Freddie Gray....Toxicology Report
May 3, 2015 20:29:58 #
eagleye13 wrote:
IMO - Char you have a good understanding of the history of the "Jewish" mixing, and the different varieties of "Jews".
Pennylynn likes to go after those that make the differentiation between Torah and Talmud. She has misquoted my position too many times. Now she calls me "evileye"; that pretty much sums it up.
Pennylynn likes to go after those that make the differentiation between Torah and Talmud. She has misquoted my position too many times. Now she calls me "evileye"; that pretty much sums it up.
Thank you I think I do and I always try to learn more. :)
So much to know so little time.
:idea:
May 3, 2015 20:30:35 #
DSchantz
Loc: Saint Joseph, Missouri
The mainstream media can't let this out. It would cause the Obama Gang to lose some leverage in their efforts to federalize our police departments nation wide.
God Bless America, God Save The Republic.
God Bless America, God Save The Republic.
May 3, 2015 20:42:17 #
archie bunker wrote:
Nothing happened. You need a new light bulb.
LOL
have not heard this one in a while.
:P
May 3, 2015 20:45:20 #
moose wrote:
Vote out as many democrats as you can,and the blac... (show quote)
O'B has carried out the Bilderberger/CFR War Agenda, with the help of the MSM Talking Heads. The U. S. government (CIA) is still instigating and supporting the fights all over the Middle East. It was exposed that the US has funded ($5 Billion) to fund the insurrections in Ukraine. CIA has also financed the insurrections in Syria, Egypt etc. This war mongering policy has cost America TRILLIONS of $s, and killed and maimed thousands of our soldiers. The bloodshed caused by these psychopaths is staggering.
Ron Paul: The Movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYIP8lGBtFQ&feature=player_detailpage
"Paranoid" Ron Paul Army sabotages billionaire Zionist Jew Sheldon Adelson's try for a Jews-only caucus in Nevada
From:
At Nevada's Conspiracy Caucus, the Paul Army Wins
(The Atlantic) -- by Molly Ball --
LAS VEGAS -- When Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire backer of Newt Gingrich, arranged to have a special after-hours voting session to accommodate him at Saturday's Nevada caucuses, Ron Paul supporters were convinced a conspiracy was afoot.
But the Paul army had the last laugh.
They flooded the evening caucus at the Adelson Educational Campus, a private school in the Las Vegas suburbs. They stood to testify in the most alarming terms. And in the end, Paul got more than three times as many votes as Gingrich, who came in third.
Adelson and his wife, Miriam, sat patiently near the front as caucus-goers, the great majority of them Paul supporters, stood to speak for more than an hour. He leaned his wrist on a cane while she checked her iPhone. Approached by this reporter, he barked, "No comments," and his bodyguards politely indicated that rule would be enforced.
The caucus commenced in the packed auditorium with a few speakers for Gingrich. First was a man who said he favored Gingrich because "he's done it before," even if "we may not like his personal issues -- he's been through three marriages."
The next speaker said he was backing Gingrich because "I'm very afraid of Mitt Romney." The reason, he said: "I'm concerned about if Romney gets elected having the most important position in the United States being a member of the LDS church."
And then there was this guy: "The Bilderberg Group is behind Mitt Romney."
Those were just the Gingrich speakers. Next came about 25 passionate speakers for Paul. In short order, the scene in the auditorium began to feel like a revival meeting for anti-government paranoiacs.
The first one accused the government of "genocide." Another complained that Paul was the victim of media bias, as evidenced by the fact that in the GOP debates, "When they go on Ron Paul the lighting's dimmer." Another accused the government of "using our own men as guinea pigs."
As Gingrich, across town, was vowing bitterly to continue his campaign, a Paul supporter was testifying: "Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney run the two-legged race together at Bohemian Grove! There's not a bit of difference between those two puppets! I got one word to describe my support for Ron Paul, and that is: End the Fed!"
When the votes were finally cast, the totals were: 183 for Paul (58 percent), 61 for Romney (19 percent), 57 for Gingrich (18 percent) and 16 for Santorum (5 percent)...MORE...LINK
May 3, 2015 20:53:37 #
eagleye13 wrote:
O'B has carried out the Bilderberger/CFR War Agend... (show quote)
You know, if you break down these plots and plans and theories and look at them logically you will see that they just don't add up.
Try it, you will live a happier life.
May 3, 2015 20:54:36 #
archie bunker wrote:
Nothing happened. You need a new light bulb.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbup: Perhaps he was 'yanking' on something other than a light bulb. If so, I doubt anything happened there either.
