One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Global Warming Hoax...The Reality
Page <<first <prev 28 of 31 next> last>>
Jan 7, 2018 15:51:36   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
son of witless wrote:
You are always picking on poor Al. He once said that the center of the Earth was several million degrees. A very minor mistake. I am trying to say nice things about him so I won't be called a hate monger, so lets see. Well I always liked his former wife Tipper. What did she ever see in him ? She never looked comfortable when she had to be photographed with Bill's wife.


Better to be called a hate monger than stupid~~ Lololol sorry just couldn’t resist.. and just joking~~I’m finding a need to clarify that point after S, comment..

Ok, I’ll join you I liked Tipper

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:14:05   #
Ricktloml
 
lindajoy wrote:
The obvious is never obvious to the intentional blinding of the left, son but you did nail it !!!

This weather change of deep freeze and snow is just not as important in the wake of need to screw us out of money the left needs for their million dollar homes or yachts or trips on their jets etc.. Just think gore, darlen..

And just as bad, or worse than the greed involved is the accompanying power. The left is so arrogant, and condescendingly contemptuous of others that they believe THEY need to spend your money because you aren't capable of spending it on the "right" things, and THEY need to control your actions because you can't be trusted to do what THEY think you should. After over 112 million dead and untold millions more tortured and made miserable by leftist governments why would ANYONE want a leftist to be in charge of ANYTHING. The answer is of coursed no one. That's why when making the case for robbing you of your freedom there always has to be deceit, "you're going to save the planet", "you can prove you're a better person", just don't ask any questions and put us in charge

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:14:35   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
ron vrooman wrote:
Do you agree to people v person; private v public; we v oligarchy; living being v straw man?


I agree person to persons is sometimes used to talk about situations related to laws with like association when they really are not..

You mean straw man objections to postmillennialism????

We vs oligarchy?? The greatness of America was a government for the people and by the people, but that ideal has been eroded in favor of a new American oligarchy led by billionaires such as George Soros, Tom Steyer, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Mark Zuckerberg, etc..They are men of the left and unlike prior rich men in American history, they can now control our election process, both halls of Congress, our courts, our schools, the press, and what will take place on a worldwide level~~ think Soros in Europe and the havoc he has created for many a country...

Think no matter what supposed party is in office nothing changes.. That is until now, with Trump, things are changing measured by the foundation of changes that has already taken place and in spite of severe obstruction and the deep state that needs to rid him of his seat to get things back on track for the progressive globalist..

Private vs public is too broad

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2018 16:23:32   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
PeterS wrote:
Gosh Davie, The only thing you've exposed is how little you know. Fortunately the majority in this country know that climate change is real and as cons age and die they are replaced by those who believe....

But Pete, climate change will have destroyed us by the time all of us "cons" are dead and gone!

And hey Pete...in case you missed it you ether never answered or avoided my question...

If the climate change situation is so dire and as you yourself have said can't be reversed, how do you propose we "fix" it? You're always shouting the sky is falling but you and others never offer any solutions.

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:25:13   #
arapaho Loc: America
 
lindajoy wrote:
Your false statements and twisting of my posts are in~correct. From now on quote my entire post not just a portion~~ and certainly my second post on the same comment..Guess you missed that too..

I said~Not once but in two different posts temperature changes occur in different years ..
My post you only quoted a portion of said:

Alaska averages more like this a~
75 inches (1.91 m) of snow. The northern coast of the Gulf of Alaska receives up to 150 inches (3,810.0 mm) of precipitation annually.

Trending warmer climates does not substantiate the cause such as the sun, planetary alignment, shifting El Niño and el Nina’s etc..

If anything given the weather conditions in Alaska fewer people live there yet the weather trends stand as they always have, and will..

Looking at each year of climate shows you in 2013 they experienced significant cold while this year it is less...

Alaska Endures Record Cold While Still Buried Under Snow
SHARE THIS
May 11, 2013; 9:07 PM

Here’s another one for you ~~ so what was it you were claiming?? Be sure to read the date too... that’s important when looking at what different years bring us in weather change..

Imagine going into a movie theater to check out the latest science fiction flick and there is not a single flake of snow on the ground. A couple hours later, as the credits start to roll, you mosey outside and are stunned to find your car buried in more than a foot of snow.

Perhaps you’d wonder if you were still watching a movie.

Well that’s kind of what happened Wednesday at Alaska’s Thompson Pass, just outside of the town of Valdez, when an incredible 10 inches of snow piled up in one hour — around 1.7 inches every 10 minutes. This is an absolutely incredible snowfall rate.

