Posts: Happishark | One Political Plaza

(Main)

War and Decision

proud republican wrote:

"Im from another planet",by KiraSeer aka Marsinah

Thanks.

(Main)

War and Decision

Marsinah wrote:

By Douglas Feith, published 4/8/2008 br br I chec... (show quote)

What's the name of the book?

(Main)

Third March Nor'easter for New England this year. What Global Warming ?

JFlorio wrote:

A weather map? Really? You global warming sycophants are truly delusional.

What's delusional about a weather map? And why do you persist in referring to climate change as global warming? That's a misleading oversimplification long ago abandoned by climate scientists and other knowledgeable people.

The dupes are people who continue to claim that they understand climate better than scientists who spend their entire lives studying it.

(Main)

Q-Anon

Peewee wrote:

If you are keeping up with Q's post, he posted a lot of data last night. If you are curious about Q, check out the following sites on YT yesterday: Jerome Corsi, Deception bytes, Tracy Beanz, and AlphaFaith:

https://youtu.be/a9cybc1ADR0 https://youtu.be/YjGLFZ_IvNs https://youtu.be/UeL420NDy1k https://youtu.be/IahSB49V70E

If you missed Levin and Nunes on Fox last night, it was really outstanding. https://youtu.be/xf0WPhQ8usQ

Okay, Q says to expect something huge this week. My guess is the IG will release his report, refer charges to AG Sessions and we're off to the races.

Under the radar: Trump signed a new EO revamping the UCMJ (Uniform Court of Military Justice) as to military tribunals. Last month Trump recalled 1,000 military officers... only officers may serve on a military tribunal.

Marshall Law: Remember the missile warning/attack in Hawaii? It was real, that allows Trump to declare Martial Law whenever he decides to. That gives him control over all military, Nat'l Guard, and local police.
Expect powerful politicians, judges, MSM, illegals, MS-13, etc... to be rounded up and either arrested or deported. Once this happens a few BLM, Antifa, ISIS cells etc... will try and start riots... they will be dealt with in short order. One important area of concern, your kids, and grandkids, if riots occur in your area keep your kids home. Have extra food and water just in case.

The purge and return to law and order began in Saudia Arabia, then here, next is Asia and finally Europe.
This is a worldwide return to Law and Order. Trump has control over the NSA and CIA as of now. By the end of the week, he should have DOJ, FBI, Congress, Supremes, Courts and Sanctuary States and Cities back to coloring within their Constitutional lines again. There also may be a Class Action lawsuit against MSM, Google, Facebook, Youtube and Twitter and an Internet Bill of Rights passed by Congress.

Before you attack me, watch the video links above. It's your job to educate yourself.

Your other job is to continue praying!

If you are keeping up with Q's post, he posted a l... (show quote)

If you tell me what city you live in, I can help you find a good mental heath treatment facility there.

(Main)

my letter to Ryan in a Portland Jail Bundy et al. hold over

ron vrooman wrote:

