One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: payne1000
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 ... 1323 next>>
Jun 9, 2015 16:34:56   #
JMHO wrote:
Conjecture...no real evidence...some one said crap!




I know trolls like you cannot be convinced of anything.
You are only here to cover up truth.
But what you are doing instead is allowing more truth to be posted.
How does that make you feel?
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 16:29:59   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Tell me again how you determine Truth, Pain?


Truth almost always makes sense.

It has to comply with the laws of science and physics.

It has to be in compliance with the rules of probability.

9/11 is a good subject for the application of the rules of probability.
Before 9/11, in the 100-year history of skyscrapers, no steel-framed building had ever fallen from fire damage. The only force which had ever brought steel-framed buildings down was controlled demolition.
The three towers which fell on 9/11 showed more characteristics of controlled demolition than they did of fire induced collapse. WTC7 which wasn't hit by an airliner, fell in classic controlled demolition fashion.
The conclusion I reach after considering the laws of science and physics and the rules of probability is that the towers were brought down by controlled demolition.

When I know that, then many more truths can be derived related to the lies we have been told about the towers.
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 15:54:15   #
JMHO wrote:
What evidence???!!!! I read opinion...conjecture...no real evidence...some one said crap. You're making crap up! That's the problem with you conspiracy nuts.


A reporter for a major British news service in Abbottabad asking local residents if the old man who was murdered was Bin Laden and they say no 50 to 1. How could I make that up? It's right there for everyone to see.

What better evidence could there be?
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 15:50:21   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Sorry, not interested. I have other resources.


Of course you don't want any knowledge which is accumulated through a lifetime of first hand experience in what causes wars.

Truth is not what you want.

It may prove that everything you think you know is a lie.
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 15:46:57   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Sarcasm--the body's natural defense against stupid.

Did you get that that was sarcasm?


Of course I did.

Is there a rule that I have to acknowledge sarcasm--especially when it's drawn on ignorance?
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 15:19:53   #
JMHO wrote:
Blah...blah...blah...yawn...ho hum...more conspiracy crap...no proof...just B.S....yawn...ho hum...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


The evidence is impossible to refute, so you attempt to slip away unnoticed by pretending boredom. The small brain just shut down on you, didn't it?
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 15:15:19   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I brought that question up, because so many people after WWII have been baffled by that conundrum, even Einstein. Neither religion nor science have had answers to World War II.

I have some answers, but I'd like to have people think about carnage and slaughter, in the 20th as well as the 21st century.

Feminists blame men, Communists blame capitalists, Socialists think the answer is to eliminate competition, forgetting it was that 19th century malignant philosophy that contributed to the 20th century, and on and on and on....
I brought that question up, because so many people... (show quote)


Read Major General Smedley Butler's essay on war and you might start to understand it. http://archive.org/stream/WarIsARacket/WarIsARacket_djvu.txt
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 15:11:17   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Well, THAT makes a lot of sense!!


Truth always makes sense.

Too bad lies outnumber the truth when it comes to written history foisted on the masses.
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 14:32:37   #
JMHO wrote:
Prove it conspiracy theorist! The dirty little truth is you can't...all you can do is manufacture conspiracy crap. Your whole premise is absolutely stupid.


BBC sent a reporter to interview the locals in Abbottabad.

Out of 50 people interviewed, only 1 thought the old man was Bin Laden.
One of those interviewed said he knew the victim and it definitely wasn't Bin Laden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkqTH91PxJM

The old man in the video shown doesn't look like Bin Laden and he's holding the video remote in his right hand. Bin Laden was left handed.

This reminds me of an early CIA produced video with an actor playing Bin Laden confessing to being behind 9/11. The actor was writing right handed and wore a gold ring which Muslims never do.

The perps don't have to be careful in their details because they know the traitors in the media will cover for them.
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 14:03:35   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Jeff, and you call that a "lie" because....?


Sorry to answer out of turn but it occurs to me that a allegedly all-caring God would not have a "chosen people."

If your God is a just God, he/she would treat all people the same.
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 13:59:29   #
JMHO wrote:
So? I posted this same article several days ago myself. But, it has nothing to do with killing off Seal team Six.


Of course it does.

If Seal Team 6 members were hinting they might blow the whistle on the Abbottabad lies which were much more serious than what Hersh exposed, those who ran the hoax would be forced to deal with them. Silencing them for good is usually the preferred method of the "Deep State."
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 13:08:26   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I said IF that was indeed written by Einstein, then he was wrong. And if he were wrong, it would be because, like some other Jewish people, he had the mistaken belief, taught the many centuries of using Jews as scapegoats, that if the Jewish people kept a low profile, they wouldn't be bothered by the "others".

For instance, at one point during the development of that European subcontinent, Jewish women shaved their heads (and wore wigs) so that the Gentile men would not find them attractive.

