is not all valedictorians on track to become brain surgeons while riding unicorns on rainbows like they want you to believe on TV.

In fact, it was just reported a week ago that revocation of DACA status due to criminal and gang activity has gone up 30% under President Trump. That’s thousands of people who were approved under President Obama and shouldn’t have even been in the country.

According to USCIS, “Most DACA terminations were based on the following infractions (not ranked): alien smuggling, assaultive offenses, domestic violence, drug offenses, DUI, larceny and thefts, criminal trespass and burglary, sexual offenses with minors, other sex offenses and weapons offenses.”

There are some horrific examples of DREAMers turning into nightmares. Here are 5 DREAMers who have been charged with or convicted of committing heinous acts that the media doesn’t want to talk about.

Three come from the Daily Caller.

First is Salvador Diaz-Garcia, who allegedly raped a 19-year old woman in Seattle apartment.

Second is Oliver Funes-Machado, who was charged with – I still can’t believe this – “beheading his own mother” back in March. Originally from Honduras, Funes-Machado had DACA status at the time of the crime.

Third is Emmanual Jesus Rangel-Hernandez, who received DACA status despite having drug charges and known gang affiliation. Afterwards, he was charged with four counts of murder.

Senator Grassley highlighted two other egregious cases. The first concerns Edgar Covarrubias-Padilla, who was charged with distributing child pornography. Mr. Covarrubias-Padilla applied for and was granted DACA. He was eventually charged with four felonies, including “possession and distribution of more than 600 child porn images and a charge for lewd and lascivious act with a child under 14.”

It gets worse. According to Senator Grassley, last January Francisco Rios-Covarrubias was charged for the alleged sex trafficking of a 3-yr-old girl in Arizona. Rios-Covarrubias allegedly “duct-taped the girl’s mouth, hands, arms and legs, and confined her to a closet, where she was found covered in human feces.” The police thankfully rescued her. Rios-Covarrubias was eventually charged with four felonies, including “kidnapping, sexual conduct with a minor, felony child abuse, and sex trafficking.”

Rios-Covarrubias was a DACA beneficiary.

I wonder how much that part of the story will be heard amidst all the liberal gnashing of teeth this week over DACA.

Probably none of it. But I can be a dreamer, too.

http://thepoliticalinsider.com/trump-daca-crimes-committed-dreamers/?utm_content=1618d0568d4f0b4aa6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI&utm_campaign=TPI_Morning_Newsletter_9_5_17&utm_source=TPI-Newsletter-9-5-17-morning&utm_medium=email
Go to
Sep 1, 2017 09:51:34   #
The Red Cross has been around for many years, but as a retired VET, I can promise you they are not all they claim to be. You will find them located on just about every base especially overseas. In these places, they will run their business as a prophet. As the article implies, do your homework and be careful. In my mind, at least all charities should be giving 85 to 90%.

Days after former President Barack Obama urged his Twitter followers to assist the victims of Hurricane Harvey by donating to the Red Cross, multiple reports re-emerged suggesting donating to the humanitarian organization might not be the wisest option.

Thank you to all the first responders and people helping each other out. That's what we do as Americans. Here's one way you can help now.

— Barack Obama (@BarackObama) August 27, 2017

NPR pointed out that according to a 2016 study released by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, the Red Cross bungled its response to the 2010 Haiti earthquake, wasting at least a quarter of donations on internal expenses alone.

Meanwhile, a 2015 investigation by ProPublica revealed that though the Red Cross claimed to have built 130,000 homes in Haiti with the half a billion dollars it raised, the humanitarian organization only built six.

“Confidential memos, emails from worried top officers, and accounts of a dozen frustrated and disappointed insiders show the charity has broken promises, squandered donations, and made dubious claims of success,” ProPublica reported.

The Red Cross also reportedly mishandled its response to the 2015 California wildfires, “showing up unequipped and unprepared, shutting down other volunteer operations, and then failing to provide promised food or shelter on its own,” according to Slate.

