One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Real Decision With Respect to Roy Moore
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
Nov 14, 2017 21:18:21   #
moldyoldy
 
Worried for our children wrote:
That’s disturbing, Moldy. Perhaps the only remedy is segregating Capital Hill according to gender...? Nah, that won’t work either, because according to the progressive left, we can change our gender at any given moment.


Young girls and old men, moore would fit right in.

Reply
Nov 14, 2017 22:54:32   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
moldyoldy wrote:
I guess they do not need another sexual predator in their rank

Nearly 50 people, including congressional lawmakers and current and past aides, say they have personally experienced sexual harassment on Capitol Hill or know others who have, CNN is reporting.
According to the news network, sexual harassment is pervasive throughout Congress.

And CNN revealed there is a "creep list," consisting of lawmakers known for inappropriate behavior. The list is passed by word-of-mouth and includes male members known for everything from making sexually suggests comments and seeking physical relations.
The unwritten list is made up primarily of those House members, notorious for inappropriate behavior, CNN reported.
"Amongst ourselves, we know," a former Senate aide told CNN referring to sexual harassers. "There is a certain code amongst us, we acknowledge among each other what occur."

Women working on the Hill say elevators are often the place where staff and members target females. They say they have been advised to stop riding alone with men if possible, CNN said.
Capitol Hill is described by one Senate aide as "a sort of old school, Wild West workplace culture that has a lot of  'work hard, play hard' ethos and without the sort of standard professionalism that you find in more traditional workplaces."

With "so many young women" working on Capitol Hill, many of the men "have no self-control," one ex-House aide told CNN.
Some of the women interviewed by CNN specifically cited a Texas congressman for inappropriate behavior, while more than a half dozen named a California congressman for pursuing women staffers, the news network said.
CNN did not name any lawmakers since the stories were unverified.

The Committee on House Administration is meeting on Tuesday for a hearing on harassment on Capitol Hill, The New York Times reported.
And the Times noted, it too interviewed more than 50 people and found sexual harassment has been an occupation hazard on Capitol Hill.
I guess they do not need another sexual predator i... (show quote)


moldy: sense 1997 over15 million Taxpayer dollars have gone to keeping these harassment cases quelled and silenced!

Reply
Nov 14, 2017 22:57:24   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Young girls and old men, moore would fit right in.


I’m having difficulty in seeing how what you said, connects to what I said. Are you suggesting that Moore likes old men as much, or the same as he supposedly likes young girls? Is this an attempt at humor? Help me out, Moldy.

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2017 05:53:35   #
samtheyank
 
mark medicus wrote:
AMAZING, All the years of service, and now, and now, and now, the democrat weapon of choice ..called " allegations of " is now caused a shadow on a man who for decades has served the people of Alabama...WHY NOW?


Good question! Why now? Remember what they tried to do Clarence Thomas and those young men who attended Duke University. They were all guilty until the Trith came out and sit them free. People who lie and bring forth false allegations should be held accountable for their actions. If what they say cannot be proven as truth, they should be sued and placed the poor house. If this happens to enough people, they will think twice before they open their mouths.

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 05:58:49   #
samtheyank
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Young girls and old men, moore would fit right in.


Moldy,

You are full of $&it. Most of the time you never make any sense. White Noise!

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 06:14:05   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
Plain Logic, I am sure they were paid well by Soros, or Clinton to lie. Can't believe anything the left tries to do.
If he is guilty, need real proof, not these flakes that has to stutter and try to read a speech someone else wrote for her.
I pray he is not guilty, and wins.

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 07:58:35   #
mongo Loc: TEXAS
 
samtheyank wrote:
Good question! Why now? Remember what they tried to do Clarence Thomas and those young men who attended Duke University. They were all guilty until the Trith came out and sit them free. People who lie and bring forth false allegations should be held accountable for their actions. If what they say cannot be proven as truth, they should be sued and placed the poor house. If this happens to enough people, they will think twice before they open their mouths.


I agree with you, They should be held accountable for attempting to assassinate
someones character with lies, and suffer the consequences of their false allegations!

SEMPER FI

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2017 08:39:56   #
Sassy Lass
 
Tgards79 wrote:
Because of Weinstein. So what. The real issue is whether you think the women are telling the truth. Why in the world would they throw their own lives into chaos, by lying, just to possibly swing an election? Are you kidding?


I think they're "telling the truth" now because they were paid for a sob story!

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 09:03:36   #
Lonewolf
 
I'll bet no woman in the wh wants to be caught alone in the same room as trump



moldyoldy wrote:
I guess they do not need another sexual predator in their rank

Nearly 50 people, including congressional lawmakers and current and past aides, say they have personally experienced sexual harassment on Capitol Hill or know others who have, CNN is reporting.
According to the news network, sexual harassment is pervasive throughout Congress.

