So _now_ I'm being criticized for NOT being smart, or for NOT graduating from some kind of school.
But, what I had said was: "Possibly one thing it's exceptional in is having more mass shootings and/or more deaths by guns, in civilian life, than other countries have." where "it" refers to the U.S. Keep that quoted sentence in mind, because that's what you were replying to (or attempting to reply to).
Here's some backup: "Of the most brutal are probably school shootings, on the list of school shootings by country, the US surely comes to the first place. Also, the US being at the top of world’s mass shooting by percentage (33%) compared to the population percentage it covers (5%) ..." (
https://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/10-countries-with-the-most-mass-shootings-in-the-world-666161/ )
And all I had alleged was "Possibly..." and "...and/or...". It looks like there's something to it, anyway, regarding mass shootings, at least, as seen in the above quote. I didn't bother to look up "deaths by guns, in civilian life" recently.
So, my sentence is fine. It's your erroneous reading of it which has a problem. Where I referred to mass shootings "and/or" to deaths by guns in civilian life, you replied sarcastically _as_though_ I had instead referred to "homicide rates" which obviously is not the same thing. And even if I were more mistaken, it was just an exploratory comment anyway, starting with "Possibly". You are just primed to insult somebody no matter how reasonable they are.
Does your misconstruing mean that you are "not very smart" or that you should be questioned about whether you did "ever graduate from any school anywhere"?
And is being "smart" or educated supposed to be a good thing or a bad thing this time? You folks flip-flop so much on them, how is one to keep track of what's currently "in" and approved, or "out" and disapproved?
So _now_ I'm being criticized for NOT being smart,... (