One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
“separation of church and state”
Page <<first <prev 6 of 22 next> last>>
Dec 14, 2014 14:25:22   #
imbobbyc Loc: Montana
 
How? In light of Art. 6




Grugore wrote:
Not legal. Constitutional. A law can be legal and still be unconstitutional.

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 14:29:02   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
Blacksheep wrote:
Of dissent, discord, disunity, disharmony, mayhem, dead decapitated children... Yeah, good job. Reap what you sow.


:-o

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 14:32:09   #
Grugore
 
Blacksheep wrote:
The problem with the Last Days is that there's so many of them. Considering that there's 36,500 days in a hundred years and the Last Days have been happening since around the year 1400, that really is an awful lot of Last Days.

I was wondering if maybe we could divide the Last Days up into name groups of say, 10,000 or so each, like The For Sure Last Days, The You Betcha Last Days, The Definitely Last Days, and so on like that. Whatcha think?


LOL! You know what I think. I think you're a troll. At least as far as religion goes.

:lol:

The Bible give us signs to watch out for, so we could know when His arrival was imminent. One of them was the restoration of Israel. This has happened, just like the Bible predicted. Israel was a desert, when the Jews took over. It is now a place of rivers and farmlands, and actually feeds several other countries in the region. This was also predicted in the Bible. Another prediction was that the generation that witnessed the return of the Jews to their homeland would see Christ return. Also, think about this. The Jews are the ONLY people in all of history who have completely lost their homeland and then got it back. That makes it a singular event in all of history. There is also the fact that Israel MUST exist as a state in order for the events described in Revelation to take place. They actually play a central role in events. Do you think this is a coincidence? So, ask yourself. What are the chances of these few prophecies all coming true, just as they were written? And what about all of the other prophecies that have come to pass? The odds are astronomical. Do you see a divine hand yet?

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2014 14:37:44   #
Grugore
 
Tasine wrote:
I bow to your expertise. I misspoke and you are 100% RIGHT.
Thanks for picking up on my screw-up.


Not really a screw up. Just a matter of misplaced emphasis.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 14:54:12   #
Blacksheep
 
Grugore wrote:
LOL! You know what I think. I think you're a troll. At least as far as religion goes.

:lol:

The Bible give us signs to watch out for, so we could know when His arrival was imminent. One of them was the restoration of Israel. This has happened, just like the Bible predicted. Israel was a desert, when the Jews took over. It is now a place of rivers and farmlands, and actually feeds several other countries in the region. This was also predicted in the Bible. Another prediction was that the generation that witnessed the return of the Jews to their homeland would see Christ return. Also, think about this. The Jews are the ONLY people in all of history who have completely lost their homeland and then got it back. That makes it a singular event in all of history. There is also the fact that Israel MUST exist as a state in order for the events described in Revelation to take place. They actually play a central role in events. Do you think this is a coincidence? So, ask yourself. What are the chances of these few prophecies all coming true, just as they were written? And what about all of the other prophecies that have come to pass? The odds are astronomical. Do you see a divine hand yet?
LOL! You know what I think. I think you're a troll... (show quote)


Yeah I did, I knew you'd think that. You've expressed that pretty well in the past, in different words. When it comes to religion I definitely can be considered a troll by the religionists. That includes all religions though. I don't just pick on Christianity, they're all fodder for my shredder.

Now. Prophecies. Astronomical chances against, etc.
No, sorry. Most of those prophecies had to come true over a period of 2000 years, and LO, Behold, most of them have come true repeatedly. Of course.

That Israel would flower again was a self-fulfilling prophecy, because it's a central part of Judaism. Sooner or later they were bound to bring it about, and after Hitler killed off most of them, they realized that they needed to have their own country again where they could unite as a people. It was the Diaspora that nearly proved their undoing, that made them so vulnerable. Time to end it.

Also, your facts are in the wind about Israel and the Jews "having completely lost it". Totally wrong, the Jews have always lived in Israel even when the Muslims took most of it away from them. They've always been there, owned land, owned businesses. They never lost Israel as a home and that's why they had no problem returning to it.

