Posts for: dongreen76
Dec 13, 2019 08:55:27 #
(Main)
proud republican wrote:
Adam Schitthead!!! 
"YOU PEOPLE" A _ _'_ _ _ _ _.!!!
Dec 13, 2019 01:09:49 #
(Main)
Pennylynn wrote:
So, in other words, you can not provide a reference to your claim. Well, you are entitled to your ignorance. But, along with your ignorance on the Constitution and American history, a few remedial high school courses in writing would allow you to string together the words you employed from a thesaurus with appropriate punctuation.
......can't, you read,or don't you have memory banks - your quintessentialness-or don't you know what you are suppose to do when provided with a link ..... By duhduh - by duhduhduh way.they suhsuhsss.. say(pardon my stutter) that generally . people whom have respectable Intellegence quotas(and that stands for IQ ) generally have good memory.What happened,did you forget,or do not you have an understanding of what you do with a link.knowing "YOU PEOPLE",I assumed duhduhduh latter, pardon me,I meant the ladder.
Dec 12, 2019 23:53:28 #
(Main)
Pennylynn wrote:
DID YOU READ THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE PHONE CALL? b... (show quote)
Well, quintessential whiteman that has a compulsitory need to marginalize every man that threatens his what he perceives as his (HIS IS SUPREME !!!) supreme superiority so that it will enlarge his penis there by making him more appealing to women because he has gross feelings of in inadequatecy....I read that several times, and also provided a link so others could read it .- but like the typical Republican/Trumpian/conservative white male,you arbitrarily and bodaciously LIE !!!!!!
Dec 11, 2019 21:06:57 #
(Main)
Pennylynn wrote:
Until the House votes, he has not been indicted. ... (show quote)
His words to Zenlensky was" he wanted them to do him a favor,and that was to investigate Biden".Biden is his closes competitor so far as his retaining his presidency.So far as his committing High Crimes and misdemeanors are concerned,the founders specified of high crimes, whether they meant misdemeanors as crimes you can be certain they meant something for some kind of an affect, other wise they would not have mentioned it.At a minimum misdemeanors would have meant mischievousness.If you had read the debates as I recommended you do ,you would have noted they used the word mal -conduct,which would have meant disorderly conduct or conduct un-befitting and unbecoming a president. Keeping in mind what they were discussing ,and that was to determine the grounds in which a president should be removed from office;these would be known as articles of impeachment...Where in this countrys history does this country have a prerequisite that has to be met by a potential ally whom are requiring our assistance for helping them to become free and independent and expounding those concepts as we have been doing since the revolutionary war ,and ever since.We also had assistance without any prerequisites to be met,such as favors done for the assistors.(which by the way,we were supported by France,and Spain,whom at that time were powers of the world,and required nothing in return) now what part of that are you denying he did or did not do (the Zen,part or the Fa_ _ _ part.
Dec 11, 2019 17:14:24 #
(Main)
padremike wrote:
So, Don, where do "high crimes and misdemeanors" necessary under the Constitution for impeachment enter into your commentary?
Read the debates by the founders arguing as to what and when a president should be impeached,The term High Crimes and misdemeanors was taken from British parliamentary law.They specifically were concerned about the president s conduct, and used a term referred to as mal- conduct.When they settled on the term misdemeanor,They had in mind mal-conduct - misdemeanor covering and being synomous with mal conduct.If you read the arguments by Morris,and Hamiliton.As was denoted in my topic post I made an analogy of an employee being under scrutiny for violations of company rules and regulations,and what is the reprimand that occurs when an employee is under scrutiny and deemed to have malfeased or have some degree of mal conduct so far as not adhering to company codes rules and regulations.In that era the term misdemeanor did not have the same connotations as it has today.Today misdemeanor means a crime not as serious as a felony,and punishable by no more than a year jail and probation and possibly a fine.In other words the term misdemeanor had not had technicality attached to it,having said this ,they could only have used the term misdemeanor to refer to mal-conduct.
https://constitutioncenter.orgblog/what-the-founders-thought-about-impeachment-and-the-president
Dec 11, 2019 15:49:40 #
(Main)
Does he understand what the impeachment procedures entails or is he shooting someone again and telling your dumb ass any thing and still expecting your support and votes.
He contends he hasn't even committed a crime.Perhaps he does not understand that being impeached is not nesscesarily a reprimand or judgement for criminal offenses but more or less Judgment of are you adhering to and doing the job as is constitutionally prescribed, as it should be adhered to.
It is the same philosophy which ascertains whether you should be discharged or not- for instance you are under rebuke for having to many un-excused absences; having to many absences is not a incarceratory criminal offense,it is however ,an offense that may cause a discharge of the individual under scrutiny for the offense that violates company rules that are not criminal,it is more or less torque or civil as oppose to criminal
He contends he hasn't even committed a crime.Perhaps he does not understand that being impeached is not nesscesarily a reprimand or judgement for criminal offenses but more or less Judgment of are you adhering to and doing the job as is constitutionally prescribed, as it should be adhered to.
