One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: "We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11" #3
This discussion was started in a previous topic. You can find it here.
Page <<first <prev 57 of 69 next> last>>
Nov 28, 2017 14:22:49   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
The real question here is why do think readers care what your name is payne1000 VS the accuracy of your argument... you are a proven liar & racist... you resort to identity issues for lack of a coherent argument... prove something or quit the BS already... your top down explosive demolition of a 110 story steel structure detonating @ every floor would leave behind massive conclusive evidence that is indisputable & you can't provide one shred... why?... 4.6 billion was paid out for this lack of any shred of explosive evidence... why would they pay when a simple bomb dog could prove foul play or were all the dogs In on it too?...
The real question here is why do think readers car... (show quote)


More babbling by the gutless anonymous shill.
Identify yourself if you want to have any credibility.

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 14:53:49   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Blade_Runner wrote:


AH HA HA HA!!!

That truly is funny.

Now....vid of ANY surveillance camera capturing the incident please.

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 15:03:13   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
bdamage wrote:
AH HA HA HA!!!

That truly is funny.

Now....vid of ANY surveillance camera capturing the incident please.
Is the "b" in bdamage the initial for "brain"?

The Flight Data Recorder installed on Boeing 757-200, registration #N644AA, designated Flight 77 was recovered from the wreckage inside the Pentagon.

FDR Analysis: Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon

Flight Path Study: AAFLT 77
The following description of American Airlines Flight 77 is based on data from the flight data recorder (FDR) recovered from the crash site, as well as radar data obtained from Federal Aviation Administration's Air Route Traffic Control Centers, approach control at Washington Dulles airport, and the U.S. Air Force 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron.

Reply
 
 
Nov 28, 2017 15:06:49   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
whole2th wrote:
The evidence continues to grow implicating "ZEWS" (zionist Jews) as the real terrorists who did 9-11.

http://wakingtimesmedia.com/lucky-larry-silverstein-set-receive-another-95-million-new-9-11-settlement/
The September 11 hijackers used U.S. and foreign financial institutions to hold, move, and retrieve their money. The hijackers deposited money into U.S. accounts, primarily by wire transfers and deposits of cash or travelers checks brought from overseas. Additionally, several of them kept funds in foreign accounts, which they accessed in the United States through ATM and credit card transactions. The hijackers received funds from facilitators in Germany and the United Arab Emirates or directly from Khalid Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) as they transited Pakistan before coming to the United States. The plot cost al Qaeda somewhere in the range of $400,000–500,000, of which approximately $300,000 passed through the hijackers’ bank accounts in the United States. The hijackers returned approximately $26,000 to a facilitator in the UAE in the days prior to the attack. While in the United States, the hijackers spent money primarily for flight training, travel, and living expenses (such as housing, food, cars, and auto insurance). Extensive investigation has revealed no substantial source of domestic financial support.

Neither the hijackers nor their financial facilitators were experts in the use of the international financial system. They created a paper trail linking them to each other and their facilitators. Still, they were easily adept enough to blend into the vast international financial system without doing anything to reveal themselves as criminals, let alone terrorists bent on mass murder. The money-laundering controls in place at the time were largely focused on drug trafficking and large-scale financial fraud and could not have detected the hijackers’ transactions. The controls were never intended to, and could not, detect or disrupt the routine transactions in which the hijackers engaged.

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 15:48:25   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
The September 11 hijackers used U.S. and foreign financial institutions to hold, move, and retrieve their money. The hijackers deposited money into U.S. accounts, primarily by wire transfers and deposits of cash or travelers checks brought from overseas. Additionally, several of them kept funds in foreign accounts, which they accessed in the United States through ATM and credit card transactions. The hijackers received funds from facilitators in Germany and the United Arab Emirates or directly from Khalid Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) as they transited Pakistan before coming to the United States. The plot cost al Qaeda somewhere in the range of $400,000–500,000, of which approximately $300,000 passed through the hijackers’ bank accounts in the United States. The hijackers returned approximately $26,000 to a facilitator in the UAE in the days prior to the attack. While in the United States, the hijackers spent money primarily for flight training, travel, and living expenses (such as housing, food, cars, and auto insurance). Extensive investigation has revealed no substantial source of domestic financial support.

Neither the hijackers nor their financial facilitators were experts in the use of the international financial system. They created a paper trail linking them to each other and their facilitators. Still, they were easily adept enough to blend into the vast international financial system without doing anything to reveal themselves as criminals, let alone terrorists bent on mass murder. The money-laundering controls in place at the time were largely focused on drug trafficking and large-scale financial fraud and could not have detected the hijackers’ transactions. The controls were never intended to, and could not, detect or disrupt the routine transactions in which the hijackers engaged.
i The September 11 hijackers used U.S. and foreig... (show quote)


Isn't it interesting (and revealing) that here it is 16 years later and Khalid Sheikh Mohamed has not been brought to trial.
The reason for that is the total lack of evidence against KSM, plus the fact the perpetrators don't want KSM on the witness stand where he might have information which would shed light on what really happened.

