Refute This (Page 6): Gopher. It tastes like chicken.

Loki Loc: Georgia

slatten49 wrote:

Then, what the heck are they serving up at KFC, Popeye's, Church's & Chick-Filet

Gopher. It tastes like chicken.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

samtheyank wrote:

The egg came first. W/O the egg, the chicken could not be born. It has to be this way. If there is anyone who disagrees with me, that person doesn't know science and is anti intellectual. I have an 80 I.Q. I am smarter than everyone else.

If your so smart, who sat on and hatched the egg... egghead.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Peewee wrote:

If your so smart, who sat on and hatched the egg... egghead.

"If your so smart, who sat on and hatched the egg... egghead."
Peewee; A surrogate chicken!!!!!

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

eagleye13 wrote:

"If your so smart, who sat on and hatched the egg... egghead."
Peewee; A surrogate chicken!!!!!

So, I'm assuming my IQ has to be higher than yours, but I've never been tested that I can remember.

kcstargoat

Bevos wrote:

Sure, that's the answer to creation - God did it. A more complicated answer is in the making - evolution. Rely on 'GOD', a mystical being who is all powerful and immortal and judges a person as bad or good. The bad ones go to hell, while the good ones get an all-expense paid stay in heaven. Doesn't that sound like some morality play for children?

thinksense

kcstargoat wrote:

Sure, that's the answer to creation - God did it. A more complicated answer is in the making - evolution. Rely on 'GOD', a mystical being who is all powerful and immortal and judges a person as bad or good. The bad ones go to hell, while the good ones get an all-expense paid stay in heaven. Doesn't that sound like some morality play for children?

The bad ones go to earth. Didn't you know why I created this planet?

Better hurry up and finish your nonsense, I'm about to awaken from this silly dream and you'll all disappear like a puff of smoke.

samtheyank

eagleye13 wrote:

"If your so smart, who sat on and hatched the egg... egghead."
Peewee; A surrogate chicken!!!!!

That is a good one. I like that comment!

Big dog

Mr Bombastic wrote:

Thank you. Nice to see at least one person has some common sense. Anyone else?

Well sure, of course. I thought EVERYONE knew that.

usewillow

Mr Bombastic wrote:

God is the only rational explanation for why anyth... (show quote)

I have no problem with this but I do have a couple about creation. First the "Big Bang" where did the "stuff" that was in the first bang come from? Now if all this stuff contains everything known and unknown (dark matter comes to mind) and everything is still expanding what is it expanding into? So far I have not heard any science persons make any comment about that part. So as you have said "The universe requires a Creator. Nothing else makes any sense."

Gatsby

If reason provided proof, then faith would have no merit.

Richard94611 wrote:

Wrong. The existence of God is NOT a rational explanation. Belief in God is an act of faith. You assume that something physical created itself. It is quite possible that the universe has ALWAYS existed, a possibility you don't take into account. That would be a much more rational explanation. There is no proof that the universe has not always existed, only your statement that there has been a beginning.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Richard94611 wrote:

I point out to our readers that your simple statement that the soul exists does not prove that it does. Your post here is based on faith and is nonsense.

You presume Faith is blind but faith IS BASED on knowledge and God is the greatest of all reality. It's a shame you don't simply doubt but choose to deny. In that act alone you exercise an option available to no other creature......free will.

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

padremike wrote:

You presume Faith is blind but faith IS BASED on knowledge and God is the greatest of all reality. It's a shame you don't simply doubt but choose to deny. In that act alone you exercise an option available to no other creature......free will.

samtheyank

usewillow wrote:

I have no problem with this but I do have a couple about creation. First the "Big Bang" where did the "stuff" that was in the first bang come from? Now if all this stuff contains everything known and unknown (dark matter comes to mind) and everything is still expanding what is it expanding into? So far I have not heard any science persons make any comment about that part. So as you have said "The universe requires a Creator. Nothing else makes any sense."

It will all come out in the wash in time. Man is not as smart as he thinks he is. He is a cosmic dust particle compared to the size of the entire Universe.

sisboombaa

samtheyank wrote:

The egg came first. W/O the egg, the chicken could not be born. It has to be this way. If there is anyone who disagrees with me, that person doesn't know science and is anti intellectual. I have an 80 I.Q. I am smarter than everyone else.

When you use the word "came" if you mean orgasm I would have to say the chicken came first as I never heard of an egg having an orgasm. Come to think of it I never heard of a chicken having an orgasm. All I know is that they both taste good. And one can prepare both many different ways before serving. Just enjoy your meal and give your weary head a needed rest. The question of chicken vs egg is not addressed in the constitution (man's law) nor the bible (God's law) so why is this question so important to provide an answer?

samtheyank

sisboombaa wrote:

When you use the word "came" if you mean... (show quote)

It is fun to debate it. Most people know that there isn't any point of finality. When people debate this simple issue, you can determine their level of thinking and their ability to express it in the written form or by what they say with their brain.