One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Donald - Let's Get Something Straight
Page <<first <prev 16 of 17 next>
Oct 11, 2020 12:32:10   #
debeda
 
lindajoy wrote:
Woooooowwwwww, he is big!!!what a little cutie too!! Iā€™ll take him if you need help.. šŸ˜³šŸ˜


Not a chance, but thanks for the offeršŸ˜šŸ˜

Reply
Oct 11, 2020 13:18:50   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
straightUp wrote:
Well, speaking for myself, I remember paying three Mexicans to trench out half an acre of ditches on my property so I can install irrigation. It took them two days and I paid them $300 under the table plus a case of cheap-ass Budweiser (which for some reason they love). That's what I call a bargain. There's no way in hell I could have gotten as good a deal from an American business.

I know for a fact that a lot of American businesses do the same, as proven by the ICE raids we always hear about. Farms, ranches, orchards and sweatshops all over the country do this because it's a bargain for them too and compared to a lot of these American businesses I was being generous.

Would you like all that to stop? Are the use (and often abuse) of illegal immigrants unfair competition for American ditch-diggers? Then document them! Give them what they need to work OVER the table. Give them what they need to secure minimum wage and pay taxes and pull their own weight.

Let the free economy decide how many immigrants are too many. When the supply of labor supasses the demand, there will be less reason for immigrants to come here and the influx will dwindle down to the refugees trying to escape violence.
Well, speaking for myself, I remember paying three... (show quote)
What a crock of bluster you spew here..Take your sympathy plea and stick it!! No matter what the economy drives that laborer who works for less will be the one staying and the one that costs more, not hired or let go...weā€™ve seen it for how long now???Thatā€™s the reality

So you preach your holier than tho opinion while admitting you take advantage of those poor men that busted their butts for two days paying them what a hundred dollars each and threw in some beer... arenā€™t you just an all american boy helping out...šŸ™„Yup, a hell of a bargain for you and of course they were just glad to have the extra cash too..You as a private citizen chose what cost you less and you have the audacity to claim the very same thing of corporate america but for them, they are abusing that illegal~ ha~ song and dance for sure there...What did you do???

Me document them??? Hey, big boy, if they want to do it legal to begin with we wouldnā€™t have this problem to begin with!!! Our government doesnā€™t enforce the laws on the books for immigration entry so they CAN take that money they keep off that worker who likewise agrees to it because they are, after all, making more money than they ever would in their country... Donā€™t tell me document them thats not my job, its theirs!!! I or I should say my clients I do work with pay enough every time they hire an employee and do an I9 on them, not choice, mandatory on all, to include the cost for the background and SS check...An added business expense it is...

Since this is all I can quote reply to its all Iā€™m saying... You break up quotes that then can not be re-quoted when someone goes to reply...

Reply
Oct 11, 2020 13:32:39   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
debeda wrote:
I agree completely. I posted something about law and order on another thread to Barracuda, and she simply agreed. I was gratified to learn that all on the left are not scofflaws. We DO have laws on the books, and those laws MUST be enforced. If we have no borders we are no longer a sovereign nation. Why would anyone want that? I am so baffled by the "logic" of the left sometimes it gives me a headachešŸ¤ÆšŸ¤ÆšŸ¤ÆšŸ¤ÆšŸ¤Æ
And ALWAYS grateful for you my dear. You're incredibly articulate and gracious in your prose
I agree completely. I posted something about law ... (show quote)


Headaches for sure!! Thank You debeda, humbled I am..šŸ’•šŸ’«āœØ

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2020 13:34:49   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
debeda wrote:
Not a chance, but thanks for the offeršŸ˜šŸ˜


Thought so~~~šŸ˜šŸ˜šŸ˜

Reply
Oct 11, 2020 13:51:25   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
lindajoy wrote:
I wanna know about this bargain we supposedly have with the illegals..

We are the country of open arms

We WERE a country of open arms but people like you are changing us into the country of middle-fingers.

lindajoy wrote:

and have taken in far more than any other country!!

There is zero evidence to support that claim. It's just something chauvinists like to say.

lindajoy wrote:

In doing so we see a transition into force, greed, hate of our country, attack of it, here only to use the benefits we so graciously pass out, but it can not be to the determent of our country, land, people and Constitution, anymore!!

Utter nonsense as thoroughly exposed in my previous post.

