One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Global Warming Hoax...The Reality
Page <<first <prev 29 of 31 next> last>>
Jan 7, 2018 19:41:34   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
arapaho wrote:
The one obvious thing from this exchange is that you are the one who lacks an education. You don't even know what climate is! What a hoot.


I thought I’d add this to the thread and your it’s here seems a good place to put it ...
A tweet war~~ Lolol

The article was written by Dr. Michael Mann, a professor of atmospheric science at Penn State University. Mann argues that heavy lake effect snows this year near the Great Lakes are a sign of global warming because the warming temperatures cause the lakes to stay warmer longer therefore producing more snow. He also argued that despite the recent cold snap, the U.S. has seen many more days of very above normal temperatures than very below normal temperatures over the past several years.

He also argued that despite the central and eastern U.S. being locked into an arctic cold pattern for more than a week, the western U.S. and much of the rest of the world has been warm. Mann also blamed last week’s major east coast snowstorm on warmer-than-normal ocean water.

These allegations, however, are more narrative and opinion rather than fact, according to meteorologist Joe Bastardi.

What did Bastardi say?

Bastardi challenged whether the recent cold has anything to do with climate change, saying cold in the 1980’s was colder than this year’s recent cold snap and it was never connected to climate change or global warming. Bastardi also questioned whether or not the upcoming thaw is connected to climate change.

After four tweets, Bastardi concluded by chiding Gore and other climate change alarmists about pursuing narrative over truth.


Joe Bastardi

@BigJoeBastardi
So let me get this straight, This cold is from climate change, Previous cold shots werent, Previous cold shots like 83-84 this period colder. So what these guys want us to believe is the cold is from climate change, but climate change made it come up short of previous cold shots https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/949267935683596288
3:34 AM - Jan 5, 2018

Only thing I can do is try to reach people that want to know the WHY BEFORE THE WHAT ,Said hurricane season would see end of major hit drought in spring along with big wildfire season, Had roaring start to winter from October, None of that had anything to do
with climate change
3:43 AM - Jan 5, 2018
8 8 Replies 27 27 Retweets 61 61 likes

Joe Bastardi

@BigJoeBastardi
Sometimes if you want to see forward, you have to look back. No one is anti science, anti model, anti "climate" But one must question authority of models and causes of variances if one truly wishes to pursue the answer
3:44 AM - Jan 5, 2018
9 9 Replies 35 35 Retweets 86 86 likes

Weren’t we speaking of models before?? Oh no do you see what this scientist says about models?? Would that be like your “ supercomputer” that’s going to give us an unbiased factual narrative “supermodel”of anything??

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 19:46:07   #
son of witless
 
lindajoy wrote:
Better to be called a hate monger than stupid~~ Lololol sorry just couldn’t resist.. and just joking~~I’m finding a need to clarify that point after S, comment..

Ok, I’ll join you I liked Tipper


I know this has been pointed out before, but it never hurts to show evidence of what is happening right now in the real World as opposed to in the mind of a Global Warming scare monger. Erie Pennsylvania over the holidays.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbEzx75vo1c

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 20:52:01   #
arapaho Loc: America
 
lindajoy wrote:
No dear YOU brought up supercomputers trying to belittle the poster, not me.. I can go back and copy it for you if you have forgotten what you said but I don’t think that is necessary, you are just evading the answer you too know.. That’s ok the point is made in your reply.. Thank You for that, you have earned a 🌟..

So I’ll now ask for a forth time when working with that computer to develop the supermodel you spoke of how is that hypothetical conclusion drawn????? It’s a very simple question you should know...
No dear YOU brought up supercomputers trying to b... (show quote)

Once again "supermodel" is what YOU said. I have no idea what you meant then or now. You don't either! It is just part of your incoherent word salad of useless verbiage.

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2018 20:59:13   #
arapaho Loc: America
 
lindajoy wrote:
I thought I’d add this to the thread and your it’s here seems a good place to put it ...
A tweet war~~ Lolol

The article was written by Dr. Michael Mann, a professor of atmospheric science at Penn State University. Mann argues that heavy lake effect snows this year near the Great Lakes are a sign of global warming because the warming temperatures cause the lakes to stay warmer longer therefore producing more snow. He also argued that despite the recent cold snap, the U.S. has seen many more days of very above normal temperatures than very below normal temperatures over the past several years.

