One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Newest Pictures | Search | Login | Register | Help
Main
If selling a wedding cake to a gay couple means...then...
(?)
If you would like to post a reply, then please login (if you already have an account) or register (if you don't).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 next>>
Oct 10, 2017 22:40:38   #
PeterS (a regular here)
 
Good question.


 
Oct 10, 2017 22:49:40   #
JW (a regular here)
 
There's nothing in the Bible suggesting owning a weapon is an abomination.
Oct 10, 2017 22:52:28   #
Ve'hoe (a regular here)
 
What about a Dr who participates in boring a hole in the head of a baby in whats called an abortion,,,,, did the dr murder???

This is a good question too,,,,, because someone dies in these,,,,, if they are successful, nobody dies in a wedding..........


PeterS wrote:
Good question.
Oct 10, 2017 22:52:43   #
Super Dave (a regular here)
 
PeterS wrote:
Good question.


Not at all. Grow up.

The baker didn't refuse to serve the gay couple other than to participate in the wedding.


Now if a gun owner specifically supplied arms for the purpose of killing someone that would make them complicit in murder.

Otherwise your argument is as dumb as most.
Oct 10, 2017 23:05:16   #
ghostgotcha (a regular here)
 
PeterS wrote:
Good question.


No. That is not a good question. It is quite ignorant and insulting to Christians, Gun owners and Americans.

I feel confident that if you try harder you too can do better.

Sorry. But I still hold out hope for you.
Oct 10, 2017 23:59:58   #
EconomistDon (a regular here)
 
PeterS wrote:
Good question.


A christian gun store owner can refuse to sell a gun to anyone he chooses. And a christian baker can refuse to sell a cake to anyone he chooses. What is so damned hard to understand about that?
 
Oct 11, 2017 00:03:21   #
byronglimish (a regular here)
 
PeterS wrote:
Good question.


Pete, aren't you a Mohammedist?... should you concern yourself with homosexualism??...or maybe it's just a passing fad...
Oct 11, 2017 00:10:46   #
Worried for our children (a regular here)
 
PeterS wrote:
Good question.


Priceless!! Liberal logic, posted by a liberal, from a website called being liberal. Ya done good, Pete.
Oct 11, 2017 00:15:30   #
Worried for our children (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
Pete, aren't you a Mohammedist?... should you concern yourself with homosexualism??...or maybe it's just a passing fad...


Attack the message, not the person. (Please)
Oct 11, 2017 00:25:57   #
byronglimish (a regular here)
 
Worried for our children wrote:
Attack the message, not the person. (Please)


I agree and will try in the future...and some help for yourself too...there is a .. it's over turdnest .. written on the bottom of all your posts...but I will work on my personal attacks, you're right..
Oct 11, 2017 00:36:43   #
Worried for our children (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
I agree and will try in the future...and some help for yourself too...there is a .. it's over turdnest .. written on the bottom of all your posts...but I will work on my personal attacks, you're right..


Thank you. The quote you're referencing, is his quote, with the time and date he said it, when he realized it was over for Clinton. I could almost hear his exasperation. But if you consider it offending toward him, or rude or what have you... I'm opened to suggestions, I know I'm not perfect either, and appreciate your input. Should I remove his quote?
 
Oct 11, 2017 00:48:36   #
byronglimish (a regular here)
 
Worried for our children wrote:
Thank you. The quote you're referencing, is his quote, with the time and date he said it, when he realized it was over for Clinton. I could almost hear his exasperation. But if you consider it offending toward him, or rude or what have you... I'm opened to suggestions, I know I'm not perfect either, and appreciate your input. Should I remove his quote?


Well we know that Administration has just posted a warning about raising the kindness bar on posts..but I do hope it doesn't go overboard with sugar-coating ...who knows..some people's humor is not as refined as others...but thanks for the heads up to me...
Oct 11, 2017 00:50:35   #
Gatsby
 
If the "gun buyer" tells the seller, in advance, that he intends to use said gun to commit murder?

I reckon they'd call that being an "accessary before the fact".



PeterS wrote:
Good question.
Oct 11, 2017 01:16:16   #
Worried for our children (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
Well we know that Administration has just posted a warning about raising the kindness bar on posts..

That's where I was going with that.
Quote:
but I do hope it doesn't go overboard with sugar-coating ...

Me too.
Quote:
who knows..some people's humor is not as refined as others...

You're right, not everyone has the same sense of humor. I think if the humor is directed toward the message, and not the person, it could be a beginning step in a better direction.
Quote:
but thanks for the heads up to me...

And thanks for yours to me. You didn't respond to my question though....
Oct 11, 2017 01:37:58   #
Worried for our children (a regular here)
 
byronglimish wrote:
I believe that turdnest can handle the jest..


Thank you. I think he can too. I was actually thinking about changing it the other day, it's been up long enough. Just haven't found anything I like.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 next>>
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2016 IDF International Technologies, Inc.