By Shawn

Say whatever you want about Brett Kavanaugh’s testimony on Thursday. Say you believe him, say you don’t. Say you liked his temperament, say you hated it. Whatever you thought about it, there’s one objective thing you can’t deny: Kavanaugh is angry, aggrieved, and he knows exactly where to point the finger. He made that clear again and again throughout the hearing. He understands perfectly well who was behind the – as Donald Trump put it – total con job that has – as Brett Kavanaugh put it – destroyed his reputation and his family.

If he can put these piercing memories behind him, he is a hell of a lot better man than anyone we know.

If he can’t, then Democrats made the worst mistake of their lives.

Ever since Kavanaugh was nominated to become the next Supreme Court justice, Democrats have invented all kinds of wild tales about his inability to put aside his partisanship, his extremist views on abortion and women’s rights, and the unique threat he poses to the very republic. This was all such nonsense that it was hard to take seriously. The echoes of “Trump is the next Hitler” were unmistakable. Democrats can no longer have a simple ideological disagreement with someone; to be heard, they have to have the loudest voices in the room. And this has led to some stunningly absurd remarks.

But now? At this point? Boy, Democrats have created themselves a monster. We don’t endorse a man taking thoughts of revenge with him to the Supreme Court, and that’s not what we’re saying Kavanaugh intends to do. No, no. It’s much simpler and much more dangerous to the left than that. Kavanaugh has looked into the eyes of evil and has seen, very clearly, what the Democratic Party and the larger American Left is all about. He can never unsee what he has seen over the past two weeks. You don’t think that will color his decision-making? You don’t think that will give him pause when the Democrats and their cohorts bring a case before the high court? It’s literally impossible to imagine.

Not only is Kavanaugh under no obligation to put what happened to him in these confirmation hearings behind him, he would be unwise to do so. He has learned a valuable (if extremely painful) lesson about the political divide in this country.

They say that if you want to take the king out, you’d better not miss. As of Friday morning, it appears that the Democrats and their attempt to take Kavanaugh out has been a miss. And now they have what they warned about from the beginning: A Supreme Court justice who understands – really understands – what kind of people fly the flag on the American Left.

Good luck subpoenaing the President, Mr. Mueller.

http://unfilteredpatriot.com/the-democrats-have-made-a-very-powerful-enemy/

How soon we forget that the vote for your gay hating baker was 9 to 2 and if ever there was a place for a liberal position it was certainly there. We have Roberts with the odd vote every now and then but is there a Republican appointee on this current court who has ever voted against their ideology on anything of major import? I can't think of any. That's why you cons wanted Kavanaugh so bad because now even the most vomit worthy conservative position is pretty much a lock for getting through.

So congratulations Blade. What the founders intended to be an apolitical court will be a purely political court for decades to come...

Since we live with a Constitution and Common Laws isn't it quite appropriate to have guardians of the Constitution on the Supreme Court, rather than wimps that allow creeping socialism to take root in the nation? The Constitution is a uniquely American law of the land and its keepers should be dedicated to the job of fending off radicalism and any other ism that threatens the laws we have. To think otherwise is to attack the fundamental structure of the Nation, which in other times would be considered treason, unless, of course, proposed changes reinforce the Constitution itself both in intent and efficacy, and with checks and balances in place too. There is provision in the Constitution to effect changes under strict rules, and it is a hard system meant to make it difficult to change without substantial will of the people behind the change.

Going around this process has been done by the likes of Obama by fiat in quite a number of cases, thus subverting the Constitution and the will of the people to retain our current system. Having a majority of strict Constitutionalists on the Court seems to me to be an obvious step in the right direction to prevent such deviations before they do harm. We have a legislature to create laws, and a Court to ensure the laws are Constitutional. However, the Court should not try to form legislation from the bench, any whiff of which would circumvent the Constitution.

Trump appointed Neil Gorsuch from the same HS as Kavanaugh and he went through with Democrat votes without a hitch. Kavanaugh is being blocked because of who he is not because of who appointed him. And just how have we been running the government? You had the House and Senate for most of the 90's, all three branches for most of the early 2000's and plus the majority in the SC. You took both houses in 2010 and blocked every piece of legislation that Obama tried to pass. Now you have all branches of government. We have either shared power or you creations controlled government since 1980 on.

Did you hear what you said about Garland? He was left of center but he was certainly closer to center than anyone since. Isn't that what we are looking for in jurist? An apolitical appointment instead of a hardened ideologue? And Obama's only mistake was being a black president whom conservatives couldn't stomach.