Hello Ryan, 2/21/18
I am told you received my letter. I hope that is true. Getting to establish communications with you is a giant cluster phuque...
I’m driving over tomorrow for a pink slip and to set up a Saturday am meeting at the Inverness jail...
Maggie Rose sends her best thru me. As does Mike School. I spoke with John Lamb and he said he would tell you I’m doing my best to help you. I do lawful not legal and this is my best effort. I sent to you a Take Heed notice for me to work with you as a Private Attorney general. You are entitled to counsel and it does not need to be a BAR attorney.
Your court appointed attorney Lisa Hay is not, will not, work for your best interest. If I had an appointed Attorney and I did I would fire her/him and I did. Are you aware of the 12 presumptions in law such as if you have an attorney you are a ward of the court. You have no standing.
The hearing is for your mental capacity. This is super double important.
Fire the court appointed BAR attorney. Defend yourself Pro se with these caveats. 1. Demand written proof filed into the record that the judge has territorial jurisdiction. Do not back down. That the judge provide a certified copy of his/her oath; Refuse to advance the case until the court and the judge prove their legitimacy, or dismiss with prejudice all charges. Do not back down. 2. Lisa will grant subject matter jurisdiction to the judge. You must not. 3.the Mark O. Hatfield Building is not on federal land it is on Oregon and it is a bogus Article III court. A deputy clerk of that court stated that they are not an Article III court in front of two witnesses. I have documented proof. I have filed into the bogus court that they are in fraud. You are guaranteed an Article III court as you are a flesh and blood man not a legal fiction known by your all caps version of your name Straw Man, which makes you a legal fiction, 4. as a Pro Se litigant if your paper work is deficient they the court and its persons must assist you in correcting your paper work. PERIOD!!! File your paper Sui Juris.in propria persona.
Challenge the original charging documents provided by Kathleen Armstrong for the government an FBI agent. Make them prove each and every statement on the original charging document. THEY cannot it is bogus. Therefore it is all bogus and must be dismissed and you must make the claim. There is no government only corporate governance.
I was at your original arraignment and spoke as amicus curie and Anna J. Brown committed 5 acts of unlawful behavior!!! 3 times she ignored challenges to her jurisdiction, ignored one defendant that claimed he did not understand, and appointed an attorney to a man that wanted to defend himself. She also had a clerk remove 5 documents from Bundy et al. record that I filed into that court. I have her as a defendant in federal court DC along with 28 other judges.
I do not trust any repeat any corporate governance employees, Jail, Sheriff, DOJ, USMS and judiciary. They are all criminal enterprises. It is all over the news and You Tube. Several of us raise hell with them every week at the federal building 1000 SW 3rd ave Portland. Which is not a federal Article III court.

I will mail this in the morning. All the best of every good fortune. I close with love, peace, harmony and a prayer.

Hello Ryan, 2/21/18 br I am told you receiv... (show quote)

Who's Ryan? Why is he being held? What drew your attention to his case?

(Main)

'What is it?' - The Sunday Morn. Riddle/question. Like 'Name that object', but unique..

S. Maturin wrote:

b IT'S TUCKER! /B br br Cripes, I thought that ... (show quote)

I made it pretty clear my "criticism of 'zealots'" applies to both conservatives and liberals.

And if you count liberals as a group that "wants to destroy liberty, freedom, and thus this country,"* then you announce yourself as one of the haters who can't or won't see that there are a whole lot of loyal Americans on either side of the political divide.

* If that's not what you meant, I apologize for misinterpreting your statement.

(Main)

'What is it?' - The Sunday Morn. Riddle/question. Like 'Name that object', but unique..

S. Maturin wrote:

No, the expense would be covered by diverting some of the $140BILLION waste in Medicare/Medicaid administration to this program. Once we find the thieves and get our money back, that is. No problem, right?

As long as diverting the waste doesn't mean raising the copays to a point where people who are already struggling to decide whether to buy food or pay the rent this month can't afford health care.

(Main)

'What is it?' - The Sunday Morn. Riddle/question. Like 'Name that object', but unique..

S. Maturin wrote:

Patient: Doctor, I need some drugs.

Doctor: Fine, I'll get you some and you can move into the controlled living spaces for a couple of weeks until we see how you react to those drugs.

Sounds good to me, but we'd have to open up a whole lot more controlled living space beds, and find a way for people to afford them. Maybe we could work out some kind of deal with addiction treatment facilities. Oh, wait--they don't have nearly enough beds as it is. What to do, what to do...

(Main)

'What is it?' - The Sunday Morn. Riddle/question. Like 'Name that object', but unique..

bggamers wrote:

I'm not picking its a fact that these meds can cause in some people suicidal and homicidal tendencies and most mass murders were on these drugs its called a side effect

It's true some antidepressants, as well as some sedatives and hypnotics, can cause
violent impulses in patients who had none previously. There needs to be more responsible prescribing of these meds and more careful monitoring of patients who start taking them. (And don't get me started on big Pharma.) But you missed my point, to wit: the answer is not allowing some government functionary access to our medical records. That would be dangerously reckless and manifestly unconstitutional.

(Main)

'What is it?' - The Sunday Morn. Riddle/question. Like 'Name that object', but unique..

pafret wrote:

You have a "Rose Colored Glasses" view of what will happen to young people who are suddenly conscripted. From my personal experience I can tell you that none of the desired effects will be provided by the military. I enlisted at age seventeen and went from being a boy to a man overnight. At least that is what the military told me when among the first lectures I got were the military code of justice, in which they enumerated all of the things for which they would severely punish me. They capped that off with article thirteen which essentially said "Do anything we don't like and we will punish you for it, even if it wasn't listed in the previous articles".