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 15:53:18   #
whole2th
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Is the "b" in bdamage the initial for "brain"?

The Flight Data Recorder installed on Boeing 757-200, registration #N644AA, designated Flight 77 was recovered from the wreckage inside the Pentagon.

FDR Analysis: Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon

Flight Path Study: AAFLT 77
The following description of American Airlines Flight 77 is based on data from the flight data recorder (FDR) recovered from the crash site, as well as radar data obtained from Federal Aviation Administration's Air Route Traffic Control Centers, approach control at Washington Dulles airport, and the U.S. Air Force 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron.
Is the "b" in bdamage the initial for &q... (show quote)


The flight data does not support your narrative:
https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2010/09/29/flight-77-missed-the-pentagon-flight-data-recorder/

"Unless the device malfunctioned – and there’s no indication of this – then it established that the plane indeed flew towards the Pentagon at more than 530 miles per hour. But it didn’t hit any light posts. And it didn’t hit the building.

There are two reasons we know this. The first is that the plane was too high to have hit anything. The last second of data recorded by the FDR was at 9:37:45 a.m. – just as it was flying over the light posts (not more than a second or two from the Pentagon).

The altimeter clearly shows the altitude at this moment to be 180 feet above sea level. According to Pilots for 9/11 Truth, if you take into consideration the air pressure that day and how that affects the readings of the altimeter, then the actual height was really 300 feet higher than shown."

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 15:56:03   #
whole2th
 
"there were two reasons why the FDR proved the plane didn’t hit the building. I’ve shown how it could not have hit the light posts because of height. But it also could not have hit them because the actual flight path indicated by the FDR is not what the 9/11 Commission Report claimed. And, the angle of approach to the Pentagon would have it missing the light posts entirely, regardless of height."

"Another tantalizing point: the Flight Data Recorder stopped recording data about one second before the plane reached the Pentagon denying us categorical proof of whether it hit or missed the building."'

"The FDR was apparently found at the crash site, although it took six years for the information to be released to the public. We don’t know where on site it was found, or when."

Reply
 
 
Nov 28, 2017 16:02:16   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
More babbling by the gutless anonymous shill.
Identify yourself if you want to have any credibility.





Sure thing payne1000 & you talk about babbling...you can just call me E if it makes you happy & frees up some brain cells...

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 17:19:22   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
whole2th wrote:
"there were two reasons why the FDR proved the plane didn’t hit the building. I’ve shown how it could not have hit the light posts because of height. But it also could not have hit them because the actual flight path indicated by the FDR is not what the 9/11 Commission Report claimed. And, the angle of approach to the Pentagon would have it missing the light posts entirely, regardless of height."

"Another tantalizing point: the Flight Data Recorder stopped recording data about one second before the plane reached the Pentagon denying us categorical proof of whether it hit or missed the building."'

"The FDR was apparently found at the crash site, although it took six years for the information to be released to the public. We don’t know where on site it was found, or when."
"there were two reasons why the FDR proved th... (show quote)
Boeing 757-200, registration #N644AA, designated Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 17:33:57   #
whole2th
 


About 75 Pentagon personnel formed a line and walked across the Pentagon lawn--picking up things.

As you claim to have the answers what were the picking up?

Agents cofiscated security camera recordings made at the CITGO station and the Sheraton ... videos which would have shown what approached the Pentagon. What was on those tapes and why have they been concealed from the public?

Explain the 'coincidence' of the destruction of the Dept. of Naval Intelligence accounting division computers--and the destruction of backup computers for the Pentagon which were housed at the World Trade Center.

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 17:59:37   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
Isn't it interesting (and revealing) that here it is 16 years later and Khalid Sheikh Mohamed has not been brought to trial.
The reason for that is the total lack of evidence against KSM, plus the fact the perpetrators don't want KSM on the witness stand where he might have information which would shed light on what really happened.
Isn't it interesting that here it is 16 years later and the 9/11 conspiracy movement still thinks someone other than Al Qaeda terrorists attacked us and still can't prove who they think did it, how they did it, or why.

Isn't it interesting that KSM was in fact brought to trial. First by a military tribunal, then Obama and Holder attempted to have him tried in civil court, but that flopped because KSM is not an American citizen, he is not protected by the US constitution. So, KSM and his four co-conspirators in the 9/11 plot were returned to be tried by military tribunal.

Possible guilty plea

On December 8, 2008, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-defendants told the judge that they wished to confess and plead guilty to all charges. The plea will be delayed until mental competency hearings for Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi and Ramzi bin al-Shibh can be held; Mohammed said, "We want everyone to plead together." Spencer Ackerman, writing in the Washington Independent, reported that Presiding Officer Stephen Henley had to consider whether he was authorized to accept guilty pleas.

On June 25, 2009, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, writing in English, made what could be read as a surprising plea for absolution: “All praise is due to Allah. I praise Him and seek His aid and His forgiveness and I seek refuge in Allah from our evil in ourselves and from our bad deeds.”