It is the same philosophy which ascertains whether you should be discharged or not- for instance you are under rebuke for having to many un-excused absences; having to many absences is not a incarceratory criminal offense,it is however ,an offense that may cause a discharge of the individual under scrutiny for the offense that violates company rules that are not criminal,it is more or less torque or civil as oppose to criminal
Dec 9, 2019 23:31:24 #
(Main)
PeterS wrote:
The decimator of fake news is at it again. What Tr... (show quote)
........ the premise behind the constant maligning of people whom receive welfare is that people whom are on it are parasitical lay abouts whom don't want to work and they drive taxes up and other people are supporting them.People whom follow this premise are generally not in the know ,therefore ignorant.Once again Trump acts like it is virtuous to deviate from that concept or idiom that
ends with the phrase `but ignorant is bliss"
When they sought to solve and alleviate the problem of reforming welfare approximately twenty-seven years ago,it being one of the hot campaign issues, politicians used as a platform to get themselves elected ,promising to end welfare as we know.Bill Clinton's contention was that :"if the country eliminated every form of welfare the country accommodated,your taxes wouldn't go down one dime."
Dec 9, 2019 15:28:24 #
(Main)
fullspinzoo wrote:
He's a 'chicken shit' piece of horse manure who didn't show up because he nows he would have eaten alive by Congressman Collins. What a disgusting human being. Looking forward to the Durham report. Where is that POS Schiff going to hide next time.
Adam Schiff did not went missing because he "NOWS" he would be eaten alive,the reason I know that is the reason he did not go missing is because like I,and every one else,we are not familiar with or how the "NOWS" verbal phrase is actuated.How does one "NOWS"be eaten alive.
Dec 9, 2019 12:08:36 #
(Main)
Peewee wrote:
Abortion and same-sex marriage were never voted on... (show quote)
Now hear this !!!!. Since we do not have a true Democracy, BUT !!! a bi-cameral Republic ,
none of the constituional laws that we adhere to came VIA "WE THE PEOPLE" - which would be a true Democracy;they come about due to the Republic we conform to.
This is why the framers debated vigarously days on end as to what kind of government we should have-this is why the arguments against having a true Democratic government were overwhelmingly convincing.Why we have Senators and Representatives,they thought -"`WE` - !! ,the people were stupid and couldn't read therefore could not make intellegent decisions as to what was best for the newly found nation. You have certainly confirmed that the founding fathers were wise.
Dec 9, 2019 11:39:36 #
(Main)
kcstargoat wrote:
So Trump mispoke, plenty of people do. He was talking about the abortion in the ninth month is wrong and should be stopped. You damned Demoncraps will use any chink in Trump's armor to rail against him.
Stupid liberals will say anything to deride the president!
Stupid liberals will say anything to deride the president!
Do us demorats remind you of your selves.If we don't.... you're no better than the Congolese.
Dec 9, 2019 05:14:18 #
(Main)
trashbaum wrote:
You need a little more education. Late term abortion isn't caring for the normal newborn. When induced labor head is exposed it's brains are then sucked out. If you believe that is caring for the newborn then you are as smart as Schiff.
I'm not a female .I'm pro choice,and I am street wise to enough to know that when they perform abortions, (especially people whom are not qualified and legally authorize to perform abortions) kill babies with hangers....they might induce labor during any month- yank the babys head far enough out of the womb for visibility purposes and flat out kill it by knocking it over the head with a soft mallet,ninth month or any month.It is also legal to perform an abortion at the point when the baby has metaphorsized enough so clearly it is Identifiable as a tiny human being-and !! the DOCTOR !! -specifying legallity ; when performing the legal abortion, strike a blow to the babies head to kill it with a mallet,the same way an individual kills another with malice with a hammer.He told you right,you need more education.
Dec 9, 2019 04:51:15 #
(Main)
[quote=EconomistDon]Oh come on nofactsjustfiction. You know as well as I that the media put out a typo, and you are ridiculing Trump for it. Trump said babies are Torn (with a "T") from their mothers womb in the 9th month. You guys are a bunch of flippin' idiots.
Nofactjustfiction, why are you sooooo full of hate?[/quote
That must have been a typo,as well as a voice dubb over,click on the video link.
Nofactjustfiction, why are you sooooo full of hate?[/quote
That must have been a typo,as well as a voice dubb over,click on the video link.
Dec 8, 2019 20:11:28 #
(Main)
[quote=factnotfiction]Guess he must have let his tiny little brain wander again, or his teleprompter malfunctioned again.
..."child birth in the 9th month is wrong and must be stopped"...