Plain enough but we had a number of young men who were given a choice of 'enlist in the Army or go to jail' by some local Judge. Most of those fellows didn't make it through basic before they were in the Stockade. An additional group of people also fell afoul of Military Regs during my three year stint and in each case it was people who had little to no discipline in growing up. They were incapable of accepting authority and obedience was the last virtue they ever practiced. If they came in with the mind set of privilege, intolerance for any authority and insistence on their own views they ultimately ran into problems.

The Army is not a finishing school and they demand absolute obedience. No one will be pampered or heard out or allowed to express their opinion in any way. They are quick to punish any infraction and nothing destroys your life more than a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. I obtained my first "Secret" clearance at age seventeen and had high level clearances through most of my working career. A bad or dishonorable discharge would have shut me out of the life I have enjoyed.

The behavior exhibited by many eighteen year olds would guarantee them a life of misery after the military found them unfit and discarded them. There is no rehab in the military.

Consider also how many wars we are engaged in at this moment. What do you think would happen if we suddenly had a huge standing Army? Politicians would undoubtedly find some other nations which need to be invaded to protect the folks at home. There has to be some justification for the huge budgets required. Maybe rationing will come back for those at home.

Some other countries such as Switzerland have such policies and it is part of their way of life. Being neutral does not mean you won't be invaded and every Swiss youth is required to be militarily trained for protection of his nation and there after to maintain a military weapon in his home for most of his adult life. Despite being armed, the Swiss murder rate is 0.5 per one hundred thousand and the majority of these murders were committed with knives (3 to 1) by about 80% foreigners, including mostly asylum seekers. This indicates a very law abiding mind set among Swiss citizens which is totally lacking in our youth.

My Swiss son-in-law has told me that the military weapon is never touched except for periodic, required, requalifying in its use. Any other use would result in severe penalties and most Swiss regard the presence of that weapon as a necessary nuisance only. Given our current societal state with its anything goes mentality, do you think our young have the discipline to survive the military? Such discipline begins in the home and is inculcated by schools and by his or her peers long before a young person reaches the end of high school or it never will take root.

We need to begin expressing moral outrage at the behaviors of our iconic public figures and we need to show our young how a moral life is lived, with all the the traditional virtues emphasized. Disrespecting the flag is symptomatic of the contempt our society has for what used to be normal behavior.

This rant is beginning to become endless so I will end it here with the statement that conscripting all youths into the current military would be a disaster for both and would not produce the desired effect.

You have a "Rose Colored Glasses" view o... (show quote)

Vefy well said.

(Main)

'What is it?' - The Sunday Morn. Riddle/question. Like 'Name that object', but unique..

bggamers wrote:

There needs to be a data base where people on anti depressants ect can be identified when they to try buy a gun.eagleye put out another thread about the people who do these mass shootings all were on psychiatric drugs. a lot of people would scream about invasion of privacy but in this case personal privacy be damned the price of privacy is beginning to cost way to much.

Why single out people on anti-depressants? What about people taking sedatives, antipsychotics, antianxiety meds, mood stabilizers, ADHD meds...? Depending on which report you believe, that's between 1/6 and 1/4 of the US population. What about people who are being treated for psychiatric problems, but aren't on medications? And how about the millions of people with psychiatric disorders that aren't being treated at all? Maybe everyone should be required by Federal law to take an MMPI (a popular standardized test that assesses psychopathology). I'm sure we could find a way around that pesky 4th amendment.

It will always be challenging to protect people's safety and privacy at the same time, but that doesn't mean we should abandon one for the sake of the other. When I think about the reasons I love my country, our Constitutionally guaranteed individual rights always top the list. I will never condone taking away those rights from any group or class of Americans--only from particular individuals under very specific circumstances defined by the law. (How "the law" differs from "Executive orders" is a conversation for another day.)

