payne1000

Was ambassador Stevens involved in transferring weapons from the Libyan rebels to the Syrian rebels?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/cia-ops-finally-revealed-what-the-us-ambassador-in-benghazi-was-really-doing/5483957

CowboyMilt

THE PLOT SEEMS TO CONTINUE TO THICKEN!

Jeffhunter

The questions I have are; who makes these weapons that america provides to Arab nations and terrorist groups? Who pays for them? Who gets the profits?
( ..and don't say its the jews, cause everybody know you hate isreal!! ) hahaha lol

payne1000

Here's more thickener. Turkey supplied the sarin gas to the Syrian rebels. You remember, the gas that was blamed on Assad? http://www.globalresearch.ca/turkish-whistleblowers-corroborate-story-on-false-flag-sarin-attack-in-syria/5483982

payne1000

Zionists may not manufacture the weapons, but as bankers, they finance the weapons.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

This story, which Glen Beck circulated before anyone else makes the most sense. Why would there be such a massive cover up of what would have been seen mostly as a security screw up if the administration was telling the truth. The truth is that this administration was telling us before the election that they were not sending weapons to jihadists to fight Assad in Syria. The truth is this administration and Clinton lied repeatedly to the American people. I imagine one of the reasons Boehner is gone is because these deals were done with his knowledge and blessing.
Just once progressives wipe the partisan sand out of your eyes and ask "Why was our ambassador in Benghazi to begin with?"

payne1000

Stevens was in Benghazi to control the dispersion of weapons to the Syrian rebels and ISIS.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Hence the cover up.

payne1000

Both political parties are in on the cover-up.

Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN

Obama's relationship with Congress is terrible, especially with Republicans including Boehner. He ha no reason to even let Boehner what was happening, let alone get his OK. Unless there's hard evidence Boehner or any Republican was involved, such speculation is highly inappropriate. Hillary was the force behind the Libyan debacle start to finish.

payne1000

Obama and Hillary are only flunkies for the cabal of Zionist bankers who are controlling U.S. foreign policy. Bush and Cheney were the same kind of flunkies. All of them are traitors and should be treated as traitors.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I'll have to find it. I read it somewhere and the artivcle was from a more conservative group. Some of the committee members were complaining they were getting no support from the Speaker. I didn't just make it up even though I don't like Boehner. Known matter what the buck stops at the top. This Benghazi lie was about guns and Obamas re- election I believe.

okie don

You got it .
Right on target.

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

I've already stated that the very day Stevens was murdered....and he was indeed murdered and not due to Muslims wanting to kill a Non muslim...he was killed by order from the White House. Period.

buffalo Loc: Texas

You got it!

Does anyone doubt the truth? The US and NATO destroyed a stable and resource rich country for no other reason than corporate and their banksters' greed because Gaddahfi was threatening their petrodollar system.

The same reason Saddam was brought down. He was not playing by the corporate and bankster international rules.

"A striking feature of events in Libya in the past week is how little interest is being shown by leaders and countries which enthusiastically went to war in 2011 in the supposed interests of the Libyan people. President Obama has since spoken proudly of his role in preventing a "massacre" in Benghazi at that time. But when the militiamen, whose victory Nato had assured, opened fire on a demonstration against their presence in Tripoli in November last year, killing at least 42 protesters and firing at children with anti-aircraft machine guns, there was scarcely a squeak of protest from Washington, London or Paris.

Coincidentally, it was last week that Al-Jazeera broadcast the final episode in a three-year investigation of the Lockerbie bombing that killed 270 people in 1988. For years this was deemed to be Gaddafi's greatest and certainly best-publicised crime, but the documentary proved beyond reasonable doubt that the Libyan intelligence officer, Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, convicted of carrying out the bombing, was innocent. Iran, working through the Palestinian Front for The Liberation of Palestine – General Command, ordered the blowing up of Pan Am 103 in revenge for the shooting down of an Iranian passenger plane by the US navy earlier in 1988.

Much of this had been strongly suspected for years. The new evidence comes primarily from Abolghasem Mesbahi, an Iranian intelligence officer who later defected and confirmed the Iranian link. The US Defense Intelligence Agency had long ago reached the same conclusion. The documentary emphasises the sheer number of important politicians and senior officials over the years who must have looked at intelligence reports revealing the truth about Lockerbie, but still happily lied about it.

It is an old journalistic saying that if you want to find out government policy, imagine the worst thing they can do and then assume they are doing it. Such cynicism is not deserved in all cases, but it does seem to be a sure guide to western policy towards Libya. This is not to defend Gaddafi, a maverick dictator who inflicted his puerile personality cult on his people, though he was never as bloodthirsty as Saddam Hussein or Hafez al-Assad.

But the Nato powers that overthrew him – and by some accounts gave the orders to kill him – did not do so because he was a tyrannical ruler. It was rather because he pursued a quirkily nationalist policy backed by a great deal of money which was at odds with western policies in the Middle East. It is absurd to imagine that if the real objective of the war was to replace Gaddafi with a secular democracy that the West's regional allies in the conflict should be theocratic absolute monarchies in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. This is equally true of Western and Saudi intervention in Syria which has the supposed intention of replacing President Bashar al-Assad with a freely elected government that will establish the rule of law."

http://www.stopwar.org.uk/news/three-years-after-nato-s-overthrow-of-gaddafi-libya-is-imp...

"Their attempt to portray the regime change in Libya as a popular revolution becomes more preposterous with each passing day. The unstable puppet regime that is taking shape in Benghazi and Tripoli has been installed through relentless and massive NATO bombing, murder and the wholesale violation of international law.

Libya stands as a warning to the world. Any regime that gets in the way of US interests, runs afoul of the major corporations or fails to do the bidding of the NATO powers can be overthrown by military force, with its leaders murdered.

Already, the US media, which has staged a hideous celebration of the bloodbath outside Sirte, is braying for NATO to repeat its Libyan intervention in Syria. For her part, Clinton warned Pakistani leaders on Thursday that insufficient support for the US-war in Afghanistan would mean that they would pay “a very big price.”

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2011/10/gadd-o21.html

klinton is just a puppet for the banksters and Wall Street just as oliar and bushie is and was.