He also argued that despite the central and eastern U.S. being locked into an arctic cold pattern for more than a week, the western U.S. and much of the rest of the world has been warm. Mann also blamed last week’s major east coast snowstorm on warmer-than-normal ocean water.

These allegations, however, are more narrative and opinion rather than fact, according to meteorologist Joe Bastardi.

What did Bastardi say?

Bastardi challenged whether the recent cold has anything to do with climate change, saying cold in the 1980’s was colder than this year’s recent cold snap and it was never connected to climate change or global warming. Bastardi also questioned whether or not the upcoming thaw is connected to climate change.

After four tweets, Bastardi concluded by chiding Gore and other climate change alarmists about pursuing narrative over truth.


Joe Bastardi

@BigJoeBastardi
So let me get this straight, This cold is from climate change, Previous cold shots werent, Previous cold shots like 83-84 this period colder. So what these guys want us to believe is the cold is from climate change, but climate change made it come up short of previous cold shots https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/949267935683596288
3:34 AM - Jan 5, 2018

Only thing I can do is try to reach people that want to know the WHY BEFORE THE WHAT ,Said hurricane season would see end of major hit drought in spring along with big wildfire season, Had roaring start to winter from October, None of that had anything to do
with climate change
3:43 AM - Jan 5, 2018
8 8 Replies 27 27 Retweets 61 61 likes

Joe Bastardi

@BigJoeBastardi
Sometimes if you want to see forward, you have to look back. No one is anti science, anti model, anti "climate" But one must question authority of models and causes of variances if one truly wishes to pursue the answer
3:44 AM - Jan 5, 2018
9 9 Replies 35 35 Retweets 86 86 likes

Weren’t we speaking of models before?? Oh no do you see what this scientist says about models?? Would that be like your “ supercomputer” that’s going to give us an unbiased factual narrative “supermodel”of anything??
I thought I’d add this to the thread and your it’s... (show quote)

You still do not know what climate is. You claimed that winter, spring, summer, and fall were each a change of climate! Those are seasons with different weather but not a different climate.

Regardless your post is incoherent verbiage. Babble, nonsense, obfuscation and a waste of time that has no meaning and makes no point.

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 21:08:26   #
PeterS
 
lindajoy wrote:
I agree person to persons is sometimes used to talk about situations related to laws with like association when they really are not..

You mean straw man objections to postmillennialism????

We vs oligarchy?? The greatness of America was a government for the people and by the people, but that ideal has been eroded in favor of a new American oligarchy led by billionaires such as George Soros, Tom Steyer, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Mark Zuckerberg, etc..They are men of the left and unlike prior rich men in American history, they can now control our election process, both halls of Congress, our courts, our schools, the press, and what will take place on a worldwide level~~ think Soros in Europe and the havoc he has created for many a country...

Think no matter what supposed party is in office nothing changes.. That is until now, with Trump, things are changing measured by the foundation of changes that has already taken place and in spite of severe obstruction and the deep state that needs to rid him of his seat to get things back on track for the progressive globalist..

Private vs public is too broad
I agree person to persons is sometimes used to tal... (show quote)


You don't think the wealthy have been able to control our election process all along? That's very naive of you Linda and to top it off you elect a billionaire to lead you. And what does he do? surrounds himself with still more billionaires. I don't think it an oligopoly that you are afraid of but whether the billionaires favor the right or the left...

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 21:09:34   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
arapaho wrote:
So you don't have a clue yet about the geography and want out of that trap!

Of course you just stepped into another one. You brought up "supermodel", not me. And I have no idea what you meant (and neither do you!).

Ask your question again, but try to make sense if you want an answer.


Hint:

Stop digging.

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 21:21:20   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
PeterS wrote:
You don't think the wealthy have been able to control our election process all along? That's very naive of you Linda and to top it off you elect a billionaire to lead you. And what does he do? surrounds himself with still more billionaires. I don't think it an oligopoly that you are afraid of but whether the billionaires favor the right or the left...


