One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Questions for veterans
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jul 12, 2021 08:41:46   #
American Vet
 
3507 wrote:
"one capacity or another" could mean a lot. In my mind there's a _big_ difference between "military service" (as soldiers) and most other kinds of service.

In my town there was a Mennonite church and some of the Mennonites were Conscientious Objectors. And I heard that some Conscientious Objectors did some kind of service, it just wasn't a soldier kind of service, and I don't think it was any kind of military service.

I wish that it were never necessary to do violence. But I think sometimes it is necessary to do violence. And there will always be soldiers.

Did you go through boot camp? What do you think about it?
"one capacity or another" could mean a l... (show quote)


I was a combat Medic - and I trained medics as well. Back in the days of the draft there were many CO's (Conscientious Objectors) going thru medic training. My observation, as well as most of the NCO's, was that there were 2 groups:

Those who were CO's for religious reasons: Almost to a T these were devout young men who did an excellent job. The best example I recall is the Seventh Day Adventists. Their sabbath is on Saturday, so we were required to let them off while the remaining trainees did scheduled duties/training. On Sunday, there was no training requirements and only regular duty assignments (guard, CoQ, etc.). The Seventh Day boys volunteered to do all the "Sunday duties" and also made up whatever training they missed. They didn't have to do so - but they did. Needless to say, there were no alcohol or drug problems with this group.

The second group was the "CO for moral reasons". For a large majority, these were the ones who hated the military but, for whatever reason, couldn't avoid the draft. Most were pretty much worthless: Not all, but most.

Just my experience.

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 09:09:08   #
currahee506
 
I was drafted into military service in 1967. The army met all my expectations of being a forceful dictatorial society.
The experience gave me an appreciation for the freedom I have in being organized for independent living in a country that believes in the rule of law.

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 11:55:42   #
agatemaggot Loc: waterloo iowa
 
3507 wrote:
"one capacity or another" could mean a lot. In my mind there's a _big_ difference between "military service" (as soldiers) and most other kinds of service.

In my town there was a Mennonite church and some of the Mennonites were Conscientious Objectors. And I heard that some Conscientious Objectors did some kind of service, it just wasn't a soldier kind of service, and I don't think it was any kind of military service.

I wish that it were never necessary to do violence. But I think sometimes it is necessary to do violence. And there will always be soldiers.

Did you go through boot camp? What do you think about it?
"one capacity or another" could mean a l... (show quote)


Peace Corps !

Reply
 
 
Jul 12, 2021 13:34:17   #
Dinty
 
Milosia2 wrote:
I think compulsory service should absolutely be called. A good whiff of that military patriotism can be quite stunning.
Sobering almost. Compulsory for all .
No Daddy Outs
No Bush special plans.
No chhitting in your panties 2 weeks for an easy out.
2 years for all in one capacity or another.
Everyone that lives in this country should have their ass up for grabs just for the humility of it all. We’ve gotten away from the blood of Patriots mostly because those at the top don’t care and will never understand.
A shrug, means you don’t understand .
I think compulsory service should absolutely be ca... (show quote)


France, at one time, had a law stating "graduate high school, 2 years service before college." Good idea.

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 15:13:47   #
Shlack
 
The Israelis have it right: compulsory service for all. Conscious Objectors could do "Peace Corps" or some
equivalent service. Too many youth have no discipline, self-respect or sense of purpose. The NFL includes a bunch
of spoiled crybabies, compared to Major League Baseball players (many of whom are Veterans). For that reason
I DO NOT SUPPORT PRO FOOTBALL. i AM A PROUD MARINE VETERAN WITH NO REGRETS.

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 19:01:31   #
teabag09
 
Shlack wrote:
The Israelis have it right: compulsory service for all. Conscious Objectors could do "Peace Corps" or some
equivalent service. Too many youth have no discipline, self-respect or sense of purpose. The NFL includes a bunch
of spoiled crybabies, compared to Major League Baseball players (many of whom are Veterans). For that reason
I DO NOT SUPPORT PRO FOOTBALL. i AM A PROUD MARINE VETERAN WITH NO REGRETS.


