You are with the Democratic Party; which does not mean that you are a liberal, since liberalism is a doctrine of defense of individual liberties, especially against the State, and this party, polarized by the extreme left, currently seeks to increase the control of the State over society.
I once told you that the logo you use here at OPP gives you away as a Marxist. A clenched fist of the right hand wrapped in what appears to be an American flag and the phrase: "We the People"; accompanied by HAVE HAD ENOUGH not used in a patriotic sense, but collectivist.
We can see photographs of Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler, all Marxists, raising their right hands with a clenched fist.
Marxists are true totalitarians who want to impose a dictatorship, who can no longer say that it belongs to the proletariat, because the division between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat no longer makes sense.
In our days, it was necessary for Marxists to substitute classes for tendencies, applying the maxim: "Divide and conquer", to justify the struggle for the imposition of their dictatorship, and they also try to impose the stratagem of what is politically correct, to dominate speech.
The trends imposed have been: ethnicity, feminism, indigenism, homosexuality, gender ideology, environmentalism and others; developed by the Sao Paulo Forum, created by Marxists in response to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the USSR, and supported by the UN, which has come under their influence.
It is indisputable that the Sao Paulo Forum is a declared enemy of the USA; and therefore, those who support these ideas cooperate with the enemy, since they intend to divide the nation against itself, so that it cannot sustain itself (paraphrasing Lincoln's famous phrase); and once destroyed, pick up the pieces that remain of it, to impose its Marxist dictatorship.

To understand what Sniffer Joey (JB) has done in the case of Afghanistan, we must remember that he was the Vice President with Barry Suetoro (BO - The Dark Star, that in Astronomy is the same as a black hole, since it is not known where he came from), that intended to fill this country with worshipers of Allah, as he converted to Islam, when he was Lolo Suetoro's stepson in Indonesia, where he attended the Muslim school and took a liking to the call of the muezzin, who called out loud to prayer or adhan, with a frequency of five times a day.
Gladly, with the help of the Moloch idolater (HRC), he gave rise to the Arab Spring, destabilizing Libya and Syria, although in Egypt did not do well, causing the troops to withdraw from Iraq (abandoning weapons and equipments, putting them at the disposal of the “enemy”) to clear the way for the Muslim extremists of ISIS, that later took years to push them back, which promoted murder, slavery and all the “good things” that these fanatics want to impose.
His performance also reminds us of another individual, the Peanut Farmer (JC), who had previously done something similar by allowing the fall of the Shah of Iran, handing over the country that maintained stability in the Middle East, following his campaign for human rights, which led that country to fall under the yoke of the Shiite Muslim theocracy, violators of human rights. In this case, he surrendered the country that had best been armed by the USA in the region, surpassing Israel. Even today they continue to use American weapons, now to attack us whenever possible.
Jimmy's performance was well intentioned, but wrong, which led to the loss of respect for the US and 52 American diplomats were taken hostage at the embassy in Tehran during 444 days, so he was not reelected as President; since trying to achieve a result, he obtained the opposite, by applying his ideas against the interests of those who defended the West, because those who exercise power must bear in mind that: "the road to hell is paved with good intentions".
Sixty years ago the same thing happened with Jack (JFK), who at the appropriate moment made the “mistake” of not fulfilling the commitment agreed with the Cuban exiles trained by the CIA, who had landed in the Bay of Pigs (1961), letting them to be decimated and captured by the communists, not giving permission to the Navy to support them as had been previously guaranteed; that was the cause of what the following year put the world on the brink of nuclear war with the Missile Crisis, which served as a blackmail, that was accepted; and allowed communism to settle in a territory of this hemisphere, only 90 miles of distance from the United States, pledging with the Soviets not to invade Cuba for 25 years; that is, until 1987; without anything objective being done to rectify this situation, neither when the Soviet Union was dissolved in 1991 or in the 30 years that have elapsed. Time that the communists have taken advantage of to regroup, creating the Sao Paulo Forum and the 21st century socialism to control some Latin American countries and influence the UN, with Bolivian "white gold" (cocaine) and Venezuelan "black gold" (petroleum); and even trying to destroy the USA from within, by penetrating the Democratic Party, where some of its leaders want to impose socialism.
And now, who was the Vice of the Dark Star, Sniffer Joey, repeating the mistake or betrayal of his co-religionists, without any consideration, just for politicking, withdraws from Afghanistan, leaving the necessary means to arm again (at this moment to ISIS-K ), to the enemies of the West; but here the betrayal is even greater, because not only does it deliver weapons, it also delivers hostages, leaving millions of people, including many Americans, under the yoke of the Taliban; and it is possible that he wants to undertake the same race to Islamize the US, bringing refugees from that country, among whom the terrorists will infiltrate.
Of course, it is known that this decrepit old man is not the one in charge, he is only the puppet that the power in the shadow has put to do the representation, because this power did not have anyone who had not declared himself or herself a socialist or communist, what was not convenient; so there were not many alternatives and not having a better choice, it was decided to put a woman from that group as his Vice, who publicly had discredited Biden, calling him "racist" and "harasser"; and now laughs when asked about what she said about her partner; blatantly saying that it was about winning a nomination.
What high morals this woman has, that she makes common cause with a "racist"!
What do the founders (originally from Africa, passing through the island of Lesbos) of BLM say? They must be very happy with Sniffer Joey as President, as racist as Woodrow Wilson, but with a mask, the COVID mask, that by hiding his face helps him to tell big lies.
Using a huge trap (it was an intimidating, media and cyber putsch, described in a Time magazine article as a “complot to save Democracy”), the power was taken from the "Ugly American" (DJT), in order to impose a policy, with which it seems they want to destroy the country.
The orders that Sniffer Joey receives and transmits are contrary to the interests of the American people: Opening of the border, closing the sources of energy, creation of galloping inflation, recognizing treaties that had been denounced as harmful to the US (with Iran and on the climate) and many others things, which honestly make me think that an agent of an enemy foreign power has been placed as President of the US in the White House, with orders to destroy this nation.
Congratulations to those who voted for Biden, who did not really vote for him; because I think that they voted against the "Ugly American", who they came to hate, because they were convinced by the means of the evil of this character. Of course, they were a minority, since a great % of the votes that were counted in favor of Joey were fraudulent.
They are already beginning to dislike Sniffer Joey, being affected by the rise in prices, which stem from the problems created by him with oil.