Advertisement - story continues below

Similar mishaps were reported to have occurred after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Sandy.

During an appearance Wednesday on NPR’s Morning Edition, Red Cross executive Brad Kieserman only added to the concerns by refusing to specify what percentage of each dollar donated to the organization goes to relief efforts.

“Yeah, I don’t think I know the answer to that any better than the chief fundraiser knows how many, how much it costs to put a volunteer downrange for a week and how many emergency response vehicles I have on the road today,” he told host Ailsa Chang.

When pressed by Chang about reports Red Cross spent only 25 percent of donated funds during the Haiti crisis, Kieserman continued to deflect, claiming he lacks “visibility” vis-à-vis the organization’s finances.

Some have suggested it would be better to donate to churches and local charities.

Before you send money to the Red Cross (my advice: don't) re Texas read ProPublica's advice on disaster charity.

— Dan Gillmor (@dangillmor) August 27, 2017

People looking to donate should “(t)ake the time to read up on” the group and “demand meaningful transparency,” ProPublica said.

“(I)f you’re willing to put in a bit of time, you can be a more informed donor and increase the chances that your money will reach those in need.”

https://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-recommends-people-help-hurricane-victims-donating-scandal-ridden-charity/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=romulusconstitution&utm_campaign=can&utm_content=2017-09-01
Go to
Aug 31, 2017 09:47:30   #
So, when the hell is Trump going to drain the Swamp? Just about every agency is corrupt and the IRS is the worst. We the people want this crap to change!

A liberal news outlet waited just four months before a federal agency gave it more than 1,000 pages of a Republican’s emails, while conservative groups’ requests have been ignored for years, according to documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group.

Records show the Federal Election Commission (FEC) reviewed more than 4,400 pages of emails related to a Freedom Information Act (FOIA) request filed by Andy Kroll, a reporter with the liberal news outlet Mother Jones. Kroll sought all emails Don McGahn sent between July 2008 through September 2013 while he was an FEC commissioner.

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

The FEC received Kroll’s request Jan. 30, 2017, and released more than 1,000 pages of McGahn’s emails in June. McGahn became White House counsel 10 days before the request was received.

FOIA requestors can ask for priority handling for particular newsworthy or time-sensitive documents, but Kroll did not ask for such treatment, records show. He did not receive the records in time for use in an April article and has not published any stories using information from this FOIA request, the Mother Jones Washington Bureau Chief told TheDCNF.

Meanwhile, the FEC hasn’t released records related to 17 FOIA requests filed more than three years ago, many of which were submitted by conservative groups, including some seeking documents on taxpayer- and foreign-funded travel by Democratic commissioners.

The National Republican Lawyers Association, for example, filed the oldest outstanding request six years ago, seeking correspondence between the Democratic FEC commissioners and outside groups.

Additionally, conservative group or officials with such organizations filed eight of the 10 next oldest outstanding FOIA requests, all of which are more than four years old. The Government Accountability Institute filed five of those, and Judicial Watch and American Center for Law & Justice officials each filed one.

Bill McGinley, the present White House cabinet secretary, filed one in July 2013 while working at the law firm Patton Boggs.

The descriptions in the FEC’s FOIA log were typically too vague to determine how complex those requests are. More recent requests, however, are more clear.

A Fox News FOIA request sought records on FEC commissioners’ travel, while The Wall Street Journal requested travel documents for just one official over for a less-than-two-year period. Both were requested in 2015.

More recently, Rudy Takala – an editor with The Hill who was a Washington Examiner reporter at the time – has only received some documents in response to an October 2016 FOIA request. He asked for a number of documents, including a list of the staff who went to either the Republican or Democratic national conventions, which he still hasn’t received.

Cause of Action Institute filed a lawsuit against the FEC for records on Takala’s behalf on Aug. 23. Similarly, the Center for Public Integrity has sued the FEC three times in two years for failing to comply with FOIA requests.

