One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: straightUp
Page: <<prev 1 ... 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 ... 758 next>>
Oct 12, 2020 19:31:21   #
Communism - the liberal perspective:
No thank you. We'd rather not give up our private property or our individualism. We DO recognize the potential disasters of capitalism but all we really have to do is use our intelligence to regulate it. (Keynes knew what he was talking about). We also recognize the LIMITS of capitalism when it comes to human-critical services, but we prefer to compensate with democratic socialism, which works out really well for that purpose... For everything else, regulated capitalism is fine. But communism? Nah, it's just not our thing. Go ahead and ask. Ask ANY liberal.

Communism - the plutocratic perspective:
No thank you. We really like the power that capitalism has given us. In fact, don't even regulate it. And screw democratic socialism, why would we want Americans to create a system that protects them from desperation when middle-class desperation is so profitable for us? And don't worry about the middle-class rising up against us. Half of them are conservative... all we have to do is tell them that socialism always leads to Stalinism. LOL

Communism - the conservative perspective:
Hell no! Socialism always leads to Stalinism!
Go to
Oct 12, 2020 19:28:45   #
eagleye13 wrote:
Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton (1952)
Go here for free download:
http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Behind%20Communism.pdf

To understand the total problem of
Communism it is necessary that we trace the
course of the movement from it’s beginning
down to the present. We must understand
who it’s originators were, and what they
were, and we must gain some idea as to the
forces which influenced and shaped their
philosophy.
Unfortunately, any deep-down discussion of
Communism and Marxism involves the
Jewish question...
Contents:
1. THE PERSECUTION MYTH
2. THE JEW IN EUROPE
3. RETURN TO THE EAST
4. THE RENAISSANCE
5. THE TERROR SECTION
6. BLOODY SUNDAY
7. PETERSBERG SOVIET
8. REVOLUTION
9. HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM
10. MORE PETERSBERG SOVIET
11. SIXTH PARTY CONGRESS
12. TROTZKY TO POWER
13. CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY
14. THE RED TERROR
15. BELA KUN
16. STALINS PAST
17. KAGANOVICH
18. IRON CURTAIN DICTATORS
19. JEWS IN AMERICA
20. NEW YORK: Jewish World Capital
21. THE TREASON TRIALS
22.COMMUNISM IN HOLLYWOOD
Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton (1952) br Go... (show quote)


This was you answer to two seperate posts... So, are you just selling copies or do you actually have a point?

BTW, you might want to check this link...

https://www.jta.org/1961/10/05/archive/frank-britton-notorious-anti-semite-sentenced-to-serve-in-san-quentin

Your big expert on communism served time in San Quentin for trying to bribe police officers. LOL.

Here's what the Jewish Telegraphic Agency says about him...

Frank L, Britton, ranked as one of the worst of the professional anti-Semites in the United States, has been sentenced to a term in San Quentin prison after conviction of trying to bribe two San Francisco police officers.

Britton, who came from Los Angeles last year to San Francisco, where he tried to revive his hate sheet, “The American Nationalist,” became involved in a fight in a tavern. He allegedly made the bribe offer to the police who were taking him to jail on a charge of assault with a deadly weapon. He was carrying a 38-caliber revolver for which he did not have a permit.

Between his arrest and conviction, he issued pleading letters for funds to one-time followers, despite the fact that at his arrest, he was found to possess $3,000 in cash. Among his activities, he has distributed stickers, posters and leaflets assailing “mongrelization” of the races and charging Jewish organizations with “inspiring” Negroes to “agitate” for equal rights.


Ha, ha... Why am I not surprised to see you peddling Nazi propaganda? Have you ever thought about reading the Communist Manifesto? It a very short read. Probably a fraction of the red scare drama that you've already read.

Of course, you would need to use your own intelligence to come to your own conclusions. I realize that's a foreign concept on the right, but you might surprise yourself.
Go to
Oct 11, 2020 14:45:36   #
lindajoy wrote:
What a crock of bluster you spew here..Take your sympathy plea and stick it!!