May 3, 2015 21:31:53 #
jelun wrote:
Yank Yank.
I am glad you got it. You guys on the left only get your own jokes, in general.
May 3, 2015 21:48:26 #
Maybe we should let the system play out before we declare someone guilty of murder or any other crime for that matter, after all isn't that what this is all about?
May 3, 2015 22:30:25 #
gmanp135 wrote:
Maybe we should let the system play out before we declare someone guilty of murder or any other crime for that matter, after all isn't that what this is all about?
Maybe we should throw the victims to the street mob. Like in Ferguson they cannot wait for facts. If the facts do not match what the mob wants, watch out.
May 3, 2015 23:04:54 #
May 4, 2015 00:00:00 #
All deaths at the hands of another person is a homicide. I just depends on the circumstances what kind of homicide it is. I have supplied a somewhat detailed definition for those interested.
The fact that the medical examiner in Baltimore determined that Freddie Grays death was a homicide means little at this point. The prosecutor did not mention the type of homicide, did she?
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Homicide
Homicide
The killing of one human being by another human being.
Although the term homicide is sometimes used synonymously with murder, homicide is broader in scope than murder. Murder is a form of criminal homicide; other forms of homicide might not constitute criminal acts. These homicides are regarded as justified or excusable. For example, individuals may, in a necessary act of Self-Defense, kill a person who threatens them with death or serious injury, or they may be commanded or authorized by law to kill a person who is a member of an enemy force or who has committed a serious crime. Typically, the circumstances surrounding a killing determine whether it is criminal. The intent of the killer usually determines whether a criminal homicide is classified as murder or Manslaughter and at what degree.
English courts developed the body of Common Law on which U.S. jurisdictions initially relied in developing their homicide statutes. Early English common law divided homicide into two broad categories: felonious and non-felonious. Historically, the deliberate and premeditated killing of a person by another person was a felonious homicide and was classified as murder. Non-felonious homicide included justifiable homicide and excusable homicide. Although justifiable homicide was considered a crime, the offender often received a pardon. Excusable homicide was not considered a crime.
Under the early common law, murder was a felony that was punishable by death. It was defined as the unlawful killing of a person with "malice aforethought," which was generally defined as a premeditated intent to kill. As U.S. courts and jurisdictions adopted the English common law and modified the various circumstances that constituted criminal homicide, various degrees of criminal homicide developed. Modern statutes generally divide criminal homicide into two broad categories: murder and manslaughter. Murder is usually further divided into the first degree, which typically involves a premeditated intent to kill, and the second degree, which typically does not involve a premeditated intent to kill. Manslaughter typically involves an unintentional killing that resulted from a person's criminal negligence or reckless disregard for human life.
All homicides require the killing of a living person. In most states, the killing of a viable fetus is generally not considered a homicide unless the fetus is first born alive. In some states, however, this distinction is disregarded and the killing of an unborn viable fetus is classified as homicide. In other states, statutes separately classify the killing of a fetus as the crime of feticide.
Generally, the law requires that the death of the person occur within a year and a day of the fatal injury. This requirement initially reflected a difficulty in determining whether an initial injury led to a person's death, or whether other events or circumstances intervened to cause the person's death. As Forensic Science has developed and the difficulty in determining cause of death has diminished, many states have modified or abrogated the year-and-a-day rule.
Justifiable or Excusable Homicide
A homicide may be justifiable or excusable by the surrounding circumstances. In such cases, the homicide will not be considered a criminal act. A justifiable homicide is a homicide that is commanded or authorized by law. For instance, soldiers in a time of war may be commanded to kill enemy soldiers. Generally, such killings are considered justifiable homicide unless other circumstances suggest that they were not necessary or that they were not within the scope of the soldiers' duty. In addition, a public official is justified in carrying out a death sentence because the execution is commanded by state or federal law.
A person is authorized to kill another person in self-defense or in the defense of others, but only if the person reasonably believes that the killing is absolutely necessary in order to prevent serious harm or death to himself or herself or to others. If the threatened harm can be avoided with reasonable safety, some states require the person to retreat before using Deadly Force. Most states do not require retreat if the individual is attacked or threatened in his or her home, place of employment, or place of business. In addition, some states do not require a person to retreat unless that person in some way provoked the threat of harm. Finally, police officers may use deadly force to stop or apprehend a fleeing felon, but only if the suspect is armed or has committed a crime that involved the infliction or threatened infliction of serious injury or death. A police officer may not use deadly force to apprehend or stop an individual who has committed, or is committing, a misdemeanor offense. Only certain felonies are considered in determining whether deadly force may be used to apprehend or stop a suspect. For instance, a police officer may not use deadly force to prevent the commission of Larceny unless other circumstances threaten him or other persons with imminent serious injury or death.