“The FEC has not been able to provide me with a handful of receipts from commissioners who attended the presidential nominating conventions more than a year ago, but it was able to review more than 4,400 of Don McGahn’s emails within a matter of months,” Takala told TheDCNF. “It’s hard to think of any credible way to explain that discrepancy. A reasonable person could certainly be led to believe that the agency is responding to FOIA requests selectively.”

The FEC did quickly provide TheDCNF with records cited in this story. The requests, however, sought two specific documents amounting to 17 pages.

“We don’t comment on matters that could be connected with pending litigation,” FEC spokeswoman Judith Ingram told TheDCNF.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/08/31/feds-quickly-release-trump-lawyers-emails-liberal-group-bury-dem-records-years-531208
Go to
Aug 30, 2017 17:44:06   #
"Antifa" have become the face of the violent resistance against the Donald Trump presidency, and while their name stands for anti-fascist,” “fascists against fascism” may be more apt.

After all, they truly are what they claim to oppose. The intentions they claim to have don't matter - their actions do. Once you realize that everyone to the political right of Joseph Stalin is designated a "Nazi" to the kooks in Antifa, you realize that nobody is safe. After all, they don’t seem to have trouble attacking anyone who isn’t part of their group.

http://thepoliticalinsider.com/antifa-chart-nazis-comparison/?utm_content=1618d0568d4f0b4aa6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI&utm_campaign=TPI_Afternoon_Newsletter_8_30_17&utm_source=TPI-Newsletter-8-30-17-afternoon&utm_medium=email


Go to
Aug 30, 2017 09:47:07   #
I am truly amazed when I see an article like this. I am 74 and I have bee stating these same concerns since I was a young man. I am not a passive Christian, as many are today, and I have always stood up for my faith and I don't 'hold' my tongue. My Savior, Jesus, was NOT a passive man and he stood tall against everything bad in his day. He never hilt his tongue either. If we, as TRUE Christians don't stand, we are finished. Remember, as the article states, "FAITH WITHOUT WORKS IS DEAD"!

Around 1900, progressives set out to change America from the free republic it was originally established as into a socialist nation where an elite class of people would be able to suppress and control the entire population. They knew that the American people would reject their ideology and attempts at that time. There were several obstacles that had to be overcome in order to make their plan work. They had to find a way to undermine and remove the two strongest obstacles – the strong Christian foundation and the strong family structure. At that time, the progressives understood that it would have be a slow and steady erosion of those foundations and agreed that it would probably take at least 100 years to accomplish.

One of their first objectives was take over the public education of America’s kids, and even that had to be a slow and steady process. They knew that if they had control of your kids for 6-8 hours a day, 5 days a week, 9 months a year for 12 years, that they could pretty much mold your kids into being the way they wanted them to be, not the way parents wanted them to be.

Take a look at today’s public-school system and you will see that they have succeeded in that task. Today’s schools teach there is no God and you don’t have to listen or obey your parents. They are taught that they only person they need to worry about is themselves and they are accountable to no one except the government.

Progressives have been using the public education system to undermine the family structure that once helped to make America strong. Pastor John MacArthur touched on this in his response to a question about Charlottesville. He stated:

“God put fathers and mothers in a family to bring a rod to discipline people in order to subdue their evil. If the family is destroyed and the family breaks down, then you have no control over those people. So, conscience can’t function because the moral law has been literally destroyed; families don’t function so there is no discipline learned, there is no sense of what is right, what is acceptable behavior.”

A post out of Australia also speaks about the breakdown of the family unit and how same-sex marriage laws are helping to destroy the family structure and lead to the decay of a nation. Even though the post deals with what is happening in Australia, it also applies to what has and is happening here in the United States. That post states:

“Some people, like the Liberal Party’s federal president Nick Greiner, don’t think we should be allowed to discuss the consequences to freedom of speech and for what children are taught about sex and gender at school.”