Historically, the traditional parties (Democrat and Republican) have had liberal and conservative wings; but for a few decades to this day, Republicans call Democrats liberal and Democrats call Republicans conservative, which is a mistake when put it into perspective.
The Democratic Party is not the party of liberals, since liberalism is a doctrine of defense of individual freedoms, especially against the State, and this party currently seeks to increase the control of the State over society.
On the other hand, it can be said that the Republican Party embraces the economic proposals of liberalism; but, opposing the imposition of a strong state that establishes a false "distributive justice" and leads to the destruction of the rule of law.
It is indisputable that it was a liberal who wrote the following: “We hold that these truths are evident, that all men are created equal, that their Creator has endowed them with certain inalienable Rights, that among them are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness."; since it is noteworthy that he accepts the principles of liberalism, changing property (of which Locke says: "each man has a 'property' in his own 'person', to which no one has a right but him"), for the pursuit of happiness.
Currently, the political action of the Republican Party is conservative liberalism and that of the Democratic Party has tendencies towards Marxist socialism that is totally contrary to liberal ideas, since it defends the rights of minority communities, instilling in them the dissatisfaction of being equal before the law , in detriment of the individual freedom of all members of society, which tends to the division and confrontation of the groups it defends, against society in general; promoting a new struggle within society, to replace the "failed class struggle" preached by Marxism, which divided society into: the bourgeoisie and the proletarians.
For all the above, it can be said that Republicans are closer to being liberal than Democrats and Socialists hates liberals more than conservatives.
In our days, the class struggle is meaningless; being necessary for Marxists to create different groups, applying the maxim: "Divide and conquer", which justify the struggle for the imposition of their dictatorship, which can no longer be called of the proletariat.
All of the above is imported from trends such as: ethnicity, feminism, indigenism, homosexuality, gender ideology, environmentalism, and others; created by the Sao Paulo Forum, which is “an enemy of the USA”, and supported by the UN, which has fallen under its influence.
It must be considered that those who support these ideas cooperate with the enemy; and therefore, they are traitors, according to the Constitution. They intend to divide the nation against itself, so that it cannot be sustained (paraphrasing the famous Lincoln sentence); and once destroyed, to collect what remains of it, in order to impose a Marxist dictatorship.
To argue that what has been written above is unfounded, is not possible, since the express support of a good number of leaders of the Democratic Party to Socialism is notorious, to which they have added the word "Democratic", creating an oxymoron (is like saying: " darkness of light "), since socialism (darkness) is contrary to democracy (light); trying to equate Democratic Socialism to Social Democracy, when between real socialism (adding the qualifier that could occurs to them) and Social Democracy, there is a huge gap in politics.
Socialism, carries implicitly the germ of dictatorship, imposing planning to replace the free market; nullifying the principle of law that says: "You can do everything that the law does not prohibit", which is replaced by: "You can only do what is authorized."
Thus, the United States, as it is North Korea or as it was East Germany, would become a Socialist Democratic Republic, for which it would be necessary to derogate the current Constitution.
I think that if it is possible for them to continue developing "complots", such as the one described by Time magazine in an article, disguising the "mediatic-cybernetic putsch" applied to defeat Donald Trump, where they justify the dark methods used, saying that it was to "save democracy", they will be close to achieving their goal.
Can they do it? I hope not; and I pray to God, that it will not be necessary to refresh the tree of freedom, remembering what was said by Thomas Jefferson; and that CO2 (although it is beneficial to trees), acting as a greenhouse gas, will not produce such an intense heat, that it would be necessary to shed the blood of the patriots and that of those who, replacing the tyrants (which at the time wanted to destroy the nation from the outside), today with their betrayal, handing it over to Socialism, want to destroy it from the inside.

