Your conspiracy theories are too weak to hold back the overwhelming evidence.

For example, the Democrats have a strong democratic advantage. This is very evident in the popular vote which is quite simply a tally of everyone's vote. Trump has never won a popular vote. He lost the popular vote by 3 million in 2016 and he lost it again in 2020, this time by 8 million votes.

So clearly, more Americans have been voting Democrat since at least 2016 and it appears this imparity is increasing. In 2016 Trump got lucky when the distortion of the electoral college worked in his favor. In 2020, it seems the 8 million vote deficit was too much for the electoral college to smear.

So your absurd claim that Democrats can't win without eliminating the EC has already been debunked and it's the Republicans, not the Democrats that are looking for ways to distort the will of the people.

Most people have no clue what the EC actually is or why it was established, which is why they don't understand how it's broken. It has nothing to do with protecting the small states, which is a rampant delusion often hoisted in a desperate attempt to validate the broken EC.

While The People elect their representatives with a popular vote, they do not technically vote for the president; Congress does. But to avoid corruption, a proxy called the Electoral College is used where electors are selected much like jurors are in a trial. Each state get's one elector per representative. So again, it's not about giving small states a boost, it's about avoiding the potential corruption that comes with allowing representatives to vote directly for a president.

This was actually very good design and it worked fine for over a century, but that's because representation expanded to keep up with the population thereby, insuring equal representation. Federalist 58 states that one of the “unequivocal objects” of the population census is “to augment the number of representatives … under the sole limitation that the whole number [of Representatives] shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand inhabitants.”

So, if two states each have 60,000 people, they would both have two representatives. If one of the states experiences a population boom resulting in 30,000 more people, a seat would be added to Congress to maintain a ratio of 1 for every 30,000. So now we have one state with 60,000 people and two representatives and the other with 90,000 people and three representatives... Everyone is equally represented.

All good so far...

But then Congress decided to stop expanding after the 1910 census and that's when the system broke. 1910 was in the middle of the industrial revolution and the states where industry was growing rapidly was experiencing massive population booms but without an expanding Congress, the people of these industrial states were forced to share one representative between 60,000 people or even more.

So it's not that there is anything wrong with the EC, per se. The problem is that it's based on the number of representatives which no longer provides equal representation for the people. So we have to ask ourselves. Is such unequal representation worth the rule that The People can't just vote for the president the same way they vote for their representatives, by popular vote?

Unfortunately, those in sparsely populated regions are fighting all efforts to fix the problem because the problem just happens to work in their favor. So my message to them is pretty simple... F u c k Y o u.

As for this nonsense that the EC is there to protect the little states, that comes from a combination of realizing that the current condition underlying the EC DOES give small states an unfair advantage and and effort to justify it by blurring the lines between the EC and past compromises, such as the 3/5th rule, which gave the southern states the advantage of counting each slave as 3/5ths of a person even though slaves couldn't vote. This was a compromise the northern states had to accept in order to get the southern states to sign on to the Constitution but since the Civil War, there has been no provision for "protecting" small states and that was NEVER the intention of the EC anyway.

Mattoid is correct. Red states do receive an oversized share of welfare. Your response really exposes your ignorance and now I will explain exactly why.

First of all, debt by itself doesn't mean shit. The country with the largest debt in the world is the United States, but the United States also has the worlds largest economy. Likewise, California has the largest economy in the union... In fact it's the 5th largest economy in the world.

Secondly, I don't see any proof that undocumented immigrants are a drain on the state. This is just something you racist say in your attempt to demonize brown people. You NEVER provide any evidence, just hearsay.

And being a sanctuary state is a point of honor. It means we stand up for the people described in the inscription on the Statue of Liberty and it was a giant middle-finger to Trump and his Nazi BS.

Finally, despite all these things, which you apparently think are bad, California still provides more money to the federal government than it takes, which means California is actually subsidizing those red welfare states.

So yes... Mattoid is correct and you're clueless.

And now I'm not just a non Christian to you, I'm a demon?

I love as Christ loves. I live because He lives. He came to save the lost. Sinners, not the righteous. The main group He held in what, for Him, was almost contempt were the Pharisees. Paul was a high priest, a Sadducee, before He was confronted by the Lord on the road to Damascus. He was certainly legalistic enough to be one. Yet somehow, Jesus got through to him.

You once asked what my problem was with Paul's letters. It's that he allows his old legal nature as a high priest to take over. Christ is a living Lord, not black writing on papyrus. He sent the Holy Spirit to be our Guide. We just need to listen for that still small voice. Because He doesn't always speak with a voice of thunder.

Mattoid is correct. Red states do receive an oversized share of welfare. Your response really exposes your ignorance and now I will explain exactly why.

First of all, debt by itself doesn't mean shit. The country with the largest debt in the world is the United States, but the United States also has the worlds largest economy. Likewise, California has the largest economy in the union... In fact it's the 5th largest economy in the world.

Secondly, I don't see any proof that undocumented immigrants are a drain on the state. This is just something you racist say in your attempt to demonize brown people. You NEVER provide any evidence, just hearsay.

And being a sanctuary state is a point of honor. It means we stand up for the people described in the inscription on the Statue of Liberty and it was a giant middle-finger to Trump and his Nazi BS.

Finally, despite all these things, which you apparently think are bad, California still provides more money to the federal government than it takes, which means California is actually subsidizing those red welfare states.

So yes... Mattoid is correct and you're clueless.

Nothing but explosive diarrhea escapes your lips regarding Trump yet a total acquiescence to Biden's intentional destruction of our Republic. You no longer qualify to be an American. You forfeited the original fought for and defended heritage, sacrificed for all patriotic freedom loving Americans in favor of those who will put your body in chains as they have already captured and enslaved your mind. You simply don't know it yet. It's astounding and Trump is actually incidental to the takeover and destruction of the Republic yet paramount to any hope of recovery. What other reason does the despotic Marxist Left have to try and utterly destroy this man? They fear him more than they fear our foreign enemies because they see Trump as a threat to their lust for absolute power.

Stup; I like that handle as it so much more fits your most exuding personality, what makes you believe a popular vote is better than Electoral College/ your portrayal of a rigged system is only touted by losers that have tried to buy the Oval Office by whatever crooked means/ the EC as you guys like to label it was installed to prevent such things from happening, surely that advanced education you always throw at people can see the logic here ( oh btw as a favor playing the race card with the 3/5 thing is really shallow)🤠

Well you certainly are not the sharpest pencil in the librarians bun. Non citizens are not called upon to serve on juries nor do they vote. The criteria that you are seeking indicates that you are barely capable of perceiving a lunch bag let alone a package. You are right, though, that this entire fiasco goes further than the presidency. It also includes the half baked, incompetent, incapable dim wit lemmings who follow the Fat Rapist looking for a chance to sniff his behind. Members of congress who would normally fall into this category are excluded since they are each allocated a small piece of what smells cut fresh from his morning dump.