One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The secret's out, I suffer from income 'inequality'
Page <<first <prev 6 of 11 next> last>>
Dec 26, 2013 00:08:34   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
emarine wrote:
No... not a problem at all... we were promised them... but the problem I have is with the people who cry socialism when they are apart of it and still use the wording against it.... Especially the ones who praise capitalism while living a socialist life.... there are many shapes and sizes of socialism... not all are bad and sometimes it is necessary.


When we go back & forth over issues These are lines we should keep in mind. I feel they speak of the core of the problem.

Doing one thing & saying another.

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 02:34:35   #
Art
 
vernon wrote:
im on ss and medicare i pay taxes on my ss so you never get the gov out of your pocket.medicare is not free either i paid in from the first day.now i pay 100 a mnth to the gov.i also pay for a insc policy at 110 a month.my wife pays 326 $every three mos.for medicare.and when i die she dosent get any ss from me all she has is a small retirement to get by on.


Yep I see what you mean.

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 04:55:57   #
Art
 
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Art: I don't see Social Security as a extortion! I see it turning into a ponzi scheme ....add this... add them... add more! Its become unsustainable all for just votes. Social Security was never visioned as a full viable program for Americans! Medicare is know different, especially providing Medicaid...also extremely unsustainable! The majority of us have been dumb - down on such programs....neither of the programs were intended to blanket America...only to ease the pain! Now too many will never leave serfdom to solve their own problems......Just what Marxist/Socialist want!
Art: I don't see Social Security as a extortion! ... (show quote)


I found a lot of articles claiming the SS Ponzi scheme a myth from sources such as Forbes, Money, Washington Post. Looking into this further, I found more money has come in than has been paid out in benefits and the unspent money was loaned to the U.S. Government through Bonds.

I think the bigger concept I find puzzling about money or investments is that it is worth only as much as people believe it is. It is only our faith in our money that makes it valuable. So why is there a sales pitch to devalue Social Security and who benefits from such a change in its worth?

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 05:47:50   #
Art
 
emarine wrote:
I don't think its jealousy..... more ironic.....Seems that the people who cry about the dangers of socialism are the ones who benefited the most from it ... Example... 20 year gig in the military followed by a 20 year civil servants job or with a Military contractor.... Even though taxes were paid throughout his career the source of his income were paid from other peoples tax dollars.... no capitalism here... no way to ever balance a budget when too many pull from private sector taxes....basic socialism... As far as social security goes ... I think its a good plan and has provided for many that would not have been capable of doing it for themselves... I have absolutely no jealousy over social security I pay out every year and have no intention of retiring anytime as long as I can work... I like what I do and suck at golf.
I don't think its jealousy..... more ironic.....Se... (show quote)


Tried playing some golf and somehow it was easier hitting my neighbors home than landing on the green.

In 1990 the federal government spent 170 billion dollars on assorted varieties of corporate welfare. The most expensive means tested welfare program, Medicaid, costs the federal government 30 billion dollars a year or about half of the amount corporations receive each year through assorted tax breaks. S.S.I., the federal program for the disabled, receives 13 billion dollars while American businesses are given 17 billion in direct federal aid. The resent corporate bail outs during our recession show corporate welfare has only gotten bigger as our US Government spent trillions covering losses in direct investments in financial institutions, purchases of high-grade corporate debt and purchases of mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.

Even with all the gifts and subsidies and tax breaks, many corporations are moving jobs overseas. Conservatives want entitlement reform while wanting even more tax breaks and more subsidies for corporations while only hinting that they may create more jobs. I believe there some misinformation about who is getting the most money for nothing from our government.

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 10:12:58   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
Art wrote:
Tried playing some golf and somehow it was easier hitting my neighbors home than landing on the green.

In 1990 the federal government spent 170 billion dollars on assorted varieties of corporate welfare. The most expensive means tested welfare program, Medicaid, costs the federal government 30 billion dollars a year or about half of the amount corporations receive each year through assorted tax breaks. S.S.I., the federal program for the disabled, receives 13 billion dollars while American businesses are given 17 billion in direct federal aid. The resent corporate bail outs during our recession show corporate welfare has only gotten bigger as our US Government spent trillions covering losses in direct investments in financial institutions, purchases of high-grade corporate debt and purchases of mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.

Even with all the gifts and subsidies and tax breaks, many corporations are moving jobs overseas. Conservatives want entitlement reform while wanting even more tax breaks and more subsidies for corporations while only hinting that they may create more jobs. I believe there some misinformation about who is getting the most money for nothing from our government.
Tried playing some golf and somehow it was easier ... (show quote)


One should seek out just where all of the money spent by the government goes. Then it is not a bad idea to look for where it all ends up. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 14:03:27   #
vernon
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
One should seek out just where all of the money spent by the government goes. Then it is not a bad idea to look for where it all ends up. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:



now i completely agree with that :thumbup:

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 14:06:34   #
emarine
 
Art wrote:
Tried playing some golf and somehow it was easier hitting my neighbors home than landing on the green.

In 1990 the federal government spent 170 billion dollars on assorted varieties of corporate welfare. The most expensive means tested welfare program, Medicaid, costs the federal government 30 billion dollars a year or about half of the amount corporations receive each year through assorted tax breaks. S.S.I., the federal program for the disabled, receives 13 billion dollars while American businesses are given 17 billion in direct federal aid. The resent corporate bail outs during our recession show corporate welfare has only gotten bigger as our US Government spent trillions covering losses in direct investments in financial institutions, purchases of high-grade corporate debt and purchases of mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.