Excusable homicide is sometimes distinguished from justifiable homicide on the basis that it involves some fault on the part of the person who ultimately uses deadly force. For instance, if a person provokes a fight and subsequently withdraws from it but, out of necessity and in self-defense, ultimately kills the other person, the homicide is sometimes classified as excusable, rather than justifiable. Generally, however, the distinction between justifiable homicide and excusable homicide has largely disappeared, and only the term justifiable homicide is widely used.
Other Defenses
Other legal defenses to a charge of criminal homicide include insanity, necessity, accident, and intoxication. Some of these defenses may provide an absolute defense to a charge of criminal homicide; some will not. For instance, a successful defense of voluntary intoxication generally will allow an individual to avoid prosecution for a premeditated murder, but typically it will not allow an individual to escape liability for any lesser charges, such as second-degree murder or manslaughter. As with any defense to a criminal charge, the accused's mental state will be a critical determinant of whether he or she had the requisite intent or mental capacity to commit a criminal homicide.
Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide
The killing of oneself is a suicide, not a homicide. If a person kills another person in order to end the other person's pain or suffering, the killing is considered a homicide. It does not matter if the other person is about to die or is terminally ill just prior to being killed; the law generally views such a killing as criminal. Thus, a "mercy killing," or act of Euthanasia, is generally considered a criminal homicide.
As medical technology advances and the medical profession is able to prolong life for many terminally ill patients, a person's right to die by committing suicide with the help of a physician or others has become a hotly contested issue. In the 1990s, the issue of physician-assisted suicide came to the forefront of U.S. law. Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a Michigan physician, helped approximately 130 patients to commit suicide. Michigan authorities prosecuted Kevorkian for murder on a number of occasions, but because aiding, assisting, or causing a suicide is generally considered to be separate from homicide, Kevorkian initially avoided conviction. Finally, in 1999, he was convicted of second-degree murder following the nationally televised broadcast of a videotape showing Kevorkian injecting a lethal drug into a patient. In 2000, the new england journal of medicine revealed a study showing that 75 percent of the 69 Kevorkian-assisted deaths that were investigated were of victims who were not suffering from a potentially fatal disease; five had no discernible disease at all. Instead, it appeared that many of the suicides were the result of depression or psychiatric disorder.
As of early 2003, only one state (Oregon) permitted physician-assisted suicide. However, at that time, similar laws had been introduced in Arizona, Hawaii, and Vermont. U.S. Attorney General john ashcroft sought a Declaratory Judgment that prescribing federally controlled drugs for the purpose of assisting suicide was not legitimate medical practice. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit was expected to render a decision in the matter later that year.
The fact that the medical examiner in Baltimore determined that Freddie Grays death was a homicide means little at this point. The prosecutor did not mention the type of homicide, did she?
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Homicide
Homicide
The killing of one human being by another human being.
Although the term homicide is sometimes used synonymously with murder, homicide is broader in scope than murder. Murder is a form of criminal homicide; other forms of homicide might not constitute criminal acts. These homicides are regarded as justified or excusable. For example, individuals may, in a necessary act of Self-Defense, kill a person who threatens them with death or serious injury, or they may be commanded or authorized by law to kill a person who is a member of an enemy force or who has committed a serious crime. Typically, the circumstances surrounding a killing determine whether it is criminal. The intent of the killer usually determines whether a criminal homicide is classified as murder or Manslaughter and at what degree.
English courts developed the body of Common Law on which U.S. jurisdictions initially relied in developing their homicide statutes. Early English common law divided homicide into two broad categories: felonious and non-felonious. Historically, the deliberate and premeditated killing of a person by another person was a felonious homicide and was classified as murder. Non-felonious homicide included justifiable homicide and excusable homicide. Although justifiable homicide was considered a crime, the offender often received a pardon. Excusable homicide was not considered a crime.
Under the early common law, murder was a felony that was punishable by death. It was defined as the unlawful killing of a person with "malice aforethought," which was generally defined as a premeditated intent to kill. As U.S. courts and jurisdictions adopted the English common law and modified the various circumstances that constituted criminal homicide, various degrees of criminal homicide developed. Modern statutes generally divide criminal homicide into two broad categories: murder and manslaughter. Murder is usually further divided into the first degree, which typically involves a premeditated intent to kill, and the second degree, which typically does not involve a premeditated intent to kill. Manslaughter typically involves an unintentional killing that resulted from a person's criminal negligence or reckless disregard for human life.
