One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A Guide to 9-11 Lies
Page <<first <prev 3 of 10 next> last>>
Apr 22, 2016 15:30:07   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
emarine wrote:
What do you call someone with the name The Whole 2th that only posts opinions supported by theory's from extremists?

Someone who doesn't know the difference between "tooth" and "truth".

Reply
Apr 22, 2016 15:49:04   #
emarine
 
LAPhil wrote:
Someone who doesn't know the difference between "tooth" and "truth".



Reply
Apr 22, 2016 16:32:08   #
boofhead
 
whole2th wrote:
What I wrote was that cell phone connections are proven to be impossible above 8000 feet--and especially, the maintaining of contact with a cell tower would not be possible as the 'handoff' to next cell tower would be necessary to maintain the duration of calls described.

It would be easy to fake such calls from the ground with the passengers' cell phones.

You have an agenda which works to conceal Israel's role in 9-11. I have an agenda to expose the truth.



It is still true that you cannot make cell phone calls from an airliner cruising at altitude. If the airplane has wireless connection and you can use it you can text or use email but the only way to make phone calls is if the airplane is wired through satellite and they allow for your phone to connect that way.
That feature was not available on 9/11.
Therefore the supposed calls did not originate from the airplanes.

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2016 16:41:26   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
What do you call someone with the name The Whole 2th that only posts opinions supported by theory's from extremists?


What do you call someone with the name emarine who only posts opinions which defend mass murderers?



Reply
Apr 22, 2016 16:48:08   #
whole2th
 
boofhead wrote:
It is still true that you cannot make cell phone calls from an airliner cruising at altitude. If the airplane has wireless connection and you can use it you can text or use email but the only way to make phone calls is if the airplane is wired through satellite and they allow for your phone to connect that way.
That feature was not available on 9/11.
Therefore the supposed calls did not originate from the airplanes.


Most of what we are told about 9-11, especially from the 9-11 Commission, is crafted deceptions and outright lies.

Meet Philip Zelikow, Executive Director of the 9-11 Commission and primary author of the 9-11 Commission Report. He was one of the key operatives involved int he cover-up of 9-11 AND even part of the planning of 9-11.

And here's just one of many videos and writings which expose this dual US-Israeli citizen who was an insider to the Bush administration and expert at the creation and preservation of public myth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuoQZkBFj9A





Reply
Apr 23, 2016 00:51:58   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
whole2th wrote:
By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
https://therebel.is/en/news/kaminski/876347-a-guide-to-9-11-lies

Probably because of recent incendiary remarks by presidential candidate Donald Trump about former President George W. Bush’s involvement with 9/11 and the fictitious charges he manufactured to justify his criminal invasion of Iraq, the debate over who was responsible for the destruction of the Twin Towers and the deaths of 3,000 people in New York City has reemerged as a hot topic in mainstream media.

Commentators and politicians are lining up to once again try to implicate Saudi Arabia as the actual perpetrators of the colossal disaster because of their alleged support for the men blamed for piloting jetliners into the World Trade Center.

But the emphasis on the nationality of the so-called hijackers reveals the recent attention given to the subject to be yet another fraud perpetrated by the kosher media moguls trying mightily to cover up the principal role of Israel and Jew traitors in the American government in the greatest crime in American history.

The role of the hijackers in assessing blame for 9/11 is absolutely irrelevant, for the following reasons.

1. The demolition of the Twin Towers was not caused by the impact of airplanes damaging the skyscrapers. The buildings never would have fallen but for explosives in the basement that caused the towers to drop straight down into their own footprints. Find out who planted those explosives and you discover the guilty party. It wasn’t Saudis, and it wasn’t Osama bin Laden in a cave in Afghanistan.

2. You can’t blame the Saudis for financing Saudi terrorists because all of the so-called hijackers possessed false identifications, as evidenced by the fact that at least seven (and possibly nine) of the names attributed to the alleged hijackers were found alive in other countries in the months following the disasters.

Plus, there are substantial doubts that the commandeering of airplanes ever happened, that it was not a charade played by U.S. and Israeli intelligence service, the type of which have become so common (Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston) ever since that day.

The FBI furnished the exact names of the 19 so-called hijackers within a day and a half of the tragedy, and has managed to arrest no one else (except for three patsies it convicted in kangaroo courts) in the following 15 years.

And then, all of the officials who participated in the greatest failure of security in American history were subsequently promoted.

3. Numerous pilots associations in the U.S. and elsewhere proved conclusively that neophytes who had trouble learning to fly small airplanes could in no way pilot complex passenger airliners, never mind execute the precise maneuvers claimed for the planes that supposedly hit the Towers and the Pentagon.

4. There is no convincing evidence that hijacked jetliners piloted by Islamic terrorists crashed into the Pentagon (requiring a complex maneuver that even expert pilots confess they could not have accomplished) or in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Neither site revealed tangible wreckage that would have indicated the presence of a crashed passenger airliner.