And CNN revealed there is a "creep list," consisting of lawmakers known for inappropriate behavior. The list is passed by word-of-mouth and includes male members known for everything from making sexually suggests comments and seeking physical relations.
The unwritten list is made up primarily of those House members, notorious for inappropriate behavior, CNN reported.
"Amongst ourselves, we know," a former Senate aide told CNN referring to sexual harassers. "There is a certain code amongst us, we acknowledge among each other what occur."

Women working on the Hill say elevators are often the place where staff and members target females. They say they have been advised to stop riding alone with men if possible, CNN said.
Capitol Hill is described by one Senate aide as "a sort of old school, Wild West workplace culture that has a lot of  'work hard, play hard' ethos and without the sort of standard professionalism that you find in more traditional workplaces."

With "so many young women" working on Capitol Hill, many of the men "have no self-control," one ex-House aide told CNN.
Some of the women interviewed by CNN specifically cited a Texas congressman for inappropriate behavior, while more than a half dozen named a California congressman for pursuing women staffers, the news network said.
CNN did not name any lawmakers since the stories were unverified.

The Committee on House Administration is meeting on Tuesday for a hearing on harassment on Capitol Hill, The New York Times reported.
And the Times noted, it too interviewed more than 50 people and found sexual harassment has been an occupation hazard on Capitol Hill.
I guess they do not need another sexual predator i... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 09:14:57   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
He's a lot of noise but I don't think white is any of it.
samtheyank wrote:
Moldy,

You are full of $&it. Most of the time you never make any sense. White Noise!

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 09:37:31   #
moldyoldy
 
Sassy Lass wrote:
I think they're "telling the truth" now because they were paid for a sob story!


Only one has a lawyer, there is nothing to gain for the others because of the statute of limitations.

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2017 11:01:35   #
grey gringo Loc: South Texas
 
Tgards79 wrote:
Moore's defenders are saying "innocent until proven guilty." But he is not on trial. He is running for the Senate. Alabamans have to decide whether they should send this man to Washington to represent them in the Senate. The standard is not "innocent until proven guilty." It is what do Alabamans think about this man based on what they have read by the time Election Day occurs. There will be no trial by then to determine either guilt or innocence. So that cannot be the standard. Alabamans have to make their own judgment on the merits. You have to ask yourself, why would these women make this up out of whole cloth, throwing their lives into utter disarray? Simply to try to swing an election? That seems unlikely to me. Their stories are detailed. Moore has not denied that he dated teenagers, and plenty of people seem to have corroborated that he hung around in malls and dated teenage girls. The important thing, Alabamans: judge the man by yourself, now, based on what you have read. Don't hide behind "innocent until proven guilty" because that would be true if he shot a man yesterday in cold blood. Just because there is no time for a trial does not preclude guilt. You have to figure that out yourself on this one.
Moore's defenders are saying "innocent until ... (show quote)


You speak of a trial? there will be no trial, the statute of limitations apply here, and the accusers know it. Additionally Gloria Allred is representing at least one of the accusers, and she has often brought false testimony against political opponents...the presumption of innocence does apply when you look at the representation of the accusers and their political persuasion.

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 11:07:02   #
Tgards79
 
JFlorio wrote:
That’s because of your ideology. If you were honest I’ll bet you didn't believe Bill Clinton’s accusers, of which there were just as many, or show the same level of outrage.
No, you are wrong, I did believe them. He was accused of having affairs with adult women, which I thought was bad and morally bankrupt, but not an impeachable offense. Roy Moore is accused of groping and molesting teenagers, which is far worse.

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 11:08:07   #
Lonewolf
 
this man is bad news I don't know why one voter would want him elected through off the court twice we got a nut in the wh we don't need another one from either party.

jSmitty45 wrote:
Plain Logic, I am sure they were paid well by Soros, or Clinton to lie. Can't believe anything the left tries to do.
If he is guilty, need real proof, not these flakes that has to stutter and try to read a speech someone else wrote for her.
I pray he is not guilty, and wins.

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 11:09:15   #
moldyoldy
 
grey gringo wrote:
You speak of a trial? there will be no trial, the statute of limitations apply here, and the accusers know it. Additionally Gloria Allred is representing at least one of the accusers, and she has often brought false testimony against political opponents...the presumption of innocence does apply when you look at the representation of the accusers and their political persuasion.


The last one was definitely a trump supporter and voter. Another one did sign language interpretations for democrats, so in GOP talk, she is a rabid Marxist.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.