“They say talking about radical LGBTIQ sex education, which has become compulsory in countries that have redefined marriage, is conflating the issue.”

‘But being told you can’t talk about consequences of redefining marriage is a bit like trying to have a debate about renewable energy targets and not being allowed to talk about the impact on electricity prices.”

“The intellectual gymnastics required and the leave pass from normal scrutiny the same-sex marriage political agenda enjoys never ceases to amaze me.”

“If ever we wanted proof that freedom of speech is at risk by the same-sex marriage political movement, it is in us being continually told what we are not allowed to talk about in the debate…”

“Under same-sex marriage the state will be obliged to lift the prohibition on commercial surrogacy so two “gay married” men can acquire babies. It will be obliged to ensure sperm donor anonymity in defiance of the rights of the child to know the identity and love of their father.”

“Again, intellectual gymnastics are required to gloss over inconvenient truths in this debate.”

Thanks to Barack Obama and the Democrats, much of the agenda set forth to change America over 100 years ago has come to fruition in the past 8 years, and legalizing and legitimizing same-sex marriage is playing a key role in that conversion.

As long as more and more Americans turn their back on God and His statutes, including marriage between one man and one woman, America will continue to slide into the abyss of socialism and the loss of everything good, wholesome and moral we once knew.

https://greatamericanpolitics.com/2017/08/legalizing-sex-marriage-undermining-americas-foundation/
Go to
Aug 29, 2017 17:23:11   #
Look it up butt lick!!!

no propaganda please wrote:
LIES lies lies-tell me great little and big lies, I, as a progressive, will believe those that support our socialist cause.
Go to
Aug 29, 2017 09:22:44   #
Obumer and his thugs will never stop their lying!

When it comes to the gullibility of the average social media user, it’s not surprising to see fake news spread like the wind.

A recent example of this was a photo of former President Barack Obama allegedly serving food in Texas, which continues to feel the catastrophic effects of Hurricane Harvey.

The caption stated, “Something you’ll never see trump do: Obama is in Texas serving meals!”

"This Obama photo, doing the rounds after Harvey, is actually from 2015"

— Larry Elder (@larryelder) August 29, 2017

The problem is, the photo is from 2015 of the then-first family serving Thanksgiving dinner at a homeless shelter.

An account under the name Aiden Benjamin — described as a “parody account for laughs” under the profile — tweeted the photo, before later deleting it and offering an apology.

I took down the tweet of obama, I apologize to people who thought it was real. also to @callrail I apologize!

— Aiden Benjamin (@Feisal_Hagi) August 28, 2017

With Americans seemingly bored out of their minds, spreading false information is as easy as a PhotoShop app and a social media account.

An example of this is another Harvey-related photo making the rounds that features a SHARK superimposed on a flooded Texas freeway — it has been shared almost 59,000 times.

Believe it or not, this is a shark on the freeway in Houston, Texas. #HurricaneHarvy pic.twitter.com/ANkEiEQ3Y6

— Jason Michael (@Jeggit) August 28, 2017

Turns out, the individual behind the photo wasn’t above calling out his own prank:

When America is this easy to troll with #FakeNews we should all be worried.

— Jason Michael (@Jeggit) August 28, 2017

Thankfully, there are still a few adept social media users out there who can spot a fugazi… here’s a sampling of responses to the Obama photo from Twitter:

Fake news!

— T L Osborne (@TLOsborne1) August 29, 2017

What Texas would this be? It must be winter time at that other Texas.

— john garisek (@tfromc) August 29, 2017

The alternate Texas in the leftist, marxists, socialists alternate universe

— Orin Kenneth Taylor (@OrinKenneth) August 29, 2017

O was nowhere to be seen during 8/16 historic floods Baton Rouge. No HRC. Only Trump came to give $$ & hand out supplies. #MAGA

— becky decker (@beckydecker8) August 29, 2017

— Mona Hart (@cbigpic1) August 29, 2017

Next the liberal fake media will use a Obama vacation photo at a swimming pool to suggest he even rescued drowning hurricane victims!