So when you hear somebody talking about the 9/11 hijackers, as mainstream media are doing today, you know they’re participating in the coverup, trying to deflect blame from the true culprits, who occupied the highest positions in the U.S. government, the U.S. military, and the Israeli government, and the Wall Street and London banking establishments (remember those “put” options?)

This is not only the conclusion of a majority of 9/11 researchers in the United States, but from scientists and government officials around the world.

In fact, the last people to realize who really did this incomparable crime against humanity are the American people themselves, who to this day remain in a fog of lies concocted by their elected representatives (including the entire crop of current presidential candidates) and the journalists and editors who claim to be telling the truth in their utterly curdled media apparatuses.

So when you hear this current engineered debate about Saudis threatening the United States with financial penalties, it’s just hot air to continue to deflect everyone’s focus from Israel and the Jewish control of the American government and its lapdog media.

It is no exaggeration to say that all governmental officials and the mainstream media outlets who cover them (and cover up for them) are traitors who have betrayed their oaths of office and the ethical guidelines of the journalistic profession.
(see full article at above link)
By John Kaminski br pseudoskylax@gmail.com br http... (show quote)



And then you woke up and wished you were in Disneyland!

You come up with the biggest stockpile of dishonesty in the history of the internet.

You've been proven wrong by the top forensic engineering scientist and crime lab work in the world, you fail again, Muslim Moe!

Reply
Apr 23, 2016 01:03:51   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
payne1000 wrote:
What do you call someone with the name emarine who only posts opinions which defend mass murderers?


No fire, no exposure of long term to the elements, no impact, not enough floors to properly represent the actual twin towers and not enclosed. THAT is the same crud dishonesty YOU and your bunk buddy rely upon in all your presentation...YOU are the 9-11 lies....YOU! You and your example videos that are done by hacks, and YOU have ignored the factors each time you have been presented with them.

You have NO experience in anything other than posting here as to what took place, no first hand knowledge, no background, no degree, no education, nothing. I would suggest you and your Muslim Bunk Buddy halfwitt2th find another place to post your garbage....like www.camellovers.com

Reply
Apr 23, 2016 01:06:49   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
whole2th wrote:
By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
https://therebel.is/en/news/kaminski/876347-a-guide-to-9-11-lies

Probably because of recent incendiary remarks by presidential candidate Donald Trump about former President George W. Bush’s involvement with 9/11 and the fictitious charges he manufactured to justify his criminal invasion of Iraq, the debate over who was responsible for the destruction of the Twin Towers and the deaths of 3,000 people in New York City has reemerged as a hot topic in mainstream media.

Commentators and politicians are lining up to once again try to implicate Saudi Arabia as the actual perpetrators of the colossal disaster because of their alleged support for the men blamed for piloting jetliners into the World Trade Center.

But the emphasis on the nationality of the so-called hijackers reveals the recent attention given to the subject to be yet another fraud perpetrated by the kosher media moguls trying mightily to cover up the principal role of Israel and Jew traitors in the American government in the greatest crime in American history.

The role of the hijackers in assessing blame for 9/11 is absolutely irrelevant, for the following reasons.

1. The demolition of the Twin Towers was not caused by the impact of airplanes damaging the skyscrapers. The buildings never would have fallen but for explosives in the basement that caused the towers to drop straight down into their own footprints. Find out who planted those explosives and you discover the guilty party. It wasn’t Saudis, and it wasn’t Osama bin Laden in a cave in Afghanistan.

2. You can’t blame the Saudis for financing Saudi terrorists because all of the so-called hijackers possessed false identifications, as evidenced by the fact that at least seven (and possibly nine) of the names attributed to the alleged hijackers were found alive in other countries in the months following the disasters.

Plus, there are substantial doubts that the commandeering of airplanes ever happened, that it was not a charade played by U.S. and Israeli intelligence service, the type of which have become so common (Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston) ever since that day.

The FBI furnished the exact names of the 19 so-called hijackers within a day and a half of the tragedy, and has managed to arrest no one else (except for three patsies it convicted in kangaroo courts) in the following 15 years.

And then, all of the officials who participated in the greatest failure of security in American history were subsequently promoted.

3. Numerous pilots associations in the U.S. and elsewhere proved conclusively that neophytes who had trouble learning to fly small airplanes could in no way pilot complex passenger airliners, never mind execute the precise maneuvers claimed for the planes that supposedly hit the Towers and the Pentagon.

4. There is no convincing evidence that hijacked jetliners piloted by Islamic terrorists crashed into the Pentagon (requiring a complex maneuver that even expert pilots confess they could not have accomplished) or in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Neither site revealed tangible wreckage that would have indicated the presence of a crashed passenger airliner.

