One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Gun Control Will NOT Stop Mass Shootings!
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 18, 2014 08:10:07   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
Loki wrote:
Holder was a major player for the Clinton/Reno cabal who brough us Ruby Ridge and Waco. A major contributor to the Clinton semi-auto ban that accomplished nothing. Holder is a weasel for sale to the highest bidder.

I did not know this. Thanks

Reply
Jun 18, 2014 08:42:12   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Rufus wrote:
I did not know this. Thanks


For some reason, his fairly high placement in the Janet Reno DOJ is not common knowledge.

Reply
Jun 18, 2014 09:26:49   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
Loki wrote:
For some reason, his fairly high placement in the Janet Reno DOJ is not common knowledge.


The little faggot Muslim bastard needs to be shot by firing squad along with Osama, Hillary, Reid and Pelosi. Praise God. I love a good execution and the smell of napalm in the morning.

Reply
 
 
Jun 18, 2014 10:05:56   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Loki wrote:
I think that both of us may be preaching to the choir. I'm not sure how many fence sitters will be convinced.


None. They do only that which their handlers advise and tell them to think.

Reply
Jun 18, 2014 10:20:45   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
None. They do only that which their handlers advise and tell them to think.


How many puppeteers does it take to operate a politician? Four, I think. Public relations person, marketing manager, political advisor and campaign finance manager. I'm not sure which one has the "hand up the ass" to make it talk. Maybe they take turns.

Reply
Jun 18, 2014 10:26:27   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
lpnmajor wrote:
How many puppeteers does it take to operate a politician? Four, I think. Public relations person, marketing manager, political advisor and campaign finance manager. I'm not sure which one has the "hand up the ass" to make it talk. Maybe they take turns.


We have a joke where I live outside of Memphis. How many Germantown women does it take to change a light bulb? Two. One to mix Martinis and one to call the electrician.

Reply
Jun 18, 2014 12:57:44   #
Augustus Greatorex Loc: NE
 
rumitoid wrote:
There is absolutely no way to know that a mass shooting may or may not have been prevented by reasonable gun control. Ease of access to an assault weapon with an enormous clip capacity where certain controls may have made such access either impossible or difficult could spell the difference. The fact one would resist such measures based on the assumption it was "unlikely" to deter seems rather callous.


Let me see if I understand your position?

Access to guns is necessary for a mass shooting.
The ability to determine whose access to guns is limited by gun control is unknowable.
Therefore, it is rational, and not emotional, to oppose gun control.

Is that your contention?

Reply
 
 
Jun 18, 2014 13:11:00   #
dennisimoto Loc: Washington State (West)
 
rumitoid wrote:
There is absolutely no way to know that a mass shooting may or may not have been prevented by reasonable gun control. Ease of access to an assault weapon with an enormous clip capacity where certain controls may have made such access either impossible or difficult could spell the difference. The fact one would resist such measures based on the assumption it was "unlikely" to deter seems rather callous.


Rumit, "reasonable gun control," and, "sensible gun control," are two commonly used phrases by folks who seem to have no clear understanding of what either one means. What you really believe is that if I have a small squadron of Beagles waving their tails on my right and one slavering PitBull on my left, I should shoot them all. The PitBull is an obvious danger and the Beagles could turn dangerous at any second so the "reasonable," and, "sensible," thing to do would be to kill all dogs. Then and only then will we all be safe from dog attacks. Do I have it right?

Reply
Jun 18, 2014 13:11:30   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
Augustus Greatorex wrote:
Let me see if I understand your position?

Access to guns is necessary for a mass shooting.
The ability to determine whose access to guns is limited by gun control is unknowable.
Therefore, it is rational, and not emotional, to oppose gun control.

Is that your contention?


Rumitoid causes arthritis and is continually preaching to take our guns away so we cannot protect ourselves from criminals and from this out of control tyrannical government. Stay away from rumitoid. He will give you arthritis and get you and your family killed.

Reply
Jun 18, 2014 13:21:02   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
dennisimoto wrote:
Rumit, "reasonable gun control," and, "sensible gun control," are two commonly used phrases by folks who seem to have no clear understanding of what either one means. What you really believe is that if I have a small squadron of Beagles waving their tails on my right and one slavering PitBull on my left, I should shoot them all. The PitBull is an obvious danger and the Beagles could turn dangerous at any second so the "reasonable," and, "sensible," thing to do would be to kill all dogs. Then and only then will we all be safe from dog attacks. Do I have it right?
Rumit, "reasonable gun control," and, &q... (show quote)

Yes. He is a fag.

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 08:53:17   #
Snoopy
 
AuntiE wrote:
Pay very careful attention. I have posted this before. Try reading it this time. The National Firearms Act of 1934 prohibits the purchase of "assault weapons". You must have a BAFTE Background check and pay a $200 licensing fee to own an "assault weapon". You might want to learn what an assault weapon is before you comment.


AuntiE

Rumitoid has always high on comments and low on real facts.

Politicians have no clue and only ban a weapon on its looks and attachments such as pistol grip, bayonet lugs, etc.

Ignorance is a dangerous thing.

Snoopy

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2014 09:16:37   #
JetJock Loc: Texas
 
AuntiE wrote:
Pay very careful attention. I have posted this before. Try reading it this time. The National Firearms Act of 1934 prohibits the purchase of "assault weapons". You must have a BAFTE Background check and pay a $200 licensing fee to own an "assault weapon". You might want to learn what an assault weapon is before you comment.


You are so right AntiE
The lame brain media never gets this right, a water gun which looks like a AK47 or AR 15 would be classified as an "assault weapon" by these fools.

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 12:13:46   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Snoopy wrote:
AuntiE

Rumitoid has always high on comments and low on real facts.

Politicians have no clue and only ban a weapon on its looks and attachments such as pistol grip, bayonet lugs, etc.

Ignorance is a dangerous thing.

Snoopy


That is why the liberal proggies are so dangerous.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.