Think that's one thing we all agree on

Pres. Trump Seeks $18 Billion To Extend Border Wall Over 10 Years

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/01/05/pres-trump-seeks-18-billion-to-extend-border-wall-over-10-years/


The Customs and Border Protection document includes $5.7 billion for towers, surveillance equipment and other technology; $1 billion over five years for road construction and maintenance; and $8.5 billion over seven years for 5,000 new Border Patrol agents, 2,500 border inspectors and other personnel, the U.S. official said.


Not to mention they're already tunneling, who'd a thought...?

I guess it's better to be half nuts then all nuts.

[quote=shortbeans]if she wasn't such a good piece of ass I wouldn't have bothered with her as long as I did... Really?? Is that all she was to you? No other qualities? Well you missed one of her qualities, you see one that believes in being connected in past lives is one that is interested in metaphysics.
www.philosophybasics.com/branch_metaphysics.html
Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of existence, being and the world. Arguably, metaphysics is the foundation of philosophy: Aristotle calls it "first philosophy" (or sometimes just "wisdom"), and says it is the subject that deals with "first causes and the principles of things".
‎Phenomenology · ‎Realism · ‎Existentialism · ‎Idealism
In not knowing your ex, she had/has an interest in metaphysics or at least the philosophy side of it, and rest assured, for most individuals, it is very difficult to understand. Science has not been able to explain everything that happens in this world, however there are four cycles of weather, and that cannot be disputed, that is fact, For instance where I live, we have four seasons spring(warming, wet or dry)summer Hot, wet or dry) fall (cooling, wet or dry) and winter(cold, wet or dry) and that my fellow opp are nothing more than cycles that I have witness most of my life. No scientific study done by [bought and paid for scientists (my opinion) to confirm what I and many other have experienced. No mater how flat a pancake is there are two sides of every story. If science cannot (without a doubt) cannot explain climate change, which previous post suggest, then maybe just maybe something else must be going on. Buy the book and start your journey to believe the unbelievable. Also buy the book Disinformation authored in the 80's read the first three or four chapters which will discuss the past administration. and all of this written many years ago before Obama came to being.[/quote]


Please it the Quote reply button so we all know who you are responding to, the reply goes to general public thanks, liked your commentary. Personally, I believe its the wrong argument at this point, Industry should not be allowed to simply dump their waste... period...not in the water, air or earth, it needs to be broken down or contained and in a designated place. It is part of their cost, they steal from our health for their profit when they poison our land water and air. I iiked what you had to say I certainly believe metaphysics and science work together.

well that was honest

He has all the required credentials as a climatologist researcher I see. Le'ts buy into him.

[quote=eagleye13]The '97% consensus' of scientists on climate change is complete bunk... fraudulent statistic repeated everywhere is based on blatant scientific FRAUD

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052317_climate_change_scientific_consensus_fraudulent_science_survey.html#ixzz4JLPs9xQq

NaturalNews) The brain-dead leftist media isn't really in the news business anymore. It's actually in the business of zombie control... with the zombies being, of course, the leftist libtard obedient propaganda swallowers who are easily fooled by sleight-of-hand trickery being paraded as science. (Then again, there are also CONtards on the right who are easily fooled by fraudulent "GMO science," so the criticism deserves to be equally distributed across the political establishment...)

If you've ever has the misfortune of listening to the libtard leftist media, you've probably heard the claim -- repeated like a mantra chant to Gaia -- that "97% of scientists believe in man-made climate change" (or some similar paraphrased version of this fraudulent claim).

Fortunately, there's a book by Mark Steyn that helps sort out the truth from the fiction. It's called A Disgrace to the Profession and features short essays and articles by scientists who speak out against the global warming / climate change hoax being perpetrated on the world.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052317_climate_change_scientific_consensus_fraudulent_science_survey.html#ixzz4JLQI0Rxa


PASADENA, CA, July 21, 2015 – Arguing with people who have already come to a conclusion based on a loose understanding of half the story is difficult. Large amounts of misinformation are unfortunately common in today’s political arena thanks to social media, shoddy journalism, millennial ambivalence and a generally apathetic view toward data and public policy. Nowhere in today’s society is this idea more prevalent than the climate change debate, formally known as global warming.

Global warming was the hot topic about 10 years ago when Al Gore’s documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth”, hit theaters and almost instantly scared millions of people into believing the Earth was hanging on by a string thanks to irresponsible Americans filling up their gas tanks one two many times.

The green energy lobby took charge and didn’t look back, raising hundreds of millions of dollars and sponsoring regulation after regulation with the intent of eliminating fossil fuels and ignoring the unintended consequence of killing jobs and destroying livelihoods. Day after day, the mainstream media spread the word that temperatures were soaring, the oceans were rising, and natural disasters were growing deadlier all because of man made global warming’s detrimental effect on the earth’s atmosphere.

After a few years of hysteria, something happened that brought the global warming train to a screeching halt. Scientists began to realize that the earth’s temperature wasn’t rising. In fact, we now know that the average global temperature hasn’t gone up in at least 15 years. Try as they might, and they did try, environmentalists could not cover up this contradictory piece of evidence, so they decided to change the name of their movement to “climate change”.

Man made climate change supporters, primarily on the left, have attempted to gloss over these glaring holes in their argument by creating the illusion that the scientific community is completely on their side and that any questioning of that science is a waste of time. They did that by coming up with the false narrative that 97% of all scientists agree with them and continued to repeat it over and over until people who weren’t really paying attention started to accept it as fact.

It’s not a fact but yet for some reason, everyone from the guy in line next to you at Starbucks all the way up to the President of the United States tout this statistic as indisputable evidence. The only truth regarding this statement is that it was dubiously manufactured in order to dilute the reality that scientists have not coalesced around one position one way or the other.

The 97% number was created by meticulously selecting certain surveys using murky terminology to formulate a specific narrative.[/quote




Stop repeating your post it was BS the first time and that hasn't changed to the second and it won't the third fourth or fifth moron, Your parachute post was one I had used you probably got from me from posts you save...weirdo

...and your vacuum is calling...it's amazing how people project their own reflection, as far as a discernment from fact and fiction, that is exactly you and all your conspiracy theories, that is you my friend, not I. Why reality is hard to bear for you along with global warming.

Great link thank you, I know here in NC our home insurance will be increasing 25 freaking percent. Renters will go up 40% !

and you as well, happy new year...

Ahh Youtube you get to go to the head of the class

This is what happens when people are too afraid to face the facts, rather than just dealing with it and making changes.

But what actually amazes me is the standpoint of the people who post this misinformation in the media I realize to get less resistance but have the lack complete sensibility to see the dire consequences in the future. Are they really so ego driven they only see within the parameters of the longevity of their own life. These people have the emotional IQ of a two-year-old. They simply cannot see past their own noses, even as you say when their own words and logic raps them along the side of their own head.

?


Yep 99-99 % of research climatologists/scientists are stupid, gee why did we think of that? You're so smart.

Amazing, isn't it...

The logic of a third grader, I'm sure you can relate to, which is why children get excused from adult conversations, they can't understand them, you're excused...