One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The BIG LIE about Hitler and gun confication
Page <prev 2 of 15 next> last>>
Apr 26, 2014 13:31:54   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
Thanks for straightening that out. Thought you were fixating on
a small point in the gun control debate. There's issue's as well other than mass murdering of defenseless populations. You are certainly right about the Jews. Allowing a government to overly control who owns firearms can be extremely dangerous and lead to mass murder.

"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the the future!" - Adolph Hitler, 1935.

Have a good day


rumitoid wrote:
I am 67. And there was wild support for Hitler until the 1944 when things started to go really wrong, yet the majority of German people still supported Hitler. But you are still off point. I was simply pointing out that the BIG LIE of using the gun control laws under Hitler in 1939 as an argument against gun control, for the exact opposite was true than what many on the Right present as fact. Looser, not stricter; and only the Jews (which was indeed terrible) lost their arms, not ALL the citizens as claimed. That is my one and only point.
I am 67. And there was wild support for Hitler unt... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 13:36:18   #
Snoopy
 
rumitoid wrote:
I am 67. And there was wild support for Hitler until the 1944 when things started to go really wrong, yet the majority of German people still supported Hitler. But you are still off point. I was simply pointing out that the BIG LIE of using the gun control laws under Hitler in 1939 as an argument against gun control, for the exact opposite was true than what many on the Right present as fact. Looser, not stricter; and only the Jews (which was indeed terrible) lost their arms, not ALL the citizens as claimed. That is my one and only point.
I am 67. And there was wild support for Hitler unt... (show quote)


Rumitoid

And who paid the highest price for that restriction?

Of course, the Jews!

In our case EVERYONE would be affected.

The Founding Fathers stated that they did not want the Federal Government to become too powerful and therefore overwhelm the States. The Militia was formed to counteract that by being more powerful than the Fed.

Snoopy

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 14:04:15   #
vernon
 
rumitoid wrote:
During the 1920s up to the Great Depression, American banks heavily invested in Germany and they enjoyed a high level of (false) prosperity. Under Hitler, the nation once again started to thrive and its economy was sound: people had the money to buy guns during both periods.



yes but the jews and other minorities couldent own guns and you know what happened to the unarmed.

Reply
 
 
Apr 26, 2014 14:12:15   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
rumitoid wrote:
During the 1920s up to the Great Depression, American banks heavily invested in Germany and they enjoyed a high level of (false) prosperity. Under Hitler, the nation once again started to thrive and its economy was sound: people had the money to buy guns during both periods.


You have missed the point. German gun laws did not disarm everyone, just the ones who had a date with the baker at Auschwitz. The Jews in the Warsaw, Poland ghetto, using captured German weapons, held out against the Germans longer than the Polish Army.

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 14:20:17   #
bahmer
 
Loki wrote:
You have missed the point. German gun laws did not disarm everyone, just the ones who had a date with the baker at Auschwitz. The Jews in the Warsaw, Poland ghetto, using captured German weapons, held out against the Germans longer than the Polish Army.


A good point, and I also believe that the American public should be able to purchase equal weapons to the military, like full auto if one wants. I for one couldn't afford said weapon and I sure couldn't afford to shoot it for over a minute or two a year but there are others who could. If people had access to these weapons maybe the government would be a little more afraid of their constituents instead of running rough shod over them.

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 15:08:02   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
rumitoid wrote:
Lol, you mean analyzing something to find the level of truth or lie is somehow an evil trick of the Left? The argument was made that gun control under Hitler was a) stricter,and b) used to confiscate guns from ALL the citizens--are outright lies. Is that being needlessly picky to point out falsehoods or just being intelligent?
These lies have been used as a fundamental argument against gun control. The NRA nut's book is a case in point: "The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. “The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition...”
Since when is seeking facts and the truth a defect to be avoided? Reality can be harsh sometimes.
Lol, you mean analyzing something to find the leve... (show quote)



Yes, Hitler Really Did Take the Guns Before Throwing Jews ...
www.infowars.com/yes-hitler-really-did-take-the-guns-before...&#8206;
Alex Jones
Mar 26, 2013 - If you read the 1938 Nazi gun laws closely and compare them to earlier 1928 ... in nevertheless be registered under the National Firearms Act;.

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 17:59:17   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Thank you for this post. Not many people would openly support A. Hitler and his actions and this does go a long way in explaining many of your responses to my comments and posts. Again, thank you for the insight into your motives and thoughts.


rumitoid wrote:
Responding to the paranoid, fear-mongering madness of this video: http://www.youtube.com/embed/0sujnvIV4g4

I suppose it can happen here and many probably believe it already has, with the hysteria I see about the NWO. But it is interesting to note that the greatest killer on this planet is the mosquito. Averaging over 2 million deaths a year for the last 50 years, it is estimated than in its entire history over a billion people have died at the hands of this little creature. Taken in context, 290 million by governments is tame. We have more to fear from a tiny bug.