The only force involved in this issue is the force of democracy as citizens with differing opinions battle it out in the ballots.

The only greed that factors in is the greed of American businesses that hire illegal immigrants to avoid taxes and get labor for super cheap.

The only people who truly hate our country do so because we are an aggressive sponsor of war and poverty throughout the world. Technically, it's a hatred of imperialism but that term has become politically incorrect in a country that refuses to acknowledge its own faults.

We most certainly do NOT "graciously pass out" benefits either. Reagan made it illegal for emergency rooms to refuse care for anyone regardless of status and that's about it. Illegal immigrants do NOT get food stamps, Medicare, welfare, disability insurance or any of those tax-funded benefits that Americans have come to rely on.

Sorry if my references to facts disrupt your delusion. I would suggest you stop listening to ignorant assholes and do some actual research but then again, I get the impression that your bigotry is better served by your BS.

lindajoy wrote:

Our true population is what?? How much do we harbor and bare in expenses for everyone coming in?

Zero. Illegal immigrants don't receive any tax-funded benefits but everytime they buy food, gas or anything else they need to survive, they pay sales tax. They actually have the short end of the deal.

lindajoy wrote:

What happened to our already on the books laws that are the foundation of illegal aliens to gain citizenship and entry and why the hell is it the sole responsibility of this country to bare what we do??

Nothing has happened to any of our laws since the Immigration Act of 1965 and we are far from the only country to bear the burden of immigration. (Just so you know, "bare" means to be naked) In fact, after our invasion of Iraq triggered the uprising of civil war in Syria, many countries took on the burden of accepting the millions of refugees with us being the least generous of them all.

If we are talking about immigrants from Latin America, the reason is simple. Where else can they go when all they have is their feet? I've already covered all this in my previous post. So, i'll move on.

lindajoy wrote:

Who says or no, what legal document declares the United States is mandated to take any and all??? Bs!!

There isn't any, which is probably why we don't.

lindajoy wrote:

Follow the laws in place, enforce them and now in fact limit what we do allow in..

We WERE doing that until Trump came along with his executive orders which have consistently been challenged in court for being unconstitutional.

lindajoy wrote:

They must be able to be vetted by what they produce, not us having to find out.. If they cannot be, then no entry.

I'm not even sure what you are trying to say here. What do you mean "by what they produce"? And how is vetting not a process of "finding out"?

lindajoy wrote:

If they are not self-sufficient and have a place to reside with families or finances to be able to handle it then they do not gain entry..

That stipulation was already on the books. The bigots that put it there thought it would limit the number of non-white immigrants, but it turns out the minorities that were already here or were able to prove their financial capacity reproduced at a far greater rate than white people AND had more family outside the country than white people, so now their racist law is backfiring on them and I'm laughing my ass off.

lindajoy wrote:

If they are criminals of course they never gain entry!!etcetcetc...

Of course... but only in so far as their crimes are "criminal" according to OUR laws. Keep in mind a lot refugees are incriminated by their home countries for political reasons.

lindajoy wrote:

Time to man up and stand for this country first, period...

Being an ignorant bigot is not the same thing as "manning up" or "standing for this country". It's more like being chicken-sh-ts that are so afraid of immigrants they want mommy to build walls to keep them out. Your disgusting view on immigration comes from a lack of courage.

lindajoy wrote:

Lest we loose it to an unrecognized migrant influx determined to intercede in all avenues from entry to government positions and one day wake up in another country of god only Knows what!!!

I can smell your fear from here. Fear of the future, fear of change, fear of the unknown. We're supposed to be the land of the brave, so get a grip.

lindajoy wrote:

Think Iā€™m kidding~~ just look around in our government right now and whats on the streets or hidden away in camps..NO thank you!!

If the world is that scary for you, maybe you should just stay in your house.

Reply
Oct 11, 2020 14:10:44   #
Rose42
 
lindajoy wrote:
What a crock of bluster you spew here..Take your sympathy plea and stick it!! No matter what the economy drives that laborer who works for less will be the one staying and the one that costs more, not hired or let go...weā€™ve seen it for how long now???Thatā€™s the reality

So you preach your holier than tho opinion while admitting you take advantage of those poor men that busted their butts for two days paying them what a hundred dollars each and threw in some beer... arenā€™t you just an all american boy helping out...šŸ™„Yup, a hell of a bargain for you and of course they were just glad to have the extra cash too..You as a private citizen chose what cost you less and you have the audacity to claim the very same thing of corporate america but for them, they are abusing that illegal~ ha~ song and dance for sure there...What did you do???

