Seems to me that I recall that every credible intelligence agency in the world, Both Western and Eastern, came to the same conclusion that Saddam possessed WMD' s. And didn't Saddam gas the Kurds? And didn't they discover plans for nukes buried in the back yard of Iraq's top nuclear scientists? And aren't we quite certain that Saddam shipped poisonous gas to Syria? And, and, and etc, etc, etc? Furthermore, it gave the cowardly Progressives in Congress a straw man argument (lie) to declare George Bush and Dick Cheney the bastards at the family reunion? It also gave them the false covering (the opposite of "sincere") to say they "were for the war before they were against it". And my most favorite of all, "Iraq was an unscheduled financed war" (some lunacy like that) as if we've always had a war savings account. And the sad, the tragic, truth is that millions of dumber than rocks folks swallowed it hook line and sinker. That's why progressives are suckers; a bottom feeding trash fish. (Allow me to use my thumb and scratch out that last remark.) Well shucks. It seems like Truth is not easily erased.

I don't think there is enough stored energy to drop the towers with cars ... but they do go boom very loudly when they explode with enough energy to blow out windows and non structural walls...
Lets assume you're correct in the statement that most of the jet-A burned on impact ... like 9/10ths which is a lot considering Jet-A burns slow like Diesel not like gasoline ... that would leave close to 9,000 gallons to find its way throughout the building down elevator shafts and stairwells, soaking up into everything porous and starting to burn... you should try this out... half fill a paint can full of rags and pour one quart of Diesel fuel in it... it will burn for hours producing coal black smoke, enough to really piss off your neighbors if there not pissed already ... now think of a chimney fire.. you've had them right? Think of the roaring in a chimney when the up rush of air bursts the combustibles into flame... 9000 gallons of Jet-A running down several elevator shafts with a 110 story updraft has the potential to do lots of damage ... there were many unusual forces at work on 911... too many to predict accurately... but it was really the alien lizard like shape shifting Zionists like the ones in your video... 8-)

In NYC (and many other cities as well), Seismic monitoring is required for major construction projects (buildings, bridges, freeways, etc.). There were 9 such monitors in lower Manhattan on 9/11. These monitors recorded both the aircraft impacts and the collapse of the buildings. Seismic and demolition engineers analyzed the data and found none of it was consistent with the seismic patterns of a controlled demolition.

A whole slew of 9/11 conspiracy theorist videos have been analyzed by video graphics experts and found to have been faked using video game technology and computer modeling. A big percentage of these faked videos are amateurish at best.

9/11 conspiracy loons still cannot articulate their mission statement--as in what precisely motivates them and what their objective really is. Missing from all their wailing and gnashing of teeth about who did it--"inside jobs", "zionists", "Bush and Cheney", "government false flags", "CIA and Mossad", or whatever, is Islamic terrorism. Why? When the evidence for an act of Islamic terrorism is overwhelming, why do these fools cling to such fantasies? What are they attempting to prove? And, if were even possible to do so, what do they intend to do about it?

911 was a day of panic and confusion... There were many forces at work aiding in the failure of the structures well beyond the impact forces ,90,000 gallons of burning jet fuel and gravity... there were many tons of other combustibles inside those building's also... I don't know how many cars were parked out of the 2000 parking space capacity underground .... have you ever seen a car gas tank explode that was half full? An eye witness comes forward...http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-rescuer-saw-explosions-inside-wtc.html

If someone poured cyanide on your Cornflakes and told you it was milk, you'd eat it.

At the first nanocecond of a nuclear detonation, regardless of the weapon's yield, the temperature is 100,000,000 degrees Celsius and it decreases as the reaction progresses. But still, the temperature would be in extremely high range for many seconds. Any idea what that would have done to steel, glass, plastic, wood, paper, carpets, concrete, people? Moreover, even laboratory experiments to test reaction criticality produces lethal gamma radiation. There was absolutely no such radiation detected at WTC, no human, living or dead, suffered radiation exposure, not during the event nor for anytime after. There was no radioactive fall out, which even a "mini-nuke" would have created.

WTF is the matter with you? Good grief. I didn't think it possible that a human being could survive without a brain.

Gravity takes down buildings... the explosives just weaken the structure to allow gravity to do the job... Controlled demolition goes from the bottom up... The WTC fell from the impact point down... The taller the building ... the better gravity works... most controlled demos require months of torch work cutting 3/4 thru steel beams and headers substantially weakening the structure. If this was a controlled demo it was light years ahead of current standards.... plus there would have been hundreds of blast waves and sound waves very auditable at ground level... it had to be Aliens :shock: :lol: