One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A serious question for those who support abortion.
Page <<first <prev 5 of 14 next> last>>
Sep 21, 2017 10:40:55   #
GRB777
 
Murder is wrong on every level. GOD'S law forbids it. Professing Christians claim his law has been done away, what rubbish. Others claim that GOD instructed Joshua to kill and wipe out whole civilizations, like the sons of Anak. This is the problem with ignorance; the sons of Anak were not human. They were hybrid giants produced from fallen angels and human women- Gen.6. The flood drowned the giants but human DNA was contaminated; including many animal species. GOD didn't create monsters like the T-Rex, fallen angels did that. GOD doesn't compromise with his law, men do that. Men choose to do the wrong thing, claim that it's the right thing to do , problem solved, there is no problem. NASA, your minister, your teachers have all lied to you. You're responsible for your behavior; educate yourself and get all things right. Don't believe me, proof all things for yourself.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 10:41:10   #
JW
 
no propaganda please wrote:
those things are morally correct within their own contexts/cultures. They are morally incorrect in our context/culture. The whole sense of moral relativism is stated in those two sentences.

That is the total definition of moral relativism, and is right in order of the 45 Current Goals of communism which is one of the destruction of Western Culture by declaring God's law to be null and void. That you validate that means that you are not a moral conservative, no matter what you claim. You may be a fiscal conservative but that is only a small part of the entire concept that founded this country.
those things are morally correct within their own ... (show quote)


Where did I say I validated anything? I am arguing a position, not necessarily my position.

I'll give you a brief statement of my position:

I demand the right to live my life within the bounds of the law, under the US Constitution, as written, without interference from busybodies and self styled do-gooders, usually called Democrats, but not limited to them. I grant that I must guarantee that right to those with whom I may disagree in order that my own right might be secured.

On abortion; it is the law of the land. If performed within the first twenty weeks, I see it as a woman's decision and no one else's. After twenty weeks I am personally opposed to it and beyond the point of independent viability, I consider it a crime, the law does not.

On religion; the right to follow ones religious and moral codes is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights which does not restrict where it may be practiced. The right to openly display one's religious convictions is guaranteed by the First Amendment and the court's modern restrictions are a violation of the intent and the guarantees of that amendment.

On financial matters; every agreement with the government involves a restriction of personal rights. The less we get from the government the less encumbered our liberties remain. Ideally, the government should be limited to protecting the nation and fixing the roads, period.

On the law; we have means and methods granted us by the Founders to adapt to changing conditions brought on by circumstances and time. That does not include legislating from the judge's bench.

If you don't think those positions define Conservatism, you really have no understanding of Conservatism.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 10:44:18   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
JW wrote:
Define for me what is a human being.

Dictionary.com
human being
noun
1. Any individual of the genus Homo, especially a member of the species Homo sapiens.
2. A person, especially as distinguished from other animals or as representing the human species.

For a biblical definition of a person, see link below:

http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionaries/bakers-evangelical-dictionary/person-personhood.html

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2017 10:44:22   #
Kazudy
 
JW wrote:
I said nothing about killing anything. I said if it can't experience life, it isn't alive. In a coma or brain dead on life sustaining technology, a living organism for sure, alive, hardly.

To you it is killing a human life. To those supporting abortion, it is something very different. It is, to them, like an appendectomy or a transfusion. What you hold to be moral certainties are not so to everyone. To assume the right to impose your view on others is called despotism.

I am a Conservative but one thing that has always bothered me about my fellow Conservatives is their absolute commitment to get that fetus through the birth canal and their equal ardor for abandoning it the second it's born. The innate hypocrisy is mind boggling in its openness.
I said nothing about killing anything. I said if i... (show quote)

Don't lie to yourself, you are not a conservative.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 10:54:17   #
JW
 
Super Dave wrote:
Separate being with human DNA. Not technical, but it gets the job done.

Do you have children? If not do you have any living family member? How do you know they're human?



That defines the human, the creature. What is a human being?

I have children. I have family. I accept that they are human beings as a matter of convenience and convention because they function within society at competent levels as opposed to my cats that also function in my society but not at what are generally considered competent human levels.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 10:58:36   #
JW
 
Kazudy wrote:
Yes tomatoes have two sides, but this is not a tomatoe that you murderes are slicing, they are innocent children, that have not been convicted of any crime. Yet YOU don't care. Do you have children or grandchildren JW??


You are missing the point. There are TWO sides that both deserve consideration. I find self-righteous ignorance of opposing views offensive.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 11:00:55   #
JW
 
Kazudy wrote:
Don't lie to yourself, you are not a conservative.


You are not in a position to judge me nor do you set the standard of conservatism.

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2017 11:04:45   #
JW
 
mwdegutis wrote:
Dictionary.com
human being
noun
1. Any individual of the genus Homo, especially a member of the species Homo sapiens.
2. A person, especially as distinguished from other animals or as representing the human species.

For a biblical definition of a person, see link below:

http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionaries/bakers-evangelical-dictionary/person-personhood.html



As I've said elsewhere, your #1 defines the creature, not the being. Your #2 might define the being but the Bible is your authority, not a scientific authority. You are not bound by science if you so choose, I am not bound by your religious conventions if I so choose.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 11:07:01   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
JW wrote:
Where did I say I validated anything? I am arguing a position, not necessarily my position.

