lindajoy wrote:
Have to agree on Hitler~~ Names like the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, is like the today, socialist Democrats or the Progressive socialist dems...All hidden agenda shielded by skewed names...
Chinese communists call it what you wish, as is the case often, is now
the theoretical system of socialism in a broad term for political theories and policies that are seen by their proponents as representing Marxism–Leninism adapted to Chinese circumstances and specific time periods. Xi Jinping is considered to represent Marxist–Leninist policies suited for China's present condition while Deng Xiaoping Theory was considered relevant for the period when it was formulated.. Change is not necessarily change as much as an intended artificial cover...They wish to seem more amenable than their true intended mission in other words... But you certainly more than I living there..
Have to agree on Hitler~~ Names like the National... (
show quote)
My point was that although the Chinese government calls itself communist, it doesn't (or no longer) engage in Communism...
Names are simply names... Look at the Democratic People's Republic of Korea... Not one of those terms is accurate
son of witless wrote:
China is counting on dominating the developing world.
Of course they are. We did too. It's a very lucrative proposition.
Seth wrote:
The only politicians whose goal is taking power away from the American people can be found in the Democratic Party.
Is that why it's the Republicans that are falling over themselves to prevent people from voting?
lindajoy wrote:
Who is that precious little sweetheart picture you have up?? My gosh just too adorable!! Made me want to hug her~~💕✨
That is my youngest granddaughter, who just got a new baby brother on August 27th. She is an EXCELLENT big sister🤗🤗🌞
Milosia wrote:
Would it make you happier if we dragged them across the border and forced them to work for free?
Why can’t we honor the fact that they came here to work?
We should at least hold up our end of the bargain.
You clowns and your immigrant problems are just mind boggling.
They are our neighbors who desire work.
You or your pals would never adopt such a thought.
Here’s my plan, for every 1 immigrant that comes into this country we pick one of our own to ship out of this country.
We could get rid of the lazy worthless and weak, in favor genuine workers.
Plus they already love this Country unlike the a Right hell bent on destroying it.
Would it make you happier if we dragged them acros... (
show quote)
I never said immigrants don't work hard. I see Hispanics riding to work on bicycles in the dead of winter and I am in awe of their tenacity. My favorite cousin is married to an Hispanic immigrant, who is a wonderful man. Nonetheless, we have laws. If the laws are not respected, by whomever, said lawbreaker does NOT love or respect this country.
straightUp wrote:
Is that why it's the Republicans that are falling over themselves to prevent people from voting?
Nonsense. Republicans have a great ground game going to get out the vote. Republicans just want the voters to actually exist, and still be breathing, unlike Democrats.
debeda wrote:
Nonsense. Republicans have a great ground game going to get out the vote. Republicans just want the voters to actually exist, and still be breathing, unlike Democrats.
Those that wave the Mexican flag, and those standing in the wings in the USA, is an indicator of some who put another country first.
https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/editorials/2020/jul/21/chinas-client-states-and-the-lessons-from-history-2172593.html The text;
China’s client states and the lessons from history
The ‘peaceful rise of China’ is obviously a myth … if only the myth could be busted a bit more subtly. Cornered over not alerting the world on time about Covid-19, Beijing has obviously decided to jettison all diplomatic niceties and come out as a bully whenever it feels fit.
Even New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Arden—quite the toast of the world for the manner in which she has tackled the pandemic—has got a taste of it now. Her rather nuanced statement at the NZ-China Business Summit in Auckland that their relations were in “good shape”, but Wellington would continue to voice its views on Hong Kong, Taiwan and Xinjiang, came in for a sharp rebuke from Wu Xi, the Chinese envoy to New Zealand.
The Kiwis were told to keep bilateral relations away from the “various viruses” of the day, and hinge them on mutual ‘respect’. China does not interfere in the ‘internal’ affairs of others as it believes in “cooperation, not confrontation”, Wu added. The last bit could have been music to New Delhi’s ears, had our soldiers not been getting the rough end of the stick in Ladakh. Or ask Vietnam and Philippines, getting the heebie-jeebies over Beijing’s recent belligerence in and around the South China Sea.
It’s against this background that Tehran has been entertaining China in a renewed engagement. Though still on the drawing board, Beijing’s $400 billion deal offer, covering everything from communication to ports and railways, is too lucrative for cash-starved Tehran to walk out on. Despite its proud self-image as an old civilisation, and a state with a sovereign foreign policy, Iran may find it difficult to keep China at bay for too long. Particularly if America votes Donald Trump back to power. Beijing is clearly moving in to set up a new order in an increasingly radarless, leaderless world. But all prospective client states would be well advised to study history.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.