One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: payne1000
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 ... 1323 next>>
Oct 24, 2015 18:18:57   #
saltwind 78 wrote:
payne, How do you know about trolling for truth?
You seek videos from U- tube that are anything but the truth!If you want the truth, take a college course on the modern history of the middle east.


The true history of the Middle East can be found in the words of those who have lived in Israel: http://www.alternet.org/story/121848/israel_screwed_itself_over_with_its_gaza_assault%3B_the_world_sees_it_as_a_'blood-stained_monster'
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 18:05:55   #
emarine wrote:
... the 78 floors had every reason to fail... they were overloaded by a factor of 10x and that factor increased with every failing floor system and sped up by a factor of 9.8mps... the jet-A explosion and fires would also make your second statement false also... the 78 floors were not as strong as the day they were built... pure bullshit..


The only reason the 78 floors were not as strong as the day they were built is because explosions were already being detonated on the lower floors before the tower started to fall.
Fireman John Schroeder was a witness to these explosions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBb00PQR1zo

William Rodriquez was also a witness to explosions going off in the basement BEFORE the plane hit the tower: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka8muGhlciA
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 17:57:56   #
emarine wrote:
well what do ya know... we're making some progress here... gravity's effect is straight down... now considering the towers were only 208' wide ... nothing was thrown hundred's of feet except dust and very light materials that could carry from the height and wind... the big chunks of what looks like steel beams are the light weight aluminum facing floating around and the heavy frame sections fell close to the building... you are still clueless on the energy involved from acre's of 4" concrete falling onto a floor system designed to carry 1300t getting heavier and falling faster with each floor... any idiot can understand that your statement of no steel frame building ever collapsed from a fire... which is false, but not my point ... back to the idiot part... no other skyscrapers were hit with fully loaded 757's cutting through a large portion of the steel frame and burned at the same time from a jet-A explosion and unknown amounts of residual fuel... the proof is in the video... use you eyes without the bullshit...The building failed @ the impact point from the plane... no ka boom putz... it's all about gravity...The weight and height involved was equal to 500,000lbs of TNT in kinetic energy... no explosives were necessary ... just a plane crash, Jet-A explosion and a huge fire... plus gravity pulling straight down ... the building fell exactly as it should have given the circumstances... straight down...
well what do ya know... we're making some progress... (show quote)


You can repeat your lies ad infinitum but the photos and videos show the twin towers did not fall straight down.






Go to
Oct 24, 2015 16:40:29   #
saltwind 78 wrote:
payne, I don't know if you are crazy or just plain blinded by your own prejudice, but it is you who is the troll.


Trolling for truth is not a paying job.
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 16:15:31   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Gee, no sh!t, Sherlock.

Flight 175 crashed through the South Tower at an angle where the fatal damage sustained was through the SE side. Do you think that had anything to do with why the structure failed there first and was obviously the reason why the upper floors tilted that direction before the entire support failed?

Yeah, damn that gravity, it has a way of doing things like that.


The entire support of the 78 lower floors had no reason to fail. The 78 lower floors were not damaged by the fires or by the airliner. They were as strong as the day they were built.
The only way they could be taken down is by controlled demolition. The videos show controlled demolition.
The news commentator on this video compares the fall of the South tower to a controlled demolition. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhyu-fZ2nRA
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 16:03:12   #
peter11937 wrote:
You, sir are as lazy as any human being can be. It would have taken you less time to lookn it up yourself than too write yiour falacious and insulting post. Rest assured you will never recieve response from me again in any form.

http://www.zionism-israel.com/dic/Haj_Amin_El_Husseini.htm


If you're looking for the truth, you don't go to a website which was written by Zionist propagandists who claim to go by these principles:


"-The Jewish people have the right to a national home in Israel.

-Israel has the right to exist

-Jewish nationalism is as legitimate as the nationalist movement of any other people."


http://www.zionism-israel.com/about.htm
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 15:29:53   #
Pulfnick wrote:
Obama's relationship with Congress is terrible, especially with Republicans including Boehner. He ha no reason to even let Boehner what was happening, let alone get his OK. Unless there's hard evidence Boehner or any Republican was involved, such speculation is highly inappropriate. Hillary was the force behind the Libyan debacle start to finish.


Obama and Hillary are only flunkies for the cabal of Zionist bankers who are controlling U.S. foreign policy. Bush and Cheney were the same kind of flunkies. All of them are traitors and should be treated as traitors.
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 15:26:35   #
Ve'hoe wrote:
Im unwatching this one,,,,, stay at your own peril...


The peril you refer to is the danger of you being exposed as a lying troll.
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 15:25:28   #
VladimirPee wrote:
Yet another conspiracy theory. You are gullible


Are you aware that what you believe happened on 9/11 is a conspiracy theory? Do you know the government version has never been backed up by any kind of solid evidence?

http://www.historycommons.org/searchResults.jsp?searchtext=colin+powell+white+paper&events=on&entities=on&articles=on&topics=on&timelines=on&projects=on&titles=on&descriptions=on&dosearch=on&search=Go

That defines you as a conspiracy theorist, Vlad.
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 13:24:19   #
JFlorio wrote:
Hence the cover up.


Both political parties are in on the cover-up.
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 13:21:47   #
Sibel Edmonds describes how the Tsarnaez brothers were recruited by the FBI and CIA years before the Boston Bombing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk7sHueSa-o
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 13:06:58   #
VladimirPee wrote:
The interview painted a picture of a tortured man who has not come to terms with his 33-year-old son's death or with the huge crime laid at his door. He said he feared the US would try to poison him.


Fear of poisoning by the CIA is a valid fear.
High-level FBI officer Ted Gunderson attempted to expose the lies of 9/11. His doctor claims Gunderson was poisoned.

Gunderson's testimony: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRaezLTU2a0

Gunderson's doctor's testimony: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu77VlA41Sk
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 12:41:30   #
JFlorio wrote:
This story, which Glen Beck circulated before anyone else makes the most sense. Why would there be such a massive cover up of what would have been seen mostly as a security screw up if the administration was telling the truth. The truth is that this administration was telling us before the election that they were not sending weapons to jihadists to fight Assad in Syria. The truth is this administration and Clinton lied repeatedly to the American people. I imagine one of the reasons Boehner is gone is because these deals were done with his knowledge and blessing.
Just once progressives wipe the partisan sand out of your eyes and ask "Why was our ambassador in Benghazi to begin with?"
This story, which Glen Beck circulated before anyo... (show quote)


Stevens was in Benghazi to control the dispersion of weapons to the Syrian rebels and ISIS.
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 12:39:23   #
VladimirPee wrote:
Nonsense. Some Arabic names were mixed up. Half the men are named Mohammed for god sakes


Only one of the 19 had Mohamed in his name. That was Mohamed Atta. Atta's father said he received a call from his son on Sept 12, after the attacks: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/sep/02/september11.usa
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 12:34:39   #
Jeffhunter wrote:
The questions I have are; who makes these weapons that america provides to Arab nations and terrorist groups? Who pays for them? Who gets the profits?
( ..and don't say its the jews, cause everybody know you hate isreal!! ) hahaha lol


Zionists may not manufacture the weapons, but as bankers, they finance the weapons.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 ... 1323 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.