The furious storm dropped another 5 inches in 30 minutes, for a remarkable 15 inches in a brief hour and a half period. In the end, 40 inches of heavy wet snow accumulated in 12 hours.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2017/12/07/alaska-just-reported-one-of-the-most-extreme-snowfall-rates-on-record-10-inches-per-hour/?utm_term=.431a26495a14


Btw~~ take read and stand on your unfounded assertions... put some proof where yours fingers are...and then try to enjoy the beautiful world around you..
Read slowly it may help with your comprehension...

Juneau averages over 50 inches (1,270 mm) of precipitation a year, while some other areas in southeast Alaska receive as much as 275 inches (6,980 mm). Average monthly precipitation generally peaks in September or October, and is lowest in May and June. Owing to the rain shadow of the coastal mountains, south-central Alaska does not get nearly as much rain as the southeast of Alaska, though it does get more snow with up to 300 inches (7.62 m) at Valdez and much more in the mountains. On average, Anchorage receives 16 inches (410 mm) of precipitation a year, with around 75 inches (1.91 m) of snow. The northern coast of the Gulf of Alaska receives up to 150 inches (3,810.0 mm) of precipitation annually.[10] Across western sections of the state, the northern side of the Seward Peninsula is a desert with less than 10 inches (250 mm) of precipitation annually, while some locations between Dillingham and Bethel average around 100 inches (2,540 mm) of precipitation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_Alaska
Your false statements and twisting of my posts ar... (show quote)

Pretty clearly you can't relate the text on the cited wiki page to a map. You cite Southeastern and Southcentral (Juneau and Valdez/Anchorage) as an average for all of Alaska. That is a small part of Alaska. Just the North Slope alone is larger (and gets less than 5 inches of precipitation per year). The Interior, between the Brooks Range and the Alaska Range, is another larger area that only gets 10 inches of precipitation per year.

Your numbers are only correct for the small area they apply to. It is just silly to say that Alaska averages 75 inches of snow per year.

Your nearly incoherent post has little relating to Climate Change.

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:25:56   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
It all plots on a bell curve


lindajoy wrote:
Your false statements and twisting of my posts are in~correct. From now on quote my entire post not just a portion~~ and certainly my second post on the same comment..Guess you missed that too..

I said~Not once but in two different posts temperature changes occur in different years ..
My post you only quoted a portion of said:

Alaska averages more like this a~
75 inches (1.91 m) of snow. The northern coast of the Gulf of Alaska receives up to 150 inches (3,810.0 mm) of precipitation annually.

Trending warmer climates does not substantiate the cause such as the sun, planetary alignment, shifting El Niño and el Nina’s etc..

If anything given the weather conditions in Alaska fewer people live there yet the weather trends stand as they always have, and will..

Looking at each year of climate shows you in 2013 they experienced significant cold while this year it is less...

Alaska Endures Record Cold While Still Buried Under Snow
SHARE THIS
May 11, 2013; 9:07 PM

Here’s another one for you ~~ so what was it you were claiming?? Be sure to read the date too... that’s important when looking at what different years bring us in weather change..

Imagine going into a movie theater to check out the latest science fiction flick and there is not a single flake of snow on the ground. A couple hours later, as the credits start to roll, you mosey outside and are stunned to find your car buried in more than a foot of snow.

Perhaps you’d wonder if you were still watching a movie.

Well that’s kind of what happened Wednesday at Alaska’s Thompson Pass, just outside of the town of Valdez, when an incredible 10 inches of snow piled up in one hour — around 1.7 inches every 10 minutes. This is an absolutely incredible snowfall rate.

The furious storm dropped another 5 inches in 30 minutes, for a remarkable 15 inches in a brief hour and a half period. In the end, 40 inches of heavy wet snow accumulated in 12 hours.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2017/12/07/alaska-just-reported-one-of-the-most-extreme-snowfall-rates-on-record-10-inches-per-hour/?utm_term=.431a26495a14


Btw~~ take read and stand on your unfounded assertions... put some proof where yours fingers are...and then try to enjoy the beautiful world around you..
Read slowly it may help with your comprehension...