If you do not want to read the following information that is factual, let me summarize: the Hitler confiscation of guns is a BIG LIE, A TOTAL MISREPRESENTATION OF THE TRUTH.
The truth about Germany and guns, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Germany:
"The treaty of Versailles of 1919 had stipulations to disarm the government. Fearing inability to hold the state together during the depression, the German government adopted a sweeping series of gun confiscation legislation against the citizens prior to completely disarming the German military. Article 169 of the Treaty of Versailles explicitly targeted the state: "Within two months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, German arms, munitions, and war material, including anti-aircraft material, existing in Germany in excess of the quantities allowed, must be surrendered to the Governments of the Principal Allied and Associated Powers to be destroyed or rendered useless."[1]

"In 1919, the German government passed the Regulations on Weapons Ownership, which declared that "all firearms, as well as all kinds of firearms ammunition, are to be surrendered immediately."[2] Under the regulations, anyone found in possession of a firearm or ammunition was subject to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 marks."

Under Hitler:
"The 1938 German Weapons Act, the precursor of the current weapons law, superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. Furthermore, the law restricted ownership of firearms to "...persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a (gun) permit." But under the new law:

Gun restriction laws applied only to handguns, not to long guns or ammunition. The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as was the possession of ammunition."[3]
The legal age at which guns could be purchased was lowered from 20 to 18.[4]
Permits were valid for three years, rather than one year.[4]
The groups of people who were exempt from the acquisition permit requirement expanded. Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. Prior to the 1938 law, only officials of the central government, the states, and employees of the German Reichsbahn Railways were exempted.[3]
Jews were prohibited from possessing any dangerous weapons, including firearms. They were also forbidden from the manufacturing or dealing of firearms and ammunition.[3]"

Cut and paste from Salon:
Unfortunately for LaPierre et al., the notion that Hitler confiscated everyone’s guns is mostly bogus. And the ancillary claim that Jews could have stopped the Holocaust with more guns doesn’t make any sense at all if you think about it for more than a minute.

University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitler’s, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.

The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. “The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.
Responding to the paranoid, fear-mongering madness... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Apr 26, 2014 18:51:43   #
rumitoid
 
Loki wrote:
You have missed the point. German gun laws did not disarm everyone, just the ones who had a date with the baker at Auschwitz. The Jews in the Warsaw, Poland ghetto, using captured German weapons, held out against the Germans longer than the Polish Army.


No, my point is and always has been and as I have repeated several times about just ONE THING: that some on the Right lied about the gun laws under Hitler to make a case against gun control and apparently many took the lie without a second thought. That's it! Nothing else.

But we could discuss how these people on the Right who used this bogus and easily disprovable argument thought that it was an easy sell to their fellows or constituency.

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 19:01:01   #
rumitoid
 
ginnyt wrote:
Thank you for this post. Not many people would openly support A. Hitler and his actions and this does go a long way in explaining many of your responses to my comments and posts. Again, thank you for the insight into your motives and thoughts.


ginnyt, I hope you have noticed that I refuse to respond in kind or at all to your vile insults and insinuations. Think what you like.

I had one point: that gun control under Hitler was not as falsely reported by many on the Right in their arguments against gun control. That's it! End of story! Read the black parts on the page.

It was claimed by many on the Right that all German citizens had their weapons taken away: untrue!
It was claimed by the Right that Hitler tightened gun control: untrue!

Merely revealing a fact of history is neutral. It is not pro or con anything.

As with another thread, 'Can anyone see clearly,' it is obvious when it comes to me you cannot. Maybe perfect vision otherwise but not when you look at my posts.

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 19:09:57   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
I believe that my comment was neither vile or insulting. If you read it, I thanked you for the valuable insight into your thoughts and beliefs as it makes so many of your responses to me more understandable. As for the other thread you mention, I only said of course you are right, you are always right. I did not disagree or say anything that is/was insulting. My vision has never been perfect; I would never be able to live up to your esteemed status.

rumitoid wrote:
ginnyt, I hope you have noticed that I refuse to respond in kind or at all to your vile insults and insinuations. Think what you like.

I had one point: that gun control under Hitler was not as falsely reported by many on the Right in their arguments against gun control. That's it! End of story! Read the black parts on the page.

It was claimed by many on the Right that all German citizens had their weapons taken away: untrue!
It was claimed by the Right that Hitler tightened gun control: untrue!

Merely revealing a fact of history is neutral. It is not pro or con anything.

As with another thread, 'Can anyone see clearly,' it is obvious when it comes to me you cannot. Maybe perfect vision otherwise but not when you look at my posts.
ginnyt, I hope you have noticed that I refuse to r... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 19:19:32   #
rumitoid
 
ginnyt wrote:
I believe that my comment was neither vile or insulting. If you read it, I thanked you for the valuable insight into your thoughts and beliefs as it makes so many of your responses to me more understandable.