In a short statement on May 16, 2014, Barack Hussein Obama stated that: "97% of scientists agree: climate change is real, man-made and dangerous." However, shortly thereafter, The Wall Street Journal responded that such a claim was a fiction; and when a new review was conducted, it was found that only 1% of scientists agreed with Obama's claim.----------- Outraged, 31,487 scientists signed a document stressing that there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, and other gases are causing or could, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic global warming and disruption of the Earth's climate. Even one of the founders of the "anthropogenic global warming" theory, Claude Allegre, resigned his position by admitting that the cause of this climate change is unknown .---

A leading scientist, Kevin Trenberth, admitted that “the fact is that we cannot explain the lack of warming at the moment. This (climate change) is a sham that cannot be explained logically. " A parody simply, because they were concerned not to lose their government funding and the convenience of hiding the truth.
During secondary education it is learned that the number one rule of scientific research is not to support it with a premeditated final objective, since only the data points that reaffirm its final conclusion would be used, adjusting the variables of the statistics to obtain what is seeks.
In research by Stephen Goddard of the Royal Academy of Sciences, he admitted how ridiculous the "climate scientists" thesis is that can be obtained by manipulating data. He revealed that the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, has been "tuning" its record by replacing actual temperatures with data "invented by computer models" from computers, fed by stakeholders.
Professor Robert Stavins, who helped draft the 2014 United Nations Climate Report, revealed to Breitbart News magazine that "politicians demanded to change and edit parts of the report to suit their needs."
Some specialists assure that the financial waste in the initiatives on the climate change not only reaches 22-billion dollars only in expenses. The specialized magazine Forbes estimates it at 1.75 billion dollars, mainly due to the domino effect that includes regulations (from government agencies such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency) which chain free enterprise and force the consumer to depend on foreing energy.
According to the financial magazine Forbes, the total cost of these knock-on effects is a staggering $ 1.750 billion annually, all of which is lost with no concrete results. That equates to $ 3-million-329-thousand-528 dollars per minute. With such a fabulous business, no one pays any attention to the truh.
In short, governments and government-funded scientists wanted to make sure that all published research on "global warming" was uniform and consistent with what they want said, not necessarily the actual evidence, in order to ensure the continuous financing and the permanence of its projects in the long term.
With good reason, at the meeting of 192 countries in Paris to define the UN millennium goals for the environment, there were plenty of proposals and contradictions. The main concern of all those present there was and will continue to be who will cover the financial aspect of an artificial problem, created with a definite objective: to fill the pockets and bank accounts of a gangster elite of politicians, scientists, corporations, individuals, and the complicity of numerous “green” NGOs in the world.

The fascists and the communists (read Marxists), support criminality to come to power; but when they obtain power, they repress criminality with a heavy hand. An assault (motivated by need) to steal merchandise from a store in Cuba could be grounds for executing the perpetrators, if such an act is repeated frequently, to dissuade those in need from doing it again.
That is what Fidel Castro did, when he ordered the execution of three young men for hijacking a boat (to flee the country and be free), anticipating that such an act would not become commonplace.

Maximo Gorki expressed that: "The miserable seek other more miserable to feel at ease." AOC applies this thought of Gorky, changing the word "miserable" for "stupid", to attract those who support it when it says that the flatulence of cows contributes to environmental pollution, due to the amount of CO2 that they expel into the atmosphere. However, she applies the thought verbatim, when she says to free the criminals, to defund the police and she tries to ignore those who make the mobs that take refuge in peaceful protests to commit their crimes.

