We hear Democrats and their lap dogs in the media tell us that a border wall would be ineffective, and useless. Are they right?
India and Pakistan
The two nuclear powers, with 1.5 billion people between them, have fought four wars since 1947, and continue to face each other down in Kashmir, a territory both countries dispute. In order to prevent Pakistani terrorists from striking inside India, the Indian government built a series of fences and walls to keep Pakistani terrorists at bay. Had it not, it is quite possible that the two countries might be at war right now.
Morocco and Algeria
Morocco built a 1,700-mile system of berms, fences and ditches to stop the Polisario Front, an Algerian sponsored terrorist group, from infiltrating the Western Sahara. It took seven years to build, but the result was so effective that Algeria agreed to a cease-fire, ending the Western Sahara war that had raged since 1975.
Israel and the West Bank
The Israeli border wall-well, actually more of a fence in most places-remains hugely controversial because many journalists and the UN officials condemn anything Israel does, no matter how much precedent exists outside Israel but, Israel's fence reduced terrorist attacks by more than 90%, something decades of diplomacy failed to do.
Cyprus
The irony of of so many UN officials condemning Israel or Trump's demands for a wall is that the UN itself built a wall dividing Cyprus in order to separate Turkish and Greek combatants. While Cyprus remains divided, the wall ended the fighting.
Northern Ireland
Saudi Arabia and Yemen
Saudi Arabia and Iraq
Turkey and Syria
Kenya and Somalia
Then there is another list of countries where a wall was built for immigration purposes
www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-border-wall-is-standard...other.../2646819We hear Democrats and their lap dogs in the media ... (