SEMPER FI. Mike

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 19:39:10   #
MeadowFields
 
Milosia2 wrote:
I think the biggest reason we are in this place is because of the Erosion of Trust.
We had trust here for a long time. You could go to sleep at night trusting you wouldn’t be robbed while asleep, not anymore.
Trust is gone. I can’t trust anyone I do business with anymore. Doing business here in this country is is like trying to get through a wet floor supermarket without slipping and falling in every aisle.
There’s no trust. You take out a loan and th fine print creates a hole for you to fall into that will cost you more money.
It seems everything has these conditional attachments that create a minefield for the consumer to get through.
Trust is gone.
Lies abound. Liars can’t believe other people are capable of telling the truth, so they lie because they are incapable of believing the truth.
I think the biggest reason we are in this place is... (show quote)


We can thank our past President for spreading lies and conspiracy theories where no one knows truth from fabrication anymore. The press also abandoned seeking out facts and truth in favor of sparking shocking headlines to sell publications to a gullible public. We reap what we sow and especially in a free democratic society where cheats and liars can use legal tactics to make easy gains with impunity. It's important to raise our kids with morals so when we give our solemn word or commitment to a task we follow through without having to lean on lawyers to bail us out. Justice, Justice shall you pursue sayeth the Lord - now that's a commandment we must all follow!

Reply
 
 
Jul 12, 2021 20:42:54   #
martsiva
 
3507 wrote:
I am not a veteran. My draft number was high, and I was told that that meant I wouldn't be drafted. Then I just attended college.

1. What do you think about your military service? Did this change from how you thought before or during it?

A comment from me: Lately I've been thinking about "collective action" or "collective responsibility" which typically involves leadership and a large group of people's coordinated response to something (or even, sometimes, just behaving themselves and not doing bad things to other people, or maybe following a rule or rules). I think that military service is an example of collective action or collective responsibility. I did not serve in the military, but there are other collective responsibilities, and some of us do more of one, and others do more of another. Even just following the law is often a kind of collective responsibility.

The way I see things, a person has an obligation or obligations, to a group. So, for example, we behave in civilized ways, not just for our own benefit, but also because we're respecting other people too. More than that, we actually care about what happens to other people, to some degree. I care about what happens to my family. Also I try to behave responsibly because I "should care" about what happens to everybody.

2. There is an idea about "every man for himself". What do you think of that?

3. Are there some forms of service which should be compulsory, and for whom? Back in the early 70's there was a draft. What do you think of it? What is there now: some kind of compulsory registration? And what do you think of how things are done now? (This could be about the military, but it could be about other, non-military things too.)

4. What group, or groups, do you think you have an obligation or obligations to?

5. Aside from military service, what other collective actions or collective responsibilities are there, and what do you think of them?

6. This last item is about respect. More specifically, I am thinking about respect and rules. Like this: Sometimes there is a rule, but I might think it's an unnecessary rule, but I follow it anyway. Or maybe I don't follow it. But sometimes I follow a rule, not because the rule itself seems good, and not even just because I'll be punished for not following it; sometimes I follow a rule just because other people care about it. This is a form of respect. Or, I might think: "What if I'm mistaken, and they're right?" and then I follow their rule, just in case I might be mistaken about it. This is also a form of respect. What do you think?
I am not a veteran. My draft number was high, and... (show quote)


'Obligation or obligations to a group'?? You 'follow a rule because other people care about it'? Do you know how to think for yourself?? It`s a good thing our founding fathers didn`t go along with the 'rules' that a crowd of Brits cared about!!

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 01:01:50   #
Red Onion Rip Loc: Oklahoma
 
3507 wrote:
I am not a veteran. My draft number was high, and I was told that that meant I wouldn't be drafted. Then I just attended college.

