Obama returns to his roots.
You people have a quick, stupid answer for everything and, like yor hero Trump, it's usually based on nothing. The Nobel prizes are not, and never have been political. They are awarded for genuine accomplishments, not dreams. Watson and Crick were awarded one for discovering the structure of chromsomes. Bob Dylan got one last year for poetry. Not every catagory is awarded every year. Try actually reading about them before you shoot off your mouth and display your appalling ignorance about nearly everything. And don't worry, I'm sure your microwave isn't filming you so you can get that off your mind.
eagleye13 wrote:
The Nobel Peace Prize has been political for as far as I can remember. It is ridiculous now. Norwegian socialists control it as far as I recollect. Correct me if I am wrong.
The prize was named for Alfred Nobel the Swedish inventor of dynamite. So when Obama got it I would call that a dud.
Skkyeviolet wrote:
You people have a quick, stupid answer for everything and, like yor hero Trump, it's usually based on nothing. The Nobel prizes are not, and never have been political. They are awarded for genuine accomplishments, not dreams. Watson and Crick were awarded one for discovering the structure of chromsomes. Bob Dylan got one last year for poetry. Not every catagory is awarded every year. Try actually reading about them before you shoot off your mouth and display your appalling ignorance about nearly everything. And don't worry, I'm sure your microwave isn't filming you so you can get that off your mind.
You people have a quick, stupid answer for everyth... (
show quote)
What "ACCOMPLISHMENT" did Obama get it for??? Because he did not UNITE anybody as you say. He did MORE DIVIDING of the American people than ANYBODY EVER HAS BEFORE!!! He ran around the World APOLOGIZING for the US for EVERYTHING under the SUN, and told a bunch of LIES, LIES, LIES!!! As it turned out, They were SORRY they gave it to him. And wished they could take it BACK!!! Check it out for yourself!!!
Skkyeviolet wrote:
He won it for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between all people. He was working to promote a global community without nuclear weapons and he continues to work toward that goal. The Nobel prize committee found that goal to have a unique and special importance so they chose to give him the prize in 2009. Pretty impressive for a president some people here have labelled the most corrupt president ever. But then I don't think any of them have ever really studied his presidency. I've taken some time to read about the things he did when he was in office. i think many are quite impressive. I don't feel comfortable with labeling people until I have something to base it on. That doesn't seem to be the case with many here.
He won it for his extraordinary efforts to strengt... (
show quote)
skkyeviolet, you claim Obama won the Nobel Peace prize," for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between all people." Was that part of his very first international tour where Obama dished the USA by apologizing to every country he visited for all the bad things the USA has done? Or was it for his Domestic policy of dividing the races and allowing more minorities than ever to become welfare recipients?
You also claimed; "He was working to promote a global community without nuclear weapons and he continues to work toward that goal." Are you referring to, or did you forget Obama's Nuclear deal with Iran? That was an intelligent move, not.
How about Obama and the Democrat's failed attempt at a single Payer, (Government Controlled) Healthcare system? "The Patients Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) sure took a noise dive. Obama's incompetency is much too extensive to delineate in this forum, therefore..........
Suffice it to say, Barack Hussein Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Price simply because he was elected the first Black Muslim President of the United States, by a Socialist Nobel Price committee.
Bevos wrote:
What "ACCOMPLISHMENT" did Obama get it for??? Because he did not UNITE anybody as you say. He did MORE DIVIDING of the American people than ANYBODY EVER HAS BEFORE!!! He ran around the World APOLOGIZING for the US for EVERYTHING under the SUN, and told a bunch of LIES, LIES, LIES!!! As it turned out, They were SORRY they gave it to him. And wished they could take it BACK!!! Check it out for yourself!!!
Try going back and reading the speechs, the public records on the programs he promoted and all the other verifiable evidence of what he worked for as president before you flig out your snarky remarks. I do that, as a rule before spouting my opinions as opposed to mearly repeating rumors. As to the Nobel- I paraphased my remarks from the Awards site and no one there has ever mentioned taking it back. I can back up my remarks based on the souces above. Can you produce the same level of unbiased sources to validate yours? I doubt you can.
patron1 wrote:
skkyeviolet, you claim Obama won the Nobel Peace prize," for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between all people." Was that part of his very first international tour where Obama dished the USA by apologizing to every country he visited for all the bad things the USA has done? Or was it for his Domestic policy of dividing the races and allowing more minorities than ever to become welfare recipients?
You also claimed; "He was working to promote a global community without nuclear weapons and he continues to work toward that goal." Are you referring to, or did you forget Obama's Nuclear deal with Iran? That was an intelligent move, not.
How about Obama and the Democrat's failed attempt at a single Payer, (Government Controlled) Healthcare system? "The Patients Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) sure took a noise dive. Obama's incompetency is much too extensive to delineate in this forum, therefore..........
Suffice it to say, Barack Hussein Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Price simply because he was elected the first Black Muslim President of the United States, by a Socialist Nobel Price committee.
skkyeviolet, you claim Obama won the Nobel Peace p... (
show quote)
My remarks were paraphrased from the Nobel site. Try reading that for yourself and read the speechs he gave and the other verifiable sources before you repeat rumors based on little to nothing.
Skkyeviolet wrote:
My remarks were paraphrased from the Nobel site. Try reading that for yourself and read the speechs he gave and the other verifiable sources before you repeat rumors based on little to nothing.
I'll grant you that Obama gave good speech presentations, a very charismatic speaker, however, Obama's speeches were nothing but lies and B.S.