Why do liberals side with a Bilderberger billionaire elitist like George "Giorgi" Soros?
Do all liberals believe this is how America should be controlled?
“This system to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. (Bilderberg Group)” - Insider, Professor Carroll Quigley – ‘Tragedy and Hope’,( p. 324)
The Bilderberg Group meets once a year, and is blacked out by the MSM.
10 Things You Didn't Know About "Giorgi" George Soros
https://youtu.be/tfBHYxEojZk
SOROS ROTHSCHILD RACE WAR PROPAGANDA EXPOSED
https://youtu.be/lhqqz3QFQKE
George Soros: Evil Puppet Master Exposed
https://youtu.be/1eRFTHD2CTg

HILLARY FOR PRISON 2016 CAMPAIGN THEME SONG
https://youtu.be/lwl56DeNK0Q

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2018 21:35:26   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
son of witless wrote:
I know this has been pointed out before, but it never hurts to show evidence of what is happening right now in the real World as opposed to in the mind of a Global Warming scare monger. Erie Pennsylvania over the holidays.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbEzx75vo1c


A likely reality although Gore says it too is climate change..Lololol Has to keep that egg that gets on his face so frequently off some how... lolol

Good grief we deniers are soooo bad!!!!!! :

Thank You for the obvious, son.. You’re a good man...

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 22:04:43   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
PeterS wrote:
You don't think the wealthy have been able to control our election process all along? That's very naive of you Linda and to top it off you elect a billionaire to lead you. And what does he do? surrounds himself with still more billionaires. I don't think it an oligopoly that you are afraid of but whether the billionaires favor the right or the left...


Oh Peter, cut it out, you’ve read enough of my posts to know I always say it is the big money that runs our supposed government..

Yes, I did vote in a billionaire, one who is not a politician and doesn’t take shi** from any of them regardless of what party they profess to be.. took down 16 politicians and made them have to take a position on issues.. Even got a couple riled enough to speak their piece too.. I liked that very much..

He doesn’t need the money, he ran over 500 companies and with the exception of a few chapter 11s not 7s, I might add all have been successful... Because of his international trade he did have knowledge on what was needed and sure made it clear these countries that have been robbing us blind in tariff trade was coming to an end.. Yup, I voted for him and will again 2020 if he elects to run..


Did you by chance read this article??

Well, the first year jobs report card is in for the Trump administration—and it’s pretty solid. There’s now enough data to compare President Trump to his predecessors on jobs growth and it’s pretty solid. Even The Washington Post wrote that President Trump, who had the best jobs creating year since Bill Clinton, earned high marks with 1.8 million new jobs created. For December, nonfarm payroll jobs rose by 148,000, while private sector employment rose by 250,000; the latter boosted the Dow Jones to close above 25,000 for the first time yesterday.

Now, while The Post gives Trump good marks, they added the recession that hit Obama at the outset of his term made his numbers worse regarding the comparison. Still, the publication admits that for year one, Trump outperformed Obama:

On Friday morning, the government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics released employment numbers for December, bookending President Trump’s first year in office. While the number of jobs added was lower than many analysts expected — up 148,000 — it was a continuation of the trend of growth seen over the course of 2017.

With those numbers in hand, we can now compare Trump’s first year in office to his predecessors’. And in that comparison, Trump comes out looking pretty good.

[…]

Trump’s immediate predecessor, Barack Obama, saw a surge in the unemployment rate during his first year, a function of the effects of the recession that was just beginning to wind down. Relative to Obama’s first year in office, Trump’s was consistently very good.

For example, in the number of jobs created or lost over the year: Under Trump, there were 1.8 million more people working in December than in January. Under Obama, 4.3 million fewer.

[…]

But we’re comparing first years here, and on that metric Trump consistently outperforms Obama. <snip> more to read should you wish..

https://www.infowars.com/wapo-admits-trumps-first-year-job-numbers-very-very-good/

Billionaires favoring one or the other is exactly why we are where we aren’t anymore.. Their cry for control outweighs any benefit for our country.. But since they are the shakers and the movers which side they support can not be dismissed, Peter..

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 22:11:17   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
arapaho wrote:
Once again "supermodel" is what YOU said. I have no idea what you meant then or now. You don't either! It is just part of your incoherent word salad of useless verbiage.


Still can’t come clean and answer the question.. Lololol you should stop while your ahead.... Your deflection so typical of you and your ilk it’s comical at this point...