Even if this were only a ritual expression of obeisance, it would stand in contrast to his customarily belligerent behavior. In the few statements of his that have been made public—a 2002 interview with the Al Jazeera reporter Yosri Fouda, pieces of the United States government’s interrogations of him, Red Cross prison interviews, and his appearances before military tribunals—Mohammed has been cold-bloodedly straightforward. He told Fouda that the Holy Tuesday planes operation, as Al Qaeda called the 9/11 assaults, was “designed to cause as many deaths as possible and havoc and to be a big slap for America on American soil.”

Testifying before a military tribunal in 2007, he likened himself to George Washington and boasted that he planned “the 9/11 operation from A-to-Z.” Killing, he said, was simply part of his job: “War start from Adam when Cain he killed Abel until now. It’s never gonna stop killing of people.” In that appearance, he boasted of murdering the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl: “I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew, Daniel Pearl, in the city of Karachi, Pakistan. For those who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me on the Internet holding his head.”

Reply
 
 
Nov 28, 2017 18:01:24   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
whole2th wrote:
About 75 Pentagon personnel formed a line and walked across the Pentagon lawn--picking up things.

As you claim to have the answers what were the picking up?

Agents cofiscated security camera recordings made at the CITGO station and the Sheraton ... videos which would have shown what approached the Pentagon. What was on those tapes and why have they been concealed from the public?

Explain the 'coincidence' of the destruction of the Dept. of Naval Intelligence accounting division computers--and the destruction of backup computers for the Pentagon which were housed at the World Trade Center.
About 75 Pentagon personnel formed a line and walk... (show quote)
Watch the video, start to finish, it's your old buddy David Chandler explaining in detail that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon.

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 18:06:09   #
whole2th
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Isn't it interesting that here it is 16 years later and the 9/11 conspiracy movement still thinks someone other than Al Qaeda terrorists attacked us and still can't prove who they think did it, how they did it, or why.


We know that muslims were not behind the 9-11 attacks.

This book lays out the Israeli connections to 9-11 beginning in the planning phases as early as 1978.

It is a very interesting read.



Reply
Nov 28, 2017 18:59:46   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Isn't it interesting that here it is 16 years later and the 9/11 conspiracy movement still thinks someone other than Al Qaeda terrorists attacked us and still can't prove who they think did it, how they did it, or why.

Isn't it interesting that KSM was in fact brought to trial. First by a military tribunal, then Obama and Holder attempted to have him tried in civil court, but that flopped because KSM is not an American citizen, he is not protected by the US constitution. So, KSM and his four co-conspirators in the 9/11 plot were returned to be tried by military tribunal.

Possible guilty plea

On December 8, 2008, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-defendants told the judge that they wished to confess and plead guilty to all charges. The plea will be delayed until mental competency hearings for Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi and Ramzi bin al-Shibh can be held; Mohammed said, "We want everyone to plead together." Spencer Ackerman, writing in the Washington Independent, reported that Presiding Officer Stephen Henley had to consider whether he was authorized to accept guilty pleas.

On June 25, 2009, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, writing in English, made what could be read as a surprising plea for absolution: “All praise is due to Allah. I praise Him and seek His aid and His forgiveness and I seek refuge in Allah from our evil in ourselves and from our bad deeds.”

Even if this were only a ritual expression of obeisance, it would stand in contrast to his customarily belligerent behavior. In the few statements of his that have been made public—a 2002 interview with the Al Jazeera reporter Yosri Fouda, pieces of the United States government’s interrogations of him, Red Cross prison interviews, and his appearances before military tribunals—Mohammed has been cold-bloodedly straightforward. He told Fouda that the Holy Tuesday planes operation, as Al Qaeda called the 9/11 assaults, was “designed to cause as many deaths as possible and havoc and to be a big slap for America on American soil.”

Testifying before a military tribunal in 2007, he likened himself to George Washington and boasted that he planned “the 9/11 operation from A-to-Z.” Killing, he said, was simply part of his job: “War start from Adam when Cain he killed Abel until now. It’s never gonna stop killing of people.” In that appearance, he boasted of murdering the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl: “I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew, Daniel Pearl, in the city of Karachi, Pakistan. For those who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me on the Internet holding his head.”
Isn't it interesting that here it is 16 years late... (show quote)


Of course we have to take the word of those who are running the torture prison at Guantanamo that KSM actually did say he wanted to plead guilty.
You do remember KSM was waterboarded 283 times before they could torture a confession out of him.
If he confessed in 2008, why is he still awaiting trial? Is it because confessions coerced by torture are not admissible in court?

Reply
Nov 28, 2017 19:03:23   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
whole2th wrote:
We know that muslims were not behind the 9-11 attacks.

This book lays out the Israeli connections to 9-11 beginning in the planning phases as early as 1978.

It is a very interesting read.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 57 of 69 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.