Me document them??? Hey, big boy, if they want to do it legal to begin with we wouldnā€™t have this problem to begin with!!! Our government doesnā€™t enforce the laws on the books for immigration entry so they CAN take that money they keep off that worker who likewise agrees to it because they are, after all, making more money than they ever would in their country... Donā€™t tell me document them thats not my job, its theirs!!! I or I should say my clients I do work with pay enough every time they hire an employee and do an I9 on them, not choice, mandatory on all, to include the cost for the background and SS check...An added business expense it is...

Since this is all I can quote reply to its all Iā€™m saying... You break up quotes that then can not be re-quoted when someone goes to reply...
b What a crock of bluster you spew here..Take yo... (show quote)


Bang on linda. His posts are too tedious to reply to. I think he does it on purpose because he likes to have the last word.

Reply
Oct 11, 2020 14:45:36   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
lindajoy wrote:
What a crock of bluster you spew here..Take your sympathy plea and stick it!!

I think you know I'm not spewing bluster, you probably just don't want to face reality. And you can call it a sympathy plea if you want but a more accurate term would be "empathy", something you don't seem to show much respect for. And it's not a "plea" either it's a democratic process that isn't going your way.

lindajoy wrote:

No matter what the economy drives that laborer who works for less will be the one staying and the one that costs more, not hired or let go...weā€™ve seen it for how long now???Thatā€™s the reality

Since it's the immigrant that works for less, I would say your emotional torrent of outrage is betraying your argument. LOL!

lindajoy wrote:

So you preach your holier than tho opinion while admitting you take advantage of those poor men that busted their butts for two days paying them what a hundred dollars each and threw in some beer... arenā€™t you just an all american boy helping out...šŸ™„

Those who think they're opinions are "holier than thou" don't admit to their own sins and those that do are often the most authoritative critics. Fact is, you can't tell me it doesn't happen when I've done it myself.


lindajoy wrote:

Yup, a hell of a bargain for you and of course they were just glad to have the extra cash too..You as a private citizen chose what cost you less and you have the audacity to claim the very same thing of corporate america but for them, they are abusing that illegal~ ha~ song and dance for sure there...What did you do???

I gave them the $100 each that they were praying for while standing in front of Home Depot. What did YOU give them? And yes, the American businesses that I referenced do it too. Again this is proven every time there's another ICE raid. These business and I are helping them get more than they got in Mexico. That's why they come here. Remember, I'm not the one all freaked out because we have immigrants.

lindajoy wrote:

Me document them??? Hey, big boy, if they want to do it legal to begin with we wouldnā€™t have this problem to begin with!!!

They DO want to do it legal, but the bigots writing the immigration laws won't allow it. Dugh!

lindajoy wrote:

Our government doesnā€™t enforce the laws on the books for immigration entry so they CAN take that money they keep off that worker who likewise agrees to it because they are, after all, making more money than they ever would in their country...

Actually, our government DOES enforce the law, they just don't catch ALL the immigrants. So yeah, it works out for the illegal immigrants and every American that hires them. The only people getting shafted are the bigots that want to keep them out. (boo-hoo)

lindajoy wrote:

Donā€™t tell me document them thats not my job, its theirs!!! I or I should say my clients

I never said it was your job. In fact, I wouldn't trust you to do it. I'm referring to whatever agencies "document" the legal immigrants. That would be the federal government for issuing visas and tax id's and the state governments for things like driver licenses. And yes, it would be the responsibility of the immigrants and their employers to apply for the documents, which they WOULD do if the government would allow it. So that's what I mean when I say "document them".

lindajoy wrote:

I do work with pay enough every time they hire an employee and do an I9 on them, not choice, mandatory on all, to include the cost for the background and SS check...An added business expense it is...

Not for illegals you don't

lindajoy wrote:

Since this is all I can quote reply to its all Iā€™m saying... You break up quotes that then can not be re-quoted when someone goes to reply...

