Posts for: payne1000
Sep 21, 2015 11:26:29 #
(Main)
Super Dave wrote:
They're having a sale on tin foil at Walmart.
You better stock up.
You better stock up.
The sale is on "Depends."
You better stock up.
Sep 21, 2015 11:20:40 #
(Main)
emarine wrote:
What does Peter Jennings have to do with anything?... (show quote)
Peter Jennings is not the point I was making. The newsman who was describing the fall of the tower was comparing it to a controlled demolition. That was the point I am making and the point you are attempting to divert from. Why didn't the top section continue to fall off the top of the tower as it had already begun? That would be the logical result of a building which had been struck by an airliner on one corner of the building. Since the structure had been weakened on one side, that side would collapse first--as it was starting to do. The resistance of the lower floors being blown out by controlled demolition allowed the top section to be rerouted into a dead fall straight down. You can see that in the video I linked.
The top section is clearly falling to one side in this photo. the explosions of the lower floors are just starting.
Sep 21, 2015 10:36:09 #
(Main)
September 11, 2001. Timeline
At eleven oclock, on the morning of September 11, the Bush administration had already announced that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) and the Pentagon. This assertion was made prior to the conduct of an indepth police investigation.
That same evening at 9.30 pm, a War Cabinet was formed integrated by a select number of top intelligence and military advisors. And at 11.00 pm, at the end of that historic meeting at the White House, the War on Terrorism was officially launched.
The decision was announced to wage war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda in retribution for the 9/11 attacks. The following morning on September 12th, the news headlines indelibly pointed to state sponsorship of the 9/11 attacks by Afghanistan
In chorus, the US media was calling for a military intervention against Afghanistan.
Barely four weeks later, on the 7th of October, Afghanistan was bombed and invaded by US troops. Americans were led to believe that the decison to go to war had been taken on the spur of the moment, on the evening of September 11, in response to the 9/11 attacks and their tragic consequences.
Little did the public realize that a large scale theater war is never planned and executed in a matter of weeks. The decision to launch a war and send troops to Afghanistan had been taken well in advance of 9/11. The terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event as it was later described by CentCom Commander General Tommy Franks, served to galvanize public opinion in support of a war agenda which was already in its final planning stage.
The tragic events of 9/11 provided the required justification to wage a war on humanitarian grounds, with the full support of World public opinion and the endorsement of the international community.
Several prominent progressive intellectuals made a case for retaliation against terrorism, on moral and ethical grounds. The just cause military doctrine (jus ad bellum) was accepted and upheld at face value as a legitimate response to 9/11, without examining the fact that Washington had not only supported the Islamic terror network, it was also instrumental in the installation of the Taliban government in 1996.
In the wake of 9/11, the antiwar movement was completely isolated. The trade unions and civil society organizations had swallowed the media lies and government propaganda. They had accepted a war of retribution against Afghanistan, an impoverished country of 30 million people."
Read more . . . http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-truth-behind-9-11-who-is-osama-bin-laden-2/3198
At eleven oclock, on the morning of September 11, the Bush administration had already announced that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) and the Pentagon. This assertion was made prior to the conduct of an indepth police investigation.
That same evening at 9.30 pm, a War Cabinet was formed integrated by a select number of top intelligence and military advisors. And at 11.00 pm, at the end of that historic meeting at the White House, the War on Terrorism was officially launched.
The decision was announced to wage war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda in retribution for the 9/11 attacks. The following morning on September 12th, the news headlines indelibly pointed to state sponsorship of the 9/11 attacks by Afghanistan
In chorus, the US media was calling for a military intervention against Afghanistan.
Barely four weeks later, on the 7th of October, Afghanistan was bombed and invaded by US troops. Americans were led to believe that the decison to go to war had been taken on the spur of the moment, on the evening of September 11, in response to the 9/11 attacks and their tragic consequences.
Little did the public realize that a large scale theater war is never planned and executed in a matter of weeks. The decision to launch a war and send troops to Afghanistan had been taken well in advance of 9/11. The terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event as it was later described by CentCom Commander General Tommy Franks, served to galvanize public opinion in support of a war agenda which was already in its final planning stage.
The tragic events of 9/11 provided the required justification to wage a war on humanitarian grounds, with the full support of World public opinion and the endorsement of the international community.
Several prominent progressive intellectuals made a case for retaliation against terrorism, on moral and ethical grounds. The just cause military doctrine (jus ad bellum) was accepted and upheld at face value as a legitimate response to 9/11, without examining the fact that Washington had not only supported the Islamic terror network, it was also instrumental in the installation of the Taliban government in 1996.
In the wake of 9/11, the antiwar movement was completely isolated. The trade unions and civil society organizations had swallowed the media lies and government propaganda. They had accepted a war of retribution against Afghanistan, an impoverished country of 30 million people."
Read more . . . http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-truth-behind-9-11-who-is-osama-bin-laden-2/3198
Check out topic: A Big Salute
Sep 21, 2015 09:48:52 #
(Main)
eagleye13 wrote:
laPhill is jmho light:-)
A mini troll
A mini troll
As opposed to a maxi troll, such as emarine and blade runner.
Sep 21, 2015 09:44:04 #
(Main)
Jean Deaux wrote:
Looks a bit like a trash dump. Have you ever seen an actual crash site? Remnants of engines, seats, wheels, structural parts, passenger body parts, luggage, ad infinitum. This was no airliner crash site and your picture proves it.
Below is what real crash sites look like.
Is this what the pentagon lawn looked like?
