When you display comments,,, like the "infidel" patches on our uniforms,,, and the Asalam Alaykum on peterS's posts,,, with the leftist slant,,,,,
the intent is to inflame,,,, the context was then added about islam,,, instead of Christianity,,,,,,,
I did not attack the person,,,, he has offensive statements on his avatar,,,,,, yet pretends to be peaceful and "among the attacked" ie a phony,,,,,,,, all the while he attacks other persons religious opinions,,,, which are covered under the constitution.....
My topic was his phoniness,,,I was not aware that you are in charge of deciding what we talk about,, sorry,, I will check with you first in the future
Worried for our children wrote:
Ok. But what do his signature statements have to do with the topic? The topic is the "message" that I'm referring to. If the topic was muslims/islam, then I could make the connection.
I'm not fighting his fights, he can handle himself just fine. I'm just trying to point out the distinction between attacking the message, and not the person, in an effort to bring OPP toward civility.
Btw, I was looking for another post of yours about my turdnest quote, don't remember what you said exactly, but you thought I should leave it. Just wanted to thank you for your opinion, I intended it as open question for anyone to offer their thoughts. Did you delete it?
Ok. But what do his signature statements have to d... (
show quote)