1. What do you think about your military service? Did this change from how you thought before or during it?

A comment from me: Lately I've been thinking about "collective action" or "collective responsibility" which typically involves leadership and a large group of people's coordinated response to something (or even, sometimes, just behaving themselves and not doing bad things to other people, or maybe following a rule or rules). I think that military service is an example of collective action or collective responsibility. I did not serve in the military, but there are other collective responsibilities, and some of us do more of one, and others do more of another. Even just following the law is often a kind of collective responsibility.

The way I see things, a person has an obligation or obligations, to a group. So, for example, we behave in civilized ways, not just for our own benefit, but also because we're respecting other people too. More than that, we actually care about what happens to other people, to some degree. I care about what happens to my family. Also I try to behave responsibly because I "should care" about what happens to everybody.

2. There is an idea about "every man for himself". What do you think of that?

3. Are there some forms of service which should be compulsory, and for whom? Back in the early 70's there was a draft. What do you think of it? What is there now: some kind of compulsory registration? And what do you think of how things are done now? (This could be about the military, but it could be about other, non-military things too.)

4. What group, or groups, do you think you have an obligation or obligations to?

5. Aside from military service, what other collective actions or collective responsibilities are there, and what do you think of them?

6. This last item is about respect. More specifically, I am thinking about respect and rules. Like this: Sometimes there is a rule, but I might think it's an unnecessary rule, but I follow it anyway. Or maybe I don't follow it. But sometimes I follow a rule, not because the rule itself seems good, and not even just because I'll be punished for not following it; sometimes I follow a rule just because other people care about it. This is a form of respect. Or, I might think: "What if I'm mistaken, and they're right?" and then I follow their rule, just in case I might be mistaken about it. This is also a form of respect. What do you think?
I am not a veteran. My draft number was high, and... (show quote)


I volunteered for the Navy in 1963 during Vietnam. Went through boot camp at Great Lakes Naval Training Station, in Illinois. Then went to school in Florida for a year in communications then to Edzell, Scotland for a year. From there to the USNS Jose F Valdez stationed in the Indian Ocean for another year. From there to Naval Radio Station Cheltenham, Maryland for two years then to Kamiseya, Japan. During my two years there I was sent on a special operation via Okinawa, & Da Nang, Vietnam to the carrier USS America CV66 stationed in the Tonkin Gulf. The carrier was going to transit the Sea of Japan, the first time a U.S. carrier had ever been in the Sea of Japan. We (there were 7 in our group) were on board to provide early warning to the carrier Combat Information Center (CIC) if any Soviet aircraft took off from Vladivostok, the Eastern command center for the Soviets. We were able to monitor Soviet air communications so we knew when a plane or planes were scrambling and heading for our position. We would notify CIC and the ship would launch fighters to go meet the Soviet bombers and fighters. After two and a half years at Kamiseya, they converted the station from an Activity to a Detachment and sent about half of us to Misawa, Japan which they converted from a Detachment to an Activity. I stayed there a year then decided it was time to get out. In hindsight I should have stayed in.

I have since gone back through my ancestry with ancestry.com and in doing so, discovered that my fourth great grand father was a 1st LT in the Bergen, N. J. Militia during the Revolutionary War from 1776-1778 when he was killed.

Something that every veteran should tell you is that when they enlisted they took an oath: "That I would protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice So Help Me God."

And that to this day NO ONE has released them from that oath. I have a sticker on my car to that effect. As far as the.orders from the President and officers appointed over one go, those orders MUST be legal and Constitutional otherwise they are null and void, at least as far as I'm concerned.

Sorry, I told my whole life story, almost, but I have a tendency to do that.