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/president-trump-publicly-comes-out-against-childbirth-in-the-ninth-month-of-pregnancy-it-is-wrong/
And surviving brain donor cons still whine about President Obama saying 57 states, which is nowhere as stupid as what the orange idiot just said.[/quote
Either he - IS- !! ,
just that stupid,or that was his vindictiveness against
the human race for not having the same opinion of him that he has of himself.As far as I know the ninth month is still the mean month
in which most human babies are born,therefore he was being suggestive that the human race should cease in perpetuating it self.As I remember reading somewhere ,God,at one time expressed the same sentiment.To express such intolerance for the human race as God did is consistent for men whom have the reputation for making claims of supremacy.
..."child birth in the 9th month is wrong and must be stopped"...
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/president-trump-publicly-comes-out-against-childbirth-in-the-ninth-month-of-pregnancy-it-is-wrong/
And surviving brain donor cons still whine about President Obama saying 57 states, which is nowhere as stupid as what the orange idiot just said.[/quote
Either he - IS- !! ,
just that stupid,or that was his vindictiveness against
the human race for not having the same opinion of him that he has of himself.As far as I know the ninth month is still the mean month
in which most human babies are born,therefore he was being suggestive that the human race should cease in perpetuating it self.As I remember reading somewhere ,God,at one time expressed the same sentiment.To express such intolerance for the human race as God did is consistent for men whom have the reputation for making claims of supremacy.
Dec 7, 2019 23:24:16 #
(Main)
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Yep 
I was a single parent kid, raised by a mother,She had two years of college and generally worked for the great mail-order businesses such as Montgermery Wards, Spiegel and Aldens.Her employment was off and on depending on how any of the three retailers were fareing due to the economy.This was the fifties on through the early seventies.Regardless of whether she was working or not as a file clerk, with pay scales at a buck sixty five an hour as a minimum and reaching the maximum glorious plateau of 3.60 an hour ,maybe four bucks at the end of this illustrious career.At this time the entitlement known as Food Stamps emerged, more or less due to Lyndon Baines Johnson concepts and visions of "A Great Society"- programs 'whose agendas was to launch a war to rid the country of poverty.As I pretty much understood and heard that it had a certain amount of success.I do remember many days of hunger and even having to attend school,both elementary and high school on empty stomach.I do remember us having partook of the food stamp entitlement and still incurring many days of hunger,even during the periods of `ole`Moms employ.There was also a friend creditor,(whom was white and also had a family to feed ) sales person who mom had an account with so that she could purchase sorely needed clothes and furniture affordably.This same sales person use to purchase our foods stamps from `ole`mom so that he could capitalize on the fact that you could get more food than the food stamps were at their literal face value- i.e. 200 worth of food stamps at it's literal face value,you get 250$ worth of food.The government made up the difference.The moral and point of this story is that ,1: the cost of living and the poor man's monetary intakes is never at a fair and porpotional distribution so that he can never meet his expenditures efficiently as they should be met.2.Even those you think that are the highest echlons of your citizentry use and have to take advantage of government subsidies such as food stamp programs to make ends meet,Why ? because you can shoot some one and steal,uh ruh... I mean still get their votes, and you keep maintaining a climate conducive to only businesses growth and expansion,not the common man's growth and expansion.
Dec 7, 2019 10:58:46 #
(Main)
PeterS wrote:
Can you say: Merry Christmas!!! br br https://www... (show quote)
Well ,you see it ,goes like this.This is the quintessential judgemental behavior of a much more fortunate white man (not superior,but more fortunate) He historically takes the low road in his assessment and evaluation of their character as opposed to the higher road.
He arrives at certain conclusions about them using processes of stereotyping;If you've seen one, you've seen them all.However,he does not apply the same processes in the gaugement of self-that is to say,if you saw a white man walking down the street...one should immediately get in touch with their teenage sons to make sure they are safe,it being that,that white man could be a John Wayne Gacy,or Jeffery Dahmer.
To further elaborate ,and link the scenario alluded to above to this act of humongus cruelty -and justifying it by assuming and saying those whom will fall victim to it , are being lazy and don't want to work and are supplementing foods stamp for the pay of employ (a Reaganist mind set,I might add.) Just imagine,they are meeting all their survival expenditures with so much as a hundred and fifty dollars worth of food stamps.SHIT!! !! ,I didn't know landlords except snap for rent,nor phone companies,or ComEd,nor did I know clothiers take food stamps in exchange for clothes,evidently they do,otherwise, how else could their expenditures be met since their source of income is food stamps in lieu of a check of employ.Neither did I know that as little as 150$ worth snap could be extended to cover expenditures of possibly 2000$ a month.,must be ,otherwise why would a body choose to not work and milk the government of a 150$ to pay a debt of possibly 2000$.Any hoooooowwww,Trump took care of that,their lazy asses are going to work now,they don't want to incurr the ravages
of mal-nutrition , and Starve!! to death.
Gooooooo ! "THE DONALD" !!??