I think you know I'm not spewing bluster, you probably just don't want to face reality. And you can call it a sympathy plea if you want but a more accurate term would be "empathy", something you don't seem to show much respect for. And it's not a "plea" either it's a democratic process that isn't going your way.

lindajoy wrote:

No matter what the economy drives that laborer who works for less will be the one staying and the one that costs more, not hired or let go...we’ve seen it for how long now???That’s the reality

Since it's the immigrant that works for less, I would say your emotional torrent of outrage is betraying your argument. LOL!

lindajoy wrote:

So you preach your holier than tho opinion while admitting you take advantage of those poor men that busted their butts for two days paying them what a hundred dollars each and threw in some beer... aren’t you just an all american boy helping out...🙄

Those who think they're opinions are "holier than thou" don't admit to their own sins and those that do are often the most authoritative critics. Fact is, you can't tell me it doesn't happen when I've done it myself.


lindajoy wrote:

Yup, a hell of a bargain for you and of course they were just glad to have the extra cash too..You as a private citizen chose what cost you less and you have the audacity to claim the very same thing of corporate america but for them, they are abusing that illegal~ ha~ song and dance for sure there...What did you do???

I gave them the $100 each that they were praying for while standing in front of Home Depot. What did YOU give them? And yes, the American businesses that I referenced do it too. Again this is proven every time there's another ICE raid. These business and I are helping them get more than they got in Mexico. That's why they come here. Remember, I'm not the one all freaked out because we have immigrants.

lindajoy wrote:

Me document them??? Hey, big boy, if they want to do it legal to begin with we wouldn’t have this problem to begin with!!!

They DO want to do it legal, but the bigots writing the immigration laws won't allow it. Dugh!

lindajoy wrote:

Our government doesn’t enforce the laws on the books for immigration entry so they CAN take that money they keep off that worker who likewise agrees to it because they are, after all, making more money than they ever would in their country...

Actually, our government DOES enforce the law, they just don't catch ALL the immigrants. So yeah, it works out for the illegal immigrants and every American that hires them. The only people getting shafted are the bigots that want to keep them out. (boo-hoo)

lindajoy wrote:

Don’t tell me document them thats not my job, its theirs!!! I or I should say my clients

I never said it was your job. In fact, I wouldn't trust you to do it. I'm referring to whatever agencies "document" the legal immigrants. That would be the federal government for issuing visas and tax id's and the state governments for things like driver licenses. And yes, it would be the responsibility of the immigrants and their employers to apply for the documents, which they WOULD do if the government would allow it. So that's what I mean when I say "document them".

lindajoy wrote:

I do work with pay enough every time they hire an employee and do an I9 on them, not choice, mandatory on all, to include the cost for the background and SS check...An added business expense it is...

Not for illegals you don't

lindajoy wrote:

Since this is all I can quote reply to its all I’m saying... You break up quotes that then can not be re-quoted when someone goes to reply...

I break up quotes to reply directly to false statements. The more false statements in the rant the more breaks there's going to be. You folks are inclined to spew these rambling rants filled with disinformation. If you don't want to deal with the way I respond you can always rely on solid arguments to support one or two points instead of ranting.

Otherwise, you can just not respond... It's not like I'd be missing out on anything.

Well, I have other things to do now. Have a nice day lindajoy. Try not to let your fears ruin it for you.
Go to
Oct 11, 2020 13:51:25   #
lindajoy wrote:
I wanna know about this bargain we supposedly have with the illegals..

We are the country of open arms

We WERE a country of open arms but people like you are changing us into the country of middle-fingers.

lindajoy wrote:

and have taken in far more than any other country!!

There is zero evidence to support that claim. It's just something chauvinists like to say.

lindajoy wrote:

In doing so we see a transition into force, greed, hate of our country, attack of it, here only to use the benefits we so graciously pass out, but it can not be to the determent of our country, land, people and Constitution, anymore!!

Utter nonsense as thoroughly exposed in my previous post.

The only force involved in this issue is the force of democracy as citizens with differing opinions battle it out in the ballots.

The only greed that factors in is the greed of American businesses that hire illegal immigrants to avoid taxes and get labor for super cheap.

The only people who truly hate our country do so because we are an aggressive sponsor of war and poverty throughout the world. Technically, it's a hatred of imperialism but that term has become politically incorrect in a country that refuses to acknowledge its own faults.

We most certainly do NOT "graciously pass out" benefits either. Reagan made it illegal for emergency rooms to refuse care for anyone regardless of status and that's about it. Illegal immigrants do NOT get food stamps, Medicare, welfare, disability insurance or any of those tax-funded benefits that Americans have come to rely on.

Sorry if my references to facts disrupt your delusion. I would suggest you stop listening to ignorant assholes and do some actual research but then again, I get the impression that your bigotry is better served by your BS.

lindajoy wrote:

Our true population is what?? How much do we harbor and bare in expenses for everyone coming in?