Rip Van Winkle
Purcell, Oklahoma

Quote Reply me if you want my email

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 13:49:27   #
elledee
 
MeadowFields wrote:
We can thank our past President for spreading lies and conspiracy theories where no one knows truth from fabrication anymore. The press also abandoned seeking out facts and truth in favor of sparking shocking headlines to sell publications to a gullible public. We reap what we sow and especially in a free democratic society where cheats and liars can use legal tactics to make easy gains with impunity. It's important to raise our kids with morals so when we give our solemn word or commitment to a task we follow through without having to lean on lawyers to bail us out. Justice, Justice shall you pursue sayeth the Lord - now that's a commandment we must all follow!
We can thank our past President for spreading lies... (show quote)


the fact that Russia and China would love own us and Iran would love to wipe us off the face of the earth is not a lie or a conspiracy theory and we have demonrat society that is not following anything the Lord sayeth

Reply
Jul 14, 2021 01:01:28   #
3507
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
The first question you should ask and answer is, What is the purpose of a nation's armed forces?


I believe there's a simple answer and a more complex answer.

I have not studied it. Also, as I've said, I'm not a veteran, in case that matters. But any citizen should have some kind of answer, though, anyway.

My simple answer is: "The purpose of a nation's armed forces is to be prepared to use force, if and when it is necessary and ordered to do so, to defend the nation."

But really, there's a complication even in just that simple sentence. "force" should really mean "appropriate force". I think most people today would agree that the "Mỹ Lai Massacre" was a wrong kind of force or a wrong way to use force.

In a more complex answer, one might first consider this: "What should be the first question or questions?"

How would you answer the question that you posed?

Reply
 
 
Jul 14, 2021 01:19:32   #
3507
 
martsiva wrote:
'Obligation or obligations to a group'?? You 'follow a rule because other people care about it'? Do you know how to think for yourself?? It`s a good thing our founding fathers didn`t go along with the 'rules' that a crowd of Brits cared about!!


Read carefully. This passage contains several indicators that the writer is thinking for himself:

{begin quote} Or maybe I don't follow it. But sometimes I follow a rule, not because the rule itself seems good, and not even just because I'll be punished for not following it; sometimes I follow a rule just because other people care about it. This is a form of respect. Or, I might think: "What if {end quote}.

Notice "Or", "maybe", "sometimes", "because", "a form of", "respect", and "What if".

If I had instead said things like "100%", "always", "never", or some slang word to mean an enemy or adversary, _then_ you should be suspicious that I may not be thinking for myself.

Reply
Jul 14, 2021 01:44:25   #
3507
 
martsiva wrote:
'Obligation or obligations to a group'?? You 'follow a rule because other people care about it'? Do you know how to think for yourself?? It`s a good thing our founding fathers didn`t go along with the 'rules' that a crowd of Brits cared about!!


You said "didn't go along with". The founding fathers did at least _care_ about (1.) rules, and about (2.) what the British people thought, and even about (3.) the rules that British people cared about. It's true that they "didn't go along" but that only happened after time, problems, anguish, and deliberation. And all that was a necessary part of the process. The Declaration of Independence describes the situation. For example, in the first paragraph, "[A] decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

By the way: It's been a while since I've read that Declaration, but as I recall, it contains a lot of ideas that are still relevant today. If our nation and that Declaration differ, it might be that the Declaration is the better thing to follow. Might be. Some careful deliberation (etc.) would be required.

Reply
Jul 14, 2021 01:59:33   #
3507
 
Red Onion Rip wrote:
I volunteered for the Navy in 1963 during Vietnam. Went through boot camp at Great Lakes Naval Training Station, in Illinois. Then went to school in Florida for a year in communications then to Edzell, Scotland for a year. From there to the USNS Jose F Valdez stationed in the Indian Ocean for another year. From there to Naval Radio Station Cheltenham, Maryland for two years then to Kamiseya, Japan. During my two years there I was sent on a special operation via Okinawa, & Da Nang, Vietnam to the carrier USS America CV66 stationed in the Tonkin Gulf. The carrier was going to transit the Sea of Japan, the first time a U.S. carrier had ever been in the Sea of Japan. We (there were 7 in our group) were on board to provide early warning to the carrier Combat Information Center (CIC) if any Soviet aircraft took off from Vladivostok, the Eastern command center for the Soviets. We were able to monitor Soviet air communications so we knew when a plane or planes were scrambling and heading for our position. We would notify CIC and the ship would launch fighters to go meet the Soviet bombers and fighters. After two and a half years at Kamiseya, they converted the station from an Activity to a Detachment and sent about half of us to Misawa, Japan which they converted from a Detachment to an Activity. I stayed there a year then decided it was time to get out. In hindsight I should have stayed in.

