One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: arapaho
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Jan 7, 2018 22:15:37   #
lindajoy wrote:
Still can’t come clean and answer the question.. Lololol you should stop while your ahead.... Your deflection so typical of you and your ilk it’s comical at this point...

Projection. Again the question actually is what did you mean by the term "supermodel"?
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 22:09:01   #
Airforceone wrote:
Trump lawyers will not allow him to give a deposition. They know him and he is a pathological liar. Trump likes to brag about winning he doesn’ Win he settles out of court without admission of guilt. He does it all the time. This guy has had 3,200 law suites. Trump Quote: that’s not unusual for a company his size. Another lie a survey of 5 major real estate developers around this country and they added up all there law suites and the 5 combined still did not equal Trumps law suites.

He consistently has got caught lying on the witness stand. I have researched a number of his courtroom appearances. I can guarantee that Trump is his own personal enemy because he is a pathological liar.

If he gets subpoena by Muellar that man is done.
Trump lawyers will not allow him to give a deposit... (show quote)

Trump is indeed "done" because eventually the Special Counsel will force him to testify.

As for his lawsuits, the main job of a General Counsel is to avoid trial courts. The primary tool to accomplish that is depositions so that both sides become aware of strengths and weaknesses in each side's case. Trump does not dare be deposed, so everyone jumps at the chance to sue him. The only way out is pay up or bankruptcy.

Some "deal maker". We can just imagine were Trump would be if not for laundering Russian money!
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 21:42:20   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Hello, anybody home?

Ohhh, you copied that stuff from other equally wacky wingnuts.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 21:03:27   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
WTF? Who said anything about emulating China or Saudi Arabia. Every nation on earth guards its borders, some much better than others. But, look what the libs have done here. They've shut down all border security fire walls, torn down the barricades, pulled the guards off their posts and rolled the fucking red carpets out to every corner of the world.

"Oh yeah, y'all just come right on in, we don't care where you are from or what you intend to do when you get here. We don't care if that's a burka or a bomb in your backpack--but if you have a Bible, stay the hell out. We don't care what language you speak or even if you speak at all, we don't care if you can read or write or do arithmetic, just come on in and we'll fix you up. We'll put a roof over your head, give you a fistful of plastic cards so you can eat, go to school, drive a car, see a doctor. Because, you see we have these knuckle dragging neanderthals who call themselves American citizens, ignorant fools who work their asses off making money to shelter, clothe, feed, educate and entertain their families, and we, your Big Sugar Daddy, take as much of their money as we can get our hands on, we'd take it all if we could, but that might not work out too well. So we tax the shit out of them to feed our insatiable need for power and control and we will give all you poor little ferners the crumbs off our table. All we ask in return is that you VOTE DEMOCRAT. Helluva deal."
WTF? Who said anything about emulating China or Sa... (show quote)

Was it fun making up your dishonest set of lies?
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 20:59:13   #
lindajoy wrote:
I thought I’d add this to the thread and your it’s here seems a good place to put it ...
A tweet war~~ Lolol

The article was written by Dr. Michael Mann, a professor of atmospheric science at Penn State University. Mann argues that heavy lake effect snows this year near the Great Lakes are a sign of global warming because the warming temperatures cause the lakes to stay warmer longer therefore producing more snow. He also argued that despite the recent cold snap, the U.S. has seen many more days of very above normal temperatures than very below normal temperatures over the past several years.

He also argued that despite the central and eastern U.S. being locked into an arctic cold pattern for more than a week, the western U.S. and much of the rest of the world has been warm. Mann also blamed last week’s major east coast snowstorm on warmer-than-normal ocean water.

These allegations, however, are more narrative and opinion rather than fact, according to meteorologist Joe Bastardi.

What did Bastardi say?

Bastardi challenged whether the recent cold has anything to do with climate change, saying cold in the 1980’s was colder than this year’s recent cold snap and it was never connected to climate change or global warming. Bastardi also questioned whether or not the upcoming thaw is connected to climate change.

After four tweets, Bastardi concluded by chiding Gore and other climate change alarmists about pursuing narrative over truth.