Juneau averages over 50 inches (1,270 mm) of precipitation a year, while some other areas in southeast Alaska receive as much as 275 inches (6,980 mm). Average monthly precipitation generally peaks in September or October, and is lowest in May and June. Owing to the rain shadow of the coastal mountains, south-central Alaska does not get nearly as much rain as the southeast of Alaska, though it does get more snow with up to 300 inches (7.62 m) at Valdez and much more in the mountains. On average, Anchorage receives 16 inches (410 mm) of precipitation a year, with around 75 inches (1.91 m) of snow. The northern coast of the Gulf of Alaska receives up to 150 inches (3,810.0 mm) of precipitation annually.[10] Across western sections of the state, the northern side of the Seward Peninsula is a desert with less than 10 inches (250 mm) of precipitation annually, while some locations between Dillingham and Bethel average around 100 inches (2,540 mm) of precipitation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_Alaska
Your false statements and twisting of my posts ar... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:28:00   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Ricktloml wrote:
And just as bad, or worse than the greed involved is the accompanying power. The left is so arrogant, and condescendingly contemptuous of others that they believe THEY need to spend your money because you aren't capable of spending it on the "right" things, and THEY need to control your actions because you can't be trusted to do what THEY think you should. After over 112 million dead and untold millions more tortured and made miserable by leftist governments why would ANYONE want a leftist to be in charge of ANYTHING. The answer is of coursed no one. That's why when making the case for robbing you of your freedom there always has to be deceit, "you're going to save the planet", "you can prove you're a better person", just don't ask any questions and put us in charge
And just as bad, or worse than the greed involved ... (show quote)


Well remember we didn’t build what we have and therefore it isn’t ours to keep but to give to them so they can squander and steel it away from us.. Eight years and 19 trillion dollars later we clearly see that too..

Arrogance is all they have left to try and intimidate us into believing them.. Their proven record of destruction weighs in the face of that arrogance..

For me that is enough to know better~~
Here’s the song I’m listening to as we drift through the deep blue sea of the pacific.. Birds gliding by, people sunning and the breeze just enough to carry you to new heights only you can achieve~~
Enjoy, I sure am..

https://youtu.be/eLRsEuCocT4

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2018 16:30:16   #
arapaho Loc: America
 
lindajoy wrote:
Go back to school, please~~

The one obvious thing from this exchange is that you are the one who lacks an education. You don't even know what climate is! What a hoot.

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:30:52   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
arapaho wrote:
Pretty clearly you can't relate the text on the cited wiki page to a map. You cite Southeastern and Southcentral (Juneau and Valdez/Anchorage) as an average for all of Alaska. That is a small part of Alaska. Just the North Slope alone is larger (and gets less than 5 inches of precipitation per year). The Interior, between the Brooks Range and the Alaska Range, is another larger area that only gets 10 inches of precipitation per year.

Your numbers are only correct for the small area they apply to. It is just silly to say that Alaska averages 75 inches of snow per year.

Your nearly incoherent post has little relating to Climate Change.
Pretty clearly you can't relate the text on the ci... (show quote)



Yes, yes, I see what your evading~~
Ok new subject now, this one sufficiently addressed, our posts speak for themself and this is now boring...

So, now, what about that supermodel concept you brought up?? Can you answer the question posed to you twice now??

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:31:02   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
mahalo

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:33:43   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
ron vrooman wrote:
mahalo


Aloha, mahalo ...

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2018 16:35:14   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
S. Maturin wrote:
An alien abductee responds....

I wish my weather controller want broken...

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:36:29   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
arapaho wrote:
The one obvious thing from this exchange is that you are the one who lacks an education. You don't even know what climate is! What a hoot.


What a hoot indeed~~
Glad our posts speak their truths..

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 16:44:30   #
arapaho Loc: America
 
lindajoy wrote:
Yes, yes, I see what your evading~~
Ok new subject now, this one sufficiently addressed, our posts speak for themself and this is now boring...

So, now, what about that supermodel concept you brought up?? Can you answer the question posed to you twice now??

So you don't have a clue yet about the geography and want out of that trap!

Of course you just stepped into another one. You brought up "supermodel", not me. And I have no idea what you meant (and neither do you!).

Ask your question again, but try to make sense if you want an answer.

Reply
Jan 7, 2018 19:07:12   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
arapaho wrote:
So you don't have a clue yet about the geography and want out of that trap!

Of course you just stepped into another one. You brought up "supermodel", not me. And I have no idea what you meant (and neither do you!).

Ask your question again, but try to make sense if you want an answer.


No dear YOU brought up supercomputers trying to belittle the poster, not me.. I can go back and copy it for you if you have forgotten what you said but I don’t think that is necessary, you are just evading the answer you too know.. That’s ok the point is made in your reply.. Thank You for that, you have earned a 🌟..

So I’ll now ask for a forth time when working with that computer to develop the supermodel you spoke of how is that hypothetical conclusion drawn????? It’s a very simple question you should know...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 28 of 31 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.