I have since gone back through my ancestry with ancestry.com and in doing so, discovered that my fourth great grand father was a 1st LT in the Bergen, N. J. Militia during the Revolutionary War from 1776-1778 when he was killed.

Something that every veteran should tell you is that when they enlisted they took an oath: "That I would protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice So Help Me God."

And that to this day NO ONE has released them from that oath. I have a sticker on my car to that effect. As far as the.orders from the President and officers appointed over one go, those orders MUST be legal and Constitutional otherwise they are null and void, at least as far as I'm concerned.

Sorry, I told my whole life story, almost, but I have a tendency to do that.

Rip Van Winkle
Purcell, Oklahoma

Quote Reply me if you want my email
I volunteered for the Navy in 1963 during Vietnam.... (show quote)


Thank you.

Where you said "decided it was time to get out. In hindsight I should have stayed in", why (or how) did you decide that and how did your thinking change later?

Also, I heard that when people entered the military as an enlisted person or as a drafted person, they had a legal obligation to serve a certain length of time (two years, I think) (although sometimes that's been extended). I see you volunteered; and that it was for the Navy; and it was in 1963. When you entered the Navy, did you have to sign some paper about it, and then did you have a legal obligation to serve a certain length of time?

Reply
Jul 14, 2021 03:32:55   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Blade_Runner wrote:

The first question you should ask and answer is, What is the purpose of a nation's armed forces?
3507 wrote:


My simple answer is: "The purpose of a nation's armed forces is to be prepared to use force, if and when it is necessary and ordered to do so, to defend the nation."

But really, there's a complication even in just that simple sentence. "force" should really mean "appropriate force". I think most people today would agree that the "Mỹ Lai Massacre" was a wrong kind of force or a wrong way to use force.

In a more complex answer, one might first consider this: "What should be the first question or questions?"

How would you answer the question that you posed?
br br My simple answer is: "The purpose of... (show quote)
Yes, be prepared to use force, but the primary purpose of a nation's military is to win wars. You don't do that by trying to determine what "appropriate force" would be. You do it with overwhelming force, superior firepower.

Sun Tsu, the Chinese philosopher general, in his treatise The Art of War, which by the way has been taught in war colleges and military academies in many nations for centuries, said this:

Supreme excellence is breaking your enemy's will to fight without fighting.

What Sun Tsu means is peace through superior firepower. You build the most powerful and combat ready military on the planet so that any enemy would seriously think twice before engaging.

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, the mastermind behind the attack on Pearl Harbor and the failed attempt to capture Midway Island in the central Pacific, tried to tell the Japanese general staff when they decided to take on the United States that he feared a protracted war with such an industrial giant. Just 7 months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, in June of 1942, at the Battle of Midway, he was proven correct.

In less than one day, outnumbered in ships, the US Navy under excellent leadership and with superior air power, destroyed the Japanese attack fleet in sinking 4 carriers and killing 90% of the Japanese Navy's top combat pilots while they were in their cockpits sitting on the deck. The Americans lost just over 300 men, the Japanese over 3000.

Though the Japanese had conquered a quarter of the western Pacific, they lost the initiative at Midway and never regained it again. However, the Japanese militants weren't about to quit. They were determined to fight to the last man, woman and child. It took an ungodly weapon to finally convince emperor Hirohito to command his military to surrender.

When war is inevitable, you go in it to win. The quicker you can do that, the less costly it is in lives and property.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.