Joe Bastardi

@BigJoeBastardi
So let me get this straight, This cold is from climate change, Previous cold shots werent, Previous cold shots like 83-84 this period colder. So what these guys want us to believe is the cold is from climate change, but climate change made it come up short of previous cold shots https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/949267935683596288
3:34 AM - Jan 5, 2018

Only thing I can do is try to reach people that want to know the WHY BEFORE THE WHAT ,Said hurricane season would see end of major hit drought in spring along with big wildfire season, Had roaring start to winter from October, None of that had anything to do
with climate change
3:43 AM - Jan 5, 2018
8 8 Replies 27 27 Retweets 61 61 likes

Joe Bastardi

@BigJoeBastardi
Sometimes if you want to see forward, you have to look back. No one is anti science, anti model, anti "climate" But one must question authority of models and causes of variances if one truly wishes to pursue the answer
3:44 AM - Jan 5, 2018
9 9 Replies 35 35 Retweets 86 86 likes

Weren’t we speaking of models before?? Oh no do you see what this scientist says about models?? Would that be like your “ supercomputer” that’s going to give us an unbiased factual narrative “supermodel”of anything??
I thought I’d add this to the thread and your it’s... (show quote)

You still do not know what climate is. You claimed that winter, spring, summer, and fall were each a change of climate! Those are seasons with different weather but not a different climate.

Regardless your post is incoherent verbiage. Babble, nonsense, obfuscation and a waste of time that has no meaning and makes no point.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 20:52:01   #
lindajoy wrote:
No dear YOU brought up supercomputers trying to belittle the poster, not me.. I can go back and copy it for you if you have forgotten what you said but I don’t think that is necessary, you are just evading the answer you too know.. That’s ok the point is made in your reply.. Thank You for that, you have earned a 🌟..

So I’ll now ask for a forth time when working with that computer to develop the supermodel you spoke of how is that hypothetical conclusion drawn????? It’s a very simple question you should know...
No dear YOU brought up supercomputers trying to b... (show quote)

Once again "supermodel" is what YOU said. I have no idea what you meant then or now. You don't either! It is just part of your incoherent word salad of useless verbiage.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 16:44:30   #
lindajoy wrote:
Yes, yes, I see what your evading~~
Ok new subject now, this one sufficiently addressed, our posts speak for themself and this is now boring...

So, now, what about that supermodel concept you brought up?? Can you answer the question posed to you twice now??

So you don't have a clue yet about the geography and want out of that trap!

Of course you just stepped into another one. You brought up "supermodel", not me. And I have no idea what you meant (and neither do you!).

Ask your question again, but try to make sense if you want an answer.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 16:30:16   #
lindajoy wrote:
Go back to school, please~~

The one obvious thing from this exchange is that you are the one who lacks an education. You don't even know what climate is! What a hoot.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 16:25:13   #
lindajoy wrote:
Your false statements and twisting of my posts are in~correct. From now on quote my entire post not just a portion~~ and certainly my second post on the same comment..Guess you missed that too..

I said~Not once but in two different posts temperature changes occur in different years ..
My post you only quoted a portion of said:

Alaska averages more like this a~
75 inches (1.91 m) of snow. The northern coast of the Gulf of Alaska receives up to 150 inches (3,810.0 mm) of precipitation annually.

Trending warmer climates does not substantiate the cause such as the sun, planetary alignment, shifting El Niño and el Nina’s etc..

If anything given the weather conditions in Alaska fewer people live there yet the weather trends stand as they always have, and will..

Looking at each year of climate shows you in 2013 they experienced significant cold while this year it is less...

Alaska Endures Record Cold While Still Buried Under Snow
SHARE THIS
May 11, 2013; 9:07 PM

Here’s another one for you ~~ so what was it you were claiming?? Be sure to read the date too... that’s important when looking at what different years bring us in weather change..

Imagine going into a movie theater to check out the latest science fiction flick and there is not a single flake of snow on the ground. A couple hours later, as the credits start to roll, you mosey outside and are stunned to find your car buried in more than a foot of snow.

Perhaps you’d wonder if you were still watching a movie.

Well that’s kind of what happened Wednesday at Alaska’s Thompson Pass, just outside of the town of Valdez, when an incredible 10 inches of snow piled up in one hour — around 1.7 inches every 10 minutes. This is an absolutely incredible snowfall rate.

The furious storm dropped another 5 inches in 30 minutes, for a remarkable 15 inches in a brief hour and a half period. In the end, 40 inches of heavy wet snow accumulated in 12 hours.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2017/12/07/alaska-just-reported-one-of-the-most-extreme-snowfall-rates-on-record-10-inches-per-hour/?utm_term=.431a26495a14


Btw~~ take read and stand on your unfounded assertions... put some proof where yours fingers are...and then try to enjoy the beautiful world around you..
Read slowly it may help with your comprehension...