— Ben Cady (@MaleWithHeart) August 29, 2017

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/08/29/trump-haters-gleefully-share-photo-obama-helping-hurricane-victims-texas-realize-530591
Go to
Aug 25, 2017 16:48:48   #
You have some good points but mostly you are wrong. The Antifa crowd is all about "FREE STUFF" at hard working taxpayers expense. Their Mantra is, if we don't get what we want, we will kill you or do our best to destroy 'your' Nation not ours. This bunch is also about living just any way they want without any controls and that is why they are going after police....no police, you can rob and kill whomever with no backlash!

You need to watch this video if you desire the real answer and TRUTH: https://www.facebook.com/JohnMacArthurGTY/videos/10155701092376602/

straightUp wrote:
I want to take a moment to issue my opinion about the role the Antifa takes in what appears to be a rise in violent confrontations between Americans. I don't personally know anyone who is associated with Antifa and to be honest, I don't know much about the organization, other than the fact that they consider themselves anti-fascist, which I am too but are they really helping the current resistance to fascism?

I have two separate reactions to the recent fuss over Antifa depending on the argument I am responding too.

To those on the right, who seem to jump at the chance to make Antifa the centerpeice of blame or a distraction from the antics of white supremacy groups. I say this... If you're going to promote bigotry and hatred, don't be surprised if you get some backsplash.

To those on the left, who support Antifa, I say this... Chill out.

As frustrating as the current government might be, it is still bound by a functioning framework of laws so it's not too late to leverage that constitutional system. In fact it's this system of laws that has so far stopped every white nationalist aspect of Trump's agenda in it's tracks. What the resistance needs is more emphasis on laws and local politics. A good example of resistance is the ACLU, an organization viciously hated by the right *because* they are so effective. And the ACLU is effective because they focus on our system of laws. Whenever you hear someone on the right saying "the liberals are destroying America", they are almost always describing their frustration (whether they know it or not) over ACLU victories within the context of our constitutional framework.

In contrast, Antifa is totally counterproductive. I *do* understand the frustration young Americans are feeling toward Trump and the white nationalists and the attraction of confronting them. I understand the feeling that you just want to beat the living shit out them. But this is the sentiment we hear being expressed by right-wing extremists about liberals, Jews, blacks and... well anyone who isn't a white nationalist. Do we really want to stoop to the same level? ...it's not a winning strategy.

Noam Chomsky recently described Antifa as a "major gift to the Right, including the militant Right, who are exuberant." Indeed they are because every time we accuse right-wing extremism of violence or intolerance, they have the ability to accuse the left-wing of the same thing and in the tiny minds that seem to gravitate to the extremes, one sin is a good excuse for another. So why give them such an easy pitch?

I'm not saying there will never be a point where violence *IS* the answer and I will admit that Antifa is a nice reminder that plenty of Americans are willing to confront the fascism of the white national movement but I don't think we've reached a point yet where we've run out of better alternatives. I think we need to give the constitutional system a little more faith because so far it's proving to be the better strategy.

Leave the violence to the fascists on the right and let the law handle it. Recognize the self-defeating nature of their violence. Look at Ruby Ridge, Waco and any of their idiot "stand-offs" did they win ANY of them? Look where their violence got them in Charlottesville... They went in with the intention of preserving one statue of Robert E. Lee and because of their violence (specifically, the murder of an American citizen) they came out loosing something like 19 different Confederate monuments throughout the country. That's what you call a backfire.

This is why the alt-right is loosing the America they want, because groups like the ACLU keep winning legal battles in the system, where the less-capable alt-right depends on public outrage to drive the battle which often results in violations of the legal system and guaranteed defeat.