Even with all the gifts and subsidies and tax breaks, many corporations are moving jobs overseas. Conservatives want entitlement reform while wanting even more tax breaks and more subsidies for corporations while only hinting that they may create more jobs. I believe there some misinformation about who is getting the most money for nothing from our government.
Tried playing some golf and somehow it was easier ... (show quote)


Great post Art :thumbup: :thumbup: it is so easy to kick around and blame the poor when in fact its a bigger problem from the wealthy... big corporations are not creating jobs just profits at the tax payers expense.

Reply
Check out topic: Presidential Immunity
Dec 26, 2013 14:18:05   #
RetNavyCWO Loc: VA suburb of DC
 
vernon wrote:
im on ss and medicare i pay taxes on my ss so you never get the gov out of your pocket.medicare is not free either i paid in from the first day.now i pay 100 a mnth to the gov.i also pay for a insc policy at 110 a month.my wife pays 326 $every three mos.for medicare.and when i die she dosent get any ss from me all she has is a small retirement to get by on.


Unless your wife's SS entitlement is larger than yours, or she has a government pension for work that did not participate in SS, she will get an amount equal to what you are getting now after you die. If she is old enough, she should be able to get a spousal benefit now equal to about half of what you are getting now, unless she is collecting SS on her own earnings record or has the government pension I mentioned in my first sentence.

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 14:19:36   #
RetNavyCWO Loc: VA suburb of DC
 
Art wrote:
Tried playing some golf and somehow it was easier hitting my neighbors home than landing on the green.

In 1990 the federal government spent 170 billion dollars on assorted varieties of corporate welfare. The most expensive means tested welfare program, Medicaid, costs the federal government 30 billion dollars a year or about half of the amount corporations receive each year through assorted tax breaks. S.S.I., the federal program for the disabled, receives 13 billion dollars while American businesses are given 17 billion in direct federal aid. The resent corporate bail outs during our recession show corporate welfare has only gotten bigger as our US Government spent trillions covering losses in direct investments in financial institutions, purchases of high-grade corporate debt and purchases of mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.

Even with all the gifts and subsidies and tax breaks, many corporations are moving jobs overseas. Conservatives want entitlement reform while wanting even more tax breaks and more subsidies for corporations while only hinting that they may create more jobs. I believe there some misinformation about who is getting the most money for nothing from our government.
Tried playing some golf and somehow it was easier ... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 14:21:42   #
vernon
 
RetNavyCWO wrote:
Unless your wife's SS entitlement is larger than yours, or she has a government pension for work that did not participate in SS, she will get an amount equal to what you are getting now after you die. If she is old enough, she should be able to get a spousal benefit now equal to about half of what you are getting now, unless she is collecting SS on her own earnings record or has the government pension I mentioned in my first sentence.


she worked for the state for 30 yrs and didnt pay into ss.

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 14:23:50   #
vernon
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
When we go back & forth over issues These are lines we should keep in mind. I feel they speak of the core of the problem.

Doing one thing & saying another.


when i pay for something i dont call it socialism to get what i paid for.now if you have been on welfare fpr 5 generations that is socialsm

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 14:26:48   #
Fred Schnaubelt Loc: San Diego
 
emarine via Floyd Brown, please name the good things about Socialism. My wife lived in the USSR for 35 years and yes health care with sterile water was free, however is you wanted medicine you had to pay extra "Na Leva" (under the table). Sweden until the 1950s had one of the world’s fastest growing economies. It tried Socialism and became a basket case. Since eschewing Socialism it is today once again among the strongest economies in Europe.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704698004576104023432243468#printMode

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 14:58:00   #
emarine
 
Fred Schnaubelt wrote:
emarine via Floyd Brown, please name the good things about Socialism. My wife lived in the USSR for 35 years and yes health care with sterile water was free, however is you wanted medicine you had to pay extra "Na Leva" (under the table). Sweden until the 1950s had one of the world’s fastest growing economies. It tried Socialism and became a basket case. Since eschewing Socialism it is today once again among the strongest economies in Europe.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704698004576104023432243468#printMode
emarine via Floyd Brown, please name the good thin... (show quote)


Anything that redistributes something from one to another is a form of socialism.... The US Military... The US Government.... State and local Government...police...fire... Taxes are a necessary redistribution for the basic wellbeing of the American people... like it or not.... fail to pay and they take all your stuff or lock you up in a box... that is unless you have the funds available to buy your way out ... How do you want to define... INEQUALITY .... The wealthy play this game very well... the average American is along for the ride. The poor did not ruin America no matter how many times the wealthy want to say it .

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 14:59:47   #
RetNavyCWO Loc: VA suburb of DC
 
vernon wrote:
she worked for the state for 30 yrs and didnt pay into ss.


The numbers tell the tale, but she might still be entitled to a part of your SS benefit. Read here about the Government Pension Offset:

http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10007.pdf

Reply
Dec 26, 2013 15:03:03   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
emarine wrote:
Anything that redistributes something from one to another is a form of socialism.... The US Military... The US Government.... State and local Government...police...fire... Taxes are a necessary redistribution for the basic wellbeing of the American people... like it or not.... fail to pay and they take all your stuff or lock you up in a box... that is unless you have the funds available to buy your way out ... How do you want to define... INEQUALITY .... The wealthy play this game very well... the average American is along for the ride. The poor did not ruin America no matter how many times the wealthy want to say it .
Anything that redistributes something from one to ... (show quote)


if you liberals would spend as much energy on making something of your selves and less on being jealous of those that have' you very likely would be richer than the ones you are jealous of

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.