All homicides require the killing of a living person. In most states, the killing of a viable fetus is generally not considered a homicide unless the fetus is first born alive. In some states, however, this distinction is disregarded and the killing of an unborn viable fetus is classified as homicide. In other states, statutes separately classify the killing of a fetus as the crime of feticide.
Generally, the law requires that the death of the person occur within a year and a day of the fatal injury. This requirement initially reflected a difficulty in determining whether an initial injury led to a person's death, or whether other events or circumstances intervened to cause the person's death. As Forensic Science has developed and the difficulty in determining cause of death has diminished, many states have modified or abrogated the year-and-a-day rule.
Justifiable or Excusable Homicide
A homicide may be justifiable or excusable by the surrounding circumstances. In such cases, the homicide will not be considered a criminal act. A justifiable homicide is a homicide that is commanded or authorized by law. For instance, soldiers in a time of war may be commanded to kill enemy soldiers. Generally, such killings are considered justifiable homicide unless other circumstances suggest that they were not necessary or that they were not within the scope of the soldiers' duty. In addition, a public official is justified in carrying out a death sentence because the execution is commanded by state or federal law.
A person is authorized to kill another person in self-defense or in the defense of others, but only if the person reasonably believes that the killing is absolutely necessary in order to prevent serious harm or death to himself or herself or to others. If the threatened harm can be avoided with reasonable safety, some states require the person to retreat before using Deadly Force. Most states do not require retreat if the individual is attacked or threatened in his or her home, place of employment, or place of business. In addition, some states do not require a person to retreat unless that person in some way provoked the threat of harm. Finally, police officers may use deadly force to stop or apprehend a fleeing felon, but only if the suspect is armed or has committed a crime that involved the infliction or threatened infliction of serious injury or death. A police officer may not use deadly force to apprehend or stop an individual who has committed, or is committing, a misdemeanor offense. Only certain felonies are considered in determining whether deadly force may be used to apprehend or stop a suspect. For instance, a police officer may not use deadly force to prevent the commission of Larceny unless other circumstances threaten him or other persons with imminent serious injury or death.
Excusable homicide is sometimes distinguished from justifiable homicide on the basis that it involves some fault on the part of the person who ultimately uses deadly force. For instance, if a person provokes a fight and subsequently withdraws from it but, out of necessity and in self-defense, ultimately kills the other person, the homicide is sometimes classified as excusable, rather than justifiable. Generally, however, the distinction between justifiable homicide and excusable homicide has largely disappeared, and only the term justifiable homicide is widely used.
Other Defenses
Other legal defenses to a charge of criminal homicide include insanity, necessity, accident, and intoxication. Some of these defenses may provide an absolute defense to a charge of criminal homicide; some will not. For instance, a successful defense of voluntary intoxication generally will allow an individual to avoid prosecution for a premeditated murder, but typically it will not allow an individual to escape liability for any lesser charges, such as second-degree murder or manslaughter. As with any defense to a criminal charge, the accused's mental state will be a critical determinant of whether he or she had the requisite intent or mental capacity to commit a criminal homicide.
Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide
The killing of oneself is a suicide, not a homicide. If a person kills another person in order to end the other person's pain or suffering, the killing is considered a homicide. It does not matter if the other person is about to die or is terminally ill just prior to being killed; the law generally views such a killing as criminal. Thus, a "mercy killing," or act of Euthanasia, is generally considered a criminal homicide.
As medical technology advances and the medical profession is able to prolong life for many terminally ill patients, a person's right to die by committing suicide with the help of a physician or others has become a hotly contested issue. In the 1990s, the issue of physician-assisted suicide came to the forefront of U.S. law. Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a Michigan physician, helped approximately 130 patients to commit suicide. Michigan authorities prosecuted Kevorkian for murder on a number of occasions, but because aiding, assisting, or causing a suicide is generally considered to be separate from homicide, Kevorkian initially avoided conviction. Finally, in 1999, he was convicted of second-degree murder following the nationally televised broadcast of a videotape showing Kevorkian injecting a lethal drug into a patient. In 2000, the new england journal of medicine revealed a study showing that 75 percent of the 69 Kevorkian-assisted deaths that were investigated were of victims who were not suffering from a potentially fatal disease; five had no discernible disease at all. Instead, it appeared that many of the suicides were the result of depression or psychiatric disorder.