Some of the Nobel Prize committee expressed regrets for awarding the Peace prize to Obama, because it was based on what they expected Obama to accomplish as president and not what he had accomplished. The Prize is usually given for an outstanding actual Accomplishment, not an anticipated accomplishment.
The peace prize committee even fell short on Obama's projected accomplishments, because he did nothing but try his best to destroy the United States of America, in 8 years. And he increased the National debt by $9.5 TRILLION to almost $20 TRILLION, in just 8 years, after excoriating George Bush for increasing the national debt by $4 TRILLION in his 8 years.
"Obama was the first U.S. president to receive the award during his first year in office (at eight and a half months, after being nominated with less than two weeks in office)." Now, again, tell me, that this prize was awarded to Barack Hussein Obama, our first Black Muslim President on his accomplishments after only two weeks in office.
It's time you Socialist Democrat's wake up to some hard facts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Nobel_Peace_Prize
patron1 wrote:
I'll grant you that Obama gave good speech presentations, a very charismatic speaker, however, Obama's speeches were nothing but lies and B.S.
Some of the Nobel Prize committee expressed regrets for awarding the Peace prize to Obama, because it was based on what they expected Obama to accomplish as president and not what he had accomplished. The Prize is usually given for an outstanding actual Accomplishment, not an anticipated accomplishment.
The peace prize committee even fell short on Obama's projected accomplishments, because he did nothing but try his best to destroy the United States of America, in 8 years. And he increased the National debt by $9.5 TRILLION to almost $20 TRILLION, in just 8 years, after excoriating George Bush for increasing the national debt by $4 TRILLION in his 8 years.
"Obama was the first U.S. president to receive the award during his first year in office (at eight and a half months, after being nominated with less than two weeks in office)." Now, again, tell me, that this prize was awarded to Barack Hussein Obama, our first Black Muslim President on his accomplishments after only two weeks in office.
It's time you Socialist Democrat's wake up to some hard facts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Nobel_Peace_PrizeI'll grant you that Obama gave good speech present... (
show quote)
Believe whatever you want. I found no evidence that what you say about the prize is true. My email to the committee came with a response that completely contradicts what you say. I never found Obama's speeches to be easy to listen to. In fact, I found him to be boring. As for America, I've read extensively on many presidencies and he was one of the better ones.
Skkyeviolet wrote:
Try going back and reading the speechs, the public records on the programs he promoted and all the other verifiable evidence of what he worked for as president before you flig out your snarky remarks. I do that, as a rule before spouting my opinions as opposed to mearly repeating rumors. As to the Nobel- I paraphased my remarks from the Awards site and no one there has ever mentioned taking it back. I can back up my remarks based on the souces above. Can you produce the same level of unbiased sources to validate yours? I doubt you can.
Try going back and reading the speechs, the public... (
show quote)
OH! You must be talking about his CAMPAIGN SPEECHES. WHAT programs had he "promoted" BEFORE he became POTUS??? NOTHING but the Housing for Blacks in Chicago!!! THAT was the ONLY thing he had done. And So had MANY other people promoted it!!! Why didn't THEY get a Nobel Peace Prize for it???
FACE IT, he got the Prize ONLY because he was Black and managed to wangle his way into the Presidency!!!
Skkyeviolet wrote:
Believe whatever you want. I found no evidence that what you say about the prize is true. My email to the committee came with a response that completely contradicts what you say. I never found Obama's speeches to be easy to listen to. In fact, I found him to be boring. As for America, I've read extensively on many presidencies and he was one of the better ones.
Try GOOGLING IT!! You will get all the evidence you need!!!
Skkyeviolet wrote:
Believe whatever you want. I found no evidence that what you say about the prize is true. My email to the committee came with a response that completely contradicts what you say. I never found Obama's speeches to be easy to listen to. In fact, I found him to be boring. As for America, I've read extensively on many presidencies and he was one of the better ones.
And you WON'T EITHER, MAINLY because you DON'T WANT to LOOK!!!
FYI, he was THE WORST POTUS EVER!!!
Bevos wrote:
And you WON'T EITHER, MAINLY because you DON'T WANT to LOOK!!!
FYI, he was THE WORST POTUS EVER!!!
You people's real problem is that he's black.
Skkyeviolet wrote:
You people's real problem is that he's black.
No. YOU PEOPLE's problem is that YOU are NOT WHITE!!!
patron1 wrote:
I'll grant you that Obama gave good speech presentations, a very charismatic speaker, however, Obama's speeches were nothing but lies and B.S.
Some of the Nobel Prize committee expressed regrets for awarding the Peace prize to Obama, because it was based on what they expected Obama to accomplish as president and not what he had accomplished. The Prize is usually given for an outstanding actual Accomplishment, not an anticipated accomplishment.
The peace prize committee even fell short on Obama's projected accomplishments, because he did nothing but try his best to destroy the United States of America, in 8 years. And he increased the National debt by $9.5 TRILLION to almost $20 TRILLION, in just 8 years, after excoriating George Bush for increasing the national debt by $4 TRILLION in his 8 years.
"Obama was the first U.S. president to receive the award during his first year in office (at eight and a half months, after being nominated with less than two weeks in office)." Now, again, tell me, that this prize was awarded to Barack Hussein Obama, our first Black Muslim President on his accomplishments after only two weeks in office.
It's time you Socialist Democrat's wake up to some hard facts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Nobel_Peace_PrizeI'll grant you that Obama gave good speech present... (
show quote)
People say Obama is this great speechifier. I have never felt the magic.
son of witless wrote:
People say Obama is this great speechifier. I have never felt the magic.
I turned him OFF anytime he was giving a speech. I got real SICK of his LIES!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.