I break up quotes to reply directly to false statements. The more false statements in the rant the more breaks there's going to be. You folks are inclined to spew these rambling rants filled with disinformation. If you don't want to deal with the way I respond you can always rely on solid arguments to support one or two points instead of ranting.

Otherwise, you can just not respond... It's not like I'd be missing out on anything.

Well, I have other things to do now. Have a nice day lindajoy. Try not to let your fears ruin it for you.

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2020 19:28:37   #
son of witless
 
lindajoy wrote:
What a crock of bluster you spew here..Take your sympathy plea and stick it!! No matter what the economy drives that laborer who works for less will be the one staying and the one that costs more, not hired or let go...weā€™ve seen it for how long now???Thatā€™s the reality

So you preach your holier than tho opinion while admitting you take advantage of those poor men that busted their butts for two days paying them what a hundred dollars each and threw in some beer... arenā€™t you just an all american boy helping out...šŸ™„Yup, a hell of a bargain for you and of course they were just glad to have the extra cash too..You as a private citizen chose what cost you less and you have the audacity to claim the very same thing of corporate america but for them, they are abusing that illegal~ ha~ song and dance for sure there...What did you do???

Me document them??? Hey, big boy, if they want to do it legal to begin with we wouldnā€™t have this problem to begin with!!! Our government doesnā€™t enforce the laws on the books for immigration entry so they CAN take that money they keep off that worker who likewise agrees to it because they are, after all, making more money than they ever would in their country... Donā€™t tell me document them thats not my job, its theirs!!! I or I should say my clients I do work with pay enough every time they hire an employee and do an I9 on them, not choice, mandatory on all, to include the cost for the background and SS check...An added business expense it is...

Since this is all I can quote reply to its all Iā€™m saying... You break up quotes that then can not be re-quoted when someone goes to reply...
b What a crock of bluster you spew here..Take yo... (show quote)




Wow. I never want to get you mad at me.

Reply
Oct 12, 2020 12:36:45   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Rose42 wrote:
Bang on linda. His posts are too tedious to reply to. I think he does it on purpose because he likes to have the last word.


Backing Communism is a real chore!
No easy task.

Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton (1952)
Go here for free download:
http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Behind%20Communism.pdf

To understand the total problem of
Communism it is necessary that we trace the
course of the movement from itā€™s beginning
down to the present. We must understand
who itā€™s originators were, and what they
were, and we must gain some idea as to the
forces which influenced and shaped their
philosophy.
Unfortunately, any deep-down discussion of
Communism and Marxism involves the
Jewish question...

Contents
1. THE PERSECUTION MYTH
2. THE JEW IN EUROPE
3. RETURN TO THE EAST
4. THE RENAISSANCE
5. THE TERROR SECTION
6. BLOODY SUNDAY
7. PETERSBERG SOVIET
8. REVOLUTION
9. HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM
10. MORE PETERSBERG SOVIET
11. SIXTH PARTY CONGRESS
12. TROTZKY TO POWER
13. CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY
14. THE RED TERROR
15. BELA KUN
16. STALINS PAST
17. KAGANOVICH
18. IRON CURTAIN DICTATORS
19. JEWS IN AMERICA
20. NEW YORK: Jewish World Capital
21. THE TREASON TRIALS
22.COMMUNISM IN HOLLYWOOD

Reply
Oct 12, 2020 12:41:05   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
PeterS wrote:
Not even close. Hitler was authoritarian and the various Soviet presidents presided over a totalitarian government. And I repeat, fascism is just as bad as communism. The difference between conservatives and liberals is that Liberals know communism is the worst that Liberalism can become whereas conservatives have no clue that Fascism lies in their wheelhouse. Most are like you and think Communism and Fascism are the same side of the liberal coin. Not so. Fascism centers around Nationalism followed by militarism with a whole slew of other ism's that you conservatives swear by day in and day out.

Now the point is simple--you can't avoid the worst if you can't recognize the worst that you can become. You think Fascism and Communism are liberal traits no doubt because you believe that National Socialist crap insulates you from any involvement. But as I told Blade Runner one time, name me one socialist thing that Hitler believed in? In fact, if you examine Hitler he was staunchly against Communists, socialists, liberals, and the intellectual elite. You can't be a socialist and disavow socialist ideals. Hitler did, he went even further than that he put socialists in his camps along with jews and everyone else he thought gummed up his perfect German world.