So when you hear somebody talking about the 9/11 hijackers, as mainstream media are doing today, you know they’re participating in the coverup, trying to deflect blame from the true culprits, who occupied the highest positions in the U.S. government, the U.S. military, and the Israeli government, and the Wall Street and London banking establishments (remember those “put” options?)

This is not only the conclusion of a majority of 9/11 researchers in the United States, but from scientists and government officials around the world.

In fact, the last people to realize who really did this incomparable crime against humanity are the American people themselves, who to this day remain in a fog of lies concocted by their elected representatives (including the entire crop of current presidential candidates) and the journalists and editors who claim to be telling the truth in their utterly curdled media apparatuses.

So when you hear this current engineered debate about Saudis threatening the United States with financial penalties, it’s just hot air to continue to deflect everyone’s focus from Israel and the Jewish control of the American government and its lapdog media.

It is no exaggeration to say that all governmental officials and the mainstream media outlets who cover them (and cover up for them) are traitors who have betrayed their oaths of office and the ethical guidelines of the journalistic profession.
(see full article at above link)
By John Kaminski br pseudoskylax@gmail.com br http... (show quote)


How to tell when This idiot, and Payne are posting obvious dishonesty? Simple. EVERYTHING they post is BUNK and the all out attempt to recruit readers into hate filled nonsense.

Oh they will call anyone that pulls their covers a troll, or a Zionist..they lie and run behind that!

Reply
Apr 23, 2016 07:04:08   #
Richard Rowland
 
This is all, mighty, interesting reading. The Pearl Habor connection resonates, for we have all heard Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen. But then, anything can be made to sound plausible. It's the world we live in. Too much information is as bad as no information. No one knows what to believe!

Reply
Apr 23, 2016 08:00:05   #
RandyB Loc: lost in Florida
 
whole2th wrote:
Tests of cell phones have proven the connections alleged could not have been made.

Hard evidence? Do you have a contemporaneous video of your relative making his/her statement? What "hard evidence"?

Why is what you say is not "hearsay"?


I have one word for you BULLS++T

Reply
Apr 23, 2016 08:10:59   #
atc333
 
Why is it that all the videos of each building collapsing show the collapse beginning at the points which the aircraft struck the buildings? It does not show the collapse beginning beneath those points. According to numerous analysis of the building construction, the massive amounts of burning aircraft fuel caused the steel structrual members to weaken, and collapse. Where is any discussion of explosions in the basement? Where are the videos of the lower portion of the buildings collapsing before the upper portions collapsed, and started the total collapse of the building?

Reply
Apr 23, 2016 08:15:24   #
payne1000
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
This is all, mighty, interesting reading. The Pearl Habor connection resonates, for we have all heard Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen. But then, anything can be made to sound plausible. It's the world we live in. Too much information is as bad as no information. No one knows what to believe!


Here's some more very interesting reading: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12571.htm
The author, Sheila Samples, is an Oklahoma writer and a former civilian US Army Public Information Officer.

Reply
Apr 23, 2016 08:25:08   #
payne1000
 
atc333 wrote:
Why is it that all the videos of each building collapsing show the collapse beginning at the points which the aircraft struck the buildings? It does not show the collapse beginning beneath those points. According to numerous analysis of the building construction, the massive amounts of burning aircraft fuel caused the steel structrual members to weaken, and collapse. Where is any discussion of explosions in the basement? Where are the videos of the lower portion of the buildings collapsing before the upper portions collapsed, and started the total collapse of the building?
Why is it that all the videos of each building col... (show quote)


The photo below shows the amount of fire which caused a partial collapse of a skyscraper.
The Windsor Tower was totally consumed in flames for over 20 hours and the partial collapse took place over a period of hours. Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKvgD9NyIi4
The South Tower burned for less than an hour while suffering only small fires. This short period would not weaken any of the steel.





Reply
Apr 23, 2016 09:43:50   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
America Only wrote:
How to tell when This idiot, and Payne are posting obvious dishonesty? Simple. EVERYTHING they post is BUNK and the all out attempt to recruit readers into hate filled nonsense.

Oh they will call anyone that pulls their covers a troll, or a Zionist..they lie and run behind that!

America Only, I wouldn't have expected this from you in a million years, and you certainly deserve this:


Reply
Apr 23, 2016 10:07:21   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
The photo below shows the amount of fire which caused a partial collapse of a skyscraper.
The Windsor Tower was totally consumed in flames for over 20 hours and the partial collapse took place over a period of hours. Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKvgD9NyIi4
The South Tower burned for less than an hour while suffering only small fires. This short period would not weaken any of the steel.




Yes the fire proof concrete core of the Windsor tower didn't collapse... Now if any of the WTC buildings had his type of construction & fire proofing than maybe what you post would have some value... The proof that you lie and deceive is how many times you post this deceptive nonsense ... is it 40 times or better yet?... also the Windsor tower steel sections did collapse from heat from fire even though it was only 29 stories tall... short enough for firemen to cool the tower with water ... your argument sucks once again putz

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.