You said I am always right. Untrue, but about this I am: when using neither, nor must accompany it, as in "my comment was neither vile [NOR not] OR insulting." My very first grammar Nazi comment, which seemed appropriate here.

If the valuable "insight" you are referring to is the sometime present ability to view history with an unbiased eye and see facts instead boogiemen, then thank you.

Reply
 
 
Apr 26, 2014 19:32:14   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Thank you for the English lesson. And the valuable insight is more into your defense of A. Hitler and his actions.
Kurt Cobain is quoted as saying “I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not.” I believe that it was he that once made the comment, "Just because you are paranoid, does not mean that they are not out to get you." A little caution, or as you would put it the fear of a bogyman, is actually healthy.

rumitoid wrote:
You said I am always right. Untrue, but about this I am: when using neither, nor must accompany it, as in "my comment was neither vile [NOR not] OR insulting." My very first grammar Nazi comment, which seemed appropriate here.

If the valuable "insight" you are referring to is the sometime present ability to view history with an unbiased eye and see facts instead boogiemen, then thank you.

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 20:05:09   #
LurkingTom Loc: North Dakota
 
rumitoid wrote:
Responding to the paranoid, fear-mongering madness of this video: http://www.youtube.com/embed/0sujnvIV4g4

I suppose it can happen here and many probably believe it already has, with the hysteria I see about the NWO. But it is interesting to note that the greatest killer on this planet is the mosquito. Averaging over 2 million deaths a year for the last 50 years, it is estimated than in its entire history over a billion people have died at the hands of this little creature. Taken in context, 290 million by governments is tame. We have more to fear from a tiny bug.

If you do not want to read the following information that is factual, let me summarize: the Hitler confiscation of guns is a BIG LIE, A TOTAL MISREPRESENTATION OF THE TRUTH.
The truth about Germany and guns, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Germany:
"The treaty of Versailles of 1919 had stipulations to disarm the government. Fearing inability to hold the state together during the depression, the German government adopted a sweeping series of gun confiscation legislation against the citizens prior to completely disarming the German military. Article 169 of the Treaty of Versailles explicitly targeted the state: "Within two months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, German arms, munitions, and war material, including anti-aircraft material, existing in Germany in excess of the quantities allowed, must be surrendered to the Governments of the Principal Allied and Associated Powers to be destroyed or rendered useless."[1]

"In 1919, the German government passed the Regulations on Weapons Ownership, which declared that "all firearms, as well as all kinds of firearms ammunition, are to be surrendered immediately."[2] Under the regulations, anyone found in possession of a firearm or ammunition was subject to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 marks."

Under Hitler:
"The 1938 German Weapons Act, the precursor of the current weapons law, superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. Furthermore, the law restricted ownership of firearms to "...persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a (gun) permit." But under the new law:

Gun restriction laws applied only to handguns, not to long guns or ammunition. The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as was the possession of ammunition."[3]
The legal age at which guns could be purchased was lowered from 20 to 18.[4]
Permits were valid for three years, rather than one year.[4]
The groups of people who were exempt from the acquisition permit requirement expanded. Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. Prior to the 1938 law, only officials of the central government, the states, and employees of the German Reichsbahn Railways were exempted.[3]
Jews were prohibited from possessing any dangerous weapons, including firearms. They were also forbidden from the manufacturing or dealing of firearms and ammunition.[3]"

Cut and paste from Salon:
Unfortunately for LaPierre et al., the notion that Hitler confiscated everyone’s guns is mostly bogus. And the ancillary claim that Jews could have stopped the Holocaust with more guns doesn’t make any sense at all if you think about it for more than a minute.

University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitler’s, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.

The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. “The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.
Responding to the paranoid, fear-mongering madness... (show quote)


where on earth do you dig up this communist tripe?

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 20:09:04   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
rumitoid wrote:
No, my point is and always has been and as I have repeated several times about just ONE THING: that some on the Right lied about the gun laws under Hitler to make a case against gun control and apparently many took the lie without a second thought. That's it! Nothing else.

But we could discuss how these people on the Right who used this bogus and easily disprovable argument thought that it was an easy sell to their fellows or constituency.


Could it be that they didn't lie, but posted something they thought to be true? There is a difference, you know. i myself believed it until researching it after reading your post.

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 20:14:16   #
rumitoid
 
ginnyt wrote:
Thank you for the English lesson. And the valuable insight is more into your defense of A. Hitler and his actions.
Kurt Cobain is quoted as saying “I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not.” I believe that it was he that once made the comment, "Just because you are paranoid, does not mean that they are not out to get you." A little caution, or as you would put it the fear of a bogyman, is actually healthy.


I know that the first time I heard "Just because you are paranoid, does not mean that they are not out to get you" was from Major Frank Burns on Mash, but it is true nonetheless who said it.

I am truly interested to know from anyone if pointing out how the 1939 gun control law actually read, that contradicts what many on the Right claim it said and did, somehow constitutes support for Hitler's regime and the crimes thereof?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.