We should try to keep it that way, at least while we still have a functioning constitutional system.
I want to take a moment to issue my opinion about ... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 25, 2017 16:37:47   #
Best speech and answer I have seen in a while;

https://www.facebook.com/JohnMacArthurGTY/videos/10155701092376602/
Go to
Aug 24, 2017 22:39:40   #
Why should you care? It's not your money, and those that have can spend their money anyway they like. Money talks and shit walks....I have heard that all my life. I never became rich but I still made a good life for my self and family. Stop this whiney cry baby crap about another's good fortune, wither earned or not. If you want to be rich, WORK for it or perhaps win the lottery, but stop worrying about those with money getting all the attention. Don't you know, the best people in this world are those who work hard, provide for their families, and stay out of the lime light!

Floyd Brown wrote:
But where is all of the Wealth ending up. The measuring stick of life is the numbers each has.
We live in a system that marks the measure of a man not in good deeds but in the number of zero's behind his net worth.
Those with the most zero's seem to have the most input over the out come of what is happening.

You may convince each other that your way is best but history is proving you wrong. Most of you are just failures in life.
Go to
Aug 24, 2017 22:10:16   #
Something I forgot to mention in my last post, Obumer WILL NEVER be considered a great president accept with lefty turds like you. Trump, with all of his faults, is one million times better than Obumer....EVER!! He has absolutely NO accomplishments.....well, maybe kicking around the goff course but never improving his game. Spending millions on vacations and increasing our debt by 5 trillion.
Now, to your post here; Yes he did talk about Mexicans and Muslim ILLEGALS. But he never put down any non-white groups, and you claim is, as usual, a LIE. The only racists in our Nation right now are dummycrats(which is natural, with years of experience), lefty perverts, black panthers, NAACP and the dummycratily owned KKK. This crap is not about hating COLOR but it's about hating that which you whiney babies want and can't have, FREE 'everything' anyway you can get it. How much is George Soros-ass paying you these days. Fact is, why don't you go move to Venezuela, a true progessive country!!

One last thought; What do the top ten cities with the highest poverty rate all have in common?
DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP!
Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn’t elected
a Republican mayor since 1961;
Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn’t elected one since 1954;
Cincinnati, OH (3rd)… since 1984;
Cleveland, OH (4th)… since 1989;
Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican Mayor;
St. Louis, MO (6th)…. since 1949;
El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican Mayor;
Milwaukee, WI (8th)… since 1908;
Philadelphia, PA (9th)… since 1952;
Newark, NJ (10th)… since 1907.
Einstein once said, “The definition of insanity is doing
the same thing over and over again and always
expecting different results.”



Alicia wrote:
**************************
Perhaps you didn't notice (or chose to ignore) but upon his declaration for the position, 45 began his opening speech with a condemnation of Mexicans. Then he went on to Muslims and then to any non-white group. It was he who, through his speeches, gave permission for the biased people following him (I wonder why they are following him now). It's pretty obvious, reading through posters on this forum, who are most prejudiced. They are the ones who refer to race and color and use the words PUNK. 45 (I can't consider him a president) still favors the white supremacists. He knows it's not getting him more followers and so he changes the same speech and whines at how misunderstood he is. He is dangerous and you, his followers, will soon discover how much. And I will say, "I told you so!"
************************** br Perhaps you didn't n... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 24, 2017 17:56:28   #
I feel sorry for you cause you are totally lost in the perverted left bullshit. Here is a little history for you;

More lies from democrats (aka the party of the KKK) on this thread. 
 
Here is a quick history of civil rights in this country. 
13th Amd - Abolishing Slavery - R 100% - D 23% 
14th Amd - Freed the slaves - R 94% - D 0% 
15th Amd - Right to vote for all races - R 100% - D 0% 
Civil Rights Act of 1875 - Anti Discrimination R 99% - D 0% 
Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Anti Discrimination R 92% - D 54% 
Civil Rights Act of 1960 - Anti Discrimination R 93% - D 68% 
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Anti Discrimination R 80% - D 63% 
 
The only party that constantly opposed civil rights for blacks was the Democrat party. The only party that fought for the rights of blacks was the Republican party. The idea that racist democrats switched parties is illogical and historically inaccurate. 
 