Sep 21, 2015 09:37:42 #
(Main)
America Only wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93
Body parts found as well...you fail so badly...stick to telling stories about your managing 850 million dollar accounts....you can fib better with that one.
Body parts found as well...you fail so badly...stick to telling stories about your managing 850 million dollar accounts....you can fib better with that one.
Body parts found? http://humansarefree.com/2015/03/shanksville-coroner-no-bodies-found-at.html
Sep 21, 2015 09:34:41 #
(Main)
America Only wrote:
You are again failed.
Here is a picture of the crash at shanksville.....and you say "not a single piece of wreckage" I see PLENTY of wreckage...but not YOUR statement again that is failed. You should actually do that so called STUDY you claim to do.
Here is a picture of the crash at shanksville.....and you say "not a single piece of wreckage" I see PLENTY of wreckage...but not YOUR statement again that is failed. You should actually do that so called STUDY you claim to do.
The photo you show was Photoshopped to accompany this article: http://seeksghosts.blogspot.com/2014/12/911-shanksville-angel-story.html
No other photo of the crash site shows a tail section.
Sep 21, 2015 09:30:04 #
(Main)
America Only wrote:
Show us one commercial building you have built. Waiting......
But first you need to show readers one you have built.
Sep 21, 2015 09:24:13 #
(Main)
emarine wrote:
In this slow motion video of the start of the failure of the south tower, you can clearly see what happened.... notice the lack of a controlled demolition .... play back the start as many times as you need to prove it to yourself once and for all....
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=youtube+wtc+south+tower+collapse&qpvt=youtube+wtc+south+tower+collapse&FORM=VDRE#view=detail&mid=D3F4C0BAC5D08DB486C6D3F4C0BAC5D08DB486C6
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=youtube+wtc+south+tower+collapse&qpvt=youtube+wtc+south+tower+collapse&FORM=VDRE#view=detail&mid=D3F4C0BAC5D08DB486C6D3F4C0BAC5D08DB486C6
This video has news commentator on site communicating with Peter Jennings. He describes the fall as like an old building which is being demolished by controlled demolition.
The video has angles other than the one you cherry-picked which clearly show the explosions. It also shows another feature which is a dead giveaway. The top of the tower starts to fall off to one side in one piece. That indicates there was resistance to the top section before the explosives were set off to destroy the undamaged lower floors. The top section would have fallen in one piece if it wasn't blown to smithereens as well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhyu-fZ2nRA
Sep 21, 2015 09:08:29 #
(Main)
emarine wrote:
The author was exactly that ... the author who compiled and presented the data he researched in his work... in exactly the same manor as all your conspiracy theory authors ... no different ... except no crazy crap like molten steel for six weeks after 911.... really Larry, want to buy a bridge cheep?
On this site you will find over 2,000 experts, most of whom who have advanced degrees in the field of architecture and engineering, saying the 3 towers were brought down by controlled demolition. http://www.ae911truth.org/gallery/evidence.html
It appears you already bought that "cheep" bridge, emarine.
Sep 21, 2015 08:59:17 #
(Main)
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Payne, Mr. Finkelstein has the fault of being a Li... (show quote)
Check out topic: The Biden Trump Debate is Insulting.
Sep 21, 2015 08:39:27 #
(Main)
son of witless wrote:
You are an amazing character. So persistent which ... (show quote)
How many times will I have to point out that WTC7 was not hit by an airliner and fell at free fall speed during most of its fall. Free fall speed means there was no resistance to its fall whatsoever. That can only be accomplished by explosives cutting all steel supporting columns.
Of course Islamist terrorists would not team up with the Jewish leaseholders to place the explosives in the towers. Muslims were the patsies in the 9/11 operation. They had nothing to do with it. Rogue elements of our government and military teamed up with Mossad in the planning and execution of 9/11. Barry Jennings, who worked for the NYC housing authority, was inside WTC7 on the morning of 9/11. He testified that explosions trapped him inside WTC7 before either of the Twin Towers fell.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Tr0TZa3WeI
Sep 20, 2015 19:03:47 #
(Main)
America Only wrote:
http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm
This covers what you mental midgets do not know...hahahahahehehehlalalolololohehehehhohoho!
This covers what you mental midgets do not know...hahahahahehehehlalalolololohehehehhohoho!
Look for the author on that debunking site. Check out his scientific credentials. I think you'll find he has none.
Sep 20, 2015 19:00:24 #
(Main)
America Only wrote:
Is there ONE skyscraper that was hit by TWO Large jetliners...before 9 11 that survived? And make sure the interior designs were the same....
You fail as most conspiracy people do....there is not one single "test model" of actual scale to use for a comparison. Without that, anything anyone could say is totally GARBAGE!
You fail as most conspiracy people do....there is not one single "test model" of actual scale to use for a comparison. Without that, anything anyone could say is totally GARBAGE!
All the other skyscrapers which burned were hotter fires and burned for much longer than the WTC towers. All the skyscrapers other than the 3 at WTC remained standing.
The North Tower caught fire on the 11th floor in 1975, spreading to the 17th floor. The fire burned for twice as long as on 9/11. None of the steel was weakened or needed to be replaced. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_1975_fire.html
Sep 20, 2015 18:57:00 #
(Main)
America Only wrote:
Where is the Nuke Radiation? Where is the outer ground zero for at least a few miles from the detonation of the mini nukes used? Where are the rest of the FLATTENED out buildings that would have been leveled from those mini nukes? How did all the people that did survive not have suffered severe radiation burns and sickness?
That is all explained in the article--which you obviously did not read.