Violence of all kinds, including gun violence, is a complex problem for which there is no simple solution. As with cancer, no cure can ever be found, but we can make tremendous strides by trying multiple approaches at the same time. We know that poverty, ignorance, untreated mental health problems--including addiction--all breed violence, so we must fight poverty, improve education, build and staff more treatment centers, and make treatment more widely available.

And though I agree that we need to make it more difficult for people to enter the country illegally from Mexico and points south, I am a hundred times more concerned about stopping the flow of weapons across our borders. No one I know wants to take guns away from legally licensed, civilized gun owners. But I could visit any city in America and, even though I'd never been there before, buy a gun illegally on the street in the course of an afternoon. With a little more time and money, I could custom-order a collection of virtually any kinds of weapons I wanted. So could any local criminal or crazy person with deadly intent. THAT'S THE PROBLEM THAT SCARES THE SHIT OUT OF ME AND MY LIBERAL FRIENDS. THAT HAS TO CHANGE BEFORE ANY OF US CAN FEEL SAFE.

Again, I recognize that the fact that almost everybody has easy access to lethal weapons is not the whole problem, and stopping these weapons from coming into the United States is not the whole answer--but it would help a whole lot.

There are many, many measures we can try in order to combat the violence epidemic before we resort to revoking people's freedom. And the only way you'll ever take away my right to privacy will be by prying it out of my cold, dead hands.

(Main)

'What is it?' - The Sunday Morn. Riddle/question. Like 'Name that object', but unique..

S. Maturin wrote:

“Let’s stop lying about this,” he said on “Tucker ... (show quote)

You don't say who he is, but whoever he is, he doesn't know what's in my heart, and isn't qualified to comment on how I feel about people on the other side of the political fence. Obviously, there are haters on both sides.

As a liberal, I know nothing I say or do can help quell the hate of bitter, vindictive, extremist conservatives. Only their fellow conservatives can do that. I can and do reach out to liberals whose hurt and fear have coalesced into blind anger.

Neither side can afford to be led by enraged zealots. We must all do what we can to help them find peace in their hearts and tolerance for other people's beliefs. When we cannot, we must condemn their narrow-mindedness and divorce ourselves from their dangerous rhetoric. Then we can get on with the business of negotiation and compromise, so we can secure the future of the country we all love.

(Main)

AR 15 knock offs

Larry the Legend wrote:

I'll do better than that. I'll give you a whole l... (show quote)

Thanks for your thoughtful reply.

Impressive list. Some I know about, but it will take some time for me to bring myself up to speed on most of them. A couple of things strike me at first glance, though. Many of the countries you name are among the poorest, most devastated, most dangerous places in the world, and so it's hard for me to imagine that the lives of their inhabitants have been much improved by the violence there--especially the conflicts that are ongoing... And the Candlelight Revolution wasn't an armed protest.

You've certainly given me a lot to think about.

(Main)

AR 15 knock offs

Larry the Legend wrote:

So you would have sided with the British in 1776? Or the French king in 1789? How about the Kaiser in 1917? What you said looks like a knee-jerk reaction. Think about it.

It's not 1776 or 1789 or 1917. Please show me one single modern example of an armed internal uprising that has put an end to injustice or righted a wrong or accomplished any kind of good. Arguably, things might have been different in the past, but these days civil violence unfailingly brings about the slaughter of innocents on all sides, destroys the social order, reduces infrastructure to rubble, lays waste to natural resources, decimates the local economy, terrorizes the populace, causes widespread hunger and disease, and in general gives rise to untold pain and suffering.

(Main)

AR 15 knock offs

Larry the Legend wrote:

Yes, an armed forces and an FBI consisting of a large number of individuals drawn from the general population who consented to serve a predetermined contract for a term of years. These are not automatons. They are regular guys (girls?) just like you and me. Ask yourself, what would you do?

Everything* I could to prevent or suppress an an armed insurrection, no matter how sympathetic I was to the complaints of those in rebellion. Injustice is rampant in the US and around the world, but none here, at least, that could be remedied by resorting to violence.

*OK--not everything. I wouldn't endorse or participate in mass arrests, torture, indiscriminate killing, the use of biological agents--and the list goes on--to put down an armed uprising. However, I am as certain as I am of anything that the dire consequences of such an action would far, far outweigh any possible good that could come of it.