So no, Fascism is authoritarian just as is Donald Trump and the vast majority of those who follow him. I'll bet you didn't know that either...
Not even close. Hitler was authoritarian and the v... (show quote)


Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton (1952)
Go here for free download:
http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Behind%20Communism.pdf

To understand the total problem of
Communism it is necessary that we trace the
course of the movement from itā€™s beginning
down to the present. We must understand
who itā€™s originators were, and what they
were, and we must gain some idea as to the
forces which influenced and shaped their
philosophy.
Unfortunately, any deep-down discussion of
Communism and Marxism involves the
Jewish question...
Contents:
1. THE PERSECUTION MYTH
2. THE JEW IN EUROPE
3. RETURN TO THE EAST
4. THE RENAISSANCE
5. THE TERROR SECTION
6. BLOODY SUNDAY
7. PETERSBERG SOVIET
8. REVOLUTION
9. HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM
10. MORE PETERSBERG SOVIET
11. SIXTH PARTY CONGRESS
12. TROTZKY TO POWER
13. CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY
14. THE RED TERROR
15. BELA KUN
16. STALINS PAST
17. KAGANOVICH
18. IRON CURTAIN DICTATORS
19. JEWS IN AMERICA
20. NEW YORK: Jewish World Capital
21. THE TREASON TRIALS
22.COMMUNISM IN HOLLYWOOD

Reply
Oct 12, 2020 19:28:45   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton (1952)
Go here for free download:
http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Behind%20Communism.pdf

To understand the total problem of
Communism it is necessary that we trace the
course of the movement from itā€™s beginning
down to the present. We must understand
who itā€™s originators were, and what they
were, and we must gain some idea as to the
forces which influenced and shaped their
philosophy.
Unfortunately, any deep-down discussion of
Communism and Marxism involves the
Jewish question...
Contents:
1. THE PERSECUTION MYTH
2. THE JEW IN EUROPE
3. RETURN TO THE EAST
4. THE RENAISSANCE
5. THE TERROR SECTION
6. BLOODY SUNDAY
7. PETERSBERG SOVIET
8. REVOLUTION
9. HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM
10. MORE PETERSBERG SOVIET
11. SIXTH PARTY CONGRESS
12. TROTZKY TO POWER
13. CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY
14. THE RED TERROR
15. BELA KUN
16. STALINS PAST
17. KAGANOVICH
18. IRON CURTAIN DICTATORS
19. JEWS IN AMERICA
20. NEW YORK: Jewish World Capital
21. THE TREASON TRIALS
22.COMMUNISM IN HOLLYWOOD
Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton (1952) br Go... (show quote)


This was you answer to two seperate posts... So, are you just selling copies or do you actually have a point?

BTW, you might want to check this link...

https://www.jta.org/1961/10/05/archive/frank-britton-notorious-anti-semite-sentenced-to-serve-in-san-quentin

Your big expert on communism served time in San Quentin for trying to bribe police officers. LOL.

Here's what the Jewish Telegraphic Agency says about him...

Frank L, Britton, ranked as one of the worst of the professional anti-Semites in the United States, has been sentenced to a term in San Quentin prison after conviction of trying to bribe two San Francisco police officers.

Britton, who came from Los Angeles last year to San Francisco, where he tried to revive his hate sheet, ā€œThe American Nationalist,ā€ became involved in a fight in a tavern. He allegedly made the bribe offer to the police who were taking him to jail on a charge of assault with a deadly weapon. He was carrying a 38-caliber revolver for which he did not have a permit.

Between his arrest and conviction, he issued pleading letters for funds to one-time followers, despite the fact that at his arrest, he was found to possess $3,000 in cash. Among his activities, he has distributed stickers, posters and leaflets assailing ā€œmongrelizationā€ of the races and charging Jewish organizations with ā€œinspiringā€ Negroes to ā€œagitateā€ for equal rights.


Ha, ha... Why am I not surprised to see you peddling Nazi propaganda? Have you ever thought about reading the Communist Manifesto? It a very short read. Probably a fraction of the red scare drama that you've already read.

Of course, you would need to use your own intelligence to come to your own conclusions. I realize that's a foreign concept on the right, but you might surprise yourself.

