Yes, throughout nature same sex acts happen. They are often part of dominance aggression, but can also be just a biological urge that is exhibited inappropriately, such as observed daily in dogs, which will mount anything even your furniture. Whether it is a natural act for some dogs, goats or monkeys should make no difference to humans. Considering that animals eat each others feces, and urinate on each other during courting and as a dominance behavior, breed female without their permission, kill other males so that they may mate with the other males females, anyone who believes that because animals do it it is a good thing and should be considered honorable in humans, has taken moral relativism to a new low. those people if they are using the same logic that it is natural somewhere so it is natural for humans should be against punishing others for murdering their children, or the children sired by another man because those are natural and very common in the animal world, as is the female eating her own young soon after giving birth to them.

Your view of the world and it's sexual nature is in fact, your view in the context in which you would like to see it. Specially in fellow human beings. Some of the animal traits you mentioned are practiced by human beings today. Not so much in our western society but I could list cases and points. Some of your points on animal behavior is practiced by the very young in humans till taught differently. Are you saying that only animal males kill other males for breeding rights. Look around the human race and tell me thats not done by many. Right now in the middle east is an example. We as a species have a long way to go before we can further separate ourselves from the rest of god's creatures. Not you. Not me. The species as a whole.
I am guessing that in your wants for us all you have separated yourself from much of the worlds present reality.
I am trying to say that what you believe to be right is fine.
It's just not reality. Not what you see in man nor animal.


Just saving.

Your view of the world and it's sexual nature is in fact, your view in the context in which you would like to see it. Specially in fellow human beings. Some of the animal traits you mentioned are practiced by human beings today. Not so much in our western society but I could list cases and points. Some of your points on animal behavior is practiced by the very young in humans till taught differently. Are you saying that only animal males kill other males for breeding rights. Look around the human race and tell me thats not done by many. Right now in the middle east is an example. We as a species have a long way to go before we can further separate ourselves from the rest of god's creatures. Not you. Not me. The species as a whole.
I am guessing that in your wants for us all you have separated yourself from much of the worlds present reality.
I am trying to say that what you believe to be right is fine.
It's just not reality. Not what you see in man nor animal.


Just saving.

My opinion is that homosexuality is a biological, unnatural act. Leaving religious beliefs aside and if one must use the blame
game, Mother Nature would be first in line. As a natural act,
civilization would cease to be and you and I would not exist.

Marriage is the joining of two human beings of the opposite sex.
It is not an act of nature to take place between those of the same
sex. If love develops between those of the same sex and a
relationship forms, so be it. We have no laws that make it illegal.
Laws should be enacted to protect the rights of all individuals,
including those of same sex relationships. Passing a law or making
a court ruling to justify protection of those rights and calling it a
marriage in unacceptable.

Laws can be passed until the end of time and I would never accept
marriage between two of the same sex even if they were my own
children. Their relationship would not alter my love or respect but I
would never consider it a marriage no more than I would accept
laws passed to legalize marriage between siblings, parent and child, uncles and nieces etc and I could go on with this. I would
welcome my child and friend into my home as long as they acted
in a manner respectful of my beliefs. Knowing homosexual
individuals through the years have never been acquainted with one
that I would not consider my friend or that I would not welcome in
my home. I stop at marriage being acceptable.

There will come a time, probably after I have left this world that
this ruling or law will come back to bite. There will be legal challenges that have never before existed and reaching decisions
will not come without problems never before considered.

I am a firm believer in right and wrong. There is no grey in this
matter. It cannot go both ways and be faithful to Mother Nature
and her intentions.

Let someone, anyone, explain to me how two of the same sex
can grow civilization as we know it.

My opinion is that homosexuality is a biological, unnatural act. Leaving religious beliefs aside and if one must use the blame
game, Mother Nature would be first in line. As a natural act,
civilization would cease to be and you and I would not exist.

Marriage is the joining of two human beings of the opposite sex.
It is not an act of nature to take place between those of the same
sex. If love develops between those of the same sex and a
relationship forms, so be it. We have no laws that make it illegal.
Laws should be enacted to protect the rights of all individuals,
including those of same sex relationships. Passing a law or making
a court ruling to justify protection of those rights and calling it a
marriage in unacceptable.

Laws can be passed until the end of time and I would never accept
marriage between two of the same sex even if they were my own
children. Their relationship would not alter my love or respect but I
would never consider it a marriage no more than I would accept
laws passed to legalize marriage between siblings, parent and child, uncles and nieces etc and I could go on with this. I would
welcome my child and friend into my home as long as they acted
in a manner respectful of my beliefs. Knowing homosexual
individuals through the years have never been acquainted with one
that I would not consider my friend or that I would not welcome in
my home. I stop at marriage being acceptable.

There will come a time, probably after I have left this world that
this ruling or law will come back to bite. There will be legal challenges that have never before existed and reaching decisions
will not come without problems never before considered.

I am a firm believer in right and wrong. There is no grey in this
matter. It cannot go both ways and be faithful to Mother Nature
and her intentions.

Let someone, anyone, explain to me how two of the same sex
can grow civilization as we know it.