You know, this is the whole problem in trying to converse with any of you religious zealots. You never have your history straight, you posit beliefs as if they were proven facts, and you flat out will not see truth even when it kicks you in the groin.

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 15:16:01   #
Buford Loc: Arizona
 
mwdegutis wrote:
What I believe "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." means is that Congress cannot make laws establishing a state religion (such as making Catholicism the official religion of the US) or prohibiting the free exercise of one’s religious beliefs.


Evidently the Muslim religion of terrorism doesn't count. Oblamo is doing a heck of a job promoting it.

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 15:58:19   #
robert66
 
mwdegutis wrote:
The libs don't seem to understand that it isn't. Every time I've brought it up all I get are lame arguments like "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." implies separation of church and state.


That's plenty clear enough. No state church bullshit. You want to know why people are constantly saying , separation of church and state ? One , its obvious from the part you cited , Two , the supreme court has ruled that way , using the words specifically ,separation of church and state. Practice your religion , whatever it may be on your own dime and your own time. No one is going to stop you.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2014 15:59:39   #
Grugore
 
robert66 wrote:
That's plenty clear enough. No state church bullshit. You want to know why people are constantly saying , separation of church and state ? One , its obvious from the part you cited , Two , the supreme court has ruled that way , using the words specifically ,separation of church and state. Practice your religion , whatever it may be on your own dime and your own time. No one is going to stop you.


But the government IS trying to stop us. I could give plenty of examples.

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 16:04:29   #
robert66
 
Grugore wrote:
But the government IS trying to stop us. I could give plenty of examples.


Did they kick in the door of your church ? I think the government has been pretty lax on this subject. It says God on our money and God is usually cited in the pledge of allegiance. The presidents are allowed to say stuff about God and pray in public. What about " God bless the united States of America ". Obama says that all the time.

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 16:23:32   #
vernon
 
robert66 wrote:
Did they kick in the door of your church ? I think the government has been pretty lax on this subject. It says God on our money and God is usually cited in the pledge of allegiance. The presidents are allowed to say stuff about God and pray in public. What about " God bless the united States of America ". Obama says that all the time.


bullshit.

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 16:34:13   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
This topic is simple: Churches are allowed tax exempt status from the government to assure their separation from the state!

http://www.latimes.com/la-oew-lynn-stanley23-2008sep23-story.html#page=1



vernon wrote:
bullshit.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2014 16:39:00   #
robert66
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
This topic is simple: Churches are allowed tax exempt status from the government to assure their separation from the state!

http://www.latimes.com/la-oew-lynn-stanley23-2008sep23-story.html#page=1


Great point.

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 16:44:59   #
PRM2014
 
First Amendment to the United States Constitution




First Amendment to the United States Constitution

fr.wikipedia.org
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights
It don't spell it out in the first amendment , just prohibits making a law infringing on religion.

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 16:49:56   #
Homestead
 
maureenthannon wrote:
It's not in the Constitution. It was in a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to a church. He wasn't telling the church to keep out of the states business, he was promising the church that the state wouldn't try to control the church.


That's not quite right.

When the Constitution was signed there were a number of states that had a state religion.

There is nothing in the Constitution that would forbid a state from having a state religion, in that state. It didn't forbid it then or now.

That would be a question for the people of that state to decide.

Tomas Jefferson felt that a state religion tended to minimize religion in a state, because, by favoring one religion over others, that religion would have an advantage and the other religions would suffer with less opportunity and therefore there would be less religion in that state.

Virginia had a state religion. Tomas Jefferson was from Virginia and was instrumental in stopping it from being a state religion, in the name of promoting more religion.

When he became president, it was asked of him to do the same thing at a federal level, that he did at the state level.

That is when he baulked and said that there must be a wall.

The wall is between federal government, overstepping it's jurisdiction and intruding on the states rights and the rights of the citizens of that state.

Reply
Dec 14, 2014 16:54:10   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
Blacksheep wrote:
He said, running from the topic with his tail between his legs like a cowardly caviling cur. Of course, having no valid rebuttal coupled with a complete inability to honestly say so, that was to be expected as normal avoidance behavior.


It appears that all you're looking for is an argument.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 22 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.