I'll give you a brief statement of my position:

I demand the right to live my life within the bounds of the law, under the US Constitution, as written, without interference from busybodies and self styled do-gooders, usually called Democrats, but not limited to them. I grant that I must guarantee that right to those with whom I may disagree in order that my own right might be secured.

On abortion; it is the law of the land. If performed within the first twenty weeks, I see it as a woman's decision and no one else's. After twenty weeks I am personally opposed to it and beyond the point of independent viability, I consider it a crime.

On religion; the right to follow ones religious and moral codes is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights which does not restrict where it may be practiced. The right to openly display one's religious convictions is guaranteed by the First Amendment and the court's modern restrictions are a violation of the intent and the guarantees of that amendment.

On financial matters; every agreement with the government involves a restriction of personal rights. The less we get from the government the less encumbered our liberties remain. Ideally, the government should be limited to protecting the nation and fixing the roads, period.

On the law; we have means and methods granted us by the Founders to adapt to changing conditions brought on by circumstances and time. That does not include legislating from the judge's bench.

If you don't think those positions define Conservatism, you really have no understanding of Conservatism.
Where did I say I validated anything? I am arguing... (show quote)


Who told you that you were a conservative?

Conservatives believe in the sanctity of life, and the protection of innocent human life.

At one time, the humanity of a fetus was unknown. Now it's a medical/scientific 100% clinically proven certainty. This is not a consensus conclusion, guestimate, approximation, speculation or prediction. It's a proven fact.

Again, please answer.

How do you know your children are human beings? Are you certain that they are entitled to protection from a post-birth abortion?

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 11:15:05   #
JW
 
Super Dave wrote:
Who told you that you were a conservative?

Conservatives believe in the sanctity of life, and the protection of innocent human life.

At one time, the humanity of a fetus was unknown. Now it's a medical/scientific 100% clinically proven certainty. This is not a consensus conclusion, guestimate, approximation, speculation or prediction. It's a proven fact.

Again, please answer.

How do you know your children are human beings? Are you certain that they are entitled to protection from a post-birth abortion?
Who told you that you were a conservative? br br ... (show quote)


Conservatives believe in many things. Not all agree on all points. One thing all Conservatives must agree on is the right to live one's own life. Fail in that and you are no Conservative. Fail in that and you're not even American.

I answered your question.

Post birth abortion? Really? You are sounding like an anti-abortion fanatic, not a political Conservative.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 11:21:06   #
JimMe
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
I assume some of you have children who you love very much. Probably grandchildren too. Here's a question for you. Actually, not really a question but a suggestion. Think about how different your life would be if your children had been aborted. Just think about it.



Mr Bombastic... I'm a single man who never has fathered a child, or been married and adopted a child, so, I think a woman should have the right to have an abortion within the first 13 weeks, or the first trimester of pregnancy, if she thinks she doesn't want to deliver another life into this world...

Now, I have concerns when the woman is under the age of 18 because her parents or legal guardians are legally responsible for the pregnant girl, and probably the girl's unborn child, so, I think the girl would need at least one of her parents or legal guardians written permission to have the abortion...

And after 13 weeks, the fetus has a heartbeat and the concern of a human's right to life becomes viable enough to limit abortions from that time forward...

Finally, I see Abortion Laws as a State Issue, and the USA Federal Government should not be Legislating, Regulating, nor Adjudicating Abortion Laws...

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2017 11:32:05   #
JW
 
Super Dave wrote:
Who told you that you were a conservative?

Conservatives believe in the sanctity of life,...


Some do, some don't. People like you set a special premium on anything carrying homo sapiens DNA but your regard for life is a myth. I happen to regard all life as equally valuable to the individual creature and each creature as the owner of its own life. The systems of survival as designed by your acknowledged Creator belies that sanctity and is the foundation of the human arrogance I find detestable.

I am never surprised by the lengths people will go to in order to set themselves next to being gods... even above the angels.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 12:59:10   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
JW wrote:
Conservatives believe in many things. Not all agree on all points. One thing all Conservatives must agree on is the right to live one's own life. Fail in that and you are no Conservative. Fail in that and you're not even American.

I answered your question.

Post birth abortion? Really? You are sounding like an anti-abortion fanatic, not a political Conservative.
IOW, you can't answer.

Conservatives do believe many things. But....

Conservatives do not believe that innocent human life is not worth protecting, or that any human being is the property of another.

You can call yourself a conservative, a progressive are the Queen of England. It doesn't matter what you call yourself. If you accept abortion for convenience you're not a conservative.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 13:11:06   #
JW
 
Super Dave wrote:
IOW, you can't answer.

Conservatives do believe many things. But....

Conservatives do not believe that innocent human life is not worth protecting, or that any human being is the property of another.

You can call yourself a conservative, a progressive are the Queen of England. It doesn't matter what you call yourself. If you accept abortion for convenience you're not a conservative.


I did answer. Go back and read what I wrote.

I accept abortion because it is the law and because I have no right to interfere with the lawful conduct of another person's life. If you disagree with that, you are a fanatic nut job, not a Conservative.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 14:15:29   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
JW wrote:
As I've said elsewhere, your #1 defines the creature, not the being. Your #2 might define the being but the Bible is your authority, not a scientific authority. You are not bound by science if you so choose, I am not bound by your religious conventions if I so choose.

So what's the "scientific" definition of a human being?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.