Zero. Illegal immigrants don't receive any tax-funded benefits but everytime they buy food, gas or anything else they need to survive, they pay sales tax. They actually have the short end of the deal.

lindajoy wrote:

What happened to our already on the books laws that are the foundation of illegal aliens to gain citizenship and entry and why the hell is it the sole responsibility of this country to bare what we do??

Nothing has happened to any of our laws since the Immigration Act of 1965 and we are far from the only country to bear the burden of immigration. (Just so you know, "bare" means to be naked) In fact, after our invasion of Iraq triggered the uprising of civil war in Syria, many countries took on the burden of accepting the millions of refugees with us being the least generous of them all.

If we are talking about immigrants from Latin America, the reason is simple. Where else can they go when all they have is their feet? I've already covered all this in my previous post. So, i'll move on.

lindajoy wrote:

Who says or no, what legal document declares the United States is mandated to take any and all??? Bs!!

There isn't any, which is probably why we don't.

lindajoy wrote:

Follow the laws in place, enforce them and now in fact limit what we do allow in..

We WERE doing that until Trump came along with his executive orders which have consistently been challenged in court for being unconstitutional.

lindajoy wrote:

They must be able to be vetted by what they produce, not us having to find out.. If they cannot be, then no entry.

I'm not even sure what you are trying to say here. What do you mean "by what they produce"? And how is vetting not a process of "finding out"?

lindajoy wrote:

If they are not self-sufficient and have a place to reside with families or finances to be able to handle it then they do not gain entry..

That stipulation was already on the books. The bigots that put it there thought it would limit the number of non-white immigrants, but it turns out the minorities that were already here or were able to prove their financial capacity reproduced at a far greater rate than white people AND had more family outside the country than white people, so now their racist law is backfiring on them and I'm laughing my ass off.

lindajoy wrote:

If they are criminals of course they never gain entry!!etcetcetc...

Of course... but only in so far as their crimes are "criminal" according to OUR laws. Keep in mind a lot refugees are incriminated by their home countries for political reasons.

lindajoy wrote:

Time to man up and stand for this country first, period...

Being an ignorant bigot is not the same thing as "manning up" or "standing for this country". It's more like being chicken-sh-ts that are so afraid of immigrants they want mommy to build walls to keep them out. Your disgusting view on immigration comes from a lack of courage.

lindajoy wrote:

Lest we loose it to an unrecognized migrant influx determined to intercede in all avenues from entry to government positions and one day wake up in another country of god only Knows what!!!

I can smell your fear from here. Fear of the future, fear of change, fear of the unknown. We're supposed to be the land of the brave, so get a grip.

lindajoy wrote:

Think I’m kidding~~ just look around in our government right now and whats on the streets or hidden away in camps..NO thank you!!

If the world is that scary for you, maybe you should just stay in your house.
Go to
Oct 11, 2020 12:19:09   #
lindajoy wrote:
No, it wouldn’t make me happy at all.. Leave them in their own country, let them work there or build businesses for themselves and help their fellow citizen providing jobs for others..Everyone has to start somewhere right??

Have you forgotten that our nation was built by people who came here to work? I'm guessing you aren't 100% Native American, which means at some point your family came here from somewhere else. Do you think your predecessors should have stayed in the old country instead? I mean, everyone has to start somewhere right?

lindajoy wrote:

Don’t you think they would prefer to live in their own country, work in their own country, to stay in their own country rather than skating off to the nearest country and take advantage of the benefits it offers rather than building those same opportunities within their own country? Get where I’m going with this?

I do. You've been led to believe that people from all over the world are attracted to our benefits and that is the ONLY reason why they come here. What arrogance! The worst kind... arrogance on top of ignorance!

First of all, out of the list of countries dealing with an influx of immigrants (that's right, we're not the only ones) the U.S. has the crappiest benefits of all. Unfortunately, for Latin American migrants, the U.S. is the only one of those countries they can reach given their means. In fact many of them walk here. (They can't exactly walk to Europe and the U.S. border blocks them from walking to Canada.) Likewise, most migrants from Africa and the Middle East head for Europe for the same reason; it's the easiest to reach given their means. Fortunately for them, the benefits in places like Germany, France and Sweden are WAAAAY better than they are here.

But government-issued benefits (in other words, the kind that people pay taxes for) is not what causes people to leave their homelands. Most of them leave because their homelands are ravaged by violence or famine, much like the Irish immigrants did in the 19th century.

In fact, the original American colonists migrated from England to get away from a kingdom where they were not allowed to worship the way they wanted to. Their efforts to fix that culminated in the English Civil War but they lost, so they came here.

