One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Real Reason Trump Cares About the Time Cover
Page <<first <prev 11 of 27 next> last>>
Nov 26, 2017 19:15:00   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
permafrost wrote:
I think he was extreamly unlucky to have to follow 2 wars on the credit card and the unfunded plan D..

That without even mentioning the limited revenue due to the tax cuts..

Maybe he should have followed RR plan and stolen the remaining SS trust fund..

what do you think he was so wrong about??
Follow 2 wars? Is that why JV ISIS pulled his underwear up over his head? Is that why he sent pallets of cash to Iran in the dead of the night?

And tell us how Obsma paid for the wars.. Did he write a check? Did he cut into his personal account?

The Bush Tax cuts? You mean the ones he personally lobbied to extend for the sake of the economy? It that the tax cuts you mean?

You should study up somewhere besides Soros news sites before speaking.

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 19:16:26   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Took 10 seconds.

“By comparing PP’s abortion income with its clinic income, we get a much more accurate picture of Planned Parenthood’s business model. In 2010, Planned Parenthood’s abortion income was 51.5 percent of its clinic income.”

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/05/planned-parenthood-51-of-its-income-comes-from-abortions/

And look, the URL has the word 'life' right at the beginning! Newsflash! There's nothing "wacko" about decrying the murder of the unborn.
Took 10 seconds. br br “By comparing PP’s abortio... (show quote)


If you want to believe the wacko site it's your problem. Are you a birther too?

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 19:26:04   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
OK, you asked for it! Here you go:









Reply
Nov 26, 2017 19:28:12   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Progressive taxation. Right. Here's how it works:

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100…

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this…

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7..

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do..

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20”. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).

The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,”but he got $10!”

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”

“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
Progressive taxation. Right. Here's how it works... (show quote)


Best example yet.

I'd do taxes differently, making all people pay taxes, even the poor. Excepting that we would have a flat tax and a minimum wage simultaneously, therefore creating an even stepping stone path to wealth amongst all citizens. Of course, this would ultimately limit the growth of government according to the Armey curve and the Laffer curve.

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 19:30:11   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Eventually, the Department of Education si going to be shut down permanently; the H.R. 899 bill is in the works.
I didn't realize Trump made a contribution to education, I hope it was a charter school or trade school.


Yeah, we don't want no money goin to da black city schools.

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 19:35:08   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Super Dave wrote:
Follow 2 wars? Is that why JV ISIS pulled his underwear up over his head? Is that why he sent pallets of cash to Iran in the dead of the night?

And tell us how Obsma paid for the wars.. Did he write a check? Did he cut into his personal account?

The Bush Tax cuts? You mean the ones he personally lobbied to extend for the sake of the economy? It that the tax cuts you mean?

You should study up somewhere besides Soros news sites before speaking.



The reason ISIS is now nearly driven out of their once large territory is due to the tactics used by the military for over 2 years. that is Obama strategy..

the wars are not paid for. They are still on the credit card and part, a large part of that near 20 trillion that used to be an issue with the right wing..

Obama was only able to force minor changes to those taxes and nothing near what he presented to congress.. so do we also have little hope for the current tax bill? It is yet one more disaster..

what in heck do you think Soros has to do with any of this..

Soros news sites??? which are those?? Any that do not match your sick outlook on the nation???

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 19:37:19   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Bad Bob wrote:





Reply
 
 
Nov 26, 2017 19:40:17   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
permafrost wrote:
No, that is not how it works... read your booklet this year..


What booklet?

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 19:47:34   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
Bad Bob wrote:




http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.3409371.1502694573!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_750/trump.jpg




Reply
Nov 26, 2017 20:03:00   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
What booklet?



Federal tax instruction booklet..

It will have a section describing how the tax level work..

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 20:28:40   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
You do know that the core business of Planned Parenthood is provision of abortions, right? That's where they make their 'bread and butter'. You give them money, you finance abortions. Plain and simple.


Yep taxpayers money goes to PP then goes back to the demo's and RINO's reason being they can't seem to get defunded

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 20:30:49   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
OK, you asked for it! Here you go:


Obama was confident enough in both himself and out country that he easily participated in the cultural norms of the country he visited.
Your nonsense is about as valid as saying George Bush was in love with king Abdulla when he kissed hm and held his hand.

You all need to get over yourselves and focus on real issues.

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 20:31:25   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
permafrost wrote:
The reason ISIS is now nearly driven out of their once large territory is due to the tactics used by the military for over 2 years. that is Obama strategy..

the wars are not paid for. They are still on the credit card and part, a large part of that near 20 trillion that used to be an issue with the right wing..

Obama was only able to force minor changes to those taxes and nothing near what he presented to congress.. so do we also have little hope for the current tax bill? It is yet one more disaster..

what in heck do you think Soros has to do with any of this..

Soros news sites??? which are those?? Any that do not match your sick outlook on the nation???
The reason ISIS is now nearly driven out of their ... (show quote)


The was no ISIS threat before Obama surrendered to them.

There was no Caliphate when Bush left office, and it took Trump to order it destroyed.

The debt you pretend to care about doubled under Obama.

The tax cuts you referenced are tax cuts Obama personally requested to be extended.

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 20:32:36   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Best example yet.
I'd do taxes differently, making all people pay taxes, even the poor. Excepting that we would have a flat tax and a minimum wage simultaneously


A flat tax and a minimum wage. Simultaneously. I see. So every time the government raised taxes they could raise the minimum wage to compensate for the extra burden? Are you aware of the effects a minimum wage has on employment and the economy?

"There is no “free lunch” when the government mandates a minimum wage. If the government requires that certain workers be paid higher wages, then businesses make adjustments to pay for the added costs, such as reducing hiring, cutting employee work hours, reducing benefits, and charging higher prices." Or any combination thereof. Minimum wage laws are a barnacle on the face of humanity. Here. read this:

https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/negative-effects-minimum-wage-laws

And this:

http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba550/

I can do this all day, but you get the idea.

As for a 'flat tax', good idea. Divide the government budget total among the taxpayers and send them each a bill for the same amount. Ever notice how government is the only 'business' that charges you based on your earnings? Imagine ordering a hamburger and being charged based on your earnings. Not right, right? So why then is it right for government to charge some more than others based on what they earn? We all get the same levels of government regardless of how much we pay, right? Right? And once these freeloaders find out how much their government actually costs, that'll make a small government capitalist out of them. Once they actually 'feel the Bern' (geddit? Feel the... Bern?), all that wonderful socialist rhetoric will suddenly grow a 'sticker-shock' price tag. Mmm-hmm.

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 20:36:03   #
Lonewolf
 
Photo shop

Larry the Legend wrote:
OK, you asked for it! Here you go:

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 27 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.