Juneau averages over 50 inches (1,270 mm) of precipitation a year, while some other areas in southeast Alaska receive as much as 275 inches (6,980 mm). Average monthly precipitation generally peaks in September or October, and is lowest in May and June. Owing to the rain shadow of the coastal mountains, south-central Alaska does not get nearly as much rain as the southeast of Alaska, though it does get more snow with up to 300 inches (7.62 m) at Valdez and much more in the mountains. On average, Anchorage receives 16 inches (410 mm) of precipitation a year, with around 75 inches (1.91 m) of snow. The northern coast of the Gulf of Alaska receives up to 150 inches (3,810.0 mm) of precipitation annually.[10] Across western sections of the state, the northern side of the Seward Peninsula is a desert with less than 10 inches (250 mm) of precipitation annually, while some locations between Dillingham and Bethel average around 100 inches (2,540 mm) of precipitation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_Alaska
Your false statements and twisting of my posts ar... (show quote)

Pretty clearly you can't relate the text on the cited wiki page to a map. You cite Southeastern and Southcentral (Juneau and Valdez/Anchorage) as an average for all of Alaska. That is a small part of Alaska. Just the North Slope alone is larger (and gets less than 5 inches of precipitation per year). The Interior, between the Brooks Range and the Alaska Range, is another larger area that only gets 10 inches of precipitation per year.

Your numbers are only correct for the small area they apply to. It is just silly to say that Alaska averages 75 inches of snow per year.

Your nearly incoherent post has little relating to Climate Change.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 14:18:17   #
lindajoy wrote:
... Climate is what?? Weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period... Winter, summer, fall and springs are all climate l changes...

Weather establishes climate changes, elementary isn’t it??

First it was Global warming, then Climate control, then climate change and now it’s called weather extremes...

More total nonsense! Why post this crap instead of learning about it first? I won't even bother with what came after this and will only address what is above.

Winter, summer, fall and spring do not constitute climate change. Climate is relative weather patterns over at least a decade. A one year interval means nothing.

Climate Change includes but is not exclusive to Global Warming. Neither climate control nor weather extremes is part of Climate Change.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 13:58:13   #
lindajoy wrote:
The quote is factual and shows any given year the temps fluctuate.. There is nothing disengenuos in my assertion at all.. I said temperatures fluctuate between any given year and they do~ If they don’t please feel free to show some proof they don’t but I’ll tell you again they do and you can not discredit that fact..

You are being dishonest in your assertions, Sir!!

What I called you on and you are now ignoring is first a claim that Alaska averages 75 inches of snow per year. That is absolutely not true.

The second was a totally out of context quote saying Fairbanks had not been up to 50F since October of 2012. The actual context showed that it was from October of 2012 only until the end of April 2013. Very normal! It went up into the 90's that summer.

Your false statements had nothing to do with showing fluctuations from year to year and that was not mentioned. And all of my statements were dead on accurate!
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 11:13:04   #
Morgan wrote:
You are kidding here, right? This has been answered so many times here on OPP it's not funny, where have you been. Don't be obtuse. The issue isn't climate change it is man-made global warming and that doesn't even have to be proven anymore, it is self- evident.

Go to
Jan 7, 2018 10:46:09   #
JFlorio wrote:
... Just another cut and paste loser.

Just another jerk that has to fabricate non-truths.

Show anything I have posted that was a cut and past instead of my own words. Of course you can't imagine that anyone knows this topic that well... because you sure don't know it.

You are just a bit too much of a creep too.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 10:37:01   #
archie bunker wrote:
The only one you're making a fool out of is yourself. But, you keep on thinking you're not, and have fun Skippy.

It is amusing that you use the name "archie bunker". I assume you are old enough to have seen the TV show and realize the character was a buffoon that everyone laughed at.

You fit the character, but lack the finess of Carroll O'Connor who played the part. Of course O'Connor was not at all like the character he played. Unlike you he washed off the makeup and went home as a real human.

But fitting the character is why it is so easy to make a fool of you, archie bunker.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 10:02:29   #
currahee wrote:
Al Gore is the grandson of Arm and Hammer who was head of the communist party. These anti-Americans take the story of "Chicken Little" seriously.

You are confused.

Armand Hammer certainly was a communist in the 1920 at least, and probably essentially so all of his life. He was not the "head of the communist party". Actually he was a Republican and donated to Richard Nixon.

Al Gore Sr was a corporate attorney for Hammer's coal industry dealings in Tennessee. Hammer supported Al Gore Jr when he ran for political office.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.