So it's not as easy as simply "fixing their own homeland". In fact, suggesting that immigrants go back and deal with their own problems is really no different than sending a distressed child back to her abusive parents while telling her that "everyone has to start somewhere."

Honestly, it's really hard not to have an attitude toward people with such an utter lack of compassion. I don't know you personally, but I can tell that you are NO Christian.

lindajoy wrote:

In other words fix the issues of their own country and stay home, where they belong...Take responsibility of their living standards instead of running from them to an easier route...That is a temporary fix with no longevity to a happy ending for them!!

Then tell that to the millions of Irish and Italian immigrants from a century ago!

Look, this is why I brought up the analogy of a child and her abusive parents. These immigrants don't have anymore control over their homeland than a child does over her abusive parents. You and I are LUCKY to be citizens of a country where we are better protected. But only because we've been preceded by generations of activism that fought hard to get the government to enforce our right to a decent life.

If not for Americans heroes like Cesar Chavez, you and I would be just as abused as these immigrants are. We (including children) would still be working 16 hour days for script. There would be no such thing as paid vacation, maternity leave or worker's compensation. There would be no child labor laws, health insurance or minimum wages. NONE of these things are listed in the U.S.Constitution.

So don't EVEN sit there in your callous arrogance and tell immigrants they need to just fix their own country as you bathe in the benefits of a country that others have already fixed for you.

lindajoy wrote:

Tell me, what bargain do we have with any illegal ???

Well, speaking for myself, I remember paying three Mexicans to trench out half an acre of ditches on my property so I can install irrigation. It took them two days and I paid them $300 under the table plus a case of cheap-ass Budweiser (which for some reason they love). That's what I call a bargain. There's no way in hell I could have gotten as good a deal from an American business.

I know for a fact that a lot of American businesses do the same, as proven by the ICE raids we always hear about. Farms, ranches, orchards and sweatshops all over the country do this because it's a bargain for them too and compared to a lot of these American businesses I was being generous.

Would you like all that to stop? Are the use (and often abuse) of illegal immigrants unfair competition for American ditch-diggers? Then document them! Give them what they need to work OVER the table. Give them what they need to secure minimum wage and pay taxes and pull their own weight.

Let the free economy decide how many immigrants are too many. When the supply of labor supasses the demand, there will be less reason for immigrants to come here and the influx will dwindle down to the refugees trying to escape violence.
Go to
Oct 11, 2020 10:38:06   #
debeda wrote:
That is my youngest granddaughter, who just got a new baby brother on August 27th. She is an EXCELLENT big sister🤗🤗🌞


Congratulations grandma!
Go to
Oct 11, 2020 10:28:25   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
A Constitutionalist interpreting the Constitution? Now there's a novel idea.

Not really. The genius of the founding fathers is that they left a lot of ambiguity in the Constitution, specifically so that it could be interpreted to suite future generations. It's ironic as hell that 250 years later, a certain group of idiots would totally miss that while claiming to be experts in the Constitution.

Apparently, a solid understanding of the U.S.Constitution can't be guaranteed by simply calling yourself a Constitutionalist. ;)

Blade_Runner wrote:

Many interpretations, huh?

Uh, yeah, as proven by the endless temper tantrums of those who disagree with the interpretations made by federal court judges.

Blade_Runner wrote:

Have you studied the Federalist Papers?

I have a copy that I use as a reference. Over the years, I've probably read about half of it. Why? Do you have a point or were you just hoping I wouldn't know what the Federalist Papers are?

Blade_Runner wrote:

And we wonder why our nation is in such a mess.

Well, YOU might wonder. And though there are many reasons, they all seem pretty obvious to me.
Go to
Oct 10, 2020 11:40:07   #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
My point was that although the Chinese government calls itself communist, it doesn't (or no longer) engage in Communism...

Names are simply names... Look at the Democratic People's Republic of Korea... Not one of those terms is accurate


Go to
Oct 10, 2020 11:39:05   #
Seth wrote:
The only politicians whose goal is taking power away from the American people can be found in the Democratic Party.


Is that why it's the Republicans that are falling over themselves to prevent people from voting?
Go to
Oct 10, 2020 11:37:20   #
son of witless wrote:
China is counting on dominating the developing world.


Of course they are. We did too. It's a very lucrative proposition.
Go to
Oct 9, 2020 23:00:43   #
Milosia2 wrote:
$3 Trillion per year taken from your economy by rich people. $50 Trillion since 1980
Now they’ve got you arguing over pennies.
Sad sad sad
You should at least blame the right people.