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2020 19:31:21   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Communism - the liberal perspective:
No thank you. We'd rather not give up our private property or our individualism. We DO recognize the potential disasters of capitalism but all we really have to do is use our intelligence to regulate it. (Keynes knew what he was talking about). We also recognize the LIMITS of capitalism when it comes to human-critical services, but we prefer to compensate with democratic socialism, which works out really well for that purpose... For everything else, regulated capitalism is fine. But communism? Nah, it's just not our thing. Go ahead and ask. Ask ANY liberal.

Communism - the plutocratic perspective:
No thank you. We really like the power that capitalism has given us. In fact, don't even regulate it. And screw democratic socialism, why would we want Americans to create a system that protects them from desperation when middle-class desperation is so profitable for us? And don't worry about the middle-class rising up against us. Half of them are conservative... all we have to do is tell them that socialism always leads to Stalinism. LOL

Communism - the conservative perspective:
Hell no! Socialism always leads to Stalinism!

Reply
Oct 12, 2020 21:26:43   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton (1952)
Go here for free download:

http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Behind%20Communism.pdf

To understand the total problem of
Communism it is necessary that we trace the
course of the movement from itā€™s beginning
down to the present. We must understand
who itā€™s originators were, and what they
were, and we must gain some idea as to the
forces which influenced and shaped their
philosophy.
Unfortunately, any deep-down discussion of
Communism and Marxism involves the
Jewish question...
Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton (1952) br Go... (show quote)

So I just read enough of this criminal's book to know that for him it's ALL ABOUT the "Jewish Question". He starts with a history of Jewish expulsions from various European countries during the Middle Ages, implying that if that many countries are expelling the Jews, there must be something wrong with them.

Not once however, in the pages I've read, does he mention the very simple fact that during the Middle-Ages, Judaism was the only religion that allowed the charging of interest on loans (and then only when loaning money to the gentry). Christianity and Islam both prohibited the practice until the Renaissance when Christians began to bend the rules to suite them.

This is how the Jews "corralled" so much wealth.

It would be one thing if our own nation didn't achieve it's massive wealth in the same exact way, but it did. So in effect, your racist felon, Frank L. Britton, is demonizing a people by ignoring the fact that they are no different than we are.

I'll not read any more of his drivel but I'm sure he'll make the Jew-communism connection in much the same way Hitler did. There's not a lot variance in right-wing hatred, which is why the alt-right still thinks it's 1950.

Reply
Oct 13, 2020 12:44:54   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
straightUp wrote:
This was you answer to two seperate posts... So, are you just selling copies or do you actually have a point?

BTW, you might want to check this link...

https://www.jta.org/1961/10/05/archive/frank-britton-notorious-anti-semite-sentenced-to-serve-in-san-quentin

Your big expert on communism served time in San Quentin for trying to bribe police officers. LOL.

Here's what the Jewish Telegraphic Agency says about him...

Frank L, Britton, ranked as one of the worst of the professional anti-Semites in the United States, has been sentenced to a term in San Quentin prison after conviction of trying to bribe two San Francisco police officers.

Britton, who came from Los Angeles last year to San Francisco, where he tried to revive his hate sheet, ā€œThe American Nationalist,ā€ became involved in a fight in a tavern. He allegedly made the bribe offer to the police who were taking him to jail on a charge of assault with a deadly weapon. He was carrying a 38-caliber revolver for which he did not have a permit.

Between his arrest and conviction, he issued pleading letters for funds to one-time followers, despite the fact that at his arrest, he was found to possess $3,000 in cash. Among his activities, he has distributed stickers, posters and leaflets assailing ā€œmongrelizationā€ of the races and charging Jewish organizations with ā€œinspiringā€ Negroes to ā€œagitateā€ for equal rights.


Ha, ha... Why am I not surprised to see you peddling Nazi propaganda? Have you ever thought about reading the Communist Manifesto? It a very short read. Probably a fraction of the red scare drama that you've already read.

Of course, you would need to use your own intelligence to come to your own conclusions. I realize that's a foreign concept on the right, but you might surprise yourself.
This was you answer to two seperate posts... So, a... (show quote)


Can't stop laughing.

Eagle loves his racist heroes, that is certain.

Reply
Oct 13, 2020 13:29:07   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Can't stop laughing.

Eagle loves his racist heroes, that is certain.


Will you to continue to cover for Stalin, Lenin and other Bolsheviks, useful?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 16 of 17 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.