One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Unclet
Page: <<prev 1 ... 162 163 164 165
Apr 13, 2013 10:34:08   #
banjojack wrote:
While I do not hold a degree in the mental health sciences, as a former US Army MP, and retired business manager I think I have some practical understanding of applied psychology. There are benefits to increasing governmental control (at least for the government) that are overlooked, ignored, but nevertheless very real.
To put this in plain language, in the real world, like it or not, once you start backing down from a bully it's hard to stop. This is the overlooked reason for the governments' push for more and more power and control, gun or otherwise. In the world envisioned by the left, pretty much everything is controlled by an omniscient, untouchable, (but, just like in the fairy tales, somehow always benevolent) AUTHORITY. This AUTHORITY assumes responsibility for every aspect of life and living that leftists feel themselves, and therefore, everyone else, incapable of dealing with. Once government reaches a certain size, it takes on a quasi-life of it's own, (much like the "science project" I once found residing in the back of my refrigerator). Like any self-respecting parasite, it reproduces itself until the host can no longer support it, at which time it dies. Unfortunately, so does the host. But I digress. Big government is a creation of, and religion of, the basically insecure, timid liberal, progressive, (now there's a contradiction for ya) mindset that craves cradle to grave security provided by someone else. The problem with that was best described many years ago by Benjamin Franklin, who said "Those who would trade essential liberty for a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security and will soon lose both." Government, like nature, abhors a vacuum, and if you leave government to others, others will govern, at your expense. The surrender of your most basic right, that of self defense, carries huge and largely unrealized psychological implications. Once you abdicate your right of self defense, you are done. Go ahead and stick a fork in yourself. Losing, while not a desirable outcome, is at least palatable when you "go down swinging." Abject surrender carries with it the knowledge that in your heart, and soul, you are beaten.
While I do not hold a degree in the mental health ... (show quote)


Well Stated!
Go to
Apr 13, 2013 10:09:53   #
Tasine wrote:
Bill Maher, the STATESMAN EXTRAORDINAIRE? THAT Bill Maher? When the MSM starts quoting ME, I MAY read what it says about Bill Maher - until then both the MSM and Bill Maher can take a long hike on a short pier. What Bill Maher thinks carries no more weight than what my 2 year old great granddaughter thinks.


Even less for me. Bill Maher is just a waste of fresh air.
Go to
Apr 13, 2013 10:00:51   #
Poco - how is this post germain to this topic - If you are trying to make the point that there is just as much corruption on the Republican side as there is in the Democratic Party - I agree. Still does not change the fact that Obama should be impeached.
Go to
Check out topic: Due to inflation...
Apr 13, 2013 09:55:28   #
Anyone who does not believe that there is a "Gun Registry" is playing Ostrich and hiding their head in the sand. There was a story in the new yesterday about a police confiscating guns from someone that had been deterimined to be mentally deficient. The police took his guns, the man hired an attorney, the police admitted a mistake, they thought he was someone else and gave the man back his guns. If no one complained and the man did not flaunt his weapons, which he did not, they were secured in a safe. How did this happen. My opinion is that, they saw how many guns this individual had on a registry and wanted to confirm and possibly take away his weapons. When caught in the scam, they said OOPs a mistake and backed off. But what if the man could not afford an attorney or was just scared to fight back against the system. Either way they had some means of identifing a weapon holder. Registry.
Go to
Apr 13, 2013 09:45:59   #
Tasine - what would you put in place of our "Representative Constitutional type of Gov't. As a veteran I could never condone such a thing. Right now, that is the problem, we don't have that type of Gov't, we have a Non-Representative Dictatorship. That is what needs to change, not our Gov't as it is written.
Go to
Apr 13, 2013 09:42:09   #
I agree with both you and Roy to a point. Even though it takes the both the House and the Senate to Impeach. It would still be worthwhile for the House to Start the Articles of Impeachment and at least get it on record (not saying that they have the balls to do it). At least we would know that they are not just as complicit as the Crook in the White House. Term Limits would fix the grid lock that is now in place. The ability to remove all of them in 4 to 8 years would not totally stop the corruption, but it would definitely slow them down. Term Limits should apply to all elected positions for all three branches of Gov't - Executive, Legislative and Judicial - Supreme Court Justices having a lifetime to impose their view on the rest of us is just unconscienable in today's world. Maybe, back when people held Honor and Integrity above all else, but not now.
Go to
Mar 24, 2013 18:48:56   #
Rather or not they are going to try to take guns away is a secondary issue. Primary issue is why they would want to take guns away. Guns in the hands of law abiding citizens are just tools, used for hunting and sport shooting. Guns in the hands of the young thugs that you referenced, are weapons. If we enforce/enforced the laws that we already have on the books, none of the rhetoric would be necessary. Punish criminals, and destroy their weapons when they are confiscated. Punish those who do not secure their weapons and whose weapons are used for crimes. Until we start holding those who are responsible for committing crimes accountable, we will forever continue to have this conversation.

That being said, there is still the issue of will the military fire on citizens. Without claiming the sky is falling, there are forces at work, to ensure that we unfortunately will find out in the near future.
Go to
Mar 24, 2013 17:32:59   #
They will fire. The whole premise of military training is "blind obedience". They will regret it later, and may, at some point change sides. That will come later after realization of what they have been ordered to do has set in, and remorse replaces zeal.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 162 163 164 165
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.