Oh Peter, cut it out, you’ve read enough of my posts to know I always say it is the big money that runs our supposed government..

Yes, I did vote in a billionaire, one who is not a politician and doesn’t take shi** from any of them regardless of what party they profess to be.. took down 16 politicians and made them have to take a position on issues.. Even got a couple riled enough to speak their piece too.. I liked that very much..

He doesn’t need the money, he ran over 500 companies and with the exception of a few chapter 11s not 7s, I might add all have been successful... Because of his international trade he did have knowledge on what was needed and sure made it clear these countries that have been robbing us blind in tariff trade was coming to an end.. Yup, I voted for him and will again 2020 if he elects to run..


Did you by chance read this article??

Well, the first year jobs report card is in for the Trump administration—and it’s pretty solid. There’s now enough data to compare President Trump to his predecessors on jobs growth and it’s pretty solid. Even The Washington Post wrote that President Trump, who had the best jobs creating year since Bill Clinton, earned high marks with 1.8 million new jobs created. For December, nonfarm payroll jobs rose by 148,000, while private sector employment rose by 250,000; the latter boosted the Dow Jones to close above 25,000 for the first time yesterday.

Now, while The Post gives Trump good marks, they added the recession that hit Obama at the outset of his term made his numbers worse regarding the comparison. Still, the publication admits that for year one, Trump outperformed Obama:

On Friday morning, the government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics released employment numbers for December, bookending President Trump’s first year in office. While the number of jobs added was lower than many analysts expected — up 148,000 — it was a continuation of the trend of growth seen over the course of 2017.

With those numbers in hand, we can now compare Trump’s first year in office to his predecessors’. And in that comparison, Trump comes out looking pretty good.

[…]

Trump’s immediate predecessor, Barack Obama, saw a surge in the unemployment rate during his first year, a function of the effects of the recession that was just beginning to wind down. Relative to Obama’s first year in office, Trump’s was consistently very good.

For example, in the number of jobs created or lost over the year: Under Trump, there were 1.8 million more people working in December than in January. Under Obama, 4.3 million fewer.

[…]

But we’re comparing first years here, and on that metric Trump consistently outperforms Obama. <snip> more to read should you wish..

https://www.infowars.com/wapo-admits-trumps-first-year-job-numbers-very-very-good/

Billionaires favoring one or the other is exactly why we are where we aren’t anymore.. Their cry for control outweighs any benefit for our country.. But since they are the shakers and the movers which side they support can not be dismissed, Peter..

Linda no billionaire needs money but that's no reason to vote them into office. As for comparing first years Obama came in in the second year of the deepest recession since the great depression. Are you really going to sit there and compare Trumps first year to Obama's? If you want to make a comparison then do Trumps first year to Obama's last year. There you'll find that Obama's jobs numbers were better than Trumps and all without all the hype.

And I have to ask, where are you pulling your numbers from? Below are the jobs numbers 2009 thru 2017

2009...-5068
2010....1061
2011....2091
2012....2142
2013....2302
2014....2998
2015....2713
2016....2240
2017....2064

2017 was under everything but 09 and 10 so how could 2017 better than anything since Clinton? Hell, Trump couldn't even beat 2016. And what prey tell is nonfarm payroll vs private sector employment? BLS only issues one number for jobs growth and that's non farm payroll so private sector employment is non farm payroll so the two have to have the same number.

https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth

And you aren't telling me how your billionaires any different than mine. If Trump wasn't in it for financial gain then he would have separated himself from his businesses. He didn't, which sits up a potential conflict of interest with foreign government giving his hotels preferential treatment--which they have. And something you haven't considered is that Trump’s billionaires are not government-hating ideologues like the Koch brothers or mega-donor Robert Mercer. They are more like what Trump used to be—unaffiliated centrists. And their agenda—and now the country’s agenda—is defined by those matters that affect their wallets.

snip>>Most of the billionaires Trump has lured to D.C. are, like him, members of the 1980s generation of leveraged-buyout tacticians, junk bond kings, corporate raiders and vulture capitalists. They got rich off of emerging financial tactics crafted to take advantage of Ronald Reagan’s great gift to Wall Street—ripping up the regulations put in place after the Great Depression. Trump adviser and corporate raider Carl Icahn (net worth $16.6 billion) is said to have been a model for Michael Douglas’s “Greed is good” character in Wall Street. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross ($2.5 billion), policy adviser Stephen Schwarzman ($11.8 billion) and unofficial intel adviser Stephen Feinberg ($1.2 billion) all made their fortunes in the kind of investment banking that came into vogue after Wall Street decreed that social responsibility and business—the Jimmy Stewart banker model—were antithetical.

The New York real estate developers now advising the president—Steven Roth (net worth $1.1 billion) and Richard LeFrak ($6.5 billion)—spent their professional lives (as did Trump) in a mosh pit with politicians, city regulators, 50-story crane operators, cement mobsters and the motley crew of characters, unsavory and otherwise, responsible for the New York skyline and the surrounding area’s malls, golf courses and housing developments.

Whether they earned their money in investment banking or New Jersey strip malls and high rises, Trump’s billionaires have much in common with the rest of the New York’s 1 percent. They don’t pay much in taxes, and most don’t think they should pay much more. They loathe government regulations, and they are ferociously competitive. “They all know each other. They finance each other. And they all compete with one another,” says Holly Peterson, journalist, author of It Happens in the Hamptons and daughter of Peter Peterson, one of the New York billionaires who is not in Trump’s camp. “They sniff each other like dogs.”

No dear YOU brought up supercomputers trying to belittle the poster, not me.. I can go back and copy it for you if you have forgotten what you said but I don’t think that is necessary, you are just evading the answer you too know.. That’s ok the point is made in your reply.. Thank You for that, you have earned a 🌟..

So I’ll now ask for a forth time when working with that computer to develop the supermodel you spoke of how is that hypothetical conclusion drawn????? It’s a very simple question you should know...

So sorry that I can't read your mind. You used that term and have been asked multiple times what you meant by it. No answer.

Who does that humiliate???

You still claim I used that word, but the only quote that can be found is when I ask you what you meant.

I certainly know of nothing called a "supermodel". It is just something you manufactured because you were unable to comprehend what you were reading (about modeling weather and/or climate with a supercomputer).

A lapse of cognition on your part. Only humiliating because you won't even look to see if it really was your doing. That lack of care really should humiliate you!

Read carefully, supercomputer equals supermodel analysts..

I never brought it up you did. And you know it..
Now go away, your boring..You go look back at who said it, I don’t have to lol I know I didn’t..

And your inability to answer your direction of using one is assisine to say the least...

But you have a good day anyway..like I said our posts define... I m happy with that fact. You just deflect and say nothing nor is any of your opinion supported, which means your just trolling for words... Lololol ....