The truth is that every Democrat that voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act (And there were many), with one exception, died a democrat. It is also true that those seats remained in democrat control for an average of 23 years. The idea that the south became Republican in 1965 is a complete lie. Here is a list of the 21 senators who voted against the 1964 CRA.. .the number at the end is how long their seats stayed in democrat hands.  
 
D - Joe Hill - AL - 17 
D - John Sparkman - AL - 33 
D - James Fulbright (Bill Clintons mentor) - AR - 46 
D - John McClellan - AR - 33 
D - Spessard Holland - FL - 25 
D - George Smathers - FL - 5 
D - Herman Talmage - GA - 17 
D - Richard Russell - GA - 39 
D - Allen Ellender - LA - 40 
D - Russell Long - LA - 41 
D - James Eastland - MS - 14 
D - John Stennis - MS - 25 
D - Benjamin Jordan - NC - 9 
D - Samuel Ervin - NC - 17 
D - Olin Johnston - SC - 41 
D - Herbert Walters - TN - 3 
D - Al Gore Sr. (Al's dad) - TN - 7 
D - Absalom Robertson - VA - 9 
D - Harry Byrd, Sr. - VA - 19 
D - Robert Byrd (KKK Member) - WV - 49



saltwind 78 wrote:
teaman, It is rare that I read such BS as this. Get real, the Democratic Party is an organization that lead the civil rights movement while the Republicans were standing around with their fingers up their nose. The real goal of every Republican is to keep on giving money to the filthy rich, while reducing benefits to the poor and middle class. The KKK hasn't been involved with the Democratic Party for decades and decades. Just look at how David Duke kept on cozying up to Trump!
Who gives a tinker's damn about the white side of Obama's background? On his worst day, he was a million times better than Trump, both Bushes, Nixon and Reagan put together.
Many think that the UN is no longer an important organization for peace, and I certainly have problems with many thing that they do. They are a useful sounding board for listening what many other countries are saying. They did condemn that maniac in North Korea for their threats and their development of nukes and delivery systems. They have no voice in our government in any case.
teaman, It is rare that I read such BS as this. Ge... (show quote)


Go to
Aug 24, 2017 17:10:06   #
The UN is absolutely the worst organization in the world today, with one exception.....the dummycratic party that has pushed racism for 200 years. They own the KKK and they elected Obumer, who's white side owned slaves. If anybody could have solved our racial problem, it should have been him. He could have brought us together better than anyone. But all he did was race bate and push perverted life styles. Shut down the UN......NOW!!!

A United Nations Committee responsible for combating racism globally issued an “early warning” for the United States, citing a growth in “alarming racism” trends.

Anastasia Crickley, chairwoman of U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), issued a statement Tuesday in response to the violence that erupted in Charlottesville, Virginia, Aug. 12 during a white nationalist rally.

“We are alarmed by the racist demonstrations, with overtly racist slogans, chants and salutes by white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and the Ku Klux Klan, promoting white supremacy and inciting racial discrimination and hatred,” Crickley said.

Advertisement - story continues below
Related Stories

Breaking: CIA Insider Reveals Billion-Dollar Operation to Take Down Trump
Trump Ditches Obama’s Changes to WH, Now Epic Photoshoot Shows the Difference
Bikers For Trump Hit Phoenix… Libs Enraged When 1 Photo Starts Making The Rounds

According to Stock Board Asset, the early warning from the UN is rare and has been issued in the past prior to civil conflicts.

The warning has only been issued a few time in the past 10 years, where it came for places like Burundi, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan and Nigeria.

“In a decision issued under its ‘early warning and urgent action’ procedure, the Committee, which monitors implementation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, stated ‘there should be no place in the world for racist white supremacist ideas or any similar ideologies that reject the core human rights principles of human dignity and equality,'” Crickley said.