Debeda is referring to some false information. I've done the research on this... illegal immigrants actually contribute more than they take.
Go to
Oct 9, 2020 22:59:04   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
A Constitutionalist interpreting the Constitution? Now there's a novel idea.

Many interpretations, huh? Have you studied the Federalist Papers?

And we wonder why our nation is in such a mess.


Federalist Papers - good point... the conflicting interpretations started before the Constitution was even ratified!
Go to
Oct 9, 2020 22:56:25   #
debeda wrote:
Deferred action for children. Got it. Do YOU know how much money goes to illegals? Daily, monthly, yearly? As far as DACA goes, it allowed these people to apply for citizenship. If they didn't, it's on them.

I am an immigrant. I came here from England with my parents when I was 2 years old. That makes me a childhood arrival. Now it so happens that my family came here legally, but I had no control over that. I was two years old, so I wasn't exactly asking my parents if this sh8t is legal.

As it turns out by the time the government started putting pressure on deportations during the last Bush Administration I have already been here for about 40 years, got married and raised two children.

I can't imagine being told that I have to leave my family and the country I grew up in to be returned to a country I don't even know, just because of a decision my parents made when I was a baby.

Some of these childhood arrivals, served our country in uniform. Some of them worked hard to give their own U.S. born children a good education, making them viable contributors to society.

Do you ever think about these things?

debeda wrote:

Its HILARIOUS that YOU see MY bias🤣🤣🤣

Okaay... Well, you did put it out there. It's easy to see. 'Not sure what makes that funny. But it's always good to laugh, right?
Go to
Oct 9, 2020 22:21:09   #
Seth wrote:
Except that... In accordance with the will of the founders and in the spirit of American core beliefs, Trump's picks for the federal bench and SCOTUS are strict Constitutionalists. They are who he is supposed to appoint to uphold the Constitution.

Being a Constitutionalist doesn't mean anything. The U.S.Constitution is a simple and relatively small body of laws that anyone can read... and interpret. The Constitutionalist view is just one of many interpretations out there.

Seth wrote:

Your ilk, on the other hand, wants to make a mockery of the Constitution, the courts and the American people by putting activists on the bench for whom the Constitution is nothing more than a list of suggestions.

And now you are describing your intolerance for other interpretations.

Seth wrote:

It has nothing to do with political parties, everything to do with his upholding his oath to preserve and protect the Constitution.

I agree this is what he SHOULD be doing.

Seth wrote:

You see, nothing your ilk represents has anything to do with patriotism, love of country or the rule of law. For your party, everything is political, and knowing that this would not be acceptable to the American people, you deflect and try to convince people that it's conservatives who represent what you yourselves do, and that it's you who represent what we do.

Oh, the irony... Fact is, the thing Democrats find most frustrating about Trump and his allies is how they bend the rule of law. As for patriotism and all that crap, I can't speak for all Democrats because I know they can also be very patriotic, but personally, I have no room for such BS. I love my family and my friends and I have respect for all humanity. I don't get caught up in all that jingoism, which is all your pathetic patriotism is.

Great fodder for fascism though. All the fascist regimes were nationalist. It's what puts them on the right.

Seth wrote:

It's not working, the lies and the rest of the unprecedented extremes to which the left-controlled Democrats have gone these last four years have so overflowed their containment by the mainstream media that even those fake news goons can no longer conceal the truth.

That's why the Walkaway Movement and the Blexit Movement have grown so large so fast and why they're still growing, and that's why the silent majority will not be silent on the third of November.

All the "polls" that favor Biden and all the wishful thinking the Democrats and the mainstream media call "indicators" of a coming Biden victory won't change anything.

Trump and the Republicans will have an outstanding election day, across the board, and the Democrats will stand there looking thunderstruck.
br It's not working, the lies and the rest of the... (show quote)

LOL - Well, let's just wait and see.
Go to
Oct 9, 2020 21:56:28   #
debeda wrote:
I do not have to recognize illegal aliens as having civil rights in America nor do I have to pay taxes to contribute to their food, housing and medical care here. And in Chicago, now that illegals have the right to Medicare, I no longer have to pay city or county sales tax to contribute to that.


OK... a bit delusional on the details but your prejudice is pretty clear... In any case, DACA has nothing to do with any of that. Maybe you shouldn't use DACA as an example until you know what it actually is.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 ... 758 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.