It might behoove you to read about Chaim Weizman, who was a friend of Einstein's.

From Wikipedia:Chaim Azriel Weizmann (Hebrew: &#1495;&#1497;&#1497;&#1501; &#1506;&#1494;&#1512;&#1497;&#1488;&#1500; &#1493;&#1497;&#1510;&#1502;&#1503;&#8206; &#7716;ay&#299;m Wayzman, Russian: &#1061;&#1072;&#1080;&#1084; &#1042;&#1077;&#1081;&#1094;&#1084;&#1072;&#1085; Khaim Veytsman; 27 November 1874 – 9 November 1952) was a Zionist leader and Israeli statesman who served as President of the Zionist Organization and later as the first President of Israel. He was elected on 16 February 1949, and served until his death in 1952. Weizmann convinced the United States government to recognize the newly formed state of Israel.

You might enjoy this little, factual story about Weizmann and Einstein, as they traveled together to the U.S. in 1923:

(Weizmann says he believes Einstein explained his Theory of Relativity to him so many times, that he thinks he finally understands it!)


Prof. Einstein has become part of Jewish legend. A hitherto unpublished Einstein anecdote is included in the new book “The Jewish People in Anecdote” by the scholar Chaim Block. The story tells of the first voyage of Prof. Einstein to America, when he accompanied Chaim Weizmann, then World Zionist President. After the voyage, Dr. Weizmann was asked, “What did you talk about during the trip?”
“During the entire trip, Einstein, kept explaining his theory of relativity to me,” said Dr. Weizmann, himself a noted chemist.
“And what impression did you get?” he was asked.
“I believe he understands it!” was the answer.

But that was before World War II. Attitudes changed---How could God have possibly allowed the extermination of 6 million Jews?
I said IF that was indeed written by Einstein, the... (show quote)


Chaim Weizman was president of the World Jewish Organization during the period when Zionists in Germany were allied with Hitler.
I assume he approved of the Transfer Agreement between Zionists and Hitler which broke the worldwide boycott of German goods and saved Hitler's economy. Zionists' traitorous act against the non-Zionist Jews of Germany is what caused all the Jewish deaths in the labor camps--not your imagined God.
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 11:35:27   #
lpnmajor wrote:
A wise commander picks the battle field, a losing commander lets someone else do the picking. So far, our commanders have let all kinds of people pick our battle fields - and we keep losing as a consequence.

There are no isolated issues, no matter how badly politicians wish us to believe there are. As an example, during WWII, we lost many ships in our OWN waters, because our leaders did not think they were at risk - and it took years to come up with an effective counter. Everything relates to everything else and failing to adequately prepare HERE - has a profoundly negative effect - everywhere else.

With our infrastructure falling apart, massive debt, social unrest, severe political corruption and many other ills - we have NO business trying to exert our will outside our own borders. We can't seem to take care of our own business and people - much less trying to do so elsewhere.
A wise commander picks the battle field, a losing ... (show quote)


Sorry to burst your bubble but our leaders knew attacks on Pearl Harbor were imminent. Why do you think they sent all aircraft carriers away from Pearl Harbor before the attacks?

In Day of Deceit, Robert Stinnett delivers the definitive final chapter on America's greatest secret and our worst military disaster.

Drawing on twenty years of research and access to scores of previously classified documents, Stinnett proves that Pearl Harbor was not an accident, a mere failure of American intelligence, or a brilliant Japanese military coup. By showing that ample warning of the attack was on FDR's desk and, furthermore, that a plan to push Japan into war was initiated at the highest levels of the U.S. government, he ends up profoundly altering our understanding of one of the most significant events in American history.

http://www.amazon.com/Day-Of-Deceit-Truth-Harbor/dp/0743201299


Go to
Jun 9, 2015 10:46:16   #
JMHO wrote:
"The most obnoxious cover-up troll on OPP?" Nope, just exposing you extreme right conspiracy theorist wackos and nutbags. I'm right wing, but not off the charts like you, pal. And, I use some common sense when reading crap like what you posted...try it sometimes.


Journalist Seymour Hersh says Obama lied about what happened at Abbottabad.
“High-level lying nonetheless remains the modus operandi of U.S. policy, along with secret prisons, drone attacks, Special Forces night raids, bypassing the chain of command, and cutting out those who might say no,” Hersh wrote of the Obama administration’s counterterrorism policies."
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/241573-report-obama-lied-about-bin-laden-raid
Go to
Jun 9, 2015 10:16:09   #
JMHO wrote:
Still pumping out the conspiracy crap...yawn...ho hum...no proof, just accusations and B.S....you're pathetic.


Still active as the most obnoxious cover-up troll on OPP, eh, Jimmyho?

Michael Savage is a right-wing Zionist. Most times you defend those views.
Why not this time?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 ... 1323 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.