That is not true. I know some Latinos who live in her district and say the opposite.
In the 2018 primaries, she eliminated a Democratic congressman who had been elected by that district on several occasions. There is a good chance that she is hand-picked by Soros's machinery, which dominates votes counting; agreeing with Stalin who said that he did not care who voted but who counted the votes.

Many people have been to college, but college apparently didn't teach them much.

Something like what you expose I tried to show one of the old boys with the sinister hand.
Cuda2020
The green new deal will keep us competitive with other nations. Tell me do you want to see Americans buy foreign electric cars or American made electric cars?
Alber
So far, electric cars have problems that are not easy to solve.
Cuda2020
Electric cars don't have anything that is difficult to solve, just a matter of choice.

The political propaganda of the New Green Deal has eaten their brains.
Since the 1950s there has been talk of engines that work with the electrolysis of water and that current internal combustion engines can be adapted for this purpose; but it seems that this is not in the interest of those who advance the New Green Deal. China is working on it.

I do not believe that what you say is true. The article that Time magazine published about the plot that developed to remove Trump and "save democracy" is a confession of venial sins, reserving the major sins, of what actually took place.

Someone told me the same thing before the elections and she was elected again. I think she has the support of the Soros machine. She defeated in the 2018 primaries a democratic congressman who had been elected on several occasions. Voting machines solve these problems easily.

Some time ago I said that what she was saying was stupid and one of her defenders immediately jumped to fight me; to whom I had to clarify that I had not called her stupid, but that she pretends to be stupid, as part of her political strategy. I remembered a thought of Maximo Gorki: "The miserable seek other more miserable to feel at ease", which just by changing the word "miserable" to "stupid", gives us an idea of what she does to attract those who vote for her.
Although it seems that she is a little stupid too, because she does her role wonderfully.

Remember Gerald Ford case. He previously had held the position of vice president of the country, for eight months, after the resignation of Spiro Agnew. He was the first to be elected according to the procedure established in the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and upon assuming the presidency, he also became the first and until now the only person to have served both the vice-presidency and the presidency of the United States, without having been elected by the Electoral College.
Now they can make Kamala Harris resign and Sniiffer Joe appoints Hilary Clinton as Vice, then Sniffer Joe resigns and Hilary remains as President appointing Michele Obama as her vice.
That duo would be invincible in the next elections, always counting on the cooperation of the "dominion" voting machines and with a complot like the one they carried out to "save democracy", defeating Trump and giving Sniffer Joe the victory, as was revealed by an article in "Time" magazine. So Hillary could be during ten years in the White House.

You tear your clothes in horror, as the Pharisees did, when what you have written can be applied verbatim to you and to those who are like you. You want to show that your opponents are the ones who do what you do. Let's see how you have written chronologically:
Cuda2020 Dec 5, 2021 07:57:54 #What a complete load of crap, and you believe that $h*+?
This scurrilous language, used before, is contrary to what you preach afterwards.
Cuda2020 Dec 5, 2021 18:04:35 #And there goes any form of civil conversation down the crapper, you guys just have to personally insult, you're incapable of a discussion. No all you want to do is ram things down peoples throats and if they disagree insult them.
This is what you preach: "Do what I say, but not what I do."
Alber Dec 5, 2021 16:21:28 #The one with a complete load of crap in your brain and believe any $h*+ that is served by the media are you.
In what is answered to you, your dirty words are not accepted and they are returned to you word for word.
That is why Jesus said of the Pharisees that they were whitewashed tombs; or what is the same, that what they had inside was carrion.

You seem to smoke, smell, or inject yourself with something that clouds your brain. The rise in the price of oil has to do with supply and demand. In addition, if you have to import it, it costs more and the price of oil causes the prices of all products to rise, which generates inflation.
As for people who save money without going out for a year because of Plandemic, that's a fallacy.
So far, electric cars have problems that are not easy to solve and I don't see the Green New Deal doing anything but creating problems. Everything is based on raising money by imposing fines for the emission of CO2 that the US and the EU must pay to the UN, China produces three times more CO2 than the US and pays nothing. Furthermore, in all this the important thing is not CO2, which is a pretext, but environmental pollution, which has been greatly reduced here, not so in China and India, to name just two cases.
In terms of energy independence, that is what we had and what has been lost by reducing oil production.