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 22:15:37   #
arapaho Loc: America
 
lindajoy wrote:
Still can’t come clean and answer the question.. Lololol you should stop while your ahead.... Your deflection so typical of you and your ilk it’s comical at this point...

Projection. Again the question actually is what did you mean by the term "supermodel"?

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2018 22:26:38   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
lindajoy wrote:
I thought I’d add this to the thread and your it’s here seems a good place to put it ...
A tweet war~~ Lolol

The article was written by Dr. Michael Mann, a professor of atmospheric science at Penn State University. Mann argues that heavy lake effect snows this year near the Great Lakes are a sign of global warming because the warming temperatures cause the lakes to stay warmer longer therefore producing more snow. He also argued that despite the recent cold snap, the U.S. has seen many more days of very above normal temperatures than very below normal temperatures over the past several years.

He also argued that despite the central and eastern U.S. being locked into an arctic cold pattern for more than a week, the western U.S. and much of the rest of the world has been warm. Mann also blamed last week’s major east coast snowstorm on warmer-than-normal ocean water.

These allegations, however, are more narrative and opinion rather than fact, according to meteorologist Joe Bastardi.

What did Bastardi say?

Bastardi challenged whether the recent cold has anything to do with climate change, saying cold in the 1980’s was colder than this year’s recent cold snap and it was never connected to climate change or global warming. Bastardi also questioned whether or not the upcoming thaw is connected to climate change.

After four tweets, Bastardi concluded by chiding Gore and other climate change alarmists about pursuing narrative over truth.


Joe Bastardi

@BigJoeBastardi
So let me get this straight, This cold is from climate change, Previous cold shots werent, Previous cold shots like 83-84 this period colder. So what these guys want us to believe is the cold is from climate change, but climate change made it come up short of previous cold shots https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/949267935683596288
3:34 AM - Jan 5, 2018

Only thing I can do is try to reach people that want to know the WHY BEFORE THE WHAT ,Said hurricane season would see end of major hit drought in spring along with big wildfire season, Had roaring start to winter from October, None of that had anything to do
with climate change
3:43 AM - Jan 5, 2018
8 8 Replies 27 27 Retweets 61 61 likes

Joe Bastardi

@BigJoeBastardi
Sometimes if you want to see forward, you have to look back. No one is anti science, anti model, anti "climate" But one must question authority of models and causes of variances if one truly wishes to pursue the answer
3:44 AM - Jan 5, 2018
9 9 Replies 35 35 Retweets 86 86 likes

Weren’t we speaking of models before?? Oh no do you see what this scientist says about models?? Would that be like your “ supercomputer” that’s going to give us an unbiased factual narrative “supermodel”of anything??
I thought I’d add this to the thread and your it’s... (show quote)


arapaho;
What are you driving at by your question about using the term "supermodel"?
Are you related to Pocahontas?

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 22:28:51   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Super Dave wrote:
Hint:

Stop digging.


I’m loven your avi!!! Too cool..

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 22:34:10   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
arapaho wrote:
Projection. Again the question actually is what did you mean by the term "supermodel"?


arapaho;
What are you driving at by your question about using the term "supermodel"?
Are you related to Pocahontas?

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 23:25:30   #
PeterS
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Why do liberals side with a Bilderberger billionaire elitist like George "Giorgi" Soros?
Do all liberals believe this is how America should be controlled?
“This system to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. (Bilderberg Group)” - Insider, Professor Carroll Quigley – ‘Tragedy and Hope’,( p. 324)
The Bilderberg Group meets once a year, and is blacked out by the MSM.
10 Things You Didn't Know About "Giorgi" George Soros
https://youtu.be/tfBHYxEojZk
SOROS ROTHSCHILD RACE WAR PROPAGANDA EXPOSED
https://youtu.be/lhqqz3QFQKE
George Soros: Evil Puppet Master Exposed
https://youtu.be/1eRFTHD2CTg

HILLARY FOR PRISON 2016 CAMPAIGN THEME SONG
https://youtu.be/lwl56DeNK0Q
Why do liberals side with a Bilderberger billionai... (show quote)

Oh come now, do you really think one set of billionaires any different than another! Tell you what, you give up your billionaires and I'll give up mine...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 29 of 31 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.