One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A Guide to 9-11 Lies
Page 1 of 10 next> last>>
Apr 22, 2016 09:58:42   #
whole2th
 
By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
https://therebel.is/en/news/kaminski/876347-a-guide-to-9-11-lies

Probably because of recent incendiary remarks by presidential candidate Donald Trump about former President George W. Bush’s involvement with 9/11 and the fictitious charges he manufactured to justify his criminal invasion of Iraq, the debate over who was responsible for the destruction of the Twin Towers and the deaths of 3,000 people in New York City has reemerged as a hot topic in mainstream media.

Commentators and politicians are lining up to once again try to implicate Saudi Arabia as the actual perpetrators of the colossal disaster because of their alleged support for the men blamed for piloting jetliners into the World Trade Center.

But the emphasis on the nationality of the so-called hijackers reveals the recent attention given to the subject to be yet another fraud perpetrated by the kosher media moguls trying mightily to cover up the principal role of Israel and Jew traitors in the American government in the greatest crime in American history.

The role of the hijackers in assessing blame for 9/11 is absolutely irrelevant, for the following reasons.

1. The demolition of the Twin Towers was not caused by the impact of airplanes damaging the skyscrapers. The buildings never would have fallen but for explosives in the basement that caused the towers to drop straight down into their own footprints. Find out who planted those explosives and you discover the guilty party. It wasn’t Saudis, and it wasn’t Osama bin Laden in a cave in Afghanistan.

2. You can’t blame the Saudis for financing Saudi terrorists because all of the so-called hijackers possessed false identifications, as evidenced by the fact that at least seven (and possibly nine) of the names attributed to the alleged hijackers were found alive in other countries in the months following the disasters.

Plus, there are substantial doubts that the commandeering of airplanes ever happened, that it was not a charade played by U.S. and Israeli intelligence service, the type of which have become so common (Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston) ever since that day.

The FBI furnished the exact names of the 19 so-called hijackers within a day and a half of the tragedy, and has managed to arrest no one else (except for three patsies it convicted in kangaroo courts) in the following 15 years.

And then, all of the officials who participated in the greatest failure of security in American history were subsequently promoted.

3. Numerous pilots associations in the U.S. and elsewhere proved conclusively that neophytes who had trouble learning to fly small airplanes could in no way pilot complex passenger airliners, never mind execute the precise maneuvers claimed for the planes that supposedly hit the Towers and the Pentagon.

4. There is no convincing evidence that hijacked jetliners piloted by Islamic terrorists crashed into the Pentagon (requiring a complex maneuver that even expert pilots confess they could not have accomplished) or in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Neither site revealed tangible wreckage that would have indicated the presence of a crashed passenger airliner.

So when you hear somebody talking about the 9/11 hijackers, as mainstream media are doing today, you know they’re participating in the coverup, trying to deflect blame from the true culprits, who occupied the highest positions in the U.S. government, the U.S. military, and the Israeli government, and the Wall Street and London banking establishments (remember those “put” options?)

This is not only the conclusion of a majority of 9/11 researchers in the United States, but from scientists and government officials around the world.

In fact, the last people to realize who really did this incomparable crime against humanity are the American people themselves, who to this day remain in a fog of lies concocted by their elected representatives (including the entire crop of current presidential candidates) and the journalists and editors who claim to be telling the truth in their utterly curdled media apparatuses.

So when you hear this current engineered debate about Saudis threatening the United States with financial penalties, it’s just hot air to continue to deflect everyone’s focus from Israel and the Jewish control of the American government and its lapdog media.

It is no exaggeration to say that all governmental officials and the mainstream media outlets who cover them (and cover up for them) are traitors who have betrayed their oaths of office and the ethical guidelines of the journalistic profession.
(see full article at above link)

Reply
Apr 22, 2016 09:59:18   #
whole2th
 
IT WASN'T MUSLIMS

http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm

Reply
Apr 22, 2016 09:59:47   #
whole2th
 
Muslims could not have rigged Building 7 for demolition:

http://ReThink911.org

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2016 10:01:00   #
whole2th
 
Muslims do not control mass media and Hollywood which have participated in the cover-up.

BBC announced Building 7 already collapsed BEFORE it collapsed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3NKvgnJmTQ

Reply
Apr 22, 2016 10:01:52   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
whole2th wrote:
Muslims could not have rigged Building 7 for demolition:

http://ReThink911.org
1 - Muslims do know how to use explosives.
2 - Nobody rigged Bld 7 for explosives
3 - There was no reason to explode Bld 7
4 - If there had been a reason, just how silly would it be to rig Bld 7 for explosion 'just in case' terrorist knock down Bld 1 and 2?

Reply
Apr 22, 2016 10:02:32   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
whole2th wrote:
Muslims do not control mass media and Hollywood which have participated in the cover-up.

BBC announced Building 7 already collapsed BEFORE it collapsed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3NKvgnJmTQ
That's it... The BBC took down Bld 7.

