PeterS wrote:
The only self defense a conservative is worried about is the United States Government. That's the only reason they want semi-automatic weapons because they are terrified of the government. The irony is that through their paranoia the prophecy of the government domination will come true...
Did you ever think the worry might be the criminals?
PeterS wrote:
Oh it's past time but I imagine it's going to take a couple more mass shootings before a real movement can take place to move forward with a constitutional amendment. The thing is the kids are pissed and instead of sitting out an election are going to go to the polls and vote!
DonβT hold your breath on any of it!
America 1 wrote:
Did you ever think the worry might be the criminals?
My wife's girl friend was raped when she was in college and when the guy got up to go to the bathroom she pulled out her S&W .38 and put 6 bullets in him 5 of which were just for good measure. Now myself I would prefer a 12 gauge loaded with buck shot though a .38 would make less of a mess.
Finaly you got one right Bad Bob, the time to repeal the second amendment has passed, and you MISSED IT!
Reality Check: 41 states have now passed either "shall issue" concealed carry permit laws, or "constitutional carry".
That leaves you with perhaps 9, you will have to "convert" at least 25 of those 41.
Any chance that you may have had, went down the drain long ago.
But go right ahead and try, it's fascinating to see you liberals attempting to urinate up a rope, and into the wind, at the same time!
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/m/9b38a9e1-0b61-3b24-976a-5aa0ae592250/ss_cable-news-shocker%3A-rachel.html
America 1 wrote:
Did you ever think the worry might be the criminals?
No, criminals seem quite content with the way the NRA's second amendment puts any gun they want in their hands.
Gatsby wrote:
Finaly you got one right Bad Bob, the time to repeal the second amendment has passed, and you MISSED IT!
Reality Check: 41 states have now passed either "shall issue" concealed carry permit laws, or "constitutional carry".
That leaves you with perhaps 9, you will have to "convert" at least 25 of those 41.
Any chance that you may have had, went down the drain long ago.
But go right ahead and try, it's fascinating to see you liberals attempting to urinate up a rope, and into the wind, at the same time!
Finaly you got one right Bad Bob, the time to repe... (
show quote)
Oh, how cute, you think concealed carry protects you. There is nothing in the constitution that protects a semi-automatic weapon and the more people who are killed by them the greater the chance of them being banned...
PeterS wrote:
If people are using knives then a gun less society is working just fine. After all, all those people who are now using knives would be using semi-automatic weapons otherwise...
And the difference is?
33 Dead, 130 Injured in China Knife-Wielding Spree
A group of knife-wielding men attacked a train station in southwestern China on Saturday, killing at least 29 people and injuring more than 130 others in what Chinese officials called a terrorist strike, the official Xinhua News Agency said.
Four of the attackers were also shot dead and only one was captured alive after the mayhem, which broke out about 9 p.m. (8 a.m. ET) at the Kunming Railway Station in the capital of southwest China's Yunnan Province.
Source:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/33-dead-130-injured-china-knife-wielding-spree-n41966And they weren't stopped by "knife-wielding", but instead by guns.
Your so-called "logic" never ceases to amaze me Peetee.
bdamage wrote:
And the difference is?
33 Dead, 130 Injured in China Knife-Wielding Spree
A group of knife-wielding men attacked a train station in southwestern China on Saturday, killing at least 29 people and injuring more than 130 others in what Chinese officials called a terrorist strike, the official Xinhua News Agency said.
Four of the attackers were also shot dead and only one was captured alive after the mayhem, which broke out about 9 p.m. (8 a.m. ET) at the Kunming Railway Station in the capital of southwest China's Yunnan Province.
Source:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/33-dead-130-injured-china-knife-wielding-spree-n41966And they weren't stopped by "knife-wielding", but instead by guns.
Your so-called "logic" never ceases to amaze me Peetee.
And the difference is? br br 33 Dead, 130 Injured... (
show quote)
And what kind of carnage do you think they could do with a semi-automatic gun? Yeah, logic never ceases to amaze. You should try it sometime...
PeterS wrote:
It's not my affairs you need to worry about but whether they vote out those who are protecting your semi automatic weapons. And piss them off enough and they just might run the government so be careful with what you say...
I am not worried about your affairs. You can botch them just fine on your own. You apparently think a handful of loudmouthed kids who are pretty much clueless about life are about to change the Constitution. Rots of Ruck with that. Tell me, will they vote out
"those who are protecting my semi-autos" before or after they eat Tide pods and snort condoms?
Repeal the 2A. Right. Ban ALL guns. Sure. Collect them. Oh yeah.
You lib douche rockets have any other ideas? This one's pretty old not to mention lame.
PeterS wrote:
No, criminals seem quite content with the way the NRA's second amendment puts any gun they want in their hands.
Most people are born ignorant, you've taken a lifetime to perfect it.ππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/f7ee22ee-7baa-38ae-9882-d6ae033c934e/ss_not-everyone-needs-a-gun-β.html
Booby, our founding fathers gave us the 2nd amendment in case a tyrant government ever got in power. And it's also great for home protection. If we have to turn our guns in, do you think the bad guys are going to turn theirs in? I'll keep mine thank you. By the way the shooting in a Church in Southerland Springs,Texas that killed 26 people was stopped by a barefooted man with a AR15 or the gunman could have killed everybody in the Church. If I really wanted to kill my mother in law, and didn't have a gun, I could use my car, baseball bat, knife, poison, bare hands, push out of a tall building, drown in the bath tub.
PeterS wrote:
Oh, how cute, you think concealed carry protects you. There is nothing in the constitution that protects a semi-automatic weapon and the more people who are killed by them the greater the chance of them being banned...
You should probably read the Heller Supreme Court ruling before you expose your ignorance of existing law to any more public scrutiny.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.