Advertisement - story continues below

She continued: “In addition to the criminal investigation of the individual who ploughed his car into a crowd of peaceful protesters killing a woman, the UN experts asked the US authorities to undertake concrete measures “to address the root causes of the proliferation of such racist manifestations.”

The early warning from the UN is not only rare, but it echoes talking points from Democrats that President Donald Trump has not adequately disavowed white nationalists and neo-Nazis.

Trump has been criticized in the mainstream media for not sufficiently condemning white nationalists and racists even though he has issued a slew statements since the tragic events, starting with the day they took place.

Trump also denounced hate groups Aug. 14 during an announcement from the White House, specifically calling out the hate groups.

Advertisement - story continues below
Trending Stories

1996 Photo of Black Woman and Nazi Shows How a True American Handles Hatred
Breaking: Bannon Set for Massive Move to Replace Fox… Billionaire Backer in Place
Watch: Trump Grabs Marine’s Cap, Pulls Move We Haven’t Seen for 8 Years

“Racism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans,” Trump said.

As Trump made extremely clear after the tragic event, Americans must come first. If the mainstream media and Democrats would stop trying to divide people, we could come together as one nation.

For an organization as corrupt as the United Nations to start attacking the United States, which has done more to root out racism than virtually any country on earth, is beyond an insult.

It could well be the first step toward an actual attack on liberties Americans hold dear — like the freedom of speech.

It could be dangerous.

http://conservativetribune.com/un-issues-measures-to-us/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=conservative-50
Go to
Aug 21, 2017 11:41:45   #
Oregon has now become a total depraved piece of crap lower than Whale poop!! Even lower than the depraved state of Californication!!

WHERE'S THE LAWSUITS????

Proving just how abhorrent the pro-abortion left has become, Oregon Gov. Kate Brown has signed a bill into law requiring all state insurers to provide free abortions for everyone, including illegal aliens:

The $10.2 million Reproductive Health Equity Act includes $500,000 for abortions for the estimated 22,873 women who would be eligible for the Oregon Health Plan, the state’s Medicaid program, “except for their immigration status.”

Under the first-of-its-kind law, most of which goes into effect immediately, Oregon insurers must provide 100 percent coverage for abortions without co-pays or deductibles.

Those covered by Providence Health Care, a nonprofit Catholic health care provider, and the only Oregon insurance company that does not cover abortions, will have expenses reimbursed by the state.

Unsurprisingly, members of the pro-abortion movement praised the law:

Of course, Planned Parenthood helped draw up the bill; and, in effect, the law is nothing more than a government bailout for the organization. Four Oregon Planned Parenthood facilities have shut down in recent years due to a 15 percent decrease in abortions from 2011 to 2014. Nationally, Planned Parenthood client visits have declined from 3 million to 2.4 million.

The fact that Planned Parenthood clinics are shuttering across the country due to a drop in abortions certainly calls into question the liberal talking point that Planned Parenthood provides so much more than abortions.

But Gayle Attenberry, the executive director of Oregon Right to Life, said Oregon’s new law is sure to increase the abortion rate:

“Oregon taxpayers already cover nearly 50 percent of all abortions in the state whether they like it or not,” said Ms. Atteberry. “By making abortion free, this percentage will inevitably increase. We also expect more late-term abortions, which are currently very expensive as well as risky to perform. All completely covered by either insurance companies or by the Oregon taxpayers.”

Just disgusting.

If pro-abortion advocates want to donate a portion of their paychecks to help women abort their babies, that’s their decision. But the government – state or federal – should not force pro-life taxpayers to surrender their money to fund something to which they are morally opposed. As Republican state Rep. Bill Post wrote on Facebook, “Oregon should be ashamed and embarrassed.”

http://thepoliticalinsider.com/oregon-free-abortion/?utm_content=1618d0568d4f0b4aa6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI&utm_campaign=TPI_Morning_Newsletter_8_21_17&utm_source=TPI-Newsletter-8-21-17-morning&utm_medium=email
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 75 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.