Reply
Apr 22, 2016 10:03:17   #
whole2th
 
9-11 in five minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLXyB5GtfBU

9-11 Trillions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3xgjxJwedA

Follow the money: BLACK911 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsDtvu2uTuA

It Can't Happen Here (wanna bet?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2ebudnWlh4

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2016 10:05:20   #
whole2th
 
Israel did 9-11 along with neocons and traitors in the U.S.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsPIj3qMGLY



Reply
Apr 22, 2016 10:09:30   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Actually, the Simpsons caused 9/11


http://beforeitsnews.com/contributor/upload/35310/images/The_Simpsons_S21E20_CLOCK%20(B).JPG

Reply
Apr 22, 2016 10:21:44   #
EconomistDon
 


Is there a full moon today? The cranks come out on full moon. Although I could speak to all the points, I will address only one. Passengers on the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania were on their cell phones describing the activity of Muslims who commandeered the plane. We know absolutely that the hi-jackers were Muslim and were flying the plane toward Washington to crash, probably the White House. The plane was far out over Ohio when the first crashes occurred, so the passengers knew what was in store for them. They continued cell phone communication as brave passengers banded together to attack the Muslims, and foiled their plot. I have family near the crash site; they are rapid responders. Their job, after the crash, was to collect body parts into large plastic bags. It was pretty gruesome and will haunt them forever.

Reply
Apr 22, 2016 10:23:21   #
whole2th
 
Super Dave wrote:


Or, perhaps the World Wrestling Federation was involved: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ep9sIdP-v4

Or, the Hollywood makers of the pilot episode of the XFILES which aired March 4, 2001 ... six months before the false flag attacks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIdhoc0PRr8

Or the makers of this 1995 Illuminati Card game:



Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2016 10:25:12   #
whole2th
 
If you want to get more serious and really study the big lies, this 5 hour detailed documentary fully exposes HOW 9-11 occurred--yet omits telling us WHO did 9-11.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M

The 3-DVD set is available for purchase. Consider this as a collectible as we get through this dark phase of human history.

The "New Pearl Harbor" phrase comes from a white paper written and signed by members of the Project for a New American Century. Many neocons and Jews signed a document indicating that the challenges of the zionist-muslim conflicts would take a long time to play out, absent a "catalyzing event such as a New Pearl Harbor"

"They" got their event--planned and aided by media and massive treason within the seats of government/military ... and we continue to suffer from the big lies of the 9-11 false flags attacks.



Reply
Apr 22, 2016 10:31:24   #
whole2th
 
EconomistDon wrote:
Is there a full moon today? The cranks come out on full moon. Although I could speak to all the points, I will address only one. Passengers on the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania were on their cell phones describing the activity of Muslims who commandeered the plane. We know absolutely that the hi-jackers were Muslim and were flying the plane toward Washington to crash, probably the White House. The plane was far out over Ohio when the first crashes occurred, so the passengers knew what was in store for them. They continued cell phone communication as brave passengers banded together to attack the Muslims, and foiled their plot. I have family near the crash site; they are rapid responders. Their job, after the crash, was to collect body parts into large plastic bags. It was pretty gruesome and will haunt them forever.
Is there a full moon today? The cranks come out o... (show quote)


The cell phone calls could not have been made. Ambassador Ted Olsen, whose wife was allegedly on the plane, changed his story twice about whether he talked to her on a cell phone or a seat-back phone. There were no seat back phones on the indicated plane. Cell phones would not connect at the altitude and especially could not remain connected between cell towers.

A career airline attendant covers the cell phone issues thoroughly in the book: METHODICAL ILLUSIONS

The county coroner did not see any bodies or body parts.

I know a man who interviewed a Shanksville farmer on whose land the major debris landed. The farmer stated he kept quiet about where the debris landed to "cooperate with the FBI". The gash in the ground is not where the plane crashed. It was shot down. Rumsfeld said so. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6Xoxaf1Al0&spfreload=10

First news reports are consistent with a shoot down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H47Gp7rZhKE



Reply
Apr 22, 2016 10:43:29   #
EconomistDon
 
whole2th wrote:
The cell phone calls could not have been made. Ambassador Ted Olsen, whose wife was allegedly on the plane, changed his story twice about whether he talked to her on a cell phone or a seat-back phone. There were no seat back phones on the indicated plane. Cell phones would not connect at the altitude and especially could not remain connected between cell towers.

A career airline attendant covers the cell phone issues thoroughly in the book: METHODICAL ILLUSIONS

The county coroner did not see any bodies or body parts.

I know a man who interviewed a Shanksville farmer on whose land the major debris landed. The farmer stated he kept quiet about where the debris landed to "cooperate with the FBI". The gash in the ground is not where the plane crashed. It was shot down. Rumsfeld said so. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6Xoxaf1Al0&spfreload=10

First news reports are consistent with a shoot down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H47Gp7rZhKE
The cell phone calls could not have been made. Am... (show quote)


So you are calling me and my family liars? I have absolute hard evidence; you have hearsay. Gee, should we believe you or me?

Reply
Apr 22, 2016 10:54:37   #
whole2th
 
EconomistDon wrote:
So you are calling me and my family liars? I have absolute hard evidence; you have hearsay. Gee, should we believe you or me?


Tests of cell phones have proven the connections alleged could not have been made.

Hard evidence? Do you have a contemporaneous video of your relative making his/her statement? What "hard evidence"?

Why is what you say is not "hearsay"?

Reply
Page 1 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.