And what of the Soviet Union given your marriage to the dictator who controls Russia today? Do you think substituting totalitarianism for authoritarianism makes everything okay? You really are something Blade--you sit there and shed tears over Communism and then have no trouble accepting Fascism all while dancing a jig. Can you honestly not see that one is not better than the other? Your problem is that you can't see yourself. You sit there thinking that all the problems of the world belong to someone else. The difference between you and I is that I see who I am and know the ills of liberalism unrestrained. You, on the other hand, think the shit beneath you belongs to someone else. Well, that smell wafting up to your nose is yours my friend and if you weren't so blind to who you are you would know the responsibility you share. But you don't, and that makes you dangerous because you could stumble into full-fledged Fascism and not know until it is too late.

By Shawn

Say whatever you want about Brett Kavanaugh’s testimony on Thursday. Say you believe him, say you don’t. Say you liked his temperament, say you hated it. Whatever you thought about it, there’s one objective thing you can’t deny: Kavanaugh is angry, aggrieved, and he knows exactly where to point the finger. He made that clear again and again throughout the hearing. He understands perfectly well who was behind the – as Donald Trump put it – total con job that has – as Brett Kavanaugh put it – destroyed his reputation and his family.

If he can put these piercing memories behind him, he is a hell of a lot better man than anyone we know.

If he can’t, then Democrats made the worst mistake of their lives.

Ever since Kavanaugh was nominated to become the next Supreme Court justice, Democrats have invented all kinds of wild tales about his inability to put aside his partisanship, his extremist views on abortion and women’s rights, and the unique threat he poses to the very republic. This was all such nonsense that it was hard to take seriously. The echoes of “Trump is the next Hitler” were unmistakable. Democrats can no longer have a simple ideological disagreement with someone; to be heard, they have to have the loudest voices in the room. And this has led to some stunningly absurd remarks.

But now? At this point? Boy, Democrats have created themselves a monster. We don’t endorse a man taking thoughts of revenge with him to the Supreme Court, and that’s not what we’re saying Kavanaugh intends to do. No, no. It’s much simpler and much more dangerous to the left than that. Kavanaugh has looked into the eyes of evil and has seen, very clearly, what the Democratic Party and the larger American Left is all about. He can never unsee what he has seen over the past two weeks. You don’t think that will color his decision-making? You don’t think that will give him pause when the Democrats and their cohorts bring a case before the high court? It’s literally impossible to imagine.

Not only is Kavanaugh under no obligation to put what happened to him in these confirmation hearings behind him, he would be unwise to do so. He has learned a valuable (if extremely painful) lesson about the political divide in this country.

They say that if you want to take the king out, you’d better not miss. As of Friday morning, it appears that the Democrats and their attempt to take Kavanaugh out has been a miss. And now they have what they warned about from the beginning: A Supreme Court justice who understands – really understands – what kind of people fly the flag on the American Left.

Good luck subpoenaing the President, Mr. Mueller.

http://unfilteredpatriot.com/the-democrats-have-made-a-very-powerful-enemy/

https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/compose-post-screen?topicnum=141950&rpostnum=2584434&quote=trueing them

The present spin likes to describe Democrats as now Liberal/democrats, this was purposely intended to turn people away from joining the party.
considering most people don't favor being connected to at liberal title. Now they to continue the slanderish endeavor by adding socialist, communist, Marxist, Leninist, to the mix or any other name they can pull out of their hat.

What has been recently subverted under this new Trump administration is the will of the people, as seen in just two examples, with Gun laws, and the ACA.

I'm fine with all of what you ideally described above, but I haven't seen that happen as you say. The people who you say are the Constitutionalists I believe to be the very people who wish to change the constitution to suit their own agenda and give more power to the president and representatives and less to the people. When the house is better balanced the inner workings of our republic function fairly well. It's when all power shifts to one side things are completely out of balance.

I have never seen a case where Obama subverted the constitution, maybe you could point that out with some credibility.

Your quote: "Constitutionalists on the Court seems to me to be an obvious step in the right direction to prevent such deviations before they do harm. We have a legislature to create laws, and a Court to ensure the laws are Constitutional." This can be true unless people begin to interpret to suit their own ideology, for example this can easily happen under religious freedom, separation of church and state.

======================

Google Obama, Constitutional Violations.

You last paragraph makes no sense to me. We have nuts interpreting things to suit all the time, partially because they haven't even read the Constitution at all. I do believe that most Leftists have created an image in their minds of what they want it to say from their ideology, and run with it, with the obvious chaos ensuing. We do have religious freedom but separation of church and state is in reality a fiction. It is not in the Constitution, but de facto it is part of leftwing ideology. The reason for that meme appears to be the desire for freedom from the Ten Commandments, Agape, and constraints on sexual activities. I would not and will not vote for such people.