As of early 2003, only one state (Oregon) permitted physician-assisted suicide. However, at that time, similar laws had been introduced in Arizona, Hawaii, and Vermont. U.S. Attorney General john ashcroft sought a Declaratory Judgment that prescribing federally controlled drugs for the purpose of assisting suicide was not legitimate medical practice. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit was expected to render a decision in the matter later that year.
May 4, 2015 03:26:40 #
Char4Dew wrote:
Not sure of all the details, been sick and did not follow all the pieces...but a man does not end up with a busted spin on the floor of a cell ... he ends up in a hospital if unresponsive for a few hours, not day/s. I am sure the cops here look guilty as sin. And why is President Obama only coming out when a black kid gets hurt???? Wish a nice citezen would have video snaped this one too.
How come no one has come out on that 61 year white guy that was tyin to stop 2 girls from fighting and was attacked by a mob of black school kids and destroyed so bad that they had to put him into an induced coma to try to save his life. Also the black man that was trying to help a white older woman get to her car because she was afraid and he was attacked by a mob of high school black kids. No one want's to mention these.
May 4, 2015 03:41:55 #
Boo_Boo
Loc: Jellystone
I think you know the answer. The man had two things going against him, white and age. Whites are targets along with all policemen. Notice no one with a camera rolling.... and the video that is available, police refused to allow its release.
http://www.wbaltv.com/news/police-man-trying-to-break-up-fight-attacked/32527280
"This is not a simple fistfight. This is a brutal assault," Baltimore County police Cpl. John Wachter said.
Baltimore County police said officers were called just before 1 p.m. Wednesday to the 500 block of 45th Street in Dundalk, where a 61-year-old man noticed two girls fighting near his truck. He went outside to break up the fight and then was attacked by a large group of juveniles who were watching.
"He simply wanted the girls to stop fighting, wanted the juveniles to move away from his car and he was brutally attacked," Wachter said.
Joe Lamb, who owns a business next door to the victim's home, caught the whole act on his surveillance camera.
"It has gotten out of hand now, gone too far," Lamb said.
While he couldn't give 11 News permission to show the video because police asked him not to, he did share a still photo that shows a bunch of juveniles rushing the scene
http://www.wbaltv.com/news/police-man-trying-to-break-up-fight-attacked/32527280
"This is not a simple fistfight. This is a brutal assault," Baltimore County police Cpl. John Wachter said.
Baltimore County police said officers were called just before 1 p.m. Wednesday to the 500 block of 45th Street in Dundalk, where a 61-year-old man noticed two girls fighting near his truck. He went outside to break up the fight and then was attacked by a large group of juveniles who were watching.
"He simply wanted the girls to stop fighting, wanted the juveniles to move away from his car and he was brutally attacked," Wachter said.
Joe Lamb, who owns a business next door to the victim's home, caught the whole act on his surveillance camera.
"It has gotten out of hand now, gone too far," Lamb said.
While he couldn't give 11 News permission to show the video because police asked him not to, he did share a still photo that shows a bunch of juveniles rushing the scene
Al-ien wrote:
How come no one has come out on that 61 year white guy that was tyin to stop 2 girls from fighting and was attacked by a mob of black school kids and destroyed so bad that they had to put him into an induced coma to try to save his life. Also the black man that was trying to help a white older woman get to her car because she was afraid and he was attacked by a mob of high school black kids. No one want's to mention these.
May 4, 2015 03:52:45 #
jelun wrote:
The person who videotaped the arrest has now been arrested himself.
There was a stop by the van that not one of the six law enforcement agents (and yes, I use that term loosely) reported that stop; it was recorded on a private camera...I have not caught whether it was a camera phone or security camera.
President Obama responds to questions. He was asked a question, he answered it.
Best to ask media outlets why they don't ask about all of those white guys who are killed by cops.
There was a stop by the van that not one of the six law enforcement agents (and yes, I use that term loosely) reported that stop; it was recorded on a private camera...I have not caught whether it was a camera phone or security camera.
President Obama responds to questions. He was asked a question, he answered it.
Best to ask media outlets why they don't ask about all of those white guys who are killed by cops.
Because reporting those, especially if the cop doing the shooting was black, would be RAAAAAACIIIIIIIST!
May 4, 2015 04:01:35 #
Pennylynn wrote:
I think you know the answer. The man had two thin... (show quote)
I still think all the entire white race needs to"GO OFF" just